| ||
While there has never been anything like a complete bibliography of Leigh Hunt's journalism, scholars have often attempted to identify the periodicals to which he contributed with some regularity. However, it does not appear that any of Hunt's bibliographers has noticed a significant group of signed essays in the early numbers of the Guide, a cheap weekly newspaper that ran from 22 April 1837 to 1 April 1838. Only one complete run of this threepenny radical weekly is known to exist,[1] but marked file copies of the first nine numbers are preserved—along with various letters, documents, and accounts relating to the Guide—among the papers of its first editor, Henry Cole, in the National Art Library at the Victoria and Albert Museum.[2]
In his autobiographical Fifty Years of Public Work, Cole devotes only two sentences to his brief editorship and part ownership of the Guide, treating it mainly as a learning experience that he subsequently turned to good account in the campaign for uniform penny postage:
In the year 1837, during my contest with the Record Commission, Mr. Charles Buller, M.P., Sir Wm. Molesworth, Bart., M.P., Mr. Leader, M.P. for Westminster, and myself started a cheap threepenny newspaper called the “Guide,” of which I became the editor. Being one of the registered proprietors, and having to go through the dismal and frivolous formalities of obtaining sureties against libel, and for payment of the stamp duties, I became acquainted with all the intricate mysteries of the rights and privileges of newspapers, divided between the Treasury, the Stamp Office, and the Post Office.[3]
The idea for the Guide seems to have originated with Charles Buller and Henry Cole in the spring of 1837, when Cole was temporarily unemployed as a result of his controversy with the Record Commission. On 9 March, Cole noted in his journal that he “called at Buller's and remained with him for two hours discussing the feasibility of starting a 2nd newspaper.”[4] The refer-
The new paper was announced in two prospectuses, the larger of which, printed in the same format as the first two numbers, describes the Guide as “A New Weekly Newspaper, giving the Latest Intelligence of Public Events, and full Information upon all subjects of General Interest.” The smaller prospectus, on a single octavo sheet, lists the following heads under which the contents are to be arranged: Political Guide, Parliamentary Guide, Foreign Guide, Colonial Guide, Gossip, Amusement Guide, Literary Guide, Scientific Guide, Judicial Guide, Commercial and Housekeeper's Guide, Miscellany, Sunday Guide, and Births, Marriages, and Deaths. Although such headings were used fairly regularly in the paper, the actual arrangement proved more flexible than this listing might suggest. The one political issue with which the prospectuses clearly identified the paper was the campaign to eliminate the newspaper tax. The price of each eight-page issue was to be 3d., of which 1d. was for the tax, 1d. for distribution, and 1d. for editorial and printing costs.[7] Financially this was a bold experiment at a time when most weekly papers cost 6d.
Despite the low price and the generally high quality of the writing, sales of the Guide appear to have disappointed expectations from the start, prompting early changes in both the format and the day of publication. Beginning with No. 3 the format was expanded from approximately 10 inches by 12½ inches with three columns per page to approximately 14 inches by 20 inches with five columns per page, and beginning with No. 5 the day of publication was changed from Saturday to Sunday. Although the circulation more or less doubled within the first eight weeks, it did not increase fast enough to make the paper a paying proposition before the initial capital was exhausted. On 15 June, Cole recorded in his journal that the Guide was sold for £100—a sum that was insufficient to clear the paper's debts.[8] No. 9, published on 18 June, was the last to appear under Cole's editorship. Two days later he noted in his journal that he was “introduced to the new pro-
Cole's annotated copies of the Guide identify the authorship of many articles in the first nine numbers. As Cole's political mentor and the paper's principal investor, Charles Buller not only wielded considerable editorial influence but also wrote most of the important political articles as well as a weekly “Journal of a Liberal M.P.” Other contributors included Edwin Chadwick, Joseph Clayton, John H. Elliott, Joseph Henry Garnier, Horace Grant, Thomas Duffus Hardy, William Hardy, William Edward Hickson, Richard Hengist Horne, John Mitchell Kemble, and John Robertson. John Stuart Mill produced one short article for the Guide and allowed Cole to print an extract from a longer article prior to its appearance in the London and Westminster Review. [10] Cole himself wrote a good many articles and obtained Thomas Love Peacock's permission to publish the poems that were later privately printed as Paper Money Lyrics, and Other Poems (1837).[11] But whereas Peacock's poems appeared anonymously, Leigh Hunt's name was prominently attached to his eight weekly essays.
Leigh Hunt's engagement to write for the Guide was apparently arranged through the paper's printer, Charles Reynell, of 26 Little Pulteney Street, whose family was connected by marriage to Hunt's. On 17 April 1837, five days before the publication of the first number of the Guide, Cole wrote in his journal: “Met Leigh Hunt by appt at Reynells—He agreed to write weekly for £2.”[12] Hunt's essays were obviously an important feature of the new paper, but they were by no means his only contributions. Cole's manuscript note at the head of Hunt's first essay indicates that he was paid a total of £2.5.3 for No. 1—£2.2.0 for the essay plus 3.3 for a “Para[graph].” Although Cole did not mark Hunt's paragraph in No. 1, his notes in subsequent issues serve to identify seven of Hunt's unsigned contributions in Nos. 3-7, four of which relate to his friend Carlyle's current series of lectures on German literature.[13] There is also a short poem signed with Hunt's initials in No. 3.
Hunt's involvement with the new paper was not limited to his original writing. As a veteran editor, he apparently gave Cole or Reynell some advice that caused problems on 20 April, when Cole noted in his journal that he
| ||