University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  

 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
 13. 
 14. 
 15. 
 16. 
 17. 
 18. 
 19. 
CHAPTER XIX. MISS MEHITABLE'S LETTER, AND THE REPLY, GIVING FURTHER HINTS OF THE STORY.
 20. 
 21. 
 22. 
 23. 
 24. 
 25. 
 26. 
 27. 
 28. 
 29. 
 30. 
 31. 
 32. 
 33. 
 34. 
 35. 
 36. 
 37. 
 38. 
 39. 
 40. 
 41. 
 42. 
 43. 
 44. 
 45. 
 46. 
 47. 
 48. 
 49. 
 50. 


212

Page 212

19. CHAPTER XIX.
MISS MEHITABLE'S LETTER, AND THE REPLY, GIVING FURTHER
HINTS OF THE STORY.

MY dear Brother: — Since I wrote you last, so strange
a change has taken place in my life that even now I
walk about as in a dream, and hardly know myself. The events
of a few hours have made everything in the world seem to me
as different from what it ever seemed before as death is from
life.

Not to keep you waiting, after so solemn a preface, I will announce
to you first, briefly, what it is, and then, secondly, how
it happened.

Well, then, I have adopted a child, in my dry and wilted old
age. She is a beautiful and engaging little creature, full of life
and spirits, — full of warm affections, — thrown an absolute waif
and stray on the sands of life. Her mother was an unknown
Englishwoman, — probably some relict of the retired English
army. She died in great destitution, in the neighboring town
of Needmore, leaving on the world two singularly interesting
children, a boy and a girl. They were, of course, taken in
charge by the parish, and fell to the lot of old Crab Smith and
his sister, Miss Asphyxia, — just think of it! I think I need
say no more than this about their lot.

In a short time they ran away from cruel treatment; lived
in a desolate little housekeeping way in the old Dench house;
till finally Sam Lawson, lounging about in his general and universal
way, picked them up. He brought them, of course, where
every wandering, distressed thing comes, — to Deacon Badger's.

Now I suppose the Deacon is comfortably off in the world, as
our New England farmers go, but his ability to maintain general
charges of housekeeping for all mankind may seriously be
doubted. Lois Badger, who does the work of Martha in that


213

Page 213
establishment, came over to me, yesterday afternoon, quite distressed
in her mind about it. Lois is a worthy creature, —
rather sharp, to be sure, but, when her edge is turned the right
way, none the worse for that, — and really I thought she had
the right of it, to some extent.

People in general are so resigned to have other folks made
burnt sacrifices, that it did not appear to me probable that there
was a creature in Oldtown who would do anything more than
rejoice that Deacon Badger felt able to take the children. After
I had made some rather bitter reflections on the world, and its
selfishness, in the style that we all practise, the thought suddenly
occurred to me, What do you, more than others? and that idea,
together with the beauty and charms of the poor little waif, decided
me to take this bold step. I shut my eyes, and took it, —
not without quaking in my shoes for fear of Polly; but I have
carried my point in her very face, without so much as saying
by your leave.

The little one has just been taken up stairs and tucked up
warmly in my own bed, with one of our poor little Emily's old
nightgowns on. They fit her exactly, and I exult over her as
one that findeth great spoil.

Polly has not yet declared herself, except by slamming the
door very hard when she first made the discovery of the child's
presence in the house. I presume there is an equinoctial gale
gathering, but I say nothing; for, after all, Polly is a good
creature, and will blow herself round into the right quarter, in
time, as our northeast rain-storms generally do. People always
accommodate themselves to certainties.

I cannot but regard the coming of this child to me at this time
as a messenger of mercy from God, to save me from sinking into
utter despair. I have been so lonely, so miserable, so utterly,
inexpressibly wretched of late, that it has seemed that, if something
did not happen to help me, I must lose my reason. Our
family disposition to melancholy is a hard enough thing to manage
under the most prosperous circumstances. I remember my
father's paroxysms of gloom: they used to frighten me when
I was a little girl, and laid a heavy burden on the heart of our


214

Page 214
dear angel mother. Whatever that curse is, we all inherit it.
In the heart of every one of us children there is that fearful
black drop, like that which the Koran says the angel showed to
Mahomet. It is an inexplicable something which always predisposes
us to sadness, but in which any real, appreciable sorrow
strikes a terribly deep and long root. Shakespeare describes this
thing, as he does everything else: —
“In sooth, I know not why I am so sad:
It wearies me, — you say it wearies you;
But how I caught it, found it, or came by it,
What stuff 't is made of, whereof it is born,
I am to learn.”
You have struggled with it by the most rational means, — an
active out-of-door life, by sea voyages and severe manual labor.
A man can fight this dragon as a woman cannot. We women
are helpless, — tied to places, forms, and rules, — chained to our
stake. We must meet him as we can.

Of late I have not been able to sleep, and, lying awake all
night long in darkness and misery, have asked, if this be life,
whether an immortal existence is not a curse to be feared, rather
than a blessing to be hoped, and if the wretchedness we fear
in the eternal world can be worse than what we sometimes suffer
now, — such sinking of heart, such helplessness of fear, such a
vain calling for help that never comes. Well, I will not live
it over again, for I dare say you know it all too well. I think
I finally wore myself out in trying to cheer poor brother Theodore's
darksome way down to death. Can you wonder that
he would take opium? God alone can judge people that
suffer as he did, and, let people say what they please, I must,
I will, think that God has some pity for the work of his hands.

Now, brother, I must, I will, write to you about Emily;
though you have said you never wished to hear her name again.
What right had you, her brother, to give her up so, and to let
the whole burden of this dreadful mystery and sorrow come
down on me alone? You are not certain that she has gone
astray in the worst sense that a woman can. We only know
that she has broken away from us and gone, — but where, how,


215

Page 215
and with whom, you cannot say, nor I. And certainly there
was great excuse for her. Consider how the peculiar temperament
and constitution of our family wrought upon her. Consider
the temptations of her wonderful beauty, her highly nervous,
wildly excitable organization. Her genius was extraordinary;
her strength and vigor of character quite as much so. Altogether,
she was a perilously constituted human being, — and what
did we do with her? A good, common girl might have been put
with Uncle and Aunt Farnsworth with great advantage. We
put her there for the simple reason that they were her aunt and
uncle, and had money enough to educate her. But in all other
respects they were about the most unsuited that could be conceived.
I must say that I think that glacial, gloomy, religious
training in Uncle Farnsworth's family was, for her, peculiarly
unfortunate. She sat from Sunday to Sunday under Dr. Stern's
preaching. With a high-keyed, acute mind, she could not help
listening and thinking; and such thinking is unfortunate, to say
the least.

It always seemed to me that he was one of those who experiment
on the immortal soul as daring doctors experiment on the
body, — using the most violent and terrible remedies, — remedies
that must kill or cure. His theory was, that a secret enemy to
God was lying latent in every soul, which, like some virulent poisons
in the body, could only be expelled by being brought to the
surface; and he had sermon after sermon, whose only object appeared
to be to bring into vivid consciousness what he calls the
natural opposition of the human heart.

But, alas! in some cases the enmity thus aroused can never
be subdued; and Emily's was a nature that would break before
it would bow. Nothing could have subdued her but love, — and
love she never heard. These appalling doctrines were presented
with such logical clearness, and apparently so established from
the Scriptures, that, unable to distinguish between the word
of God and the cruel deductions of human logic, she trod both
under foot in defiant despair. Then came in the French literature,
which is so fascinating, and which just now is having
so wide an influence on the thinking of our country. Rousseau


216

Page 216
and Voltaire charmed her, and took her into a new world. She
has probably gone to France for liberty, with no protection but
her own virgin nature. Are we at once to infer the worst, when
we know so little? I, for one, shall love her and trust in her
to the end; and if ever she should fall, and do things that I and
all the world must condemn, I shall still say, that it will be less
her fault than that of others; that she will be one of those who
fall by their higher, rather than their lower nature.

I have a prophetic instinct in my heart that some day, poor,
forlorn, and forsaken, she will look back with regret to the old
house where she was born: and then she shall be welcome
here. This is why I keep this solitary old place, full of bitter
and ghostly memories; because, as long as I keep it, there is
one refuge that Emily may call her own, and one heart that will
be true to her, and love her and believe in her to the end.

I think God has been merciful to me in sending me this child,
to be to me as a daughter. Already her coming has been made
a means of working in me that great moral change for which all
my life I have been blindly seeking. I have sought that conversion
which our father taught us to expect as alchemists seek
the philosopher's stone.

What have I not read and suffered at the hands of the theologians?
How many lonely hours, day after day, have I bent the
knee in fruitless prayer that God would grant me this great,
unknown grace! for without it how dreary is life!

We are in ourselves so utterly helpless, — life is so hard, so
inexplicable, that we stand in perishing need of some helping
hand, some sensible, appreciable connection with God. And yet
for years every cry of misery, every breath of anguish, has
been choked by the logical proofs of theology; — that God is my
enemy, or that I am his; that every effort I make toward Him
but aggravates my offence; and that this unknown gift, which no
child of Adam ever did compass of himself, is so completely in
my own power, that I am every minute of my life to blame for
not possessing it.

How many hours have I gone round and round this dreary
track, — chilled, weary, shivering, seeing no light, and hearing


217

Page 217
no voice! But within this last hour it seems as if a divine ray
had shone upon me, and the great gift had been given me by the
hand of a little child. It came in the simplest and most unexpected
manner, while listening to a very homely hymn, repeated
by this dear little one. The words themselves were not much
in the way of poetry; it was merely the simplest statement of
the truth that in Jesus Christ, ever living, ever present, every
human soul has a personal friend, divine and almighty.

This thought came over me with such power, that it seemed as
if all my doubts, all my intricate, contradictory theologies, all
those personal and family sorrows which had made a burden on
my soul greater than poor Christian ever staggered under, had
gone where his did, when, at the sight of the Cross, it loosed
from his back and rolled down into the sepulchre, to be seen no
more. Can it be, I asked myself, that this mighty love, that I
feel so powerfully and so sweetly, has been near me all these dark,
melancholy years? Has the sun been shining behind all these
heavy clouds, under whose shadows I have spent my life?

When I laid my little Tina down to sleep to-night, I came
down here to think over this strange, new thought, — that I,
even I, in my joyless old age, my poverty, my perplexities, my
loneliness, am no longer alone! I am beloved. There is One
who does love me, — the One Friend, whose love, like the sunshine,
can be the portion of each individual of the human race,
without exhaustion. This is the great mystery of faith, which
I am determined from this hour to keep whole and undefiled.

My dear brother, I have never before addressed to you a word
on this subject. It has been one in which I saw only perplexity.
I have, it is true, been grieved and disappointed that you did not
see your way clear to embrace the sacred ministry, which has
for so many generations been the appointed work of our family.
I confess for many years I did hope to see you succeed, not
only to the library, but to the work of our honored, venerated
father and grandfather. It was my hope that, in this position, I
should find in you a spiritual guide to resolve my doubts and lead
me aright. But I have gathered from you at times, by chance
words dropped, that you could not exactly accept the faith of our


218

Page 218
fathers. Perhaps difficulties like my own have withheld you.
I know you too well to believe that the French scepticism that
has blown over here with the breath of our political revolution
can have had the least influence over you. Whatever your
views of doctrines may be, you are not a doubter. You are
not — as poor Emily defiantly called herself — a deist, an alien
from all that our fathers came to this wilderness to maintain.
Yet when I see you burying your talents in a lonely mountain
village, satisfied with the work of a poor schoolmaster, instead
of standing forth to lead our New England in the pulpit, I ask
myself, Why is this?

Speak to me, brother! tell me your innermost thoughts, as I
have told you mine. Is not life short and sad and bitter enough,
that those who could help each other should neglect the few
things they can do to make it tolerable? Why do we travel
side by side, lonely and silent, — each, perhaps, hiding in that
silence the bread of life that the other needs? Write to me as
I have written to you, and let me know that I have a brother
in soul, as I have in flesh.

Your affectionate sister,

M. R

My dear Sister: — I have read your letter. Answer it
justly and truly how can I? How little we know of each other
in outside intimacy! but when we put our key into the door of
the secret chamber, who does not tremble and draw back? —
that is the true haunted chamber!

First, about Emily, I will own I am wrong. It is from no
want of love, though, but from too much. I was and am too sore
and bitter on that subject to trust myself. I have a heart full of
curses, but don't know exactly where to fling them; and, for
aught I see, we are utterly helpless. Every clew fails; and what
is the use of torturing ourselves? It is a man's nature to act,
to do, and, where nothing can be done, to forget. It is a woman's
nature to hold on to what can only torture, and live all her despairs
over. Women's tears are their meat; men find the diet too salt,
and won't take it.


219

Page 219

Tell me anything I can do, and I 'll do it; but talk I cannot, —
every word burns me. I admit every word you say of Emily.
We were mistaken in letting her go to the Farnsworths, and be
baited and tortured with ultra-Calvinism; but we were blind, as
we mortals always are, — fated never to see what we should have
done, till seeing is too late.

I am glad you have taken that child, — first, because it 's a
good deed in itself, and, secondly, because it 's good for you. That
it should have shed light on your relations to God is strictly philosophical.
You have been trying to find your way to Him by
definitions and by logic; one might as well make love to a lady
by the first book of Euclid. “He that loveth not his brother
whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not
seen?” That throb of protecting, all-embracing love which
thrilled through your heart for this child taught you more of
God than father's whole library. “He that loveth not knoweth
not God.” The old Bible is philosophical, and eminent for its
common sense. Of course this child will make a fool of you.
Never mind; the follies of love are remedial.

As to a system of education, it will be an amusement for you
to get that up. Every human being likes to undertake to dictate
for some other one. Go at it with good cheer. But, whatever
you do, don't teach her French. Give her a good Saxon-English
education; and, if she needs a pasture-land of foreign languages.
let her learn Latin, and, more than that, Greek. Greek is the
morning-land of languages, and has the freshness of early dew
in it which will never exhale.

The French helped us in our late war: for that I thank
them; but from French philosophy and French democracy, may
the good Lord deliver us. They slew their Puritans in the
massacre of St. Bartholomew, and the nation ever since has been
without a moral sense. French literature is like an eagle with
one broken wing. What the Puritans did for us English people,
in bringing in civil liberty, they lacked. Our revolutions have
been gradual. I predict that theirs will come by and by with an
explosion.

Meanwhile, our young men who follow after French literature


220

Page 220
become rakes and profligates. Their first step in liberty is
to repeal the ten commandments, especially the seventh. Therefore
I consider a young woman in our day misses nothing who
does not read French. Decorous French literature is stupid, and
bright French literature is too wicked for anything. So let
French alone.

She threatens to be pretty, does she? So much the worse
for you and her. If she makes you too much trouble by and by,
send her up to my academy, and I will drill her, and make a
Spartan of her.

As to what you say about religion, and the ministry, and the
schoolmaster, what can I say on this sheet of paper? Briefly
then. No, I am not in any sense an unbeliever in the old Bible;
I would as soon disbelieve my own mother. And I am in my nature
a thorough Puritan. I am a Puritan as thoroughly as a hound
is a hound, and a pointer a pointer, whose pedigree of unmixed
blood can be traced for generations back. I feel within me the
preaching instinct, just as the hound snuffs, and the pointer
points; but as to the pulpit in these days, — well, thereby hangs
a tale.

What should I preach, supposing I were a minister, as my
father, and grandfather, and great-grandfather were before me?
What they preached was true to them, was fitted for their
times, was loyally and sincerely said, and of course did a
world of good. But when I look over their sermons, I put an
interrogation point to almost everything they say; and what was
true to them is not true to me; and if I should speak out as
honestly as they did what is true to me, the world would not understand
or receive it, and I think it would do more harm than
good. I believe I am thinking ahead of the present generation,
and if I should undertake to push my thoughts I should only
bother people, — just as one of my bright boys in the latter part
of the algebra sometimes worries a new beginner with his advanced
explanations.

Then again, our late Revolution has wrought a change in the
ministry that will soon become more and more apparent. The
time when ministers were noblemen by divine right, and reigned


221

Page 221
over their parishes by the cocked hat and gold-headed cane, is
passing away. Dr. Lothrop, and Dr. Stern, and a few others,
keep up the prestige, but that sort of thing is going by; and in
the next generation the minister will be nothing but a citizen; his
words will come without prestige, and be examined and sifted
just like the words of any other citizen.

There is a race of ministers rising up who are fully adequate
to meet this exigency; and these men are going to throw Calvinism
down into the arena, and discuss every inch of it, hand to
hand and knee to knee, with the common people; and we shall
see what will come of this.

I, for my part, am not prepared to be a minister on these
terms. Still, as I said, I have the born instinct of preaching; I
am dictatorial by nature, and one of those who need constantly to
see themselves reflected in other people's eyes; and so I have
got an academy here, up in the mountains, where I have a set
of as clear, bright-eyed, bright-minded boys and girls as you
would wish to see, and am in my way a pope. Well, I enjoy being
a pope. It is one of my weaknesses.

As to society, we have the doctor, — a quiet little wrinkled old
man, a profound disbeliever in medicines, who gives cream-of-tartar
for ordinary cases, and camomile tea when the symptoms
become desperate, and reads Greek for his own private amusement.
Of course he does n't get very rich, but here in the
mountains one can afford to be poor. One of our sunsets is worth
half a Boston doctor's income.

Then there 's the lawyer and squire, who draws the deeds, and
makes the wills, and settles the quarrels; and the minister, who
belongs to the new dispensation. He and I are sworn friends;
he is my Fidus Achates. His garden joins mine, and when I am
hoeing my corn he is hoeing his, and thence comes talk. As it
gets more eager I jump the fence and hoe in his garden, or he
does the same to mine. We have a strife on the matter of garden
craft, who shall with most skill outwit our Mother Nature, and get
cantelopes and melons under circumstances in which she never
intended them to grow. This year I beat the parson, but I can
see that he is secretly resolved to revenge himself on me when


222

Page 222
the sweet corn comes in. One evening every week we devote to
reading the newspaper and settling the affairs of the country. We
are both stanch Federalists, and make the walls ring with our
denunciations of Jacobinism and Democracy. Once a month we
have the Columbian Magazine and the foreign news from Europe,
and then we have a great deal on our hands; we go over affairs,
every country systematically, and settle them for the month. In
general we are pretty well agreed, but now and then our lines of
policy differ, and then we fight it out with good courage, not
sparing the adjectives. The parson has a sly humor of his own,
and our noisiest discussions generally end in a hearty laugh.

So much for the man and friend, — now for the clergyman.
He is neither the sentimental, good parson of Goldsmith, nor the
plaintive, ascetic parish priest of Romanism, nor the cocked
hat of the theocracy, but a lively, acute, full-blooded man, who
does his duty on equal terms among men. He is as single-hearted
as an unblemished crystal, and in some matters sacredly
simple; but yet not without a thrifty practical shrewdness, both
in things temporal and things spiritual. He has an income of
about two hundred and fifty dollars, with his wood. The farmers
about here consider him as rolling in wealth, and I must say that,
though the parsonage is absolutely bare of luxuries, one is not
there often unpleasantly reminded that the parson is a poor man.
He has that golden faculty of enjoying the work he does so utterly,
and believing in it so entirely, that he can quite afford to
be poor. He whose daily work is in itself a pleasure ought not
to ask for riches: so I tell myself about my school-keeping, and
him about his parish. He takes up the conversion of sinners as
an immediate practical business, to be done and done now; he
preaches in all the little hills and dales and hollows and brown
school-houses for miles around, and chases his sinners up and
down so zealously, that they have, on the whole, a lively time of
it. He attacks drinking and all our small forms of country immorality
with a vigor sufficient to demolish sins of double their
size, and gives nobody even a chance to sleep in meeting. The
good farmers around here, some of whom would like to serve
Mammon comfortably, are rather in a quandary what to do.


223

Page 223
They never would bear the constant hounding which he gives
them, and the cannonades he fires at their pet sins, and the way
he chases them from pillar to post, and the merciless manner in
which he breaks in upon their comfortable old habit of sleeping
in meeting, were it not that they feel that they are paying him
an enormous salary, and ought to get their money's worth out of
him, which they are certain they are doing most fully. Your
Yankee has such a sense of values, that, if he pays a man to thrash
him, he wants to be thrashed thoroughly.

My good friend preaches what they call New Divinity, by
which I understand the Calvinism which our fathers left us, in
the commencing process of disintegration. He is thoroughly and
enthusiastically in earnest about it, and believes that the system,
as far as Edwards and Hopkins have got it, is almost absolute
truth; but, for all that, is cheerfully busy in making some little
emendations and corrections, upon which he values himself, and
which he thinks of the greatest consequence. What is to the
credit of his heart is, that these emendations are generally in
favor of some original-minded sheep who can't be got into the
sheep-fold without some alteration in the paling. In these cases
I have generally noticed that he will loosen a rail or tear off a
picket, and let the sheep in, it being his impression, after all, that
the sheep are worth more than the sheep-fold.

In his zeal to catch certain shy sinners, he has more than once
preached sermons which his brethren about here find fault with,
as wandering from old standards; and it costs abundance of
bustle and ingenuity to arrange his system so as to provide for
exceptional cases, and yet to leave it exactly what it was before
the alterations were made.

It is, I believe, an admitted thing among theologians, that,
while theology must go on improving from age to age, it must
also remain exactly what it was a hundred years ago.

The parson is my intimate friend, and it is easy for me to see
that he has designs for the good of my soul, for which I sincerely
love him. I can see that he is lying in wait for me patiently, as
sometimes we do for trout, when we go out fishing together.
He reconnoitres me, approaches me carefully, makes nice little


224

Page 224
logical traps to catch me in, and baits them with very innocent-looking
questions, which I, being an old theological rat, skilfully
avoid answering.

My friend's forte is logic. Between you and me, if there is a
golden calf worshipped in our sanctified New England, its name
is Logic; and my good friend the parson burns incense before it
with a most sacred innocence of intention. He believes that
sinners can be converted by logic, and that, if he could once get
me into one of these neat little traps aforesaid, the salvation of
my soul would be assured. He has caught numbers of the
shrewdest infidel foxes among the farmers around, and I must
say that there is no trap for the Yankee like the logic-trap.

I must tell you a story about this that amused me greatly.
You know everybody's religious opinions are a matter of discussion
in our neighborhood, and Ezekiel Scranton, a rich farmer
who lives up on the hill, enjoys the celebrity of being an atheist,
and rather values himself on the distinction. It takes a man of
courage, you know, to live without a God; and Ezekiel gives
himself out as a plucky dog, and able to hold the parson at bay.
The parson, however, had privately prepared a string of questions
which he was quite sure would drive Ezekiel into strait
quarters. So he meets him the other day in the store.

“How 's this, Mr. Scranton? they tell me that you 're an
atheist!”

“Well I guess I be, Parson,” says Ezekiel, comfortably.

“Well, Ezekiel, let 's talk about this. You believe in your
own existence, don't you?”

“No, I don't.”

“What! not believe in your own existence?”

“No, I don't.” Then, after a moment, “Tell you what,
Parson, ain't a going to be twitched up by none o' your syllogisms.”

Ezekiel was quite in the right of it; for I must do my friend
the parson the justice to say, that, if you answer one of his
simple-looking questions, you are gone. You must say B after
saying A, and the whole alphabet after that.

For my part, I do not greatly disbelieve the main points of


225

Page 225
Calvinism. They strike me, as most hard and disagreeable things
do, as quite likely to be true, and very much in accordance with a
sensible man's observation of facts as they stand in life and nature.
My doubts come up, like bats, from a dark and dreadful
cavern that underlies all religion, natural or revealed. They are
of a class abhorrent to myself, smothering to my peace, imbittering
to my life.

What must he be who is tempted to deny the very right of his
Creator to the allegiance of his creatures? — who is tempted to
feel that his own conscious existence is an inflicted curse, and
that the whole race of men have been a set of neglected, suffering
children, bred like fish-spawn on a thousand shores, by
a Being who has never interested himself to care for their
welfare, to prevent their degradation, to interfere with their
cruelties to each other, as they have writhed and wrangled into
life, through life, and out of life again? Does this look like being
a Father in any sense in which we poor mortals think of fatherhood?
After seeing nature, can we reason against any of the harshest
conclusions of Calvinism, from the character of its Author?

Do we not consider a man unworthy the name of a good father
who, from mere blind reproductive instinct, gives birth to children
for whose improvement, virtue, and happiness he makes no provision?
and yet does not this seem to be the way more than half
of the human race actually comes into existence?

Then the laws of nature are an inextricable labyrinth, — puzzling,
crossing, contradictory; and ages of wearisome study have
as yet hardly made a portion of them clear enough for human
comfort; and doctors and ministers go on torturing the body and
the soul, with the most devout good intentions. And so forth,
for there is no end to this sort of talk.

Now my friend the parson is the outgrowth of the New
England theocracy, about the simplest, purest, and least objectionable
state of society that the world ever saw. He has a good
digestion, a healthy mind in a healthy body; he lives in a village
where there is no pauperism, and hardly any crime, — where
all the embarrassing, dreadful social problems and mysteries
of life scarcely exist. But I, who have been tumbled up and


226

Page 226
down upon all the shores of earth, lived in India, China, and
Polynesia, and seen the human race as they breed like vermin,
in their filth and their contented degradation, — how can I think
of applying the measurements of any theological system to a reality
like this?

Now the parts of their system on which my dear friend the
parson, and those of his school, specially value themselves, are
their explanations of the reasons why evil was permitted, and
their vindications of the Divine character in view of it. They
are specially earnest and alert in giving out their views here, and
the parson has read to me more than one sermon, hoping to
medicate what he supposes to be my secret wound. To me
their various theories are, as my friend the doctor once said to
me, “putting their bitter pill in a chestnut-burr; the pill is bad, —
there is no help for that, — but the chestnut-burr is impossible.”

It is incredible, the ease and cheerfulness with which a man in
his study, who never had so much experience of suffering as even
a toothache would give him, can arrange a system in which the
everlasting torture of millions is casually admitted as an item.
But I, to whom, seriously speaking, existence has been for much
of my life nothing but suffering, and who always looked on my
existence as a misfortune, must necessarily feel reasonings of
this kind in a different way. This soul-ache, this throb of pain,
that seems as if it were an actual anguish of the immaterial part
itself, is a dreadful teacher, and gives a fearful sense of what the
chances of an immortal existence might be, and what the responsibilities
of originating such existence.

I am not one of the shallow sort, who think that everything for
everybody must or ought to end with perfect bliss at death.
On the contrary, I do not see how anything but misery in eternal
ages is to come from the outpouring into their abyss, of wrangling,
undisciplined souls, who were a torment to themselves and
others here, and who would make this world unbearable, were
they not all swept off in their turn by the cobweb brush of
Death.

So you see it 's all a hopeless muddle to me. Do I then believe
nothing? Yes, I believe in Jesus Christ with all my


227

Page 227
heart, all my might. He stands before me the one hopeful
phenomenon of history. I adore him as Divine, or all of the
Divine that I can comprehend; and when he bids me say to
God, “Our Father which art in heaven,” I smother all my
doubts and say it. Those words are the rope thrown out to
me, choking in the waters, — the voice from the awful silence.
“God so loved the world that he gave his own Son.” I try
to believe that he loves this world, but I have got only so far
as “Help thou mine unbelief.”

Now, as to talking out all this to the parson, what good would
it do? He is preaching well and working bravely. His preaching
suits the state of advancement to which New England has
come; and the process which he and ministers of his sort institute,
of having every point in theology fully discussed by the
common people, is not only a capital drill for their minds, but it
will have its effect in the end on their theologies, and out of
them all the truth of the future will arise.

So you see my position, and why I am niched here for life, as
a schoolmaster. Come up and see me some time. I have a
housekeeper who is as ugly as Hecate, but who reads Greek.
She makes the best bread and cake in town, keeps my stockings
mended and my shirt-ruffles plaited and my house like wax,
and hears a class in Virgil every day, after she has “done her
dinner-dishes.” I shall not fall in love with her, though. Come
some time to see me, and bring your new acquisition.

Your brother,

Jonathan Rossiter.

I have given these two letters as the best means of showing
to the reader the character of the family with whom my destiny
and that of Tina became in future life curiously intertwisted.

Among the peculiarly English ideas which the Colonists
brought to Massachusetts, which all the wear and tear of democracy
have not been able to obliterate, was that of family. Family
feeling, family pride, family hope and fear and desire, were, in
my early day, strongly-marked traits. Genealogy was a thing at
the tip of every person's tongue, and in every person's mind;


228

Page 228
and it is among my most vivid remembrances, with what a solemn
air of intense interest my mother, grandmother, Aunt Lois, and
Aunt Keziah would enter into minute and discriminating particulars
with regard to the stock, intermarriages, and family settlements
of the different persons whose history was under their
consideration. “Of a very respectable family,” was a sentence
so often repeated at the old fireside that its influence went in
part to make up my character. In our present days, when
every man is emphatically the son of his own deeds, and nobody
cares who his mother or grandmother or great-aunt was, there
can scarcely be an understanding of this intense feeling of race
and genealogy which pervaded simple colonial Massachusetts.

As I have often before intimated, the aristocracy of Massachusetts
consisted of two classes, the magistracy and the ministry;
and these two, in this theocratic State, played into each other's
hands continually. Next to the magistrate and the minister, in
the esteem of that community, came the schoolmaster; for education
might be said to be the ruling passion of the State.

The history of old New England families is marked by strong
lights and deep shadows of personal peculiarity. We appeal to
almost every old settler in New England towns, if he cannot
remember stately old houses, inhabited by old families, whose
histories might be brought to mind by that of Miss Mehitable
and her brother. There was in them a sort of intellectual vigor,
a ceaseless activity of thought, a passion for reading and study,
and a quiet brooding on the very deepest problems of mental
and moral philosophy. The characteristic of such families is
the greatly disproportioned force of the internal, intellectual,
and spiritual life to the external one. Hence come often morbid
and diseased forms of manifestation. The threads which connect
such persons with the real life of the outer world are so fine
and so weak, that they are constantly breaking and giving way
here and there, so that, in such races, oddities and eccentricities
are come to be accepted only as badges of family character. Yet
from stock of this character have come some of the most brilliant
and effective minds in New England; and from them also have
come hermits and recluses, — peculiar and exceptional people, —


229

Page 229
people delightful to the student of human nature, but excessively
puzzling to the every-day judgment of mere conventional society.

The Rossiter family had been one of these. It traced its origin
to the colony which came out with Governor Winthrop. The
eldest Rossiter had been one of the ejected ministers, and came
from a good substantial family of the English gentry. For
several successive generations there had never been wanting a
son in the Rossiter family to succeed to the pulpit of his father.
The Rossiters had been leaned on by the magistrates and consulted
by the governors, and their word had been law down to the
time of Miss Mehitable's father.

The tendency of the stately old families of New England to
constitutional melancholy has been well set forth by Dr. Cotton
Mather, that delightful old New England grandmother, whose
nursery tales of its infancy and childhood may well be pondered
by those who would fully understand its far-reaching maturity.
As I have before remarked, I have high ideas of the
wisdom of grandmothers, and therefore do our beloved gossip,
Dr. Cotton Mather, the greatest possible compliment in granting
him the title.

The ministers of the early colonial days of New England,
though well-read, scholarly men, were more statesmen than theologians.
Their minds ran upon the actual arrangements of society,
which were in a great degree left in their hands, rather than
on doctrinal and metaphysical subtilties. They took their confession
of faith just as the great body of Protestant reformers left
it, and acted upon it as a practical foundation, without much further
discussion, until the time of President Edwards. He was
the first man who began the disintegrating process of applying
rationalistic methods to the accepted doctrines of religion, and
he rationalized far more boldly and widely than any publishers
of his biography have ever dared to let the world know. He
sawed the great dam and let out the whole waters of discussion
over all New England, and that free discussion led to all the
shades of opinion of our modern days. Little as he thought
it, yet Waldo Emerson and Theodore Parker were the last results
of the current set in motion by Jonathan Edwards.


230

Page 230

Miss Mehitable Rossiter's father, during the latter part of his
life, had dipped into this belt of New Divinity, and been excessively
and immoderately interested in certain speculations concerning
them. All the last part of his life had been consumed
in writing a treatise in opposition to Dr. Stern, another rigorous
old cocked-hat of his neighborhood, who maintained that the
Deity had created sin on purpose, because it was a necessary
means of the greatest good. Dr. Rossiter thought that evil had
only been permitted, because it could be overruled for the greatest
good; and each of them fought their battle as if the fate of the
universe was to be decided by its results.

Considered as a man, in his terrestrial and mundane relations,
Dr. Rossiter had that wholesome and homely interest in the
things of this mortal life which was characteristic of the New
England religious development. While the Puritans were intensely
interested in the matters of the soul, they appeared to
have a realizing sense of the fact that a soul without a body, in a
material world, is at a great disadvantage in getting on. So
they exhibited a sensible and commendable sense of the worth of
property. They were especially addicted to lawful matrimony,
and given to having large families of children; and, if one wife
died, they straightway made up the loss by another, — a compliment
to the virtues of the female sex which womankind appear
always gratefully to appreciate.

Parson Rossiter had been three times married; first, to a
strong-grained, homely, highly intellectual woman of one of the
first Boston families, of whom Miss Mehitable Rossiter was the
only daughter. The Doctor was said to be one of the handsomest
men of his times. Nature, with her usual perversity in these
matters, made Miss Mehitable an exact reproduction of all the
homely traits of her mother, with the addition of the one or two
physical defects of her handsome father. No woman with a heart
in her bosom ever feels marked personal uncomeliness otherwise
than as a great misfortune. Miss Mehitable bore it with a
quaint and silent pride. Her brother Jonathan, next to herself
in age, the son of a second and more comely wife, was far more
gifted in personal points, though not equal to his father.


231

Page 231
Finally, late in life, after a somewhat prolonged widowhood,
Parson Rossiter committed the folly of many men on the downhill
side of life, that of marrying a woman considerably younger
than himself. She was a pretty, nervous, excitable, sensitive
creature, whom her homely elder daughter, Miss Mehitable, no
less than her husband, petted and caressed on account of her
beauty, as if she had been a child. She gave birth to two more
children, a son named Theodore, and a daughter named Emily,
and then died.

All the children had inherited from their father the peculiar
constitutional tendency to depression of spirits of which we have
spoken. In these last two, great beauty and brilliant powers
of mind were united with such a singular sensitiveness and way-wardness
of nature as made the prospect for happiness in such a
life as this, and under the strict requirements of New England
society, very problematical.

Theodore ran through a brilliant course in college, notwithstanding
constant difficulties with the college authorities, but
either could not or would not apply himself to any of the accepted
modes of getting bread and butter which a young man
must adopt who means to live and get on with other men.
He was full of disgusts, and repulsions, and dislikes; everything
in life wounded and made him sore; he could or would do nothing
reasonably or rationally with human beings, and, to deaden
the sense of pain in existence, took to the use of opiates, which left
him a miserable wreck on his sister's hands, the father being
dead.

Thus far the reader has the history of this family, and intimations
of the younger and more beautiful one whose after fate was
yet to be connected with ours.

Miss Mehitable Rossiter has always been to me a curious study.
Singularly plain as she was in person, old, withered, and poor,
she yet commanded respect, and even reverence, through the
whole of a wide circle of acquaintance; for she was well known
to some of the most considerable families in Boston, with whom,
by her mother's side, she was connected. The interest in her
was somewhat like that in old lace, old china, and old cashmere


232

Page 232
shawls; which, though often excessively uncomely, and looking in
the eyes of uninterested people like mere rubbish, are held by
connoisseurs to be beyond all price.

Miss Mehitable herself had great pride of character, in the
sense in which pride is an innocent weakness, if not a species of
virtue. She had an innate sense that she belonged to a good
family, — a perfectly quiet conviction that she was a Bradford by
her mother's side, and a Rossiter by her father's side, come
what might in this world. She was too well versed in the duties
of good blood not to be always polite and considerate to the last
degree to all well-meaning common people, for she felt the
noblesse oblige as much as if she had been a duchess. And, for
that matter, in the circles of Oldtown everything that Miss
Mehitable did and said had a certain weight, quite apart from
that of her really fine mental powers. It was the weight of past
generations, of the whole Colony of Massachusetts; all the sermons
of five generations of ministers were in it, which to a God-fearing
community is a great deal.

But in her quaint, uncomely body was lodged, not only a most
active and even masculine mind, but a heart capable of those
passionate extremes of devotion which belong to the purely feminine
side of woman. She was capable of a romantic excess
of affection, of an extravagance of hero-worship, which, had she
been personally beautiful, might perhaps have made her the
heroine of some poem of the heart. It was among the quietly
accepted sorrows of her life, that for her no such romance was
possible.

Men always admired her as they admired other men, and
talked to her as they talked with each other. Many, during the
course of her life, had formed friendships with her, which were
mere relations of comradeship, but which never touched the
inner sphere of the heart. That heart, so warm, so tender, and
so true, she kept, with a sort of conscious shame, hidden far
behind the intrenchments of her intellect. With an instinctive
fear of ridicule, she scarcely ever spoke a tender word, and
generally veiled a soft emotion under some quaint phrase of
drollery. She seemed forever to feel the strange contrast


233

Page 233
between the burning, romantic heart and the dry and withered
exterior.

Like many other women who have borne the course of marked
plainness, Miss Mehitable put an extravagant valuation on personal
beauty. Her younger sister, whose loveliness was uncommon,
was a sort of petted idol to her, during all her childish years.
At the time of her father's death, she would gladly have retained
her with her, but, like many other women who are strong
on the intellectual side of their nature, Miss Mehitable had a sort
of weakness and helplessness in relation to mere material matters,
which rendered her, in the eyes of the family, unfit to be
trusted with the bringing up of a bright and wilful child. In
fact, as regarded all the details of daily life, Miss Mehitable was
the servant of Polly, who had united the offices of servant-of-all-work,
housekeeper, nurse, and general factotum in old Parson
Rossiter's family, and between whom and the little wilful Emily
grievous quarrels had often arisen. For all these reasons, and
because Mrs. Farnsworth of the neighboring town of Adams
was the only sister of the child's mother, was herself childless,
and in prosperous worldly circumstances, it would have been
deemed a flying in the face of Providence to refuse her, when
she declared her intention of adopting her sister's child as her
own.

Of what came of this adoption I shall have occasion to speak
hereafter.