University of Virginia Library

VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, PER HEAD, IN 1850.

No enumeration was made in 1850 of the whole number of
persons engaged in agriculture, as was done in 1840, and the
returns for the latter year must therefore be the basis of our
calculation for 1850, as to the number, and the consequent
value, of the products per head in the two sections of our
country. Assuming, then, that in the North the proportion of
the whole population of those engaged in agriculture was the
same in 1850 as in 1840, and that in the South the proportion
of the free population thus engaged was no larger than in the
North, we have the following result, viz:

FREE STATES.

     
Whole number engaged in agriculture in 1850,  2,509,126 
Value of agricultural products,  $858,634,334 
Value per head,  $342 

SLAVE STATES.

         
Number of free population engaged in agriculture in 1850,  1,197,649 
Number of slaves engaged in agriculture in 1850,  2,500,000 
Total,  3,697,649 
Value of agricultural products,  $631,277,417 
Value per head,  $171 


41

Page 41

De Bow says of the slave population of 1850 (Census Compendium,
p. 94), there are "about 2,500,000 slaves directly
employed in agriculture." This is a small estimate, and the
number given above (1,197,649) of the 6,412,605 free population
of the South engaged in agriculture is very small. With
the little manufactures and commerce of the South, what are
the people of that region engaged in? But, under protest, we
adopt the above conclusions. This, then, is the grand result in
the department of agriculture, the peculiar province of the
South:

The North, with half as much land under cultivation, and
two-thirds as many persons engaged in farming, produces two
hundred and twenty-seven millions of dollars worth of agricultural
products in a year more than the South; twice as much on an
acre, and more than double the value per head for every person
engaged in farming.

And this, while the South, paying nothing for its labor,
has better land, a monopoly of cotton, rice, cane sugar, and
nearly so of tobacco and hemp, and a climate granting two and
sometimes three crops in a year. Nor does a comparison of the
products of 1850 with those of 1840 afford any ground for
hope for the South. A recurrence to Table XI. will show
that, excluding wheat, sugar, and molasses from the aggregate,
the production of the South for 1840 was nearly equal that of
the North. Perhaps in 1830 it was greater.

Table XIII. gives the population, white and slave, number of
acres of land, value of farms, value of land per acre, number
of students and scholars in public and private schools, and the
number of whites over twenty unable to read and write, in the
counties in the several States on the dividing line between the
Free and Slave States, from the Atlantic to the Mississippi.
The statistics are from De Bow's Compendium of the Census
of 1850. The table is an important one, and deserves a more
extended consideration than can be given it in this work.


42

Page 42

TABLE XIII.
A Statement of Population, White and Slave, Number of acres of Land, Value of Farms, Value of Farms per acre, Number
of Students and Scholars in Public and Private Schools, and the Number of Whites over 20 years of age unable to read
and write, in the Counties on the dividing line between the Free and the Slave States, from the Atlantic to the Mississippi,
with the like Statistics of the Remaining Counties of the respective States.

                                                 
Border Counties
and
Remaining Counties
of their several States. 
White
Population
in 1850. 
Slaves
in 1850. 
Acres of
Improved and
Unimproved
Land
in 1850. 
Value of
Improved and
Unimproved
Land
in 1850. 
Value of Farms
per Acre. 
Pupils in
Colleges, Academies,
and Private
Schools. 
White Scholars
in Public
Schools during
the year. 
No. of Whites
over 5 and
under 20
years old. 
No. of Whites
over 20 unable
to read & write. 
Counties of Delaware adjacent to New Jersey  50,849  741  501,667  $15,848,760  $31.59  2,075  10,596  18,707  6,292 
The remaining County of Delaware  20,320  1,549  454,667  3,541,550  7.79  80  3,620  7,902  3,485 
Counties of New Jersey adjacent to Delaware  47,486  386,720  14,553,731  37.63  185  10,642  17,628  1,120 
Remaining Counties of New Jersey  418,023  2,366,226  105,683,781  44.66  10,129  78,633  148,253  11,667 
County of Pennsylvania adjoining Delaware  23,122  105,569  9,067,082  85.89  303  5,142  8,320  422 
Counties of Maryland adjoining Pennsylvania  315,282  17,430  1,615,227  47,851,615  29.63  10,386  42,885  105,229  19,268 
Remaining Counties of Maryland  102,661  72,938  3,019,123  41,790,373  13.84  1,528  17,562  42,488  19,158 
Counties of Pennsylvania adjoining Maryland  330,688  2,799,532  105,136,277  37.56  3,245  77,376  123,613  11,473 
Counties of Virginia adjoining Pennsylvania  64,540  527  732,913  9,512,647  12.98  867  10,505  24,368  4,001 
Remaining Counties of Virginia  830,260  472,001  25,419,398  213,910,668  8.42  9,544  99,206  320,897  83,382 
Counties of Pennsylvania adjoining Virginia  128,927  1,373,119  32,985,617  24.74  1,330  31,283  49,350  3,708 
Remaining Counties of Pennsylvania  2,129,233  13,545,228  374,890,482  27.68  25,941  466,828  775,320  47,575 
Counties of Virginia adjacent to Ohio  38,251  1,689  980,219  5,543,346  5.65  150  5,677  15,614  3,845 
Counties of Ohio adjacent to Virginia  97,963  843,545  9,354,429  11.09  762  22,374  38,463  4,998 
Remaining Counties of Ohio  1,858,087  17,153,948  349,404,174  20.37  17,911  489,904  719,170  51,960 
Counties of Kentucky adjacent to Ohio  81,749  9,672  926,151  66,923,351  18.27  942  12,327  30,944  4,422 
Counties of Ohio adjacent to Kentucky  261,724  1,069,308  34,577,488  32.34  5,994  48,102  91,906  8,334 
Counties of Kentucky adjacent to Indiana  106,473  28,731  1,653,014  17,250,889  10.44  2,764  16,267  39,303  5,252 
Remaining Counties of Kentucky  654,940  182,251  15,296,746  142,839,410  9.34  11,721  114,650  263,596  62,107 
Counties of Indiana adjacent to Kentucky  134,509  1,276,989  14,480,233  11.34  1,114  26,665  45,657  7,075 
Remaining Counties of Indiana  842,645  11,516,433  121,904,940  10.59  6,140  193,369  353,635  62,370 
Counties of Kentucky adjacent to Illinois  27,443  5,908  627,218  2,918,419  4.65  338  5,235  11,085  2,700 
Counties of Illinois adjacent to Kentucky  18,101  235,716  1,093,685  4.54  none.  2,307  7,384  1,861 
Remaining Counties of Illinois  828,933  11,801,696  95,039,604  8.05  4,686  179,662  328,079  33,575 


43

Page 43

In proportion to the white population, these border counties
of the Slave States contain the following per cent of slaves, viz:

       
Delaware,  1 per cent. 
Maryland,  5 " 
Virginia,  2 " 
Kentucky,  21 " 

The remaining counties of the same States give the following,
viz:

       
Delaware,  8 per cent. 
Maryland,  71 " 
Virginia,  59 " 
Kentucky,  31 " 

The value of lands per acre will be seen by an examination
of the table; and it will be noticed, that, with the exception of
the broken region of Virginia, which lies adjacent to Ohio, and
that of Kentucky, which lies adjacent to Illinois, the value of
lands per acre in the counties of the Slave States adjoining the
Free is greater than that of the remaining counties of their
respective States. The opposite is true, generally, of the
border counties of the Free States. Thus, the effects of
freedom and slavery on the value of the adjacent lands is
reciprocal. The neighborhood of slavery lessens their value in
the Free States; the neighborhood of freedom increases it in
the Slave States. To such an extent is this true, that, in Virginia,
for example, the lands in counties naturally poor, are, by
the proximity of freedom, rendered more valuable than those
unequalled lands in the better portions of the State. Indeed,
this table shows the fact that the lands in the border
counties of the Slave States are worth more per acre than the
remaining lands in the same States, with the addition of the
value of the whole number of their slaves at $400 per head.
And this, be it remembered, while the value of lands in the
balance of the counties of the border Slave States is double
that of the lands in the Slave States not adjacent to the Free.
It is for the interest of the Slave States to be hedged in by a


44

Page 44
circle of Free States. If Tennessee had been a Free State,
her lands would have been worth as much as those of Ohio,—
$19.99 per acre, instead of $5.16 as now,—and who cannot
see that, in that event, the lands of North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Georgia would have been worth more per acre
than the sums of $3.24, $1.40, $4.19, respectively. Not only
could Tennessee afford to sacrifice the whole value of her slaves
for the sake of freedom, but even North Carolina, South Carolina,
and Georgia could afford to sacrifice the whole value of
their own slaves, and pay for all of the slaves in Tennessee for
the sake of having a free neighbor. The increased value of
lands would more than compensate for the sacrifice. The
figures prove this.

                 
Tennessee has 18,984,022 acres of land under cultivation,
worth $5.16 per acre. Multiply this number of acres by
$14.83 (the difference between the value of lands in Tennessee
and Ohio), and the amount is, 
$281,533,046 
Tennessee has 239,459 slaves; value, at $400
each, 
95,783,600 
This leaves the respectable margin of  185,749,446 
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia
have 60,891,774 acres of land, worth $3.08
per acre. Multiply this number of acres by
$15.73 (the difference in value between the
lands in these States and the border Slave
State of Maryland), and the amount is 
$957,827,605 
Number of slaves in these States,  1,055,214 
Value at $400 each,  $422,085,600 
Value of slaves in Tennessee, as above,  95,783,600 
Total,  $517,869,200 
Deducting this from the increased value of
lands, and the balance in favor of free neighbors
is the sum of 
$439,958,405 


45

Page 45

Thus, the figures show that Tennessee could afford, for the
sake of freedom, to sacrifice the whole value of her quarter of
a million of slaves, and pay in addition the sum of $185,749,446.
For the sake of a free neighbor, and to bring up their lands to
the value of those of Maryland, the States of North and South
Carolina, and Georgia, could afford to sacrifice the whole of
their own slaves, pay for those of Tennessee, and make
$439,958,405 by the bargain, which sum is considerably more
than twice the present value of all their lands. Nay, these
States could afford to send off, singly, every slave within their
limits, in a coach with two horses, and provisions for a year, if
they could but bring up the value of their lands to that of the
land in northern Maryland. Indignation, and patriotism, and
dissolution of the Union, indeed, if a fugitive now and then be
not reclaimed! South Carolina could afford to pay every year
more money than she spent in the whole Revolutionary war,
to make her whole number of slaves fugitives; and then make
money enough by the transaction to fence in the whole State
with a picket fence, to prevent their return.