University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
collapse section18. 
expand section18.1. 
 18.2. 
expand section18.3. 
 18.4. 
expand section18.5. 
 18.6. 
expand section18.7. 
 18.8. 
 18.9. 
 18.10. 
 18.11. 
 18.12. 
 18.13. 
 18.14. 
expand section18.15. 
 18.16. 
expand section18.17. 
 18.18. 
expand section18.19. 
 18.20. 
 18.21. 
expand section18.22. 
 18.23. 
expand section18.24. 
expand section18.25. 
expand section18.26. 
collapse section18.27. 
  
  
expand section18.28. 
expand section18.29. 
expand section18.30. 
expand section18.31. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

31.27. 27. Another change which happened in the Fiefs.

In Charlemagne's time they were obliged, [181] under great penalties, to repair to the general meeting in case of any war whatsoever; they admitted of no excuses, and if the count exempted any one, he was liable himself to be punished. But the treaty of the three brothers [182] made a restriction upon this head which rescued the nobility, as it were, out of the king's hands; they were no longer obliged to serve him in time of war, except when the war was defensive. [183] In others, they were at liberty to follow their lord, or to mind their own business. This treaty relates to another, [184] concluded, five years before, between the two brothers, Charles the Bald and Louis, King of Germany, by which these princes release their vassals from serving them in war, in case they should attempt hostilities against each other; an agreement which the two princes confirmed by oath, and at the same time made their armies swear to it.

The death of a hundred thousand French, at the battle of Fontenay, made the remains of the nobility imagine that by the private quarrels of their kings about their respective shares, their whole body would be exterminated, and that the ambition and jealousy of those princes would end in the destruction of all the best families of the kingdom. A law was therefore passed that the nobility should not be obliged to serve their princes in war unless it was to defend the state against a foreign invasion. This law obtained for several ages. [185]

Footnotes

[181]

Capitulary of the year 802, art. 7, Baluzius's edition, p. 365.

[182]

Apud Marsnam, in the year 847, Baluzius's edition, p. 42.

[183]

Art. 5, ibid., p. 44.

[184]

Apud Argentoratum, in Baluzius, "Capitularies," tome ii, p. 39.

[185]

See the law of Guy, King of the Romans, among those which were added to the Salic law, and to that of the Lombards, tit. 6, section 2 in Echard.