Dictionary of the History of Ideas Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas |
![]() | II. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | IV. |
![]() | IV. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | IV. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | VII. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | VII. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | VII. |
![]() | III. |
BIBLIOGRAPHY |
![]() | I. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | III. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | VII. |
![]() | VII. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | VI. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | I. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | IV. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | II. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | V. |
![]() | IV. |
![]() | Dictionary of the History of Ideas | ![]() |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Th. Abbt, Vermischte Werke (Berlin and Stettin, 1780), IV,
46. J. Addison, The Spectator, No. 29 (1711); No. 409 (1712).
L. Ariosto, Orlando Furioso (1532), Canto XXXV, 26. W.
Atkynson, Th. à Kempis: a full devout and gostely treatyse,
Early English Text Society (1893), Book I, Ch. XXII, 171.
A. Baeumler, Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Ihre Geschichte
und Systematik (Halle, 1923); reprinted as Das Irra-
tionalitätsproblem in der Aesthetik und Logik des 18.
Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft (Darmstadt,
1967): Crousaz, pp. 43-49; Dubos, pp. 49-51; Muratori, pp.
51-53; Batteux, Voltaire, d'Alembert, pp. 74-75; König, p.
82; Meier, pp. 90f. A. G. Baumgarten, Metaphysica (Halle,
1739), sections 607-08. Y. Belaval, L'esthétique sans paradoxe
de Diderot (Paris, 1950), pp. 75-80. E. B. O. Borgerhoff, The
Freedom of French Classicism (Princeton, 1950), p. 14. K.
Borinski, Baltasar Gracián und die Hofliteratur in Deutsch-
land (Halle, 1894), pp. 40-43. F. Braitmaier, Geschichte der
poetischen Theorie und Kritik von den Diskursen der Maler
bis auf Lessing (Frauenfeld, 1888), II, 192f. D. Bouhours,
La manière de bien penser dans les ouvrages de l'esprit
(Paris, 1687), p. 382. M. Buonarroti, Le rime (Florence,
1863), pp. 27, 253. F. Cartaud de la Vilate, Essay critique
et philosophique sur le goust (Paris, 1736). [W.] Caxton's
Historie of Jason, Early English Text Society (1912), p. 72.
B. Cellini, I trattati dell'oreficeria e della scultura (Florence,
1857), p. 41. W. Congreve, The Double Dealer (1694), I,
2. B. Croce, Estètica come scienza dell'espressione e lin-
guistica generale (Bari, 1946a), “Storia,” Ch. III; idem, Storia
della età barocca in Italia (Bari, 1946b), Ch. V: Zuccolo,
p. 167. C. A. Crusius, Anweisung, vernünftig zu leben
(Leipzig, 1744), sec. 108f. Mme Anne Lefèvre Dacier,
Préface to her translation of Aristophanes' Plutus and Les
Nuées (Paris, 1684). L. Dolce, Diàlogo della pittura (Venice,
X, Considérations sur le goût. Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire
raisonné des arts, des sciences et des métiers, Vol. VII (Paris,
1757), art. “Goût” by Voltaire, Montesquieu, d'Alembert.
C. Ettorri, Il buon gusto ne' componimenti rettorici (Bologna,
1696). B. J. Feijóo y Montenegro, Teatro crítico universal
(Madrid, 1727-30), Vol. VI, Disc. XI. F. B. de Felice,
L'Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire universel raisonné des
connaissances humaines, Vol. XXII (Yverdon, 1773), art.
“Goût” by Mingard and d'Alembert. L. Formigari, L'estètica
del gusto nel Settecento inglese (Florence, 1962): Shaftes-
bury, pp. 28, 31f., 33f., 53f., 62f.; Burke, p. 81. F. Gallaway,
Reason, Rule and Revolt in English Classicism (New York,
1940). B. Gracián, El Criticon, Part I, Crisis III, in Obras
completas, ed. del Hoyo (Madrid, 1960), p. 533a. J. C.
Gottsched, Versuch einer critischen Dichtkunst... (1730;
Leipzig, 1751; reprint Darmstadt, 1962), pp. 123f. P.
Grappin, La théorie du génie dans le préclassicisme allemand
(Paris, 1952), p. 217. G. Graziani, Cromuele (Bologna, 1671),
Preface. C. C. Green, The Neo-Classic Theory of Tragedy
in England during the XVIII Century (Cambridge, Mass.,
1934), pp. 738, 760f. G. P. Harsdörffer, Die Fortpflanzung
der Hochlöblich Fruchtbringenden Gesellschaft, mit einer
Rede von dem Geschmack vermehret (Nürnberg, 1651).
J. G. Herder, Ursachen des gesunknen Geschmacks bei den
verschiednen Völkern, da er geblüht (Berlin, 1775), Sec. I.
E. N. Hooker, “The Discussion of Taste, from 1750 to 1770,
and the New Trends in Literary Criticism,” PMLA, 49
(1934). H. Klein, There is no Disputing about Taste. Unters.
zum englischen Geschmacksbegreiff im 18. Jhdt. (Münster,
1967). J. de La Bruyère, Les Caractères..., eds. Servois
and Rébelliaux (Paris, 1923), “Des jugements.” J. de La
Fontaine, Fables (1668), Book V, 1. F. de Marcillac de La
Rochefoucauld, Maximes et autres oeuvres morales (1655),
ed. Borrot (Paris, 1949), p. 131: Réflexions diverses, X,
“Du goût.” G. W. Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften,
ed. C. I. Gerhardt (Berlin, 1887), III, 430f. Leone Ebreo,
Dialoghi d'Amore, ed. Gebhardt (Heidelberg, London, 1929),
p. 133. N. Malebranche, Recherche de la vérité (1674), in
Oeuvres complètes (Paris, 1958f.), I, 149; idem, Méditations
chrétiennes (1683), ibid., X, 43. G. M. Mazzucchelli, Gli
scrittori d'Italia (Brescia, 1753-63), Vol. II, Part IV, p. 2389.
G. McKenzie, Critical Responsiveness. A Study of the Psy-
chological Current in Later XVIII Century Criticism
(Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1949), Ch. IV. R. Mengs,
Gedankeen über die Schönheit und den Geschmak in der
Mahlerei (Zurich, 1762), Ch. II. A. Gombaud de Méré,
Oeuvres complètes, ed. Boudhors (Paris, 1930), II, 127-29;
see also pp. 38f. J. Milton, Paradise Regained (1671), Book
IV, line 347. Molière, Les précieuses ridicules (1659), Scene
X; idem, La critique de l'école des femmes (1663), Scene
VII; idem, La Gloire du Dôme du Val-de-Grâce (1669), line
360. G. Morpurgo Tagliabue, Il concetto di gusto nell'Italia
del Settecento (Florence, 1962a); idem, “La nozione di gusto
nel secolo XVIII: Shaftesbury e Addison,” Rivista di Estetica,
8 (1962b); idem, La nozione di gusto nel XVIII secolo: E.
Burke (Milan, 1962c). L. A. Muratori, Delle riflessioni sopra
il buon gusto nelle scienze e nell'arti (Venice, 1708). J. Norris,
Practical Discourses upon several Divine Subjects, 3 vols.
(London, 1691-93), I, 186. Quellenschriften für Kunst-
geschichte, New Series III (Vienna, 1890), IX, 291. F. Rinuc-
cini, Ricordi storici dal 1282 al 1460 (Florence, 1840),
“Documenti,” p. 148. C. Rollin, Traité de la manière
d'étudier et d'enseigner les belles-lettres (Paris, 1726), Vol.
I, Réflexions générales sur le goût. R. G. Saisselin, Taste in
Eighteenth Century France (Syracuse, N.Y., 1965). G. H.
Schramm, Versuch über den philosophischen Geschmack
(Jena, 1772), pp. 12, 49. H. von Stein, Die Entstehung der
neueren Ästhetik (Stuttgart, 1886): Saint-Evremond, p. 93;
Rapin, Bouhours, p. 93; Batteux, p. 94; Montesquieu, p. 95;
Hutcheson, pp. 188-90; d'Alembert, p. 287; Bodmer, pp.
286-89. J. G. Sulzer, Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste
(Leipzig, 1792), Vol. II, art. “Geschmack,” with important
bibliography. C. Thomasius, Kleine deutsche Schriften
(Halle, 1701), p. 48; idem, Discurs, welchergestalt man denen
Frantzosen im gemeinen Leben nachahmen solle (1687). G.
Tonelli, Kant, dall'estetica metafisica all'estetica psicoem-
pirica, Memorie della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino,
Series 3, Vol. 3, Part II (Turin, 1955a): Hutcheson, pp. 111f.;
Hume, pp. 100f., 212; Burke, pp. 111f.; Gerard, pp. 102,
112f.; Gottsched, p. 24; König, p. 31; Meier, p. 32; Lessing,
Mendelssohn, Riedel, p. 212; Kant, pp. 59-63, 111, 113f.,
174-77; idem, “Estetici minori britannici del Settecento,”
in Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 9 (1955b):
Mandeville, p. 31; Hartley, pp. 37f.; Priestley, pp. 204f. B.
Varchi, Storie Fiorentine (Florence, 1857-58), Book VIII, p.
191. L. de Clapier de Vauvenargues, Introduction à la con-
naissance de l'esprit humain (Paris, 1746), Book I., n. 12,
“Du goût.” R. Wellek, A History of Modern Criticism:
1750-1950, Vol. I (New Haven, 1955): Voltaire, I, 38-42;
Hume, I, 107; Home, I, 109; Johnson, I, 95.
GIORGIO TONELLI
[See also Beauty; Neo-Classicism;Relativism in Ethics;Sublime.]
![]() | Dictionary of the History of Ideas | ![]() |