University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  

collapse section1. 
collapse section1. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
collapse section7. 
 1. 
  
collapse section8. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
 9. 
 10. 
collapse section11. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section2. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
collapse section8. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
THE NOVÆ
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 2. 
 2. 
 2. 
  
 9. 
collapse section10. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section3. 
collapse section1. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
 3. 
  
  
  
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
collapse section2. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
  
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
collapse section9. 
 1. 
  
collapse section10. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 

  
  

THE NOVÆ

The so-called new stars, otherwise known as temporary stars or novæ, present interesting considerations. These are stars which suddenly flash out at points where previously no star was known to exist; or, in a few cases, where a faint existing star has in a few days become immensely brighter. Twenty-nine new stars have been observed from the year 1572 to date; 19 of them since 1886, when the photographic dry plate was applied systematically to the mapping of the heavens, and 15 of the 19 stand to the credit of the Harvard observers. This is an average of one new star in two years; and as some novæ must come and go unseen it is evident that they are by no means rare objects. Novæ pass through a series of evolutions which have many points in common; in fact, the ones which have been extensively studied by photometer and spectrograph have had histories with so many identities that we are coming to look upon them as standard products of evolutionary processes. These stars usually rise to maximum brilliancy in a few days: some of the most noted ones increased in brightness ten-thousand-fold in two or three days. All of them fluctuate in brightness irregularly, and usually in short periods of time. Several novæ have become invisible to the naked eye at the end of a few weeks. With two or three exceptions, all have become invisible in moderate-sized telescopes, or have become very faint, within a few months. Two novæ, found very early in their development, had at first dark line spectra, a night later bright lines appeared, and a night or two later the spectra contained the broad radiation and absorption bands characteristic of all recent novæ. After the novæ become fairly faint, the bright lines of the gaseous nebula spectrum are seen for the first time. These lines increase in relative brilliancy until the spectra are essentially the same as those of well-known nebulæ, except that the novæ lines are broad whereas the lines of the nebulæ are narrow. In a few months or years the nebular lines diminish in brightness, and the continuous spectrum develops. Hartmann at Potsdam, and Adams and Pease with the 60-inch Mount Wilson reflector, have shown that the spectra of the faint remnants of four originally brilliant novæ now contain some of the bright lines which are characteristic of Wolf-Rayet stars.[2]

Why the novæ suddenly flare up, and what their relations to other celestial bodies may be, are questions which can not be regarded as settled. Their distribution on the celestial sphere in indicated in Figure 25 by the open circles. In this figure the densest parts of


184

the Milky Way are drawn in outline. All of the novæ have appeared in the Milky Way, with the exception of five: and these exceptions are worthy of note. One of the five appeared in the condensed nucleus of the great Andromeda nebula, not far from its center; another (Ζ Centauri) was located close to the edge of a spiral nebula and quite possibly in a faint outlying part of the nebula; a third (Τ Coronæ)
illustration

FIG. 25. DISTRIBUTION OF NOVÆ AND WOLF-RAYET STARS.

[Description: Illustration of two globe-like spatial maps that indicate the distribution of novæ and Wolf-Rayet stars.]
was observed to have a nebulous halo about it at the earliest stage of its observed existence; a fourth (τ Scorpii) appeared in a nebula; and the fifth (Nova Ophiuchi No. 2) in 1848 was not extensively observed. The other 24 novæ appeared within the structure of the Milky Way. Keeping the story as short as possible, a nova is seemingly best explained on the theory that a dark or relatively dark star, traveling rapidly through space, has encountered resistance, such as a great nebula or cloud of particles would afford. While passing through the cloud the forward face of the star is bombarded at high velocities by the resisting materials. The surface strata become heated, the luminosity of the star increases rapidly. The effect of the bombardment by small particles can be only skin deep, and the brightness of the star should diminish rapidly and therefore the spectrum change speedily from one type to another. The new star of February, 1901, in Perseus, afforded evidence of great strength on this question. Wolf at Heidelberg photographed in August an irregular nebulous object near the nova. Ritchey's photograph of September showed extensive areas of nebulosity around the star. In October Perrine and Ritchey discovered that the nebular structure had apparently moved outward from the nova, from September to October. Going back to a March 29th photograph taken for a different purpose, Perrine found an irregular ring of nebulosity closely surrounding the star. Apparently, the region was full

185

of nebulosity which is normally invisible to us. The rushing of the star through this resisting medium made the star the brightest one in the northern sky for two or three days. The great wave of light going out from the star when at its brightest traveled in five weeks as far as the ring of nebulosity, where, falling upon non-luminous nebulous materials, it made the ring visible. Continuing its progress, the wave
illustration

FIG. 26. APPARENT MOVEMENT OF NON-LUMINOUS NEBULOSITY ABOUT NOVA PERSEI.
Photographed at the Lick Observatory.
The motion is best shown by the bright mass above and to the right of the center, in comparison with the surrounding stars.

[Description: Two photographs that compare the apparent movement of non-luminous nebulosity about the Persei nova.]
of light illuminated the material which Wolf photographed in August, the materials which Ritchey photographed still farther away in September, and the still more distant materials which Perrine and Ritchey photographed in October, November, and later. We were able to see this material only as the very strong wave of light which left the star at maximum brightness made the material luminous in passing. That 24 novæ should occur in the Milky Way, where the stars are most numerous, and where the resisting materials may preferably prevail, is not surprising; and it should be repeated that at least three of the five occurring outside of the Milky Way were located in nebulous surroundings.

The actual collision of two stars would necessarily be too violent in its effect to let the reduction of brilliancy occur so rapidly as to cause the disappearance of the nova in a few weeks or months. The close approach of two stars might conceivably produce the observed facts, but even this process seems too violent in its probable results. The chances for the collision of a rapidly traveling star with an enormously extended nebulous cloud are vastly greater, and the apparent mildness of the phenomenon observed is in better harmony with expectation.