University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
II
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1.0. 
collapse section2.0. 
collapse section2.1. 
 2.2a. 
 2.2b. 
collapse section2.2. 
 2.2a. 
 2.2b. 
  

collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

II

By recording wholly new readings, Table I emphasizes the originality of editors; it favors those who were early enough not to be anticipated, and it looks forward to their lasting contributions to the text of the play. Table II notices the reintroduction or unconventional use of an old reading, thereby giving a broader base for evaluating an edition's individuality. It looks backward as well as forward, showing where an editor may have gotten most of the readings he did not invent and, at the same time, which editions supplied the most readings for their successors. The second and third columns below list the


97

Page 97

TABLE II

                                                                 
Edition  Highest unique  2nd highest  No. eds.  Highest total  2nd highest 
Total variants  2583  2583  2583  2583 
Q2  1991 Q1  --  1991 Q1  -- 
F1  364 Q1  186 Q2  2083 Q1  1905 Q2 
F2  285 F1  27 Q2  2412 F1  1974 Q1 
Q3  60 Q1  57 Q2  2149 Q1  2047 F1 
F3  74 F2  17 Q2  2414 F2  2327 F1 
F4  65 F3  27 Q2  2241 F3  2139 F2 
Rowe I  181 F4  29 Q3  2121 F4  1871 F3 
Rowe II  320 Rowe I  6 Q2  2558 Rowe I  2098 F4 
Rowe III  7 Rowe II  6 Q3  2459 Rowe II  2456 Rowe I 
Pope I  49 Rowe III  36 Q2  2111 Rowe III  2026 Rowe I 
Pope II  281 Pope I  1 3 eds.  2555 Pope I  2102 Rowe III 
Theobald I  10 Q3  7 Q2, Pope II  2284 Pope II  2267 Pope I 
Theobald II  192 Theobald I  2 Q3  2539 Theo. I  2250 Pope II 
Hanmer I  11 Theo. II  3 Q3  2386 Pope I  2384 Pope II 
Warburton  22 Theo. II  4 Hanmer I  2501 Theo. II  2463 Theo. I 
Theobald III  2 Q3, Warburton  2549 Theo. II  2509 Theo. I 
Johnson  8 Q2  6 Warb.  2372 Warb.  2355 Theo. III 
Capell  17 Q2, Johnson  1776 Warb.  1775 Theo. III 
Hanmer II  55 Capell  48 Hanmer I  2418 Hanmer I  2235 Pope I, II 
Johnson-Steevens I  80 Capell  38 Johnson  2162 Johnson  2075 Theo. III 
Johnson-Steevens II  75 Capell  24 J-S I  2290 J-S I  2281 Capell 
Rann  12 J-S II  7 Capell  2525 J-S II  2273 Capell 
Malone  29 Capell  2 Q2, Rann  2400 J-S II  2389 Rann 
Steevens-Reed I  27 Malone  3 Capell  2516 Malone  2386 J-S II 
Steevens-Reed II  14 S-R I  None  2569 S-R I  2516 Malone 
Eccles  9 Capell  2 3 eds.  2431 S-R II  2429 S-R I 
Boswell-Malone  2 S-R II  1 4 eds.  2545 S-R II  2537 S-R I 
Singer I  3 Q2, Rann  2518 S-R II  2515 B-M 
Knight  3 Capell  2 Q2, Singer I  2396 B-M  2386 S-R II 
Collier I  6 Knight  3 Johnson  10  2281 B-M  2261 S-R II 
Hudson I  33 Collier I  4 Knight  2355 Collier I  2334 B-M 

98

Page 98
                                                               
Edition  Highest unique  2nd highest  No. eds.  Highest total  2nd highest 
Singer II  8 Singer I, Collier I  2471 Singer I  2433 S-R II 
Halliwell  16 Knight  7 Collier I  2303 Knight  2288 Hudson I 
Dyce I  8 Collier I  4 Halliwell  2261 Hudson I  2234 B-M 
Collier II  29 Collier I  6 Dyce I  2469 Collier I  2292 Hudson I 
Staunton  7 Dyce I  6 Knight  2374 Knight  2319 Singer II 
White I  2 Collier I, Dyce I  2407 Collier I  2345 Collier II 
Old Cambridge I  15 Dyce I  14 Q2  12  2179 Dyce I  2131 Hudson I 
Globe  81 OCam. I  1 3 eds.  2520 OCam. I  2164 Dyce I 
Keightley  4 Halliwell  3 Johnson  10  2254 Singer II  2215 Singer I 
Dyce II  66 Dyce I  4 Collier II, Keightley  2393 Dyce I  2144 Hudson I 
Rolfe I  4 White I, Globe  2313 White I  2248 Globe 
Delius  3 White I  1 3 eds.  2389 Collier I  2334 White I 
Hudson II  19 Dyce II  4 OCam. I  12  2295 Dyce II  2226 Dyce I 
White II  5 Globe  2 Q1, White I  2396 Globe  2354 OCam. I 
Rolfe II  4 Rolfe I  None  2496 Rolfe I  2295 Delius 
Old Cambridge II  1 Q1, OCam. I  2541 OCam. I  2503 Globe 
Oxford  1 4 eds.  2310 White II  2305 Globe 
Rolfe III  5 Rolfe II  2 Keightley  2526 Rolfe II  2450 Rolfe I 
Old Arden  2 White II, Oxford  2390 Oxford  2345 White II 
Neilson  8 Keightley  7 Rolfe III  11  2242 White II  2223 OArden 
New Cambridge I  10 Neilson  7 Johnson  20  1856 Globe  1855 OCam. II 
Ridley  10 Q1  4 Q3, NCam. I  2143 OArden  2114 OCam. II 
Kittredge  26 Neilson  15 NCam. I  2143 Neilson  2060 Rolfe III 
Neilson-Hill  19 Neilson  1 Kittredge  2496 Neilson  2210 OArden 
Alexander  14 Kittredge  2 NCam. I  2214 Kittredge  2207 N-H 
Sisson  5 Kittredge  3 Halliwell, Keightley  11  1963 NCam. I  1906 Alexander 
New Arden  5 Johnson, Sisson  13  1971 Ridley  1939 Alexander 
London  11 Kittredge  5 Sisson  2103 N-H  2098 OCam. II 
New Yale  5 Q1  3 Q3  2100 NArden  1985 Ridley 
New Cambridge II  163 NCam. I  1 Johnson  2528 NCam. I  2084 London 
Evans  5 Kittredge  1 3 eds.  2181 N-H, Alexander 

99

Page 99
highest and second highest number of unique agreements that each edition has with its predecessors (no other previous edition collated has the reading); and the fourth column gives the number of preceding editions with which there is unique agreement. The fifth and sixth columns give the highest and second highest number of total agreements (unique and shared with one or more earlier or intervening editions) with any previous edition.

The columns of unique agreement suggest both the extent to which an editor used readings that were not yet established and the degree to which he influenced his successors. Editions from Hanmer II to Eccles borrowed from Capell, some of them quite heavily, although none was actually based upon Capell. Pope, Johnson, Capell, Malone, Singer I, Knight, and the Old Cambridge editors went back to Q2 for readings not used since 1619 (as they thought, since 1600); and Ridley and New Yale adopted readings not used since Q1. Many later editors have borrowed from Johnson: unique agreements are shown in the table for Capell, Johnson-Steevens I, Collier I, Keightley, New Cambridge I and II, and New Arden; and unique agreements not listed appear in Hanmer II (2), Johnson-Steevens II (3), Rann (1), Steevens-Reed I (1), Hudson I (2), Neilson (6), Sisson (2), and London (1). In the fourth column — the number of editions with which there is unique agreement — Capell (9), Rowe (8), and Malone (8) are higher than their predecessors or contemporaries; Old Cambridge I and Hudson II with 12 and Collier I and Keightley with 10 are high for the nineteenth century; and New Cambridge I is most eclectic by far with unique agreements with 20 editions, followed by New Arden (13) and Sisson and Neilson (11).

For the non-critical texts of the seventeenth century and for many critical editions (especially those that are early and those for which the figures in the table are high), the largest number of shared readings shows the edition used as base text.[14] However, as the text of the play becomes more established during the nineteenth century and there are more editions with less variation among them, this figure is a less reliable guide. The texts showing the least variation are often the second and third editions. Rowe II agrees with Rowe I in 2558 of


100

Page 100
2583 instances, and there are, therefore, only 25 differences among the variants included in the tabulation. Similarly, Pope II differs from Pope I 28 times, Hanmer II from Hanmer I 165 times, Globe from Old Cambridge I 63 times, New Cambridge II from New Cambridge I 55 times, and so on.[15] However, Hudson II and White II are markedly independent of their first editions: the former agrees more frequently with four other editions than with Hudson I (2112 agreements), and the latter more frequently with six other editions than with White I (2159 agreements). Only four critical editions have fewer than 2000 agreements with any single predecessor: in the eighteenth century Capell with 1776 and in the twentieth New Cambridge I with 1856, Sisson with 1963, and New Arden with 1971. In Capell 807 readings (31 percent) had not appeared in the closest text (Warburton); and, according to Table I, 330 readings (13 percent) had not appeared anywhere previously.