University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
2 occurrences of macinnis
[Clear Hits]

 
 
collapse section
 
 
collapse section
 
'Back To The Issues'
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 

2 occurrences of macinnis
[Clear Hits]

'Back To The Issues'

He said he felt it was time
to get back to the issues and
look for "someone most
qualified and competent."

"We feel the issue is at this
time to project the system to
the students," Mr. Berkeley
said.

"We propose personal
contact to expand the
informational sources
available," he said.

Commenting on why he
feels he and Mr. Morris are the
most qualified candidates, Mr.
Berkeley spoke of their
experience with honor trials.

Their involvement with the
resident staff program and the
University Union has given
them "a keen understanding on
how students feel on the
various issues," he said.

Mr. Miller said that he and
Mr. Friedman "believed the
Honor System should be
administered with a new
attitude–an attitude which is
positive and affirmative."

Their platform is an effort
to increase interaction between
students and the Honor
Committee and "to enhance
the viability of the system" he
said.

"It is the responsibility of
the Honor Committee to insure
that privileges extended to the
students are accorded," he
said.

Their proposed innovations
such as a hot line, increased
knowledge of the Honor
System for students and
faculty, a mock honor trial,
and a University-wide
referendum "have in mind a
more effective Honor System
and a more concerned Honor
Committee," Mr. Miller said.