University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
collapse section24. 
 24.1. 
expand section24.2. 
expand section24.3. 
expand section24.4. 
 24.5. 
 24.6. 
6. Another of M. Bayle's Paradoxes.
expand section24.7. 
expand section24.8. 
expand section24.9. 
 24.10. 
expand section24.11. 
 24.12. 
expand section24.13. 
expand section24.14. 
expand section24.15. 
expand section24.16. 
expand section24.17. 
expand section24.18. 
expand section24.19. 
expand section24.20. 
 24.21. 
 24.22. 
expand section24.23. 
expand section24.24. 
expand section24.25. 
expand section24.26. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

24.6. 6. Another of M. Bayle's Paradoxes.

M. Bayle, after having abused all religions, endeavours to sully Christianity: he boldly asserts that true Christians cannot form a government of any duration. Why not? Citizens of this profession being infinitely enlightened with respect to the various duties of life, and having the warmest zeal to fulfil them, must be perfectly sensible of the rights of natural defence. The more they believe themselves indebted to religion, the more they would think due to their country. The principles of Christianity, deeply engraved on the heart, would be infinitely more powerful than the false honour of monarchies, than the humane virtues of republics, or the servile fear of despotic states.

It is astonishing that this great man should not be able to distinguish between the orders for the establishment of Christianity and Christianity itself; and that he should be liable to be charged with not knowing the spirit of his own religion. When the legislator, instead of laws, has given counsels, this is because he knew that if these counsels were ordained as laws they would be contrary to the spirit of the laws themselves.