University of Virginia Library


1

XI. THE HISTORY OF THE FORMER HAN DYNASTY

CHAPTER XI

EMPEROR HSIAO-AI

INTRODUCTION

Summary of the period

The short reign of Emperor Ai (7-1 B.C.) constituted a temporary
eclipse to the power of the Wang clan and Wang Mang. The Emperor
himself, a sickly young man, attempted to imitate the "strong" government
of Emperor Wu, but only succeeded in becoming a tool, first of his
grandmother and then of his favorite's family. As a result of the Emperor's
attempt to rule in person, the period is full of intrigues: concerning
the maternal relatives of the Emperor, concerning a certain revelation,
and concerning Tung Hsien2a. Attention is centered in the court; external
events continued to be uneventful. The influence of Han Confucianism,
which reached its apogee in the reign of Wang Mang, continued
to grow. This introduction will deal with the events and forces
necessary to understand the background of this chapter, matters which
are not explained in the chapter itself (for further details, cf. the Onomasticon
and Glossary). It, like the other imperial annals, is rather a
chronological summary than what occidentals would call a history.

The intrigues of Emperor Ai's various maternal relatives

The reign of Emperor Ch'eng had fixed, as a dynastic practise, the
Confucian principle of favoring imperial relatives (11: 4b). Relatives
on the paternal side, who were potential rivals for the imperial throne,
were given kingdoms or marquisates and were carefully watched. When
Emperor Ai was continually ill, the Queen of King Yang of Tung-p'ing,
Liu Yün2a, an imperial fourth cousin, who was descended from Emperor
Hsüan, was discovered to have made magical imprecations against the
Emperor, with the purpose of bringing her husband to the imperial throne.
She, her husband, and her uncle (who was an imperial physician) were
executed and the informers were ennobled. Imperial paternal relatives,
who might benefit from any harm done to the imperial person, were
ordinarily kept away from the court and drastically repressed. The
imperial power was thus left to the imperial maternal relatives.

Emperor Ai had however four sets of maternal relatives. The Wang
clan's power rested upon the fact that the mother of Emperor Ch'eng,


2

now entitled the Grand Empress Dowager nee Wang, was still alive.
She was the Emperor's adoptive grandmother and the head of the imperial
clan. Due to her influence, Wang Mang had been put in charge
of the government as Comander-in-chief just five months before
Emperor Ch'eng had died. The Chao clan owed its influence to Emperor
Ch'eng's second wife, the famous Chao Fei-yen. Emperor Ai had
nominally been made the son of Emperor Ch'eng; this lady was consequently
the Emperor's adoptive mother and was now made the Empress
Dowager. Her relatives were given noble titles and positions. Emperor
Ai had in addition his own maternal relatives. His grandmother, the
former imperial Brilliant Companion, now the Queen Dowager nee Fu,
had been Emperor Yüan's favorite, and her son, Liu K'ang1a, had become
the King of Ting-t'ao. His son, Liu Hsin5, now Emperor Ai, had been
born of a Concubine nee Ting, so that there was also a Ting clan. The
Fu and Ting clans, because they were out of the court, worked together,
opposing the Wang clan, which had entrenched itself in the court. Thus
the situation was ripe for abundant jealousies and intrigues.

The Chao clan was quickly eliminated. Within half a year, an industrious
Director of the Retainers dug up the facts about Emperor
Ch'eng's imperial infanticides (cf. HFHD, II, 369-72), which were due
to Chao Fei-yen's younger sister. This sister had previously committed
suicide, but, when the facts became known, they occasioned such a revulsion
that her male relatives were all dismissed from their positions
and titles and were exiled. Because of Emperor Ai's debt to the Empress
Dowager nee Chao, she was not touched and retained her title. Without
any male relatives in the court, she was helpless.

Before his death, Emperor Ch'eng had endeavored to prevent any
conflict between the various clans among the maternal relatives of his
successor by separating Liu Hsin5, the future Emperor Ai, from his own
family and restricting him to intercourse with the imperial family.
Emperor Ch'eng appointed Lin Ching3b, another descendant of Emperor
Hsüan, as the King of Ting-t'ao, to be the successor of Emperor Ai's
father, so that the new Emperor would not have any further obligation
to his natural father's clan. When Liu Hsin5 came to the capital as the
Imperial Heir-apparent, Emperor Ch'eng separated him from his actual
grandmother and mother, establishing them in the Lodge for the Princes
of Ting-t'ao, while Liu Hsin5 went to the Heir-apparent's palace. (We
may perhaps see Wang Mang's hand in these moves.) Emperor Ch'eng
was not even going to allow them to see Liu Hsin5, but the Empress
Dowager nee Wang reminded her son that Liu Hsin5 had been reared by
his grandmother, so that the Queen Dowager should have the privileges


3

given a nurse. She was accordingly allowed to visit her grandson
every ten days.

The Queen Dowager nee Fu was an indomitable and high-tempered
woman, who would not easily yield up her opportunity for power and
prestige. She was capable in intrigue and had previously almost succeeded
in having her son, Liu K'ang1a, made the Imperial Heir-apparent
in place of Emperor Ch'eng. She had taken her grandson away from his
mother and had raised him herself, teaching and directing him, thus
acquiring an ascendancy over him. She had paid large bribes to the
Wang and Chao clans, in order that her grandson should be preferred
as Heir-apparent over his cousin. Now she was not willing to lose the
opportunity of reaping her reward.

After Emperor Ch'eng's death, the future Emperor Ai found himself
without anyone in the court upon whom he could rely. It was filled
with the adherents of the Wang and Chao clans. Four days before he
took the throne, his maternal uncle, Ting Ming, and his maternal great-uncle,
Fu4 Yen, were enfeoffed as marquises. These ceremonies were performed
by the Queen Dowager nee Fu, who had no real authority to do so
(97 B: 20a). Since however these appointments would have been made
anyway, this illegality was not challenged, although there was some disapproval
of the Fu clan's greediness. Probably the Queen Dowager felt
these appointments were essential, in order that the new Emperor would
not be left without aid in the court; for an Emperor, without any courtiers
to recommend what he wanted done, would be helpless. The visits of his
grandmother were still limited to once every ten days, and his mother
was also allowed to make such visits. The two ladies were established in
Kuei Palace, in another part of the city, two miles distant. This palace
was however connected by a private elevated passageway with Wei-yang
Palace (where the Emperor lived), so that it was possible to go from one
to the other without making a formal royal progress. The Queen Dowager
nee Fu accordingly went morning and evening by this elevated
passageway to the Emperor, instructing and advising him. A steadfast
refusal of his grandmother's wishes would have been unthinkable, for it
would have violated the Confucian principle of filial piety, in which all
noble children were trained. Thereafter the Ting and Fu clans needed
only to discover and report the faults of those who stood in their way, in
order to achieve control over the court.

As soon as Emperor Ai came to the throne, the Empress Dowager nee
Wang tactfully ordered Wang Mang, who had previously controlled the
government, to resign. He did so, but Emperor Ai could not permit his
predecessor's chief minister to resign immediately, for such an act would


4

have implied that the new ruler would not filially continue the policies
of his predecessor. So Wang Mang (who probably expected such a result
and may have instigated the Empress Dowager's action) was continued
in office.

Then strife arose concerning precedence between the Emperor's actual
grandmother, the Queen Dowager nee Fu, and his nominal grandmother,
the Grand Empress Dowager nee Wang. An official memorialized that,
according to classical principles, a mother should receive honor when her
son becomes honorable, so that the Emperor's mother should receive an
imperial title. Shih1 Tan and Wang Mang however opposed the proposal,
and Emperor Ai did not want immediately to go contrary to the advice
of his highest ministers, so let the matter drop. Instead of that, Emperor
Ch'eng's old officials, who had been put in power by the Wang clan, were
dropped one by one, being accused of some crime or other. When Wang
Mang saw that he had incurred the enmity of the Queen Dowager nee Fu,
he again asked to resign. This time he was allowed to do so and was
asked to remain at the court with high honors, but no official post. Two
years later he was sent away from the court to his estates. The Grand
Empress Dowager nee Wang, who was not herself aggressive or interested
in politics, was not interfered with. The titles of the Queen Dowager nee
Fu and the Concubine nee Ting were raised.

Fu Hsi, a paternal cousin of the Queen Dowager and the ablest member
of the Fu clan, succeeded Wang Mang as Commander-in-chief. When
he opposed female influence in the government and refused to raise the
titles of the Emperor's mother and grandmother still further, he too was
dismissed from his position and sent away from the court. As one after
another of the court officials were removed, the Emperor's mother and
grandmother were given higher and higher titles, until there were four
Empresses Dowager in the court: nee Wang, nee Chao, nee Fu, and nee
Ting. The latter died in 5 B.C.; two years later the Empress Dowager
nee Fu was at last given the same title as her former rival, the Grand
Empress Dowager nee Wang; both ladies had borne sons to Emperor
Yüan. The Grand Empress Dowager nee Fu had previously succeeded
in legally murdering her other former rival for Emperor Yüan's favor,
the Queen Dowager nee Feng of Chung-shan. This active and ambitious
Empress Dowager thus triumphed over those who held to a strict construction
of proprieties (the Confucians who had tried to prevent her
elevation), but she died a year later. Meanwhile the clans of the Emperor's
mother and grandmother had been highly honored: the Ting clan
counted among its members two marquises, one Commander-in-chief, six
generals, ministers, and officials ranking at two thousand piculs, and more


5

than ten Palace Attendants and Division Heads. The Fu clan (including
the Chang clan, that of the Empress Dowager nee Fu's half-brother)
numbered among its members six marquises, two Commander-in-chiefs,
six ministers or officials ranking at two thousand piculs, and more than
ten Palace Attendants or Division Heads. These high officials of course
distributed positions liberally to their henchmen and relatives. Thus a
spoils system was put into full play in ancient China by the maternal
relatives of the emperor.

Emperor Ai's strong rule and his execution of Wang Chia1a

In his government, Emperor Ai imitated Emperor Wu by not retaining
any official in office for long, and by executing several of them. In this
short period of six years, there were five Lieutenant Chancellors, seven
Commanders-in-chief, and eleven Grandee Secretaries. Two Lieutenant
Chancellors and one Grandee Secretary were executed. The most flagrant
case was that of Wang Chia1a (not a member of Wang Mang's clan).
He was an honest, self-respecting, and capable official, who opposed
Emperor Ai's desire to advance and enrich his favorite, Tung Hsien2a.
When the treason of the Emperor's fourth cousin, Liu Yün2a, was reported,
Emperor Ai substituted the name of Tung Hsien2a for that of the
person who had transmitted this information, thus obtaining an excuse
for ennobling his favorite. Later the Emperor sent an order to the
Lieutenant Chancellor and Grandee Secretary to make Tung Hsien2a a
full marquis. These officials however knew the (unwritten) constitutional
practise, that the Emperor can only act on the motion of his high
ministers, and refused to make the necessary recommendations. The
Emperor was thus blocked. But in a few months he issued an edict
making this enfeoffment. Thus Emperor Ai, following the example of
Emperor Wu, broke down this important provision in the Han constitution.
When the Empress Dowager nee Fu died, Emperor Ai sent to
these two highest ministers her testamentary edict, which ordered the
granting of estates to her relatives and to Tung Hsien2a. Wang Chia1a
sealed and returned this edict to the Emperor, probably because he suspected
that the name of Tung Hsien2a was a forgery, thus again blocking
the Emperor. When the Commandant of Justice and others had investigated
Liu Yün2a, they concluded that this King was innocent, and
ordered him tried again. Emperor Ai thought that they were trying to
curry favor with the King, and dismissed them. A few months later
there was a general amnesty, after which Wang Chia1a recommended the
dismissed Commandant of Justice and his associates for official position.
That was too much for Emperor Ai. He charged Wang Chia1a with having


6

been unjust and with attempting to mislead the throne. The case
was committed to the important courtiers. Some fifty, including K'ung
Kuang, who then had high hopes of being again made Lieutenant Chancellor,
supported the Emperor's charges; ten recommended mercy.

A century earlier, a high spirited noble would have taken poison rather
than go to jail; but that chivalric age had passed. Wang Chia1a was a
high-minded Confucian; his conscience was clear and he recognized that
he had acted for the best interests of the state. He refused the poison
his subordinates offered him and went to jail. Emperor Ai was angry
that this stubborn minister should have thus again blocked his efforts to
put him out of the way, and sent a committee of high officials to argue
him down. But Wang Chia1a justified his actions and condemned Tung
Hsien2a and his relatives as flatterers. The dismissed minister was starved
in prison and died twenty days later. A prison sentence was then frequently
merely a milder form of capital punishment than public execution.
Martyrs for their moral convictions were not lacking among Han Confucians.
After Emperor Ai's death, Wang Mang ordered Wang Chia1a
listed as a faithful minister, restored his marquisate to his son, and gave
him the posthumous name, Faithful (Marquis Chung).

Supernatural revelations influence governmental policy

This reign witnessed the appearance of revelations or oracle books
(ch'an) that affected government policy. These revelations were a
natural development from the Confucian practise of interpreting visitations
and portents as having a meaning for government policies. The
theory of the five powers as determining history was first elaborated by
Tsou Yen (iv cent. B.C.), and became popular in Confucian circles
through its appearance in the "Great Plan," which became a chapter in
the Book of History. This theory had as one of its consequences the
doctrine that dynasties rise and fall in accordance with the dominating
power. After the Han dynasty had been on the throne for a century
and its virtual collapse during the last years of Emperor Wu's reign,
people accordingly began to speculate what would be the next dynasty.
In 78 B.C., Kuei Hung, who had studied Tung Chung-shu's interpretation
of the Kung-yang Commentary and who was then a minor court official,
interpreted a portent as indicating the end of the Han dynasty and the
appearance of a new dynasty with the surname Kung-yang. He was
executed for treason, but speculation continued. One belief was that
3 × 70 = 210 years was the period a dynasty endured, which era,
counting from 206 B.C., would end in A.D. 4 (cf. 99 A: n. 34.5). In
the reign of Emperor Ch'eng, a certain Kan Chung-k'o from the Ch'i


7

commandery wrote a book in twelve chapters, which he said was a revelation
from a spirit named the Essence of the Red Lord (Ch'ih-ching-tzu),
by whose power Emperor Kao had killed the serpent blocking his path
(HS 1 A: 7a) and had seated his dynasty on the throne. In this book,
Kan Chung-k'o evidently reasoned, on a calendrical basis, that the Han
dynasty, if it was to continue, must again receive a mandate from Heaven,
and asserted that the Essence of the Red Lord had come down to teach
the dynasty how to secure this mandate. Kan Chung-k'o was thus supporting
the Han dynasty against interpretations like that of Kuei Hung.
Kan Chung-k'o's book seems to have been the first of the "revelations."
(Kuei Hung was later said to have written a book of revelations, which
did not appear until the first century A.D., when a pretender surnamed
Kung-sun appeared, so that this book was probably a forgery.) Liu
Hsiang4a had been asked by Emperor Ch'eng to report on the correctness
of this revelation. He had memorialized that this doctrine was not
classical, and was an attempt to deceive the Emperor and to mislead the
crowd. Kan Chung-k'o was imprisoned, tortured, and died; his disciples
were dismissed from office.

When it was discovered that Emperor Ch'eng had killed his own infant
sons, thus leaving himself without a natural heir, and when sundry
portents occurred, people came increasingly to feel that the Han dynasty
had actually decayed. This opinion was confirmed by the fact that Emperor
Ai was continually ill, with some disease like arthritis, and also
that he had no natural heir. He was told about Kan Chung-k'o's revelation.
The matter was submitted to Liu Hsiang4a's son, Liu Hsin1a, who
again condemned the doctrine as unclassical. Other courtiers, however,
supported this new teaching, and Emperor Ai summoned Kan Chung-k'o's
chief disciples to several audiences. They told the Emperor that he
should change the year-period and take a new title, whereby he would
secure lengthened life and an heir, as well as freedom from his illness, etc.
On July 13, 5 B.C., he followed their advice, taking new, long, and
flowery names.

A month later, the bearers of the revelation, emboldened by their
success, proposed further changes. They now said that the highest
ministers should be dismissed, and those courtiers who had supported the
revelation should be given the vacant positions. That was too much for
the ministers. Emperor Ai's illness had not improved, so that the supporters
of the revelation could not point to any verification of their
promises. The Emperor was persuaded that the revelation was groundless;
he rescinded his edict and committed Kan Chung-k'o's disciples to
the officials; these disciples were sentenced for having deceived the Emperor,


8

an inhuman crime, and were executed. This incident marks the
first important influence upon government policies by revelations, which
were to play such a large part in the reign of Wang Mang and later times.

The popular cult of the Mother Queen of the West

The popular excitement in the spring and summer of 3 B.C., connected
with the worship of the Mother Queen of the West (Hsi-wang-mu), deserves
careful notice. Unfortunately we know little about it; all the
relevant passages are to be found in the text and notes under this date.
The Mother Queen of the West figures in ancient Chinese legends and
grave-sculptures before and after this date. She was then supposed to be
an immortal, dwelling in the far western K'un-lun Mountains, in a grotto
inside a metal house in a stone city, and to have three green birds who
brought her food to this desert place. She had a human body, a leopard's
tail, tiger's teeth, which latter were good for whistling, and brilliant
white tangled hair, in which she wore a peculiar high jade hair-ornament.
She was probably now represented as offering to her devotees a means of
escaping death from starvation and becoming as immortal as she was.

This incident seems to have been a soteriological religion promising
immortality, in many respects similar to the Bacchic religion of ancient
Greece. The drought brought it popularity. The present Shantung,
where it started, is still susceptible to this sort of ecstatic, revivalistic
religious agitation. It did not affect the bureaucracy or court, hence is
merely mentioned in the History as a curious incident, a portent requiring
explanation.

Tung Hsien2a's meteoric rise and fall

The rise of Tung Hsien2a shows how far a completely worthless person
could go by imperial favor. He was merely a handsome and pliable lad
in the Heir-apparent's suite, who was made a Gentleman when Emperor
Ai came to the throne, and became the Emperor's catamite. He was
promoted from one post to another, all the while continuing in personal
attendance upon the Emperor. In the course of ten months, he had
accumulated a hundred million cash in grants and rewards. When he
did not leave the Palace on the regular days for vacation, the Emperor
arranged that Tung Hsien2a's wife might enter the palace inner apartments,
with the result that his wife and children lived there. The Emperor took
Tung Hsien2a's younger sister as a Brilliant Companion, giving her the
rank next to the Empress. Tung Hsien2a, his wife, or his sister were continually
in attendance upon the Emperor. His father was made a minister
and noble; his father-in-law and brother were given court positions;


9

a large and splendid residence was built for him just outside the palace
portal and a splendid burial place was prepared beside the imperial tomb.
Jewels and weapons were given him from the palace workshops, even
better ones than those the Emperor secured. By an imperial forgery, he
was given a marquisate and an estate. When Wang Chia1a opposed this
proposed enfeoffment. he was removed and finally executed.

The Emperor's maternal uncle, Ting Ming, was Commander-in-chief,
and he too disapproved of Tung Hsien2a. Emperor Ai dismissed this
minister and also retired Fu4 Yen, the imperial great-uncle. Thus the
Emperor's infatuation with a boy led him to break with both his own
maternal clans. He was thus left without any loyal followers in the
court except the Tung clan. The latter clan contained no one of ability.
It seems not to have been interested in politics except to enrich itself.
Tung Hsien2a was finally made Commander-in-chief, the controlling position
in the ministry, although he was only in his twenty-second year.
His younger brother was given Tung Hsien2a's former position and the
whole Tung clan were made Palace Attendants, Division Chiefs, etc.,
receiving greater favors than had even been bestowed upon the Emperor's
maternal clans. The Emperor seems even to have come to believe that
the Han dynasty, because of the succession of the elements, must inevitably
be soon succeeded by a different dynasty (cf. Ku Chieh-Kang,
Ku-shih-pien, V, 465-77). Once, at a feast, the Emperor even calmly
talked about resigning the throne to his favorite. Wang Hung, a cousin
of Wang Mang, happened to be in attendance. He immediately remonstrated,
telling the Emperor that the empire was no plaything, for it had
been received from his ancestors and must be transmitted to his descendants,
thus invoking the Confucian exaltation of filial piety. Emperor Ai
was plainly displeased, at which circumstance the imperial attendants
were frightened and Wang Hung left the room. Thus imperial infatuation
was carried to the extreme.

When Emperor Ai died suddenly without an heir and without having
appointed a successor, his mother and grandmother had previously died
and his maternal relatives had been deprived of their positions, possibly
because the Emperor continued to hope that Tung Hsien2a would inaugurate
a new dynasty. But the latter was wholly incapable of doing so,
even though he possessed the imperial seals of office. The imperial
authority naturally reverted to the Grand Empress Dowager nee Wang,
the senior of the two surviving Empress Dowagers. During his last
years, after Emperor Ai had broken with his maternal clans, he had begun
recalling the Confucians whom he had displaced from their positions when
he took the throne. At this time Wang Mang had been praised by those


10

who took the civil service examinations, so that he had been recalled to
the capital and had been there during the last year of Emperor Ai's
reign, without however being given a post.

On the day of the imperial death, the Grand Empress Dowager, who
probably had previously been instructed what to do, immediately went
to the emperor's palace and collected the imperial seals of state. Thereby
she took to herself the imperial authority. She then asked Tung Hsien2a
about the regulations for imperial mourning, which he, as the highest
minister, would be required to conduct. The young man was distraught
and in all likelihood completely ignorant of such matters, so could only
beg her pardon. She remarked that Wang Mang had previously conducted
the mourning for Emperor Ch'eng and sent a messenger galloping
to summon him.

Wang Mang, like most of the other courtiers, could not endure Tung
Hsien2a. The latter was now impeached for negligence in caring for the
Emperor and imprisoned in the palace. He had no influential friends
outside of his own clan. Wang Mang then told the Grand Empress
Dowager that public opinion disapproved of the favorite. The day after
the emperor died, Wang Mang had her order Tung Hsien2a dismissed
from his position and sent to his residence. The latter and his relatives
were so frightened that, on the same day, both he and his wife committed
suicide in order to save the rest of their clan. The two were buried that
same night. The whole Tung clan were dismissed from their positions
and exiled, and their wealth sold. It amounted to 4,300,000,000 cash.
Tung Hsien2a's body was exhumed, stripped, and reburied meanly. Thus
the imperial favorite received his reward.

The influence of Confucianism

During this period, the influence of Confucianism continued unabated.
The high officials continued to be Confucians. Learned men were recommended
for the highest posts. There came indeed to be two parties in
the imperial court: the Fu and Ting clans, who defended their positions
and sought wealth and influence, and the Confucians (to whom Wang
Mang belonged), who comprised the bulk of the bureaucracy and stood
for a strict construction of court proprieties and for moral ideals. In
spite of this division, Confucian influence continued to be strong, for the
imperial maternal relatives owed their influence to the Confucian teaching
of favoring one's relatives, hence, even when they dismissed the Confucians
from high office, they continued to cultivate Confucianism and favor
those Confucians who would accord with them. There was no thought,
on the part of any important personage, of changing from Confucianism
to any other philosophy.

K'ung Kuang, a lineal descendant of Confucius and one of the great


11

scholars of the empire, was installed as Lieutenant Chancellor on the day
Emperor Ch'eng died; he was dismissed in two years, because he opposed
the raising of the Empress Dowager nee Fu's title. Three years later, he
was recalled to court when she died, and was soon reappointed to his old
post. He had meanwhile learned to be more pliable to the Emperor's
wishes, lending his consent to the condemnation of Wang Chia1a and
treating Tung Hsien2a deferentially. A very learned Confucian who was
at the same time a lineal descendant of Confucius could not be neglected,
for such a person would be an ornament to any Chinese court. The post
of Commander-in-chief, which actually dominated the government, was,
however, except for brief intervals, kept in the hands of imperial relatives
or of the imperial favorite, Tung Hsien2a. Through his concurrent
position as Intendant of the Affairs of the Masters of Writing, the Commander-in-chief
controlled the most important source of imperial information.
Under Emperor Ai, this control was not as important as previously,
for the Empress Dowager nee Fu and Tung Hsien2a both had direct access
of the imperial person. Thus Confucian influence, while important, was
partly checked by the imperial maternal relatives and favorite.

Confucian influence also showed itself in certain reforms. The practise
of mourning for a parent to the third year was revived (cf. App. I). An
attempt was made to restrict the amount of land and slaves one person
could own (11: 2b, 3a). This edict was however tabled because the imperial
maternal relatives and favorite found it inconvenient. At the
same time certain imperial ateliers were abolished and a few other
humanitarian laws were enacted (11: 3a, b). A new ruler was expected
to show his devotion to Confucian principles in his government, and reforms
such as these were enacted because Confucians urged them. The
Wang clan, not to be outdone, distributed its private fields to the poor
people (11: 4a); but this does not mean that they gave up the estates from
which their income as marquises was derived—their estates were government,
not private fields. Their generosity was probably limited to their
lands near the capital, rents from which (at least part of which were paid
in grain) would be more convenient for a court official than income from
distant estates in the provinces. Wang Mang may have foreseen that
he would eventually be exiled from the court; this generous gift aided
greatly in inducing people to urge the recall of Wang Mang, four years
later.

A temporary rectification of high official titles, following
classical models

The most interesting effect of Confucianism was the change of official
titles—a phenomenon that became pronounced under Wang Mang. A
cardinal Confucian principle was the imitation of ancient practises.


12

About 8 B.C., Ho Wu, who was then Grandee Secretary, memorialized
that in ancient times, when life was simple, government business was
divided among the three highest ministers (San-kung), whereas now,
when there were not available officials who had as great ability as those
of ancient times, the duties of the three ancient highest ministers were
concentrated in the hands of the Lieutenant Chancellor. He suggested
the appointment of the three highest ministers as in ancient times (83:
13b). Emperor Ch'eng asked Chang Yü3a, a retired Lieutenant Chancellor
and Confucian, about the matter; the latter agreed, whereupon the
title of Grandee Secretary was changed to Grand Minister of Works, and
he was given the same salary and rank as the Lieutenant Chancellor and
Commander-in-chief. There probably was at the same time also a division
of responsibility, so that some of the Lieutenant Chancellor's duties
were given to the Grand Minister of Works.

But many who discussed the matter said that ancient and present times
required different institutions and that the Han official titles, from that
of the Emperor down to that of the Accessory Officials, were different
from those of ancient times, so that a change in merely the titles and
duties of the three highest officials would make no difference in the quality
of the government (83: 14a). After the Confucian Ho Wu had been dismissed
for lack of filial piety, and Chu Po, an adherent of the Fu clan,
became Grand Minister of Works, he memorialized that dynasties do not
need to imitate one another, that when Emperor Kao received the Mandate
of Heaven to found the Han dynasty, he had established a Grandee
Secretary as second in rank to the Lieutenant Chancellor and had given
him the duty of correcting the laws and institutes, with the result that
the empire had now been calm for two centuries. Hence the change of
Grandee Secretary to Grand Minister of Works would not secure the
blessing of Heaven. So he recommended that titles be changed back
again (83: 14b). Emperor Ai accordingly made the change, and in 5 B.C.
installed Chu Po as Grandee Secretary.

The Han dynasty had adopted the practise of the Ch'in dynasty in
dividing the country into counties (hsien) and grouping these into commanderies
(chün), each containing about a dozen prefectures or more,
over which there was set a Commandery Administrator to act as satrap
of the region, usually with the rank of two thousand piculs. In 106 B.C.,
Emperor Wu had grouped these commanderies into thirteen divisions or
provinces (chou), and appointed to each province an Inspector of a
Regional Division (Pu-tz'u-shih), with the rank of six hundred piculs,
whose business it was to make the circuit of his commanderies and report
any irregularities. Feudal kingdoms (which later became smaller than


13

commanderies) were governed by a Chancellor (Hsiang), who was appointed
by the imperial court, so that there had come to be little difference,
outside of titles, between the government of commanderies and of
kingdoms. Both were supervised by the same Inspectors.

In 8 B.C., Ho Wu memorialized that this Han practise was contrary
to Confucian classical principles, according to which the superior should
govern the inferior, not the reverse. So he had Emperor Ch'eng change
the Inspectors to Provincial Shepherds (Chou-mu), a title taken from the
Book of History, and rank them at fully two thousand piculs, so that
their rank should be higher than that of Administrators.

Two years later (6 B.C.), Chu Po however pointed out that when
Inspectors ranked lower than Administrators, the former had been stimulated
to activity by the hope of being promoted to be one of the 103
Administrators or Chancellors, so that an efficient Inspector had had
lively hopes of promotion. But when these officials became Shepherds
and were given a high rank, they had available for promotion only the
dozen ministerial positions at the imperial court. Consequently they lost
their incentive to activity; the better ones merely guarded themselves
for fear of committing a fault and sullying their record, while the wicked
ones were unrestrained, since there was no one to watch them. Local
administrations were consequently left without supervision and government
degenerated. So Chu Po recommended the abolition of Shepherds
and the restoration of the Inspectors. This change was made in
5 B.C. Thus the practical bureaucrat showed more wisdom than the
Confucian. One of the reasons for the inefficiency of Wang Mang's
provincial administration was undoubtedly that he reestablished Provincial
Shepherds in order to accord with classical Confucian ideas.

When an eclipse of the sun happened on a New Year's day (Feb. 5,
2 B.C.), followed within a month by the death of the Empress Dowager
nee Fu, Emperor Ai was deeply impressed, and in that very month summoned
K'ung Kuang back to court, asking him to explain the portent.
The latter said that government matters had not been right and should
be reformed (81: 19a-20a). Since the Emperor's grandmother was no
longer alive and the Emperor had broken with his maternal clans, while
the Tung clan showed no disposition to interfere in government policies,
Emperor Ai turned to the Confucians again, recalling those whom he had
dismissed at the beginning of his reign. When, a year later, a second
solar eclipse occurred, Emperor Ai interpreted it as a warning and,
through Confucian influence, restored the arrangement under which
government control was divided among the three ancient highest ministers.
In the scholastic interest of uniformity, a new title was also given


14

to the Lieutenant Chancellor, and these three officials were now entitled
Ta-szu-t'u (Grand Minister Over the Masses), Ta-szu-ma (Commander-in-chief),
and Ta-szu-k'ung (Grand Minister of Works). This arrangement
did not last long, for Emperor Ai died within a month and in the
next year Wang Mang changed these titles again. The change is however
interesting as showing that the tendency to change titles and to adopt
ancient phraseology and ancient governmental arrangements was inherent
in Han Confucianism, and that Wang Mang merely took it from
that powerful current of influence.


15

THE BOOK OF THE [FORMER] HAN [DYNASTY]

Chapter XI
THE ELEVENTH [IMPERIAL ANNALS]

The Annals of [Emperor Hsaio]-ai

Emperor Hsiao-ai was the grandson of Emperor
Yüan by a concubine and the son of King Kung of
Ting-t'ao, [Liu K'ang1a]. His mother was the Concubine
[nee] Ting. When he was in his third year,

22 B.C.[2]
he succeeded [his father] and was set up as King.
When he grew up, he delighted in words and phrases
and in the laws and statutes.[3]

In [the period] Yüan-yen, the fourth year, he came

9 B.C.
[to Ch'ang-an] to pay court, followed by all [his high
officials], his Tutor, his Chancellor, and his Commandant
of the Capital. At that time the youngest
brother of Emperor Ch'eng, King Hsiao of Chung-shan,
[Liu Hsing], also came to pay court, followed
[only] by his Tutor. The Emperor thought it
strange, and asked [Liu Hsin5, the future Emperor
Ai], about it. The King of Ting-t'ao, [Liu Hsin5]
replied, "According to the [imperial] ordinances, when
vassal kings come to pay court, they are permitted
to be accompanied by the [officials ranking at] two
thousand piculs in their kingdoms. The Tutor,
Chancellor, and Commandant of the Capital are all
[officials ranking at] two thousand piculs in a kingdom,
hence I am accompanied by them all." The
Emperor ordered him to recite from the Book of Odes,
and he understood and was versed in it, and was able
to explain it.

On another day, [the Emperor] asked the King of
Chung-shan, [Liu Hsing], in what law or ordinance


16

9 B.C.

[it was ordered that he should be] accompanied only

11: 1a, b


by his tutor, and he was unable to reply. [The
Emperor] ordered him to recite from the Book of
History,
and he broke off [in the middle of his recitation].
Moreover, [at an imperial feast], when he had
been granted food in the presence of [the Emperor],
he was the last to finish eating; when he arose, his
stockings came down, [for] their ties had become
1b[8]
loosened. Because of these [facts], Emperor Ch'eng
1b[10]
considered that he was incapable, and esteemed the
King of Ting-t'ao, [Liu Hsin5], as capable, often
exalting his abilities.

At this time the grandmother of the King, the

1b[12]
Queen Dowager [of Ting-t'ao, nee] Fu, had come
with the King to pay court, and privately sent
presents to the Brilliant Companion [nee] Chao,
whom the Emperor favored, and to the Emperor's
maternal uncle, the General of Agile Cavalry and
Marquis of Ch'ü-yang, Wang Ken. The Brilliant
Companion [nee Chao] and [Wang] Ken saw that
the Emperor had no sons, and also wished beforehand
to attach themselves [to the coming ruler] by a plan
for the distant future, so both in turn praised the
King of Ting-t'ao and urged the Emperor to make
him his successor. Emperor Ch'eng of his own volition
also exalted [Liu Hsin5's] ability, and, after
having put the bonnet of virility upon him, sent him
9 B.C.
[back to his kingdom]. At that time he had
[reached] his seventeenth year.

8 B.C.
The next year, [the Emperor] sent the Bearer of
Mar. 20[16]
the Gilded Mace, Jen Hung, as Acting Grand Herald,
with credentials, to summon the King of Ting-t'ao to
[come and] be established as the Imperial Heir-apparent.
[Liu Hsin5 however] excused himself,
saying, "Your servant has been favored in being

17

11: 1b, 2a

permitted to succeed his father in charge of a tribu-

8 B.C.


tary [kingdom] and to become a vassal king. My
ability and nature is inadequate for use as the occupant
of the Heir-apparent's palace. Your Majesty
is sage and virtuous, generous and benevolent.
[Your Majesty] has respectfully succeeded his ancestors
and has upheld and been obedient in the care
of the gods in heaven and earth. It is proper that
your [Majesty] should receive happiness and blessing
thru the reward of `thousands and millions of descendants.'[19]
Your servant is willing temporarily to be
2a
permitted to remain in the prince's lodge of his
kingdom [at the imperial capital], morning and evening
to present himself [to your Majesty] to ask [about
your Majesty's] health, and to wait until there may
be an imperial heir, [whereupon your servant] will
return to his kingdom and [remain] in charge of his
tributary [state]." When the memorial was presented,
the Son of Heaven replied, "[We] have
heard it."[21]

More than a month later, [Emperor Ch'eng]

Dec.[23]
established [Liu] Ching3b, a grandson of King Hsiao
of Ch'u, [Liu Ao], as King of Ting-t'ao, to uphold
the sacrifices to King Kung [of Ting-t'ao, Liu K'ang],
in order to encourage and incite the Heir-apparent
to apply himself solely to the purpose of being [the
97B: 17a
Emperor's] successor. A discussion is in the "Memoir
2a
of the [Imperial] Relatives by Marriage."
7 B.C.

In [the period] Sui-ho, the second year, the third

II
month, Emperor Ch'eng died, and in the fourth
2a[29]
Apr. 17
month, on [the day] ping-wu, the Heir-apparent took
May 7

18

7 B.C.

the imperial throne and presented himself in the

11: 2a


Temple of [Emperor] Kao. He honored the Empress
Dowager [nee Wang] with the title, Grand August
Empress Dowager, and the Empress [nee Chao] with
May 17[35]
the title, Empress Dowager. He [granted] a general
amnesty to the empire, granted one quadriga of
horses to each king's son of the imperial house who
was enregistered,[36] to the officials and common
people, noble ranks, to [each] hundred households,
an ox and wine, and to the Thrice Venerable, the
Filially Pious, the Fraternally Respectful, the [Diligent]
Cultivators of the Fields, widowers, widows,
orphans, and childless, silk.

The Grand Empress Dowager [nee Wang] issued
an imperial edict honoring King Kung of Ting-t'ao,
[Liu K'ang], as Sovereign Kung [of Ting-t'ao]. In

June 16
the fifth month, on [the day] ping-hsü, [the Emperor]
established the Empress nee Fu [as Empress]. An
imperial edict said, "[According to the principle of]
the Spring and Autumn, [in the Kung-yang Commentary]
that `a mother becomes honorable because of
2b
her son,'[39] [We] honor the Queen Dowager [nee Fu]
of Ting-t'ao with the title, Empress Dowager Kung,
and the Concubine [nee] Ting [of Ting-t'ao with the
title, Empress Kung, and establish for each an entourage,
a Supervisor of the Household, and the

19

11: 2a

income of an estate, like [the occupants of] the

7 B.C.


Ch'ang-hsin Palace and the Inner Palace.[42] [We]
posthumously honor the father of [the Empress
Dowager nee] Fu as the Marquis [through Whom the
Emperor] Renders Homage to an Ancestor, and the
father of [the Empress nee] Ting as the Marquis in
Recompense to his Virtue." The maternal uncle [of
the Emperor], Ting Ming, had been made the Marquis
May 3[44]
of Yang-an, his maternal uncle's son, [Ting]
Man, was made Marquis of Ping-chou, and [Ting]
June 19[46]
Man's father, [Ting] Chung, was posthumously
[granted] the posthumous name, Marquis Huai of
P'ing-chou. The Empress [nee Fu's] father, [Fu4]
Yen, had become the Marquis of K'ung-hsiang, and
May 3[48]
the younger brother of the Empress Dowager [nee
Chao], the Palace Attendant and Imperial Household
Grandee Chao Ch'inb, became the Marquis of
June 22[50]
Hsin-ch'eng.[51]

In the sixth month, an imperial edict said, " `The

July
melodies of Cheng are licentious'[53] and bring disorder
into music. They were banished by the Sage-kings.[55]
2b
Let the Bureau of Music be abolished."

For the Marquis of Ch'ü-yang, [Wang] Ken, who


20

7 B.C.

had previously as Commander-in-chief initiated the

11: 2a, b


plan for [the dynasty's] gods of the soils and grains,
[whereby Emperor Ai had been appointed Heir-apparent],
there was added to his enfeoffment [the
2b
income of] two thousand households, and for the
Grand Coachman, the Marquis of An-yang, [Wang]
Shun4b, who had seconded and guided [the Emperor
before he was appointed] and had been his former
benefactor, there was added to his enfeoffment [the
income of] five hundred households. Moreover, for
the Lieutenant Chancellor, K'ung Kuang, and the
Grand Minister of Works, the Marquis of Fan-hsiang,
3a
Ho Wu, there was added to each of their
enfeoffments [the income of] a thousand households.[60]

An imperial edict said, "The King of Ho-chien,
[Liu] Liang, has mourned for his Queen Dowager to
the third year and so has become a sign-post to the
imperial house.[61] Let his enfeoffment be increased


21

11: 2b, 3a

by ten thousand households."

7 B.C.

It also said, " `Frugality in expenditure and caution
in action,'[64] in order to prevent extravagance
and excess, are the first things in government and
the unvarying way of all the [true] kings. [But]
the vassal kings, the full marquises, the princesses,
and the officials [ranking at] two thousand piculs,
together with powerful and rich common people,
keep [many] male and female slaves, cultivated fields
and residences without limit. They compete with
the common people in profitable [enterprises] so the
people lose their occupations and suffer severely
without enough [to live on]. Let regulations for the
restriction [of these matters] be discussed."[65]

The high officials memorialized detailed [regulations

3a
as follows], "The vassal kings and full marquises
are to be permitted to own private cultivated
fields in their states; the privately owned cultivated
fields in the prefectures or marches of full marquises
who [live] in Ch'ang-an and of princesses and the privately
owned cultivated fields of Marquises of the
Imperial Domain, officials, and common people are

22

7 B.C.

3a
all not to be allowed to exceed thirty ch'ing.[69] The

11: 3a


male and female slaves of the vassal kings [shall be
limited to] two hundred persons; those of full marquises
3b
and princesses, to a hundred persons; and those
of Marquises of the Imperial Domain, officials, and
the common people, to thirty persons. Those
[slaves] in their sixtieth year and over or in their
tenth year and under are not to be counted in this
number. No merchants are to be allowed to own
private cultivated land or become officials.[72] Those
who violate [this order] shall be sentenced according
to the Code. Those who [after three years] own
private cultivated land or keep male or female slaves
more than the [allowed] number, shall all have them

23

11: 3a

confiscated and delivered over the imperial govern-

7 B.C.


ment."

[The production of] those articles in the Three
Offices for Garments in the Ch'i [Commandery] and
in various offices which weave figured silks and
[make] embroidery, which are difficult to produce or
are injurious to women's work,[75] were all stopped and
[such goods] were not to be made or transported [to
the capital]. The ordinance [concerning] the giving
of office to a son[76] was done away with, together with


24

7 B.C.

the laws about slandering [the government][78] and

11: 3a, b


3b
calumny. Palace Maids in the Lateral Courts [of
the Wei-yang Palace] who were in their thirtieth
year and under were sent out [of the harem] and
married off; government male and female slaves who
were in their fiftieth year and above were freed and
made commoners. The prohibition [was made] that
the commanderies and kingdoms should not be permitted
to present famous wild animals [to the imperial
court]. The salaries of officials [ranking at]
three hundred piculs[81] and under was increased.
Officials who were oppressive or tyrannical were investigated
in order that from time to time they
might be dismissed. The high officials were not permitted
to bring up former matters that had happened
previous to an amnesty.[82] When the fathers or
mothers of Erudits or their Disciples died, they were
4a
given leave for mourning to the third year.[84]

Autumn
In the autumn, [it was decided that] the Marquis
of Ch'ü-yang, Wang Ken, and the Marquis of Ch'eng-tu,

25

11: 3b, 4a

Wang K'uang4a, had both committed crimes;

7 B.C.


[Wang] Ken went to his estate; [Wang] K'uang4a
3b
was dismissed [from his title] and became a commoner,
returning to his native commandery.[89]

An imperial edict said, "Since We have succeeded
to the heavy [responsibilities] of the [imperial] ancestral
temples, [We] have been trembling and circumspect,
fearing that [We] might depart from the
will of Heaven. [But] recently the sun and moon
have lost their brilliance, the five planets have lost
their paths, and the commanderies and kingdoms
have frequently [suffered from] movements of the
Earth.[90] Recently in the Ho-nan and Ying-ch'uan
Commanderies, streams have overflowed and have
carried away and killed some of the common people,

4a

26

7, 6 B.C.

ruining and demolishing[93] their cottages. [Owing

11: 4a


to] Our lack of virtue, the common people have
suffered punishment in [Our] place. We have been
greatly dismayed and have already sent an Imperial
Household Grandee to travel about, inspect, and
report [the names] and registration [in which those
who have suffered are located], granting for each
dead person three thousand cash for a coffin. Let it
be ordered that in the counties and towns which
have been injured by flood, together with those other
commanderies and kingdoms which have suffered
four-tenths or more from a [calamitous] visitation,
the common people whose property does not [amount
to] fully 100,000 [cash] shall all not [be required] to
pay this year's land-tax or poll-taxes."[95]

I
In [the period] Chien-p'ing, the first year, in the
6 B.C.
spring, the first month, an amnesty [was granted] to
Feb./Mar.
the empire. The Palace Attendant and Colonel of
Cavalry, the Marquis of Hsin-ch'eng, Chao Ch'inb,
and the Marquis of Ch'eng-yang, Chao Hsin1b, who
had both committed crimes, were dismissed [from
4b
their titles], made commoners, and exiled to the
Liao-hsi [Commandery].[100]

The Grand Empress Dowager [nee Wang] issued
an imperial edict that the cultivated fields which
had not been [used for] tombs, belonging to the Wang
clan who were imperial relatives by marriage, should
all be distributed to the poor people.[101]

Mar./Apr.
In the second month, an imperial edict said,
"Verily [We] have heard that the Sage-kings, in
their government, considered the securing of capable

27

11: 4a, b

persons as the most important [of matters]. Let

6 B.C.


[the Lieutenant Chancellor, K'ung Kuang, the
Grand Minister of Works, Shih1 Tan], with the
Commander-in-chief, [Fu Yen], the full Marquises,
the generals, [officials ranking at] fully two
thousand piculs, the Provincial Shepherds, the Administrators,
and the Chancellors each recommend
one person who is filially pious, fraternally respectful,
true and honest, able to speak frankly, who understands
government matters, and has arisen[105] from
a mean condition, so is able to love the common
people."
4b 4a

In the third month, [the Emperor] granted to the

Apr./May
vassal kings, the princesses, the full marquises, the
Lieutenant Chancellor, [K'ung Kuang], the generals,
[officials ranking at] fully two thousand piculs,
[officials] in the imperial capital offices, the Gentlemen,
and [minor] officials, gold, cash, and silk, to
each proportionately.[108]

In the winter, the Queen Dowager, [Feng] Yüan, of

Winter
King Hsiao of Chung-shan, [Liu Hsing], and her
younger brother, the Marquis of Yi-hsiang, Feng
Ts'an, who had [been charged with] having committed
a crime, both killed themselves.[110]


28

5 B.C.

II
In the second year, in the spring, the third month,

11: 4b, 5a


5 B.C.
[the title of] Grand Minister of Works was abolished,
Apr./May
and [the former title of] Grandee Secretary was
restored.[116]

May/June
In the summer, the fourth month, an imperial
edict said, "The institutes of the Han dynasty stress
the favoring of [imperial] relatives in order to manifest
the honoring of those who should be honored.
5a
In the title of Sovereign Kung of Ting-t'ao, [Liu
K'ang], it is not proper that he should again be
called `of Ting-t'ao.' [We] honor the Empress Dowager
Kung [nee Fu] with the title, the Emperor's
5a
Grand Empress Dowager; she is to be called [the
occupant of] the Yung-hsin Palace.[120] The Empress
Kung [nee Ting] is to be entitled the Emperor's
Empress Dowager; she is to be called [the occupant
of] the Chung-an Palace. There is to be established
a Temple to Sovereign Kung in the [imperial] capital."
An amnesty was granted to convicts in the
empire.

[The Emperor] abolished the [office of] Provincial
Shepherds and reestablished [their occupants as]
Inspectors.

5.2Book of Odes, I, VI, ix, 3 (Legge, I, 121).

July 9
In the sixth month, on [the day] keng-shen, the
Emperor's Empress Dowager nee Ting died. The

29

11: 5a, b

Emperor declared, "We have heard that husband

5 B.


and wife are one flesh. The Book of Odes says,
`When living, we occupy different apartments,
But when dead, we shall share the same grave.'
Anciently, `When Viscount Wu, Chi-[sun Su], had
completed his private apartments, and at the foot of
his western steps there was' a corpse `of the Tu clan,
[the head of that clan] begged permission to bury
[the wife of the deceased] together with [her husband],'
and `[Chi-sun Su] permitted it.'[124] The right
of associating [husband and wife] in burial arose in
the Chou [period].[125] `How complete and elegant
was its culture! I follow the Chou [practises].'[126] A
filial son `serves the dead as he served the living.'
It is proper that for the Emperor's Empress Dowager
there should be raised a tumulus in the funerary
of King Kung." She was thereupon buried in [the
kingdom of] Ting-t'ao. Fifty thousand persons from
Ch'en-liu, Chi-yin, and neighboring commanderies
and kingdoms were mobilized to dig and replace
the earth.

5.6Quoted from the Doctrine of the Mean, xix, 5 (Legge, p. 403; Couvreur, Li Ki, I
447; Legge, Li Ki, II, 311).

5.7Cf. 99 A: 34b and 11: 6a. On this incident, cf. Introduction, pp. 6-8.

The Expectant Appointee Hsia Ho-liang and
others spoke of revelations from Ch'ih-ching-tzu
that the Han dynasty had come upon [a time of
decay in the midst of [the period of time allotted to
it] by its destiny, so that it must again receive the
Mandate [of Heaven; hence] it was proper that [the
Emperor] should change the year-period and alter
his title. The imperial edict said, "The Han [dynasty]
arose two hundred years [ago], and many
times in succession it has begun [new] year-periods.


30

5 B.C.

August Heaven has sent down its aid to [Us] who

11: 5b


have no ability, so that the Han [dynasty's] estate
should a second time be permitted to have the
portents for receiving the Mandate [of Heaven].
Though We are not virtuous, who [are We that We]
should dare not to listen [to the will of Heaven]?

"Now [that We are to receive] this great Mandate
which is the foundation of [all] government, [We]
must certainly give [everyone in] the empire [an
opportunity to] renew himself. Let a general amnesty
[be granted] to the empire. Let the second
year of [the period] Chien-p'ing become the first
year of [the period] T'ai-ch'u-yüan-chiang. [Let
Our] title be the Sovereign Emperor of Great Peacefulness
Who Makes Known the Sageness of the Liu

5a
[House].[130] For the graduations on the clepsydra,

31

11: 5b, 6a

[let] 120 [graduations per day] be used as the meas-

5 B.C.


ure of their size."[133]
6a

In the seventh month, on the plain northwest of

Aug.
Wei-ch'eng, in the Yung-ling Commune section [of
6a
the prefecture], there was made the Emperor's tomb,
[with the order], "Do not remove the common people
from the commanderies and kingdoms [to this place],
in order that [the people] may not be disturbed."

In the eighth month, an imperial edict said, "The

Sept.
Expectant[138] Appointee Hsia Ho-ling and others gave
advice that [We] should change the year-period,

32

5 B.C.

alter [Our] title, and increase the [number of] gradu-

11: 6a


ations on the clepsydra, whereby [We] could [secure]
permanent peace for the clan [ruling] the state. We
mistakenly listened to the advice of [Hsia] Ho-liang
and the others, hoping to obtain blessings for [all]
within the [four] seas. [But] in the end there was
no happy verification [of their promises]; they have
all gone contrary to the Classics, turned their backs
on ancient [practises], and are not in accordance
with the needs of the times. The decree of the
July 13
sixth month and [the day] chia-tzu, except for the
order of an amnesty, is all expunged. [Hsia] Ho-liang
and the others have gone contrary to the
[right] Way and misled the crowd; they are to be
committed [the charge of] the high officials." They
all suffered [death] for their crimes.

The Lieutenant Chancellor, [Chu] Po, the Grandee
Secretary, [Chao] Hsüan2a, and the Marquis of K'ung-hsiang,
[Fu4] Yen, had committed crimes; [Chu] Po

Sept. 21[143]
killed himself, [Chao] Hsüan's death-[penalty] was
reduced by three[144] degrees, and [Fu4] Yen was
sentenced to have one-fourth of the households [in
his estate] cut off. A discussion is in the "Memoir of
83: 16a-17a
[Chu] Po."[146]

III
In the third year, in the spring, the first month,

33

11: 6a, b

[the Emperor] made [Liu] Kuang-hana, the younger

4 B.C.


4 B.C.
brother of King Yi of Kuang-tê, [Liu Yün-k'o], the
Jan./Feb.
King of Kuang-p'ing.
6b 5b 6b

On [the day] kuei-mao, there was a fire in the

Feb. 17
Main Hall of the Kuei Palace where the Emperor's
Grand Empress Dowager [nee Fu] lived.[154]

In the third month, on [the day] chi-yu, the Lieutenant

Apr. 24
Chancellor [P'ing] Tang died. A comet appeared
in the [constellation] Ho-ku.[156]

In the summer, the sixth month, [the Emperor]

July/Aug.
established the Marquis of Wu-hsiang, [Liu] Min3a,
the son of King Ch'ing of Lu, [Liu Feng1], as King
[of Lu].

In the winter, the eleventh month, on [the day]
jen-tzu, [the Emperor] reestablished the Altar to the

Dec. 23
Supreme [One] at the Kan-ch'üan [Palace] and the
Temple to Sovereign Earth at Fen-yin [as places
for regular imperial sacrifices] and disestablished [the
places in] the southern and northern suburbs [for the
suburban sacrifices].[159]

The King of Tung-p'ing, [Liu] Yün2a, [Liu] Yün2a's
Queen, Yeh, and Fang, the Lady of Marquis Kung
of An-ch'eng [Wang Ch'ung2a], had all committed
crimes; [Liu] Yün2a killed himself; Yeh and Fang
were publicly executed.[160]

In the fourth year, in the spring, [the first

IV
month],[162] there was a great drought. East of the
3 B.C.
[Han-ku] Pass the common people carried in procession
Feb./Mar.

34

3 B.C.

the wands of the Mother Queen of the West.

11: 6b, 7a


They passed thru commanderies and kingdoms and
went west thru the [Han-ku] Pass to the imperial
capital. The common people [there] also collected
and sacrificed to the Mother Queen of the West.
Some by night took fire up on top of buildings, beat
drums, and cried out, exciting and frightening one
another.

7a
In the second month, [the Emperor] enfeoffed a
Mar./Apr.
younger cousin of the Emperor's Grand Empress
Dowager [nee Fu], the Palace Attendant, Fu Shang,
as Marquis of Ju-ch'ang, and the son of a younger
[half]-brother of the [Emperor's Grand] Empress
Dowager [nee Fu] by the same mother, the Palace
7a
Attendant Cheng Yeh, as Marquis of Yang-hsin. In

35

11: 7a

the third month, the Palace Attendant and Chief

3, 2 B.C.


Apr.
Commandant of Attendant Cavalry, Tung Hsien2a,
the Imperial Household Grandee, Hsi-fu Kung, and
the [former] Grand Administrator of Nan-yang
[Commandery], Sun Ch'ung, were all enfeoffed as
full marquises because they had informed on the
King of Tung-p'ing, [Liu Yün2a]. A discussion is in
the "Memoir of [Tung] Hsien2a."
93: 9a

In the summer, the fifth month, [the Emperor]

June/
granted noble titles to [officials ranking from] fully
two thousand piculs to those of six hundred piculs,
also to the males of the empire. In the sixth month,
July/.
he honored the Emperor's Grand Empress Dowager
[nee Fu, with the title,] August Grand Empress Dowager.
6a
In the autumn, the eighth month, there was a
Sept./
visitation [of fire] to the North Gate of the Funerary
Park for Sovereign Kung, [Liu K'ang].

In the winter, an imperial edict [ordered] the

Winte
generals and [officials ranking at] fully two thousand
piculs to recommend those who understood military
affairs and who had great plans [for the empire's
future].[179]

In [the period] Yüan-shou, the first year, in the

I
spring, the first month, on [the day] hsin-ch'ou, the
2 B.C.
first day of the month, there was an eclipse of the
Feb. 5
sun.[183] The imperial edict said, "We have been
permitted to protect the [imperial] ancestral temples,

36

2 B.C.

and, [altho We are] neither wise nor clever, [We

11: 7a, b


have] toiled day and night, taking no leisure for
repose. Nevertheless, the Yin and Yang have not
been in accord, so that the great multitude do not
have enough [to live on]. We have not yet perceived
[where lies] the blame for this [state of affairs],
and have frequently [ordered Our] ministers to be
attentive [to their duties], expecting that [We]
might have hopes [of improvement in the government.
But] to the present, the high officials, in
administering the laws, have not yet attained [Our]
goal [of good government]. Some esteem oppressiveness
and cruelty and utilize the power [of the
government] to obtain fame, while gentle and good,
magnanimous and forgiving [people] fall into destruction
7b
and extinction. For this reason murderous
brigands have increased more and more, while harmony
and concord have daily declined, the people
are resentful, and have no place to repose themselves.

"Recently on the first day of the first month
there was an eclipse of the sun. The blame for that
[event] is not far [to seek]—it lies upon Ourself.

7b
Let the ministers and grandees each do their utmost
and make all efforts to lead the officials, taking care
to appoint benevolent persons and to degrade and
send far away injurious villains, with the purpose of
securing tranquillity for the common people. They
should make Our faults known and not be silent
about anything. Let them, with the generals, the
full marquises, and [officials ranking at] fully two
thousand piculs, each recommend one person who is
capable and good, sincere and upright, and able to
speak frankly. A general amnesty [is granted to]
the empire."


37

11: 7b, 8a

On [the day] ting-szu, the August Grand Empress

2, 1 B.C.


Feb. 21
Dowager nee Fu died.

In the third month, the Lieutenant Chancellor

Apr./May
[Wang] Chia1a who had committed a crime, was
6b
sent to prison, where he died.[193]

In the autumn, the ninth month, the Commander-in-chief

Oct.
and General of Agile Cavalry, Ting Ming,
was dismissed. The bronze tortoise and snake door-knocker
heads on the gate to the Hall in the Temple
of [Emperor] Hsiao-yüan cried out.

In the second year,[195] in the spring, the first month,

8a
the Shan-yü of the Huns and the Greater K'un-mi
1 B.C.
of the Wu-sun came to pay court. In the second
Feb./Mar.
month, they returned to their states. The Shan-yü
Mar./Apr.
was not pleased. A discussion is in the "Memoir of
8a
the Huns."[201]
94B: 14b,

In the summer, the fourth month, on [the day]

June 20
jen-hsu,[204] the last day of the month, there was an
eclipse of the sun.

In the fifth month, [the titles of] the three highest

June/July
ministers were corrected and their duties divided: the
Commander-in-chief and General of the Guard, Tung

38

1 B.C.

Hsien2a, became the Commander-in-chief; the Lieu-

11: 8a, b


tenant Chancellor, K'ung Kuang, became the Grand
Minister of the Masses; and the Grandee Secretary,
P'eng Hsüan, became the Grand Minister of Works.[208]
[The latter] was enfeoffed as Marquis of Ch'ang-p'ing.
The duties of the Director of Uprightness and the
Director of the Retainers were to be corrected, and a
Minister of Brigands was to be created.

Before the matter was settled, in the sixth month,

Aug. 15
on [the day] mou-wu, the Emperor died in the Wei-yang
8b
Palace. In the autumn, the tenth[211] month,
Nov. 27
on [the day] jen-yin, he was buried in the Yi Tomb.

In eulogy we say: When [Emperor] Hsiao-ai was a
tributary king and then entered the palace of the
Heir-apparent, his vocabulary was large[213] and intelligent,
[so that even when] he was young, he [had

7a
already] obtained a good renown. He observed the
period of [Emperor] Hsiao-ch'eng, when `blessings
left the' imperial `house'[215] and [the Emperor's]
power was transferred to his maternal [relatives].
For this reason, when [Emperor Ai] attended court,
he frequently executed his great officials, seeking to
strengthen the might of the ruler and to imitate
8b
[Emperors] Wu and Hsüan. In his nature he did

39

11: 8b

not care for music or women. At times he watched
boxing,[218] archery, and military sports. When he
ascended the throne, he had arthritis,[219] and in his
latter years [his arthritis] gradually became worse.
He did not long enjoy the rule. How sad![220]

 
[2]

Cf. HS 14: 23a.

[3]

These phrases (the first one is repeated on 11: 8b) may well refer to the matters
discussed by the school of circumstances and names or penological terminology; cf. 9: n. 1.2.

[8]

Light upright numbers indicate the paging in the Ching-yu ed., reprinted in the
Commercial Press' Po-na Series of the "Twenty-four Histories".

[10]

Italic numbers indicate the paging in the Palace ed. or Wu-ying Tien ed., reprinted
in the Szu-pu Pei-yao.

[12]

Bold-face numbers indicate the paging in the Wang Hsien-ch'ien's Han-shu Pu-chu,
as in previous volumes.

[16]

HS 10: 14b; 80: 10a.

[19]

A quotation from the Book of Odes, III, II, v, 2 (Legge, p. 482).

[21]

Implying tacit disapproval. Emperor Ch'eng planned to separate the future
Emperor Ai from his own family and make him an Imperial Son. Emperor Ai's relatives
refused to allow him to be separated from them.

[23]

HS 10: 15b.

[29]

HS 10: 16a.

[35]

HS 97 B: 14a.

[36]

Yen Shih-ku (581-645) explains, "Yu-shu [OMITTED] means that his relationship had
not been extinguished, so that he was still [of the proper relationship] to wear mourning."
In 9: 2b and 10: 2b Emperors Yüan and Ch'eng are each recorded as having at the beginning
of their reigns made grants to the members of the imperial house who [OMITTED];
Emperor Ai, in similarily making grants, would hardly have meant anything different
from what they did. Then the phrase here is merely an abbreviation for the phrase
used in the "Annals of Emperors Yüan" and "Ch'eng." Those who rebelled or were
sentenced for crime and their descendants were dropped from the imperial house, cf. 6:
4b. The practise of considering relationship to have lapsed after a certain number of
generations is recognized in 12: 3a; cf. n. 3.1. This phrase is also found in 8: 7a.

[39]

A quotation from the Kung-yang Commentary (iii cent. B.C.) to the Spring and
Autumn,
1: 7b, Dk. Yin, Yr. I.

[42]

Ying Shao (ca. 140-206) explains, "The mother of Emperor Ch'eng, the Empress
Dowager [nee] Wang, lived in the Ch'ang-hsin Palace." "The Ch'ang-hsin Palace" was
then an indirect way of referring to this Empress Dowager; the "Inner Palace" was
similarily an indirect reference to the Empress; cf. Glossary sub Inner Palace. Li Ch'i
(fl. ca. 200) remarks, "The Concubine [nee] Fu was to be [treated] like [the occupant of]
the Ch'ang-hsin [Palace] and the Concubine nee Ting like [the occupant of] the Inner
Palace."

[44]

According to 18: 24a, b and Shih1 Tan's memorial in 86: 16a, Ting Ming and
Fu Yen had been enfeoffed on May 3, four days before Emperor Ai came to the throne;
Ting Man and Chao Ch'inb were enfeoffed on June 19 and 22, respectively (18: 24b, 22b).

[46]

According to 18: 24a, b and Shih1 Tan's memorial in 86: 16a, Ting Ming and
Fu Yen had been enfeoffed on May 3, four days before Emperor Ai came to the throne;
Ting Man and Chao Ch'inb were enfeoffed on June 19 and 22, respectively (18: 24b, 22b).

[48]

According to 18: 24a, b and Shih1 Tan's memorial in 86: 16a, Ting Ming and
Fu Yen had been enfeoffed on May 3, four days before Emperor Ai came to the throne;
Ting Man and Chao Ch'inb were enfeoffed on June 19 and 22, respectively (18: 24b, 22b).

[50]

According to 18: 24a, b and Shih1 Tan's memorial in 86: 16a, Ting Ming and
Fu Yen had been enfeoffed on May 3, four days before Emperor Ai came to the throne;
Ting Man and Chao Ch'inb were enfeoffed on June 19 and 22, respectively (18: 24b, 22b).

[51]

According to 18: 24a, b and Shih1 Tan's memorial in 86: 16a, Ting Ming and
Fu Yen had been enfeoffed on May 3, four days before Emperor Ai came to the throne;
Ting Man and Chao Ch'inb were enfeoffed on June 19 and 22, respectively (18: 24b, 22b).

[53]

A quotation from a saying of Confucius in Analects XV, x, 6. Cf. Legge's
"Concluding Note" to his translation of the Book of Odes I, vii, "The Odes of Cheng,"
p. 149.

[55]

Another allusion to Analects XV, x, 6 where Confucius directs a disciple to "banish
the melodies of Cheng." For this dismissal of 441 out of a total of 829 imperial musicians,
cf. 22: 34b-37a; Glossary sub Bureau of Music.

[60]

The above paragraph is probably a quotation from the imperial edict making these
awards, but, since Pan Ku does not precede it by writing, "An edict also said," he plainly
did not mean it to be read as a quotation.

[61]

Yen Shih-ku says, "Yi1-piao [OMITTED] means that he should be a model in the rites
and ceremonies (yi1)." But Wang Nien-sun (1744-1832) points out that HS 90: 21a,
speaking of the "Tyrannical Officials," says "Those who were incorrupt were qualified
to be yi1-piao," as showing that Yen Shih-ku's interpretation is inadequate. He continues,
"In my opinion, a standing post which directs people was called a yi1 and was
also called a piao. The Shuo-wen [(ca. 100) 6A: 4b says], `Yi2 [OMITTED] is a plank [OMITTED] [laid
horizontally as the casing in making an earthen wall. It comes] from the `wood' [radical]
and yi4 [OMITTED] as the sound.' The classics and the `traditions' (ancient commentaries)
interchange [yi2] and yi1. Hence the Erh-ya [(before and during Han times) 2: 7a, says,
`Yi1 is a plank.' [Kao Yu (fl. 205-212), in] a note to the Lü-shih Ch'un-ch'iu, Bk. 25,
ch. 6[p. 10a, says], `A piao is a post.' [Wilhelm, p. 446, translates piao as "Stange."]
Hence when [a person's] virtue and conduct were adequate to serve as a model for people,
he was called a sign-post (piao-yi). [The Li-ki (ca. i cent. B.C.)], Bk. XXX, 4 [Legge,
II, 353; Couvreur, II, 516, says], `The superior should be careful in what he likes
and dislikes, for he is a sign-post (piao) to the common people,' and Cheng [Hsüan, (127200)]
comments, `The common people follow their prince as a shadow follows a gnomen
(piao).' Hsün-tzu [ca. 320-235 B.C.] roll VIII, fascicle XII [p. 4a, says], `The prince is
the gnomen (yi1). When the gnomen (yi1) is straight, then its shadow is straight.'
These [passages] prove that yi1 was the same as piao. Kuan-tzu [iii cent. B.C.] roll 20,
fascicle 64 [p. 8b, says], `Rules and laws are the sign-posts (yi1-piao) for the many common
people; the rules of proper conduct and moral principles are the sign-posts (yi1-piao) for
honorable and humble [persons].' Huai-nan-tzu [d. 122 B.C.], ch. 9 [p. 1a, says], `His
words are embroideries and his actions are his sign-posts (yi1-piao).' The Tso-chuan
[(iv cent. B.C.), Dk.] Wen, Yr. VI [Legge, 2429, Couvreur I, 471 says], `They proclaimed
the standard and model [for tribute], and led them by their examples (piao-yi1).' Then
whether it says yi1-piao or piao-yi1, the meaning is the same. [Yen] Shih-ku . . . did
not know that a yi1-piao . . . was a standing post, and also did not know that yi1 was a
word borrowed for yi2." This phrase is also used in SC 130: 9. Cf. also HFHD, I,
p. 244, n. 1.

For the implications of this edict upon the practise of mourning to the third year,
cf. app. I.

[64]

A phrase from the Classic of Filial Piety 2: 1a, ch. 3, I. Chen's trans., p. 18.

[65]

The language of this edict is taken from Shih1 Tan's memorial, quoted in 24A:
20a, b.

[69]

Ju Shun (fl. dur. 189-265) explains, "To own private cultivated land (ming-t'ien
[OMITTED] [[OMITTED] = `to possess']) in their states [refers to land] within the states from which
they received their income. In addition to collecting the land-tax and tax on products,
[vassal kings and marquises] were also personally permitted to own three thousand mou
of private cultivated land (szu-t'ien [OMITTED]). As to `owning private cultivated land (ming-t'ien)
in the prefectures and marches': [according to] the first section in [the dynastic]
ordinances, those nobles who [lived] in their states and who owned private cultivated
land (ming-t'ien) in other prefectures should be fined [the equivalent of] two taels of gold.
[But] now some full marquises had not gone to their states; altho they received the income
of the land-tax and tax on produce from their distant states, they were also themselves
permitted to have cultivated land (t'ien) in other prefectures or marches. Princesses
were similarily treated. [But these lands] were not permitted to exceed three thousand
mou." For a discussion of these private lands, cf.; [OMITTED], pub. by
Commercial Press, ch. 3. Tung Chung-shu seems to have been the first to suggest
limiting the size of private lands, cf. HS 24 A: 17a. Emperor Ai's edict was made as a
result of Shih1 Tan's suggestion (HS 24 A: 20a). Wang Hsien-ch'ien states that ming-t'ien
is the same as chan-tien [OMITTED], which latter phrase is used in Han-chi 28: 1b.

[72]

The regulation that those enregistered in market-places and their sons and grandsons
were not allowed to be officials dates back to the time of Emperor Kao or earlier.
Cf. HS 24 B: 4a11.

HS 24 A: 20b also quotes this edict adding, "The period [for final compliance with this
edict] shall end with the third year." The passage continues, "[At this] time the price
of cultivated fields, residences, and male and female slaves became low. The Ting and
Fu [clans] were [however] employed [on important government] matters and Tung Hsien2a
became great and honorable, all [of whom found this edict] inconvenient. [So the enforcement
of this] edict was temporarily postponed to a latter [time]. Thereupon it was
tabled and not put into effect."

[75]

For the Three Offices for Garments in the Ch'i Commandery, cf. Glossary, sub voce

The reference to "women's work" is reminiscent of Emperor Ching's edict, where the
term is explained. Cf. 5: 9a, HFHD, I, 328, & n. 9.4.

The text is ambiguous: Ju Shun interprets it: "Those which are being made and are
already completed, and those which are not yet completed shall all be stopped and shall
not again be made. All shall be transported to the depot nearest the Office." But
Yen Shih-ku writes, "Ju [Shun's] explanation is mistaken. It merely means that those
which are not yet completed shall not be made, and those which are already completed
shall not be transported." Wang Hsien-ch'ien comments, "The two explanations of Ju
[Shun] and Yen [Shih-ku] are [both] mistaken. Hu San-hsing [1230-1287, in a note to
the Tzu-chih T'ung-chien 33: 7a] says, `The Three Offices for Garments in Ch'i together
with the various offices for weaving shall all not make articles difficult to complete in
order to transport them [to the capital]."

[76]

Ying Shao comments, "[As to] the ordinance [concerning] the giving office to sons,
the Comment in the Han-[chiu]-yi [by Wei Hung, (fl. dur. 25-57; this passage has dropped
out of that book, much of which has been lost; it has been replaced in its "Appendix"
of fragments, A: 3a), says], `Officials [ranking at] two thousand piculs and above, who
have attended to [government] affairs for three full years, are permitted to obtain the
position of Gentleman for one of [their brothers or half-brothers] of the same father [or
these persons' sons], or for a son.' [Such persons however] were not selected for their
virtue, hence [the order] was done away with." (Yen Shih-ku, following a comment of
Fu Ch'ien (125-195) to HS 36: 6a, interprets [OMITTED] as meaning the same as [OMITTED], "guarantee,"
but Chou Shou-ch'ang (1814-1884) replies that in view of the provision in the Han Code,
quoted by Ying Shao, guarantors were not necessary.)

Tung Chung-shu (56: 13a) and Wang Chi5a (72: 7a) had protested against this practise.
Its abolition constituted a strengthening of the examination system.

At various times in the Later Han period persons are stated to have been made Gentlemen
of the court (lang) because of their close relationship to high officials (HHS, M. 31:
14a, 17b; M. 9: 10b-11a; M. 27: 4a, 6a; M. 35: 6a; M. 51: 13a, b). But in each case this
appointment was probably a special act of imperial grace. In A.D. 121, one son, nephew,
or younger brother of each one of the highest ministers, high ministers, colonels, and
masters of writing was made a Gentleman or Member of the Heir-apparent's Suite. This
act was also a special favor; it is listed along with grants of general amnesty to the common
people and grants of cash or silk to the Honored Ladies at the imperial tombs, the royal
princesses, ministers, and lesser officials (HHS, An. 5: 15a). This grant establishes that
the abolition of 7 B.C. was maintained, except for special imperial favors. In A.D. 146
it was however enacted that the sons of officials ranking at 600 piculs and over could enter
the Imperial University and that the best ten of these sons should be made Gentlemen
of the court or Members of the Heir-apparent's Suite (HHS, An. 6: 17b). Thus the
practise of giving office to sons was partially and qualifiedly renewed.

[78]

This law had seemingly been ineffectively abolished by Emperor Wen; cf. 4: 10b.

[81]

The Official ed. (1739) carelessly reads [OMITTED] for [OMITTED].

[82]

Shen Ch'in-han (1775-1832) remarks, "This edict was probably occasioned by the
[Director] of the Retainers, Chieh Kuang, memorializing the deeds of the [Brilliant Companion]
nee Chao." It was probably an attempt to protect the life of her sister, the
Empress Dowager nee Chao. Cf. HFHD, II, ch. X, Introduction, pp. 369-372; Glossary,
sub Brilliant Companion nee Chao.

[84]

Yen Shih-ku explains, "Ning [OMITTED] means to dwell at home and wear mourning
garments." The Official ed. has the word "previously (ch'ien [OMITTED])" at the beginning of
this sentence, before the words for "Erudits" (po-shih), with the note, "The Sung Ch'i
[ed., xi or xii cent.] says, `[In the phrase] "Ch'ien po-shih," one text does not have the
word "ch'ien." ' " This word was dropped in the Ching-yu ed. (1034-5). On this period
of mourning, cf. App. I.

[89]

HS 18: 19b and 98: 11a report that these two persons were sentenced because,
before Emperor Ch'eng's tomb was completed, they had married imperial concubines
and had held a feast at which there was singing and dancing, (cf. Glossary, sub Wang,
Grand Empress Dowager nee). Hence abstinence from festivities was now required for
far more than merely the thirty-six days after an emperor's death stipulated by Emperor
Wen. Cf. 4: 20a.

Another curious event happened at this time. HS 27 Ca: 21b says, "In the second
year of [the period] Sui-ho, the eighth month, on [the day] keng-shen [Huang gives no
such day in the eighth month, but if the intercalary month, which he inserts after the
seventh month, is changed to come after the eighth month, this date is Sept. 18, 7 B.C.],
a man of the T'ung Hamlet in the Cheng [county], Wang Pao, clothed in carmine garments,
with a small bonnet, and girt with a two-edged sword, entered thru the Northern
Major's Gate and the Eastern Gate of the [Wei-yang Palace] Hall, went up into the
Front Hall and entered the Extraordinary Room, loosened the ribbon of a curtain,
knotted and girded himself with it, beckoned to the Chief in the offices in the Front Hall,
Yeh, and others, saying, `The Lord of Heaven ordered me to live here.' Yeh and the
others arrested, bound, and examined him. [Wang] Pao had been a soldier of the [Chief]
Grand Questioner to the Major [in Charge of Official Carriages], and was suffering from
insanity, so that he himself did not know the circumstances under which he had entered
the palace. He was sent to prison and died."

[90]

The Official ed. inverts the order of [OMITTED].

HS 27 Ca: 9a says, "In the ninth month, on [the day] ping-ch'en [Nov. 13], there was
an earthquake. From the capital to the northern borders, in more than thirty commanderies
and kingdoms, the inner and outer city walls were ruined. Altogether it
killed 415 people."

[93]

The Official ed. inverts the order of [OMITTED].

[95]

A hundred thousand cash [which was equivalent to ten catties of gold] was the
value of a middle-class family's estate; Cf. 4: 21a.

[100]

They were both brothers of the Brilliant Companion nee Chao, who had been
responsible for imperial infanticide. Cf. HFHD II, 369-372; Glossary, sub vocibus.

[101]

HS 27 Cb: 25a says, "In Chien-p'ing I, i, on [the day] ting-wei [Mar. 4], ten meteorites
fell in the [Commandery] of Po-ti."

[105]

Yü Yüeh (1821-1906) declares that yen [OMITTED] is a copyist's error for an ancient form
of [OMITTED]. Without this emendation, as Wang Nien-sun remarks, the clause beginning
with yen interrupts the sentence and must have been displaced. According to Yen
Shih-ku's comment (A.D. 641), yen was already in his text.

Liu Pin (1022-1088) remarks that this edict must have been a command to the Lieutenant
Chancellor and Grand Minister of Works as well as to the officials mentioned;
their titles have hence been inserted into the translation.

[108]

HS 27 Cb: 25a says, "In the ninth month, on [the day] chia-ch'en [Oct. 27], two
meteorites fell in Yü [in the kingdom of Liang]."

[110]

The Queen Dowager had been a rival of the Empress Dowager nee Fu for Emperor
Yüan's favor, and was hated by her; her younger sister had now been falsely charged with
plotting an attempt on the life of Emperor Ai. Cf. Glossary, sub Feng, Brilliant Companion
nee.

Chou Shou-ch'ang glosses on 11: 4a, "The Ku-chin-chu [ca. 300, (we have been unable
to find this passage there) says], `In the first year of Emperor Ai, a fungus of immortality
grew on a laurel magnolia tree of the rear slaughter-house.' Chung Chang-t'ung's [180220]
Ch'ang-yen [lost; fragments in the Yü-han Shan-fang Chi-yi Shu; this passage is in
B: 5b, and is recovered from the Yi-wen Lei-chü (vii cent.) ch. 89, and from the T'ai-p'ing
Yü-lan
(978-983), 960: 4a] says, `In the time of Emperor Ai of the Han [dynasty,
(the Yü-lan says, "Emperor An")], there were prodigies which grew on an arbor-vitae
tree of an eastern gallery (behind the Yen-yü stables) in the Ch'ang-lo Palace, and on a
mimosa tree at the southern door of the Long Lane. Those who discussed them considered
that they were fungi of immortality. The courtiers all congratulated [the Emperor]
and received grants.' "

[116]

Wang Hsien-ch'ien remarks that this change was the result of a request by Chu Po.
The change in the title of Provincial Governors below was also due to his recommendation.
Cf. Introduction, p. 13.

[120]

Cf. 11: 2a & n. 2.4.

[124]

A quotation (with a variation in two words) from the Li-ki, II, i, i, 3 (Legge,
121; Couvreur, I, 109-110).

[125]

Cf. Li-ki, ibid.

[126]

Quoted from a saying of Confucius in Analects III, xiv.

[130]

This edict is given in greater fullness in 75: 32b, which passage is much clearer.

The Official ed. has not "yüan-chiang," the last two words of the new year-period,
and quotes the Sung Ch'i ed. as saying that some editor "did not understand that the
name [of the year-period] included four words, so excised the two words `yüan-chiang',
which is an error. Later I obtained a T'ang text [before xi cent.] in which the words
`yüan-chiang' are really preserved." All four words of this name are found in HS 75:
32b and 99 A: 34b. Ch'i Shao-nan remarks that T'ai-ch'u was a year-period in Emperor
Wu's reign, and would not be repeated in this reign. "[The Emperor] must have been
misled by the sayings of these magicians who invented this name with four words to
show that there was a renaissance. Altho [this name of a year-period] was not actually
established, nevertheless the names [of year-periods] in later ages which contain four
words began with this one." This name may possibly be translated, "The Primordial
and Great Grand Beginning."

It is almost impossible to be sure about the meaning of a magical title such as that
taken by the Emperor, viz., "Ch'en-sheng Liu T'ai-p'ing Huang-ti." Wang Mang took
them as a prophecy of his usurpation; cf. 99 A: 34b. Li Fei (prob. iii cent.) says, "Ch'en
is to lead. It means that he obtained spiritual leading. The sage is the Liu [house]."
Ju Shun however says, "[The rulers of the state of] Ch'en, [the first word in the Emperor's
title], were the descendants of Shun. Wang Mang was a descendant of [the rulers of]
Ch'en. These were deceptive words which made plain that [Wang] Mang would usurp
[the throne] and set himself up [as emperor]. However [Hsia Ho-liang and Emperor Ai]
did not know that." Wei Chao (197-273/4) says, "It made known and published
(ch'en) the virtue of the sage Liu [house]." Yen Shih-ku adds, "The two explanations
of Ju [Shun] and Wei [Chao] are [both] correct," and Hu San-hsing remarks ironically
"If Wei [Chao's] explanation is not far from the truth, then Ju [Shun's] explanation is
like magic. Since Yen [Shih-ku] considers that both explanations are correct, which one
shall we follow?"

[133]

Yen Shih-ku remarks, "Previously in the clepsydra, for a day and night together
there were 100 graduations [OMITTED]. Now [the Emperor] increased them by twenty." Wang
Mang later established 120 graduations; cf. 99 A: 35a. Shen Ch'in-han remarks, "If a
hundred graduations are divided equally among twelve [double]-hours, one [double]-hour
has 8 graduations and 20 divisions [OMITTED]. Now 120 graduations were used, so that one
[double]-hour had ten graduations. The Wu-tai Hui-yao [by Wang Po (922-982), 10:
13a, 14a, 13b, says], `In the [Posterior] Chin [dynasty, in the period] T'ien-fu III, [ii
Mar., 938], the Director of the Imperial Observatory memorialized, . . . "The various
Classics on the Graduations of the Clepsydra [(there were five books by this title listed
even as early as the Sui History's "Treatise on Arts and Literature") all consider that in
a day and night there are one hundred graduations, which are divided among twelve
[double]-hours, so that each [double]-hour has 8 graduations and a third. . . . Sixty
divisions make one graduation, so that one [double]-hour has 8 graduations and 20 divisions."
The Sui Dynastic History [begun 622], 19: [26a ff, which gives a full account
of the apportionment of clepsydra graduations among the various hours and their changes,
says], `In 507, Emperor Wu considered that if the hundred graduations [of the clepsydra]
in a day and night were divided equally among the twelve double-hours, a double-hour
would have 8 graduations and there still would be some excess divisions [of a graduation].
So he considered that a day and night should have 96 graduations, so that one double-hour
should have eight whole graduations.' [Other schemes were also tried, by which
some double-hours had more graduations that others.] In the present [Ch'ing] dynasty,
the imperial almanacs use the arrangement [of Emperor Wu]. Each [double]-hour has 8
equal graduations, and each graduation has 15 divisions, without any distinction between
long graduations and short graduations."

[138]

Ch'ien Ta-chao (1744-1813) declares that [OMITTED] should be emended to [OMITTED]. The
Official ed. has the latter reading. It is also found in the version of this edict on HS
75: 32b.

[143]

HS 19 B: 49a.

[144]

The present text and the Han-chi 28: 7b read "two degrees"; but HS 83: 17a4 and
the Tzu-chih T'ung-chien 34: 5b read "three degrees." Hu San-hsing explains, "[Whoever]"
has his capital punishment reduced three degrees, becomes a convict servitor or
concubine."

These three officials had conspired, at the instigation of the Emperor's Grand Empress
Dowager nee Fu, to have her nephew, Fu Hsi, dismissed. The latter was the most
capable member of the Fu clan, but had opposed elevating the title of the Emperor's
Grand Empress Dowager. Cf. Glossary, sub Chu Po.

[146]

HS 27 Ca: 18b says, "In Chien-p'ing II, in the [Commandery] of Ting-hsiang, a
male horse bore a colt with three legs, which followed the herd in drinking and eating."
Ibid. 19b says, "In [the period] Chien-p'ing, in the [Commandery] of Yü-chang, there
was a boy who metamorphosed and became a girl, was married, became a man's wife,
and gave birth to a child."

[154]

HS 27 A: 16a says it was in the Hall of Vast Peace in that palace.

[156]

Williams lists this comet as no. 53.

[159]

These places had been last reestablished by the Empress Dowager nee Wang in
Apr., 7 B.C. Cf. 10: 16a.

[160]

These women had tried by magical means to bring about the death of Emperor Ai,
in order that Liu Yün2a might become Emperor. Cf. Glossary, sub Liu Yün2a.

HS 27 Bb: 17b says, "In Chien-p'ing III, at P'ing-tu in the [Commandery] of Tung-lai
there were produced seven large fish, 80 feet long and 11 feet high, all of whom died."
They were probably whales.

[162]

Wang Nien-sun remarks that HS 27 Ca: 22a, in recounting this matter, prefaces
it with "In the first month"; the next event in 11: 6b is prefaced with "in the second
month"; the Han-chi 29: 1a also prefaces its account with "in the first month"; hence
these words should be in this passage too.

This interesting soteriological religion is described in two other passages, which are
appended here: HS 27 Ca: 22a says, "In Chien-p'ing IV, the first month, the common
people were excited and ran, [each] holding a stalk of straw or of hemp, carrying them on
and passing them to one another, saying, `I am transporting the wand of [the goddess's
edict].' Those who passed along and met on the roads were as many as thousands.
Some let down their hair and walked barefoot. Some at night broke door-bars and some
climbed over walls, entering [houses]. Some rode chariots or on horseback, galloping
fast, making [themselves] post-messengers to transmit and transport [the wands]. They
passed and traveled thru 26 commanderies or kingdoms and came to the imperial capital.

"That summer, in the imperial capital, the common people of the commanderies and
kingdoms met together in the wards, lanes, and foot-paths, making sacrifices and setting
out utensils for tablets [like dice to throw lots, probably for divination], singing and
dancing, sacrificing to the Mother Queen of the West. They also transmitted a written
message which said, `The Mother informs her people that those who wear this writing
will not die. Let those who do not believe my words look below their door hinges, where
there will be white hairs.' In the autumn it stopped."

HS 26: 59b adds, "In [Chien-p'ing], the fourth year, the first month, the second month,
and the third month [Feb.-May], the common people frightened each other, crying out
and running, transmitting wands [containing] the edict [of the goddess], and sacrificing
to the Mother Queen of the West. They also said, `People with eyes [placed] vertically
will come.' "

Tu Yeh interpreted this event as portending weakness in the government, because
of its domination by the evil Ting and Fu clans. Pan Ku says that the Grand Empress
Dowager nee Wang and Wang Mang responded to this portent when he destroyed the
Ting and Fu clans. Cf. 27 Ca: 22a, b.

Chavannes, La Sculpture sur pierre en Chine, pl. XXXVIII, in the third register of
the gable; Mission archeologique dans la Chine Septentrionale, Plates, 88, vol. I, fig.
161, 162, also vol. I1, fig. 1237, and p. 80 reproduce Han grave sculptures in which devotees
offer branches to the Mother Queen of the West, which are these wands. Cf. also
Introduction, p. 8; Glossary, sub Mother Queen of the West; "An Ancient Chinese
Mystery Cult," Harvard Theological Review, 35, Oct., 1942, 221-240.

[179]

This edict is quoted in greater detail in 45: 17a, b.

[183]

Cf. Appendix II for eclipses. This eclipse brought about the downfall of Sun
Ch'ung and Hsi-fu Kung (45: 17b, 18a) and served to bring K'ung Kuang and Wang
Mang back to the capital (81: 18b, 19a; 99 A: 3b). Pao Hsüan recommended that Tung
Hsien2a also be sent away and that Ho Wu, Shih1 Tan, P'eng Hsüan, and Fu Hsi be
recalled (72: 24a).

[193]

Wang Chia1a was a capable and loyal official, who prevented Emperor Ai from
promoting and enriching his catamite, Tung Hsien2a. After an amnesty, he recommended
some officials whom the Emperor had previously dismissed, so he was accused of having
misdirected the state and misled the Emperor, which was an inhuman crime. He was
sent to prison, where he starved to death. In 4 A.D., Wang Mang had him listed as a
faithful minister. This judicial murder was perhaps Emperor Ai's greatest crime.

[195]

Chang Chao (1691-1745) remarks that the Academy ed. (1124) prefixes "Yüan-shou"
to the words "second year," the use of which words is contrary to the practise of
the history, hence they are an interpolation.

[201]

Tzu-chih T'ung-chien 35: 11a (following HS 94 B: 14b) points out that the Shan-yü
was not pleased because he had been lodged in the Grape Lodge of the Shang-lin Park
in order that the planet Jupiter might repress and overcome the evil influences the Shan-yü
had brought with him in coming from the north (Yin). Cf. de Groot, Die Hunnen,
p. 261, n. 1.

[204]

The text reads jen-ch'en, but calculation shows that ch'en is an error for hsü. Cf.
App. II, ii.

[208]

Hu San-hsing, in a note to the Tzu-chih T'ing-chien 35: 11a, explains, "The division
of duties was that the Commander-in-chief took charge of military matters, the Grand
Minister of the Masses took charge of matters concerning the people, and the Grand
Minister of Works took charge of matters concerning the waters and the earth."

The Sung Ch'i ed. says that the Chiang-nan text (prob. x-xiii cent.) has[OMITTED] before
the [OMITTED].

[211]

The present text says "ninth month," but Huang lists no jen-yin day in that month.
Fu Tsan, in a note, says that from the death to the burial was to the 105th day. Szu-ma
Kuang, in his Tzu-chih T'ung-chien K'ao-yi 2, 9b notes that the 105th day after the
death was in the tenth month, so emends "ninth" to "tenth." I have adopted that
suggestion. Han-chi 29: 13b dates the burial in the ninth month, on the day jen-ch'en,
which is also impossible, for Huang also puts that day in the tenth month.

[213]

A phrase reminiscent of SC 47: 84 (= Mh V, 421), where the Spring and Autumn
is said to be [OMITTED] "condensed in its language, but extensive in its allusiveness."

[215]

A quotation from Analects XVI, iii.

[218]

HS 70: 5a says that Kan Yen-shou "was examined in boxing and made an Attendant
at the Gate." Meng K'ang (ca. 180-260) and Su Lin (fl. 196-227) say that
pien [OMITTED] or [OMITTED] is [OMITTED].

[219]

Ju Shun comments, "The pronunciation of wei [OMITTED] is that of the fan-jui [OMITTED]
cross-bow. The sickness in which one cannot cross his two feet is called wei." Yen
Shih-ku says that fan-jui is the name of a cross-bow and means to press with both feet.
Shen Ch'in-han adds, "In stretching this cross-bow one has to use the feet, hence it became
the name of the cross-bow." These were probably the extremely stout crossbows
used by "skilled soldiers."

[220]

A pun; the word for "sad" is ai, the Emperor's posthumous name.


40

APPENDIX I

THE CUSTOM OF MOURNING TO THE THIRD YEAR

The custom of mourning for parents to the third year was urged by
Confucius,[1] seemingly because it reinforced the virtue of filial piety.[2]
It was vehemently attacked by Moh-tzu,[3] and defended by Mencius[4]
and Hsün-tzu.[5] However, even in the state of Lu at the time of Mencius,
it was still an uncommon practise. When he urged it upon the Duke of
T'eng, after the death of Duke T'ing, the court advisors memorialized the
Duke saying, "None of the former princes of Lu, which kingdom we
honor, observed [this practise of mourning to the third year], neither
have any of our own former princes observed it."[6] In its extreme form,
when the son spent his time weeping and in partial fasting, cutting himself
off from his usual pursuits, this custom could only have originated among
aristocrats, for no one else had the leisure to devote two years and more to
such a practise.

This custom of mourning to the third year seems to have remained a
specifically Confucian practise. Emperor Wen, in his posthumous edict
of 157 B.C., condemned it and limited mourning for an emperor to the
thirty-sixth day after his burial.[7] That period was thereafter adopted by
officials in mourning for their own parents.[8] Even the famous Confucian
bibliophile, Liu Tê, King Hsien of Ho-chien (d. 130 B.C.), seems not to
have followed the custom of mourning to the third year. We have the
citation of his deeds by his Commandant of the Capital,[9] and it says
nothing about his having mourned to the third year, even though he is
said to have cultivated Confucian practises in his rites and robes. Thus
the attack of Moh-tzu upon the Confucian mourning rites and Emperor
Wen's condemnation of this practise seems to have led the Confucians
themselves to dispense with this practise until their doctrine secured an


41

unchallenged hold upon official China. It remained quite uncommon to
the end of the first century B.C., for in 7 B.C. Emperor Ai considered
this practise unusual and so meritorious that he rewarded King Hui of
Ho-chien, Liu Liang, a descendant of King Hsien, by a complimentary
edict and an increase by ten thousand households in the size of his kingdom,
for having mourned to the third year for his mother, the Queen
Dowager.[10] In the same year Erudits and their Disciples, who were the
teachers in the Confucian Imperial University, were allowed to take leave
to the third year to mourn for their parents.[11] The practise of mourning
to the third year seems thus to have first been propagated widely during
the latter part of the first century B.C.

The Han dynasty stressed filial piety in many ways. The Classic of
Filial Piety
was a textbook studied by all; the Han Emperors (except the
first) were all given the word "hsiao [OMITTED], filially pious" as the first part of
their posthumous names. They made occasional grants to Filially Pious
people and had persons recommended for the bureaucracy because of their
filial piety. Emperor Ai considered a lack of filial conduct as sufficient
grounds for dismissing even the highest official.[12] Hence it is quite
natural, when Confucianism came to be well established and an attempt
was made to fulfil all its requirements, that the practise of mourning
to the third year should have been revived and adopted by those who
were careful in their Confucianism and had the leisure to follow this
custom.

Yet the practise was slow in spreading. It was not until Jan. 1, 117
A.D. that the Empress nee Teng, while ruling for Emperor An, "for the
first time permitted high officials, [those ranking at] two thousand piculs,
and Inspectors to perform the mourning to the third year,"[13] at the end
of which time they were returned to their former posts. This provision
was confirmed by later emperors. At the suggestion of Ch'en Chung,[14]
on Dec. 25, 120, Emperor An "again decided that high officials [and those
ranking at] two thousand piculs and over should wear mourning to the
third year."[15] The actual period was twenty-five months.[16] In 154,


42

Emperor Huan "again permitted Inspectors [and officials ranking at] two
thousand piculs to perform the mourning to the third year,"[17] and in
Apr./May 159 he "again decided that Inspectors [and officials ranking at]
two thousand piculs should perform the mourning to the third year."[18]
Thus only at the end of the Later Han period was the mourning to the
third year performed by the high officials as an example to the empire.

 
[1]

Analects XVII, xxi.

[2]

Dubs, Hsüntze, the Moulder, p. 148 ff.

[3]

Y. P. Mei, The Works of Motse, ch. 25.

[4]

Mencius, III, I, ii, 2 (Legge, p. 236).

[5]

Dubs, The Works of Hsüntze, p. 239 ff.

[6]

Mencius, III, I, ii, 3 (Legge, p. 237).

[7]

HS 4: 20a; HFHD I, 270, n. 3.

[8]

HS 84: 4b.

[9]

HS 53: 2a, b.

[10]

HS 11: 2b.

[11]

HS 11: 3b.

[12]

Cf. Glossary, sub Ho Wu.

[13]

HHS, An. 5: 12b.

[14]

HHS, Mem. 36: 13b.

[15]

HHS, An. 5: 16a.

[16]

HHS, Mem. 36: 13a.

[17]

HHS, An. 7: 6b.

[18]

Ibid., 8b.


43

APPENDIX II

ECLIPSES DURING THE REIGN OF EMPEROR AI

i. In Yüan-shou I, i (the first month), on the day hsin-ch'ou, the first
day of the month, an eclipse of the sun is recorded (11: 7a). HS 27
Cb: 16a adds, "It was not total, [but] like a hook, and was 10 degrees in
[the constellation] Ying-shih, in the same month and day as that in the
seventh year of Emperor Hui."

Huang, Concordance des chronologies néoméniques, gives this date as
Feb. 5, 2 B.C., for which day Oppolzer, Canon der Finsternisse, calculates
his solar eclipse no. 2879. He charts the path of totality as passing along
the Yangtze River. Calculation of this eclipse according to Neugebauer,
Astronomische Chronologie, shows that at Ch'ang-an it reached a magnitude
(totality = 1.00) of 0.85 at 7:45 a.m. local time, and that the path
of totality passed through the present Lhassa, Southern Szechuan,
southern Hunan and Foochow. The sun was in longitude 314° = 317°
R.A. The first and principal star in Ying-shih, α, Pegasi was then in 319°
R.A. It is interesting that a total eclipse was not reported when it
went so far south.

In the 10 years between this and the preceding recorded eclipse, no
solar eclipses were visible in China.

ii. HS 11: 8a states, in Yüan-shou II, "the summer, fourth month, on
[the day] jen-ch'en, the last day of the month, there was an eclipse of
the sun." Han-chi 29: 12b merely states, "In the summer, the fourth
month, there was an eclipse of the sun." HS 27 Cb: 16a however states,
"In [Yüan-shou] II, the third month, on [the day] jen-ch'en, the last day
of the month, there was an eclipse of the sun." Huang gives no jen-ch'en
day in the fourth month, but makes that day the last day of the third
month, May 21, 1 B.C. He gives the last day of the fourth month as a
jen-hsü day, June 20, 1 B.C., for which day Oppolzer calculates his solar
eclipse no. 2882. He gives none for the other date. Calculation of this
partial eclipse by Neugebauer's tables shows that it reached a magnitude
of 0.06 at sunset, 5:08 p.m. local time at Ch'ang-an.

It is then evident that jen-ch'en [OMITTED] is a mistaken reading for jen-hsü [OMITTED]
(a natural error), and that someone who knew that jen-ch'en could not
have been the last day of the fourth month corrected the record in ch. 27.
Astronomers must have been looking for this eclipse, else they would
not have perceived it. In the 16 months between this and the preceding
recorded eclipses, no solar eclipses were visible in China.