University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  
  
expand section 

expand section1. 
collapse section2. 
expand section1. 
collapse section2. 
 0. 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
expand section1. 
collapse section2. 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
collapse section5. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
PROOF.
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
expand section9. 
expand section3. 
 3. 

  

PROOF.

Granted, that there does exist freedom in the transcendental sense, as a peculiar kind of causality, operating to produce events in the world— a faculty, that is to say, of originating a state, and consequently a series of consequences from that state. In this case, not only the series originated by this spontaneity, but the determination of this spontaneity itself to the production of the series, that is to say, the causality itself must have an absolute commencement, such that nothing can precede to determine this action according to unvarying laws. But every beginning of action


279

presupposes in the acting cause a state of inaction; and a dynamically primal beginning of action presupposes a state, which has no connection— as regards causality— with the preceding state of the cause— which does not, that is, in any wise result from it. Transcendental freedom is therefore opposed to the natural law of cause and effect, and such a conjunction of successive states in effective causes is destructive of the possibility of unity in experience and for that reason not to be found in experience— is consequently a mere fiction of thought.

We have, therefore, nothing but nature to which we must look for connection and order in cosmical events. Freedom— independence of the laws of nature— is certainly a deliverance from restraint, but it is also a relinquishing of the guidance of law and rule. For it cannot be alleged that, instead of the laws of nature, laws of freedom may be introduced into the causality of the course of nature. For, if freedom were determined according to laws, it would be no longer freedom, but merely nature. Nature, therefore, and transcendental freedom are distinguishable as conformity to law and lawlessness. The former


280

imposes upon understanding the difficulty of seeking the origin of events ever higher and higher in the series of causes, inasmuch as causality is always conditioned thereby; while it compensates this labour by the guarantee of a unity complete and in conformity with law. The latter, on the contrary, holds out to the understanding the promise of a point of rest in the chain of causes, by conducting it to an unconditioned causality, which professes to have the power of spontaneous origination, but which, in its own utter blindness, deprives it of the guidance of rules, by which alone a completely connected experience is possible.