University of Virginia Library

DEVELOPMENT FUND

Mr. Edward C. Anderson presented the report of a Special Committee to The Executive Committee
of The University of Virginia Development Fund, appointed by Admiral Halsey to study the method of handling
and administration of funds obtained through the Development Fund campaign.

To The Executive Committee

The undersigned Committee, appointed by Chairman Halsey at the meeting of the Executive Committee
held September 11, 1947, to investigate and report upon the best method to be employed in the handling
and administration of funds obtained through the efforts of the Development Fund Campaign, respectfully
advises as follows:

I. The Committee is unanimously of opinion that the Alumni Association of the University of
Virginia is presently without power to constitute a new and separate Board of Trustees to hold and administer
funds that may now be obtaining through the efforts of the Development Fund Campaign. Its
reasons for entertaining this view are as follows:

The Society of Alumni of the University of Virginia was incorporated by an Act of the General
Assembly of this State, adopted February 6, 1873. By an amendment approved March 7, 1903, the name of
the Society was changed to the General Alumni Association of the University of Virginia. By Section
Seven of this Act, the Association was given "power to raise an endowment fund for the use and benefit
of the University, to be held by the Treasurer of the State, in Virginia registered century bonds, and
all funds belonging to said Association in excess of $1,000, and all those donated for the purpose of
building a public hall, shall be similarly invested and only disposed of as they may be deemed for the
purposes of the Association or the University." By Section Eight of the Act the Association was given
power to receive and hold property and donations passing by grant, conveyance, demise or bequest,
"under the general powers of endowment created in the Seventh Section of this Act..."

It is thus seen that under the charter of the Association at that time in effect any endowment
fund raised by it for the use and benefit of the University had to be held by "the Treasurer of the
State, in Virginia registered century bonds." Your Committee is informed that when the Association


12

interested itself in the raising of an endowment in 1907 and 1908 at least one large donor refused to
give funds which would be subject to the political control of the State of Virginia. The aforementioned
sections Seven and Eight of the charter of the Association were therefore amended as of December 5, 1907,
so as to authorize the Association to appoint by deed of trust a Board of seven Trustees, to be known
and designated as "The Alumni Board of Trustees of the University of Virginia Endowment Fund." It was
provided that this "Board and its successors shall be perpetual and its duties, powers, rights, privileges
and responsibilities shall be irrevocable, to hold, manage, invest and expend the funds now
raised, or hereafter to be raised, or any gift or grant heretofore or hereafter made to the General
Alumni Association for the use and benefit of the University of Virginia under the terms of this charter
and the provisions of said deed of trust herein authorized to be executed, which deed shall define the
duties, powers, rights, privileges and responsibilities of said Board."

Pursuant to the foregoing provisions of the charter of the Association, as amended, it executed
on February 15, 1908, a deed to Joseph Bryan, Thomas Nelson Page, Thomas F. Ryan, Alexander P.
Humphrey, Charles J. Faulkner and Williamson W. Fuller, and Edwin A. Alderman, President of the University
of Virginia, ex officio, Trustees, to be known as "The Alumni Board of Trustees of the University
of Virginia Endowment Fund" transferring and conveying "all gifts, funds, moneys, investments or subscriptions
now made or which may hereafter be made, to the said Trustees for the use and benefit of the
University of Virginia," together with "all such grants, gifts, funds, moneys, investments, interest,
credit, bonds, notes, or subscriptions that may hereafter be made of every character or description
whatsoever,
including income, revenues, issues and profits thereof, either directly to the Trustees,
parties of the second part, or to this Association for the benefit of the University of Virginia."

While the charter of the Association has since three times been amended, on August 4, 1922,
January 24, 1929 and September 9, 1933, the rights, powers and duties of the Trustees and their successors,
appointed by the aforesaid deed of trust of February 15, 1908, have been fully preserved, it having
been expressly provided in the amendment of September 9, 1933, that -

"It (the Alumni Board) shall hold, manage, invest and expend, the funds
raised or hereafter to be raised, or any gifts or grants heretofore or hereafter
made by will, deed or otherwise, to it, or to the Alumni Association for the use
and benefit of the said Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia under the
terms of this charter."

It seems to your Committee, therefore, that title to any funds presently solicited by, or
obtained as a result of the efforts of the Alumni Association of the University of Virginia would
necessarily pass to "The Alumni Board of Trustees of the University of Virginia Endowment Fund"
created by the deed of February 15, 1908, and their successors presently in office. The execution
of a further or additional deed of trust at this time, whereby a new board of trustees would be created
for the purpose of receiving title to, possession and control of funds likely to be raised in
the present campaign would not, therefore, in the opinion of the Committee, be presently within the
power of the Association.

II. In this situation a majority of your Committee, Messrs. Scott and Hildreth, are of
opinion that a new non-profit, non-stock corporation should be organized under the provisions of
Chapter 151 of the Code of Virginia, to be designated as "The University of Virginia Development
Fund," that there be seven Trustees presently selected and named to manage the affairs and investments
of the corporation, and that the President of the University be at all times, ex officio, a
Trustee of the corporation; that the first seven Trustees be selected by this Executive Committee
to serve for terms of one to seven years, respectively, the term of each Trustee to be determined
by lot after their selection by the Executive Committee; that no Trustee drawing a term of more than
three years shall be eligible for re-election but that any Trustee drawing a term of three years or
less shall be eligible for election for one additional term of seven years, that the first seven
Trustees be selected without reference to their respective ages, but that all successor Trustees
shall be of the age of 57 years or less, so that upon the expiration of their respective seven year
terms of service they would have attained an age of not to exceed 65 years; that all successor Trustees
be nominated by a majority vote of the Trustees then in office, such nominations to receive the
approval of the majority of the Board of Managers of the Alumni Association of the University of Virginia
in attendance upon any meeting at which the selection of a successor Trustee shall come before
the Board of Managers for consideration and action; that for each vacancy the trustees then in office
shall nominate three persons, one of whom shall be selected by the Board of Managers in the manner
stated; that no member of the Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia shall be selected either
as an original or successor Trustee; that the charter of the corporation provide that all securities
held by it shall be placed in the possession, as custodian, of some trust company or companies or bank or banks
having trust powers, and that the corporation may in its discretion employ the services of some corporation
or individual, or duly accredited officer of the University, as investment counsel and/or custodian;
that the corporation shall apply faithfully the gifts or grants to the objects or purposes designated by
the donor or grantor, but when no direction, condition or limitation is attached to the gift or grant,
the corporation shall hold the same with full power to invest and reinvest in accordance with the discretion
of its Trustees, and such portion as the Trustees may deem necessary of the income and/or principal
from any and all funds at any time held by the corporation shall, except as otherwise specifically
required and provided by the donor or grantor, be applied to the needs of the University of Virginia
after full conference with the President and Rector and the Corporation shall pay the same, to the Bursar
of the University, to be expended as directed by the Corporation; that the corporation, acting through
its Board of Trustees, shall have the broadest investment discretion and special care should be taken
in the preparation of its charter to see that its powers are expressed in terms in conformity with
modern investment practice.

If such development fund corporation is organized, Mr. Gay concurs in the statements in this
report as to the manner of its creation, the selection of its director-trustees and the manner in which
they and the corporation shall function, but reserves for further consideration any expression of opinion
upon the question whether, in the over-all interest of the University, it is wise and expedient to create
at this time a new agency for holding and administering funds procured through the conduct of the campaign
presently being undertaken.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Buford Scott
/s/ William S. Hildreth
Thomas B. Gay, Chairman

13

Mr. Gay pointed out the problem of handling gifts received by the Alumni Association. Under
present trust agreement, all funds received by the Alumni Association must be paid to the present Alumni
Board of Trustees. He pointed out that no other Board of Trustees can be appointed by the Alumni Association
to receive funds. Mr. Gay believes conflict would result between new Development Fund Corporation
trustees and the present Alumni Board of Trustees. He recommended that the Board continue looking
for some other way to solve this problem.

Part of Mr. Gay's recommendation was deleted - that part providing for the Development Fund
Trustees to consult with the Board of Visitors concerning the expenditure of income of the Development
Fund.

Mr. Anderson stated that the present Alumni Board of Trustees has not actively solicited funds,
nor is it their duty to do so. The new Development Fund expects to continuously solicit funds with
definite goals to be attained.

Mr. Stettinius expressed the view that the Alumni Board of Trustees should be consulted.

President Darden stated he believed everything should be done to work through the present
Alumni Board of Trustees. He agreed to discuss with the Alumni Board of Trustees this whole problem on
December 6.