University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  

collapse section2. 
collapse section1. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section2. 
  
  
  
collapse section3. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section4. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section5. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section6. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section7. 
  
  
COFFEE-HOUSE SHARPERS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 8. 
collapse section9. 
  
  
collapse section10. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 11. 
 12. 
collapse section13. 
  
  
collapse section14. 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
 13. 
 14. 
 15. 
 16. 
 17. 
 18. 

COFFEE-HOUSE SHARPERS.

Sir John Fielding thus describes the men in the year 1776. `The deceivers of this denomination are generally descended from families of some repute, have had the groundwork of a genteel education, and are capable of making a tolerable


194

appearance. Having been equally profuse of their own substance and character, and learnt, by having been undone, the ways of undoing, they lie in wait for those who have more wealth and less knowledge of the town. By joining you in discourse, by admiring what you say, by an officiousness to wait upon you, and to assist you in anything you want to have or know, they insinuate themselves into the company and acquaintance of strangers, whom they watch every opportunity of fleecing. And if one finds in you the least inclination to cards, dice, the billiard table, bowling-green, or any other sort of Gaming, you are morally sure of being taken in. For this set of gentry are adepts in all the arts of knavery and tricking. If, therefore, you should observe a person, without any previous acquaintance, paying you extraordinary marks of civility; if he puts in for a share of your conversation with a pretended air of deference; if he tenders his assistance, courts your acquaintance, and would be suddenly thought your friend, avoid him as a pest; for these are the usual baits by which the unwary are caught.'[42] [42] The Magistrate: Description of London and Westminster.

In 1792, Mr Br — gh — n, the son of a baronet,


195

one day at a billiard-table in St James's Street, won £7000 from a Mr B — , but the latter, at the close of the day, recovered the loss, and won £15,000 more. Payment was thus arranged — £5000 on the death of the father of the former, and £10,000 secured by a reversionary annuity, to commence on the father's decease, on the life of the Duc de Pienne, between whom and B — a previous gaming account existed.

In 1794, Mr — — was a billiard player of the first class, ranking with Brenton, Phillips, Orrel, and Captain Wallis, who were the leaders of the day in this noble game of skill, tact, and discretion.[43] Having accidentally sported his abilities with two other players, he was marked as a `pigeon' whom every preparation was made for `plucking.' Captain Cates, of Covent Garden celebrity, was pitted against him at the coffee-room billiard-table, during


196

Epsom races, to play 21 games, for two guineas each game, and five guineas the odds. Mr — — won 13 games to eight from his veteran opponent, who was invariably backed by the leading sportingmen of the day, whilst the company at large were casually the adherents of Mr — — . [43] The game of Chess may be played in application of the principles of Strategy; the game of Billiards in application of Tactics; indeed, all man's favourite diversions and pastimes most significantly relate to war — which has been called his natural state — exemplifying always either the brute-force that crushes, the skill that foils, the stratagem that surprises, or the ruse that deceives; and such is war to all intents and purposes. The philosophic diversions of science also come in and lend their aid in the game of war — the pastime of heroes and the necessary defence of nations.

The match was renewed at the ensuing Ascot meeting, at the rooms of the celebrated Simson, so much frequented by the Etonians — where Mr — — again obtained the victory, by 36 games to 17. Immense sums were sported on these occasions.

Mr — — resided at Windsor, and was surprised by a message on the Sunday evening preceding the Winchester races, purporting that a gentleman wished to see him on very particular business. It proved to be a request to play a match at Billiards during the races at Winchester, for which the parties offered 10 guineas for the journey. But it was explained to him that the match was of a particular kind, and must be played in a particular way — either to win or lose — so that those concerned might be sure of winning upon the whole, let the match terminate how it would! . . . .

This villainous proposal being made without the presence of a third person, Mr — — indignantly


197

rejected it, instantly left the room, and communicated the facts for the protection of the unwary against a set of desperate sharpers.