II
The easiest way for the Society to
establish a corporate identity and also to
serve the core community most directly was to
hold public meetings, and over the next
twenty years the group sponsored about 120 of
them. The University and city newspapers
invited local residents, while Society
members received notice on one-cent postcards
labeled by Addressograph plates. Most
meetings featured a distinguished guest who
gave an evening talk in front of the McGregor
Room fireplace. Gemmill's discussion of
Baskerville in October 1946 foreshadowed the
pattern that developed once the Society was
formally constituted in February 1947.
Besides Bowers's presentation at that
meeting, two other speakers appeared before
the Society that spring: charter members
Charles D. Hurt from the Stone Printing Co.,
Roanoke, speaking about "The Monotype" (18
April), and Charlton Hinman from Johns
Hopkins on "Why 79 First Folios?" (6 June).
When the Society reassembled for the next
academic year, its roster of programs had
attained the shape it was to hold for about
two decades. A list of the talks given the
first two full seasons shows something of the
nature and range of the presentations.
Providing these speakers was a significant
contribution to the life of the University
and town; the guests meanwhile gained an
opportunity to encounter a pleasant part of
the physical and intellectual world, and the
Society benefited from the increased sense of
its existence on the part of its visitors.
1947-48 |
|
Oct. 8
|
Kenneth S. Giniger (Prentice
Hall, New York City), "The
Effect of Modern Publishing
Production Practices on Book
Collecting"
|
Oct. 17
|
Walter L. Pforzheimer
(Washington, D.C.), "On
Copyright"
|

Oct. 24 |
H. W. Tribolet (Chicago),
"Processes of Hand Bookbinding
and Restoration"
|
Nov. 17
|
Earl K. Fischer (Institute of
Textile Technology,
Charlottesville), "On Printing
Inks"
|
Feb. 13
|
C. William Miller (Temple
Univ.), "Henry Herringman"
|
Mar. 12
|
Coolie Verner (UVa), "First
Maps of Virginia"
|
May 14
|
Giles E. Dawson (Folger
Shakespeare Library), "The
Career of R. Walker, Printer-
Publisher, 1729-1750"
|
1948-49 |
|
Oct. 8
|
Charles H. Lindsley (Institute
of Textile Technology,
Charlottesville), "Scientific
Incunabula: Scientific Works
Printed before 1501"
|
Nov. 12
|
James G. McManaway (Folger
Shakespeare Library), "Two
Prompt Books of
Hamlet"
|
Dec. 17
|
William B. Todd (Univ. of
Chicago), "The Strange Case of
the Monk: A Bibliographical
Investigation"
|
Jan. 14
|
Edwin Wolf 2nd (Rosenbach
Company, Philadelphia), "The
Textual Importance of
Manuscript Commonplace Books
of 1620-1660"
|
Feb. 25
|
William B. O'Neal (UVa),
"William Blake as Illustrator
of Books"
|
May 12
|
Robert K. Black (Antiquarian
Bookseller, Montclair, N.J.),
"The Sadleir-Black Collection
of Gothic Novels"
|
May 20
|
John Alden (Curator of Rare
Books, Univ. of Pennsylvania),
"Problems in Eighteenth-
Century American Bibliography"
|
Even in the early years, then, the
Society's speakers were drawn from the ranks
of publishers, printers and binders,
scientists, academics (including historians,
literary critics, bibliographers, and textual
scholars), collectors and curators, dealers,
and art historians. The Society's breadth of
contacts and its increasing recognition
enabled it to lure speakers without
duplication, though a number of them could be
found close to home. As a talented crop of
Fredson Bowers's graduate students came to
maturity they joined the procession: Philip
Williams and Irby B. Cauthen, Jr., in 1952,
George Williams in 1955 and 1958, Oliver
Steele in 1957, and Matthew Bruccoli in 1958.
UVa alumni who were flourishing in the book
world were obvious candidates--people such as
Hinman, Miller, or John D. Gordan, Curator of
the Berg Collection at the New York Public
Library (who spoke in 1954). C. Waller
Barrett, whose collection of American
literature would make the UVa library the
preeminent repository of such materials, was
likewise a natural choice (in 1951 and 1962).
The arrangements for Gordon Ray's
talk on 20 April 1966 show how the Society
might go about planning a visit by someone
with less direct ties to the University. Ray
was already well known to many in the
Charlottesville academic and bibliographic
community, especially through his work as a
Victorian scholar and his presidency of the
Guggenheim
Foundation and the Grolier Club.
On 24 January of that year, Bowers, who had
to be ever alert for articles for
Studies, sent a brief
note to Massey:
We ought to ask Gordon Ray to give a
BibSoc talk? Not only is he Mr.
Guggenheim, but he writes up good,
publishable lectures I could use in
SB. I'll guarantee
the audience from the graduate students.
Massey accordingly wrote Ray, extending these
terms:
We can offer you a literate audience,
a sum sufficient to cover travel
expenses but no honorarium, a decent bed
and an even more decent dinner with even
more decent wines in my own home, your
choice of a suitable subject, and a date
agreeable to you. (3 March 1966)
Ray accepted (14 March), the date was agreed
on, and the subject of the talk chosen from
the possibilities Ray had suggested:
Fredson Bowers . . . prefers your
talk on "Victorian Society and the
Victorian Novel" for its appeal to
graduate students. We might at some
future date have the opportunity to hear
your paper on Sydney Smith. (17 March
1966)
Ray flew into Charlottesville the morning of
the 20th in time for lunch at the Masseys,
where guests included many of the people he
had declared (on 18 March) he hoped to see
while in town: "the Blotners and the
Ehrenpreises . . . the Barretts, the Bowers,
the Shannons." His McGregor Room talk that
evening on "Victorian Society and the
Victorian Novel" was well received, and he
returned to New York the next day. Bowers
never did snare an article from Ray for
Studies, although three
years later in Ray's Foreword to
The American Writer in
England: An Exhibition (from Barrett's
collection at UVa) he sided with Bowers in
the debate that had arisen in the
New York Review of Books
over the editing of American writers, and he
provided what proved to be the most cogent
assessment of the controversy.
Still other visitors were pleased to
book a Charlottesville engagement as part of
a wider speaking tour. The recently
published memoirs of Barbara Kaye
(Second Impression, 1995)
offer insight into such a stop from the
visitor's point of view. In 1951 she
accompanied her husband Percy Muir to speak
to the Society on 24 October. The night
before, he had given his talk "Rogues and
Vagabonds in the Book Trade" at the Folger
Library in Washington; they rode the C&O down
to Charlottesville, visited the University
and Monticello, dined at the Bowers home,
went to the Society meeting, and then caught
the 10:30 train for New York. The exhaustion
created by such a pace may explain the
slippery grasp of details in her account of
their visit to "the university building" at
the "University of North Virginia," where an
"unusual and attractive feature" of the
campus was a wall, which "stands there no
longer." The
repast on the Bowers terrace
was the "typical southern meal" that Mrs.
Bowers, Nancy Hale, had promised: "southern
fried chicken followed by strawberry
shortcake." Barbara Kaye seemed taken aback
to discover that Nancy Hale had written more
novels than she had, but she found the
Bowerses "good company" and as "human and
friendly as everyone else we met." She
enjoyed Charlottesville, but "Bill Jackson's
schedule [for the Muir tour] allowed for no
loitering, and after Percy had delivered his
`Rogues and Vagabonds' talk at the
university, the Bowerses saw us off on the
night train" (208).
Although the evenings with formal papers
were the most frequent Society gatherings,
the group also met under other circumstances.
The annual business meeting of the Society,
chiefly to elect officers, eventually was
combined with an evening lecture, but
initially it served as the occasion for a
"members only" introduction to special items
in the University library or a viewing of
films on printing or illustration. Beginning
in the fall of 1949 and continuing at least
to 1952, the Society sponsored a number of
"Student Round Tables," informal discussion
of bookbinding, type faces, imposition, and
printing (including a demonstration of a hand
press by Charles E. ("Chic") Moran, Jr., of
the University Printing Office). These in
turn led to the library's sponsorship of
"Browsing Room Talks," "in part successor to
the Society's Seminar talks" according to the
Society's Secretary's News
Sheet (SNS) 15.
(Massey himself gave a Browsing Room Talk on
Joyce on 18 March 1958.) In the winter of
1952-53 the Society and library together
sponsored an experimental series of hour-long
"Tea Meetings" in which, according to
SNS 25,
it is planned to have some one person
available to lead the discussion that
may result from the announcement of a
topic: (1) a subject connected with book
collecting; (2) discussion of special
collections in the University of
Virginia Library; (3) discussion of
special functions of the Library; (4) a
subject in technical bibliography.
Four of these were given: by Walter Harding
of the English Department, on collecting
Thoreau; by Mrs. Eleanor Shea, Society
Councilor, on the T. Catesby Jones Print
Collection of the University; by Harvey Deal,
University reference librarian, on the use of
the Union Catalog in research; and by John
Cook Wyllie on "The Forms of Twentieth-
Century Cancels." When Wyllie's paper under
that title was published in
PBSA in 1953, he noted
that it "had its origin as one of a series of
talks on twentieth-century bibliographical
problems prepared at the request of the
student seminar of the Bibliographical
Society of the University of Virginia." Tea
and all it entailed was also a customary way
for the Society to honor special guests, from
at least the time in May 1951 when
"The
Secretary and Mrs. Wyllie" served
"refreshments in the Library Staff Room
immediately following the talk in order to
give members an opportunity to meet the
Barretts," and in 1953 to honor F. C. Francis
of the British Museum, through 1967, when the
visitor of distinction was Keith I. D. Maslen
from the University of Otago in New Zealand.
The various interests to which the
Society's constitution committed it all found
expression in its formal meetings, but some
members wished to follow particular interests
more intensively. Accordingly, the budget
for 1959 introduced a line for "`Typogs' and
Student bibliographical awards." The linking
of those two endeavors suggests that the
"Typogs," later to be called the
"Typographical Section" of the Society and to
receive a separate budget allocation, were
considered an additional way of serving
University students. The student newspaper,
the Cavalier Daily,
described the organization this way:
About a dozen members of the Society
have formed a sub-group interested in
typography. This group holds monthly
meetings. The "typogs" own a printing
press in the basement of Cocke Hall
[perhaps the only building designed by
Stanford White to be used for such
purposes]. According to Mr. William
Runge, secretary of the Society and
chairman of this sub-group, members can
print anything from their own woodcuts
or Christmas cards to books. . . . Any
member of the Society is eligible for
membership in the "typogs." (11 May
1962)
The size of the group fluctuated; the core
members were Runge, Chic Moran, Charles
Smith, and Joan Scholes--all non-students.
An article in the June 1963 issue of the
University's
Alumni
News said that participants "number from
15 to 20 (the total varies)," while thirty
members attended the luncheon on 30 May 1963
honoring Smith on his retirement.
Luncheons in the cafeteria of Newcomb
Hall, the student union, were one of the two
main occasions on which the group manifested
its corporate existence. Beginning in the
fall of 1959, members met at 12:30 on
Wednesdays, often accompanying their lunches
with informal talks (such as those by Warren
Chappell, book designer and artist, who spoke
about type design on 24 May 1962, and A.
Samuels, President of Charlottesville's Allen
Company, speaking on processes for color
separation on 7 November 1962).
The soul of the group, however,
lay in its small printing establishment. In
1962 members adopted for it the name
"Cockescraw Press," with a crowing rooster
designed by Smith as its device. According
to the Richmond Times-
Dispatch,
The name comes from two sources--Cocke Hall,
home of the University art department, where
the press has its quarters, and the grinding
mechanism of a chicken. Apparently Harvey
Gill [actually Deal], University reference
librarian
who supplied the name, envisioned
the press crew spending its time mashing type
and grinding machinery, Runge said. (20
August 1963)
(Before assuming that name, the fledgling
establishment was briefly known as the
"Ruptured Rooster Press.") At its peak of
activity, in 1963, the Press had "two foot-
powered printing presses, a few fonts of
handset type, two proof presses (hand
operated) and various other pieces of
equipment," according to the
Times-Dispatch. Most of
the apparatus had been donated; the Society,
however, purchased the workhorse of the
operation, a 12" x 18" Chandler and Price
press, recognizing not only the delight but
also the instruction that would result.
The printers typically would meet on
Monday nights, generally breaking off by
11:00 or 11:15 in order, according to Runge,
to get a beer before midnight at the Gaslight
Coffee House on West Main Street. Other
deadlines were more problematic for the
group; as Runge told the
Alumni News, in order to
have something printed one needed to "Just
ask us and then wait a couple of years for us
to do it." Under pressure of time, the Press
would sometimes have its compositions printed
by the University Printing Office--which at
other times would set copy in linotype for
the Cockescravians when their supply of type
was too limited. (When those situations
coalesced, the Cockescraw contribution was
limited to design work.)
The largest printing jobs of the
Press tended to be programs--for the Society
itself, as on the occasion of its joint
meeting with the Baltimore Bibliophiles on
11-12 May 1963, and, from February 1962
through April 1964, for the twenty-fourth
through thirtieth Peters Rushton Seminars in
Contemporary Prose and Poetry, the successors
to McGregor Room Seminars that had in fact
served earlier as models for Society meetings
in that room. An undergraduate member of the
Press, Gene Blumenreich, was editor-in-chief
of the student literary magazine
Plume and Sword, and with
his staff printed its covers there. The two
largest projects were booklets:
Atcheson Laughlin Hench: A
Check List, Nineteen Hundred and Twenty-one,
Nineteen Hundred and Sixty-two, a 1962
production to commemorate the work of the
Society's third president and sometime Press
member, and William B. O'Neal's
Charles Smith: His Work in
Book Design: A Checklist (one form of
which was issued as
SNS 50), in conjunction
with a McGregor Room exhibition of Smith's
typographical work opening on 16 May 1963, to
honor him on the occasion of his retirement
from the University.
The surprise reception and
luncheon the Cockescraw Press held for Smith
on 30 May, with Warren Chappell as
toastmaster and illustrator of a menu-
keepsake, marked the apogee of the group.
When Smith left the
Art Department that he
had joined permanently in 1947, serving as
its first chairman for most of that time, so
did the Press's claim on space in the
departmental quarters. Though as late as the
following spring the Press was still printing
Rushton Seminar programs, minutes of the
Society's Council meeting on 23 October 1965
record its quick demise:
Mr. Runge reported that the typogs were in
fact without a home, and that the press would
be moved shortly to a storage area. No
activity would be carried on therefore until
such time as a printing shop can be
found.
Interest in printing itself did not die as
readily, however, and the minutes of 18
September 1971 offer a brighter note:
Mr. Stubbs reported that several
groups have recently asked that the
former Cockescraw Press be put back in
working order and made available for
their use. The press, which is the
property of the Society, has been in
storage at Birdwood for several years;
but Mr. Frantz has said that he would
like to make Library space available for
it. Mr. Beaurline therefore moved that
the press be donated to the Library;
this motion passed without dissent.
By 14 June of the next year Kendon Stubbs was
able to write Massey, then in London:
You might be interested to know that
the old Cockescraw press has been put
back in working condition; and a little
broadside has been produced on it, of
which I have a copy for you when you
return. We might want to consider using
this press for some small keepsake at
some time in the future.
The "little broadside" contained a passage
from John Donne's
Devotions upon Emergent
Occasions, and the press was the
Chandler and Price, which formed the nucleus
of what over the next twenty years was known
as the Alderman Press, on the first floor of
Alderman Library. There the press itself was
subsequently used to print the menu-keepsake
for Fredson Bowers's retirement dinner on 26
October 1974 ("by C.S. & K.S. for I.C."--that
is, Clinton Sisson and Kendon Stubbs for Irby
Cauthen); type for the Society's limited
edition of Faulkner's
Marionettes (1975.3 in
the accompanying list) was also set there.
In the mid 1970s the establishment added a
replica of an eighteenth-century common
press, built chiefly by Lester Beaurline of
the English Department and Clinton Sisson of
the library, in order to provide better
facilities for teaching bibliography.
One way for the Society to serve its
wider communities was to host meetings with
or for other organizations. Some of these
groups were local--the University Library
(whose distinction from the Society was often
unclear), the Medical School Library, the
student History and

English clubs, the
University Press, and the local branch of the
English Speaking Union. But soon they were
also national, beginning with a joint meeting
with the Bibliographical Society of America
on 9-10 May 1952. The BSA met the first day,
with talks by A. H. Greenly, Henry R. Wagner,
and William A. Jackson. The following day
Philip Williams, Irby Cauthen, Joseph Graves,
and Fredson Bowers spoke at the BSUVa
sessions, Bowers serving for the first time
as the heavy artillery that the Society would
roll out to salute visiting scholarly
organizations. He gave the only talk when
the Grolier Club came to Charlottesville on
24-25 October 1958 (at which time the local
newspaper noted John Carter's delight in
examining the library's Michael Sadleir-
Robert Black collection of gothic novels), he
gave the talk at the banquet when the
Baltimore Bibliophiles held a joint meeting
with the Society on 11-12 May 1963, and he
spoke at the Saturday evening dinner when the
Pittsburgh Bibliophiles visited on 24-25
September 1966. (Besides at the inaugural
meeting in 1947, Bowers addressed the Society
as well on 9 April 1957, 10 April 1958, and
20 March 1961--more often than any other
speaker.) Despite its power, this ordnance
seems not to have been overwhelming; one
Baltimore visitor wrote that "Fredson Bowers
capped the evening in a fascinating way," and
another praised the "delightful dinner with
Dr. Bowers making wisdom painless, even in
the abstruse reaches of mechanized
bibliographical description."
The Society also worked with a
variety of other groups, in a number of ways.
In its early days, for instance, it held a
coffee for a regional meeting of the Virginia
State Printers' Association (5 December
1953), and it hosted the Walpole Society (7
May 1954) and the Manuscript Society of
America (27 May 1955); years later it co-
sponsored, with the University's Center for
Advanced Studies and the English Department,
an Eightieth-Birthday Conference for Fredson
Bowers (20-23 April 1985). One reason for
multiple sponsorship of events was that the
line separating the activities of people who
served both as Society officers and as
representatives of other organizations was
not always clear; consequently, when an
exhibition seemed in order for delegates to
the International Congress of Archives (14
May 1966), for example, it was jointly
arranged by the Society and the University
Library. (The next day in the lobby of the
library's Barrett Room the Society hosted a
tea honoring two of the visitors, Sir David
Evans, former Keeper of the Public Records,
and Mr. Peter Walne, County Archivist of
Hertfordshire.) The overlap of
commitments and sponsorships is particularly
evident in the case of Wyllie. Typical is
the announcement in the final issue of
another organization's
News Sheet, that of the
Bibliographical Society of America, at a time
(1951) when the youthful Virginia society
needed all the attention from Wyllie that it
could garner: "Publication of the Index to
the Society's
Papers
[that is, of the BSA] . . . has been delayed
by the death of Mr. David M. Matteson. Mr.
Matteson's work will be carried on by Mr.
John Cook Wyllie of the University of
Virginia Library, Charlottesville, Virginia."
Recognition of the importance of serving the
wider bibliographical world was indeed a
persistent characteristic of the Society.
When in 1958 Donald Hyde as Vice-President of
the BSA organized regional advisory councils,
Dorothy Miner, who as chairman of the
Southern Area Board solicited Wyllie's
participation, cautiously tested whether his
work for the Virginia society had made his
interests more parochial. He happily
accepted the post, pointing out that he had
been a member of the BSA longer than he had
been of the Virginia society (and that he had
no inclination to loosen that tie).
Paradoxically, service that Society leaders
could divert from the Society to the larger
world worked to strengthen the Society--and
in that way too served the larger cause of
bibliography. Wyllie was not formally acting
in his Society capacity when, as Secretary of
the Rare Book Section of the Association of
College and Research Libraries, he arranged
for its first major conference to be held at
the University (18-20 June 1959). One
accomplishment of that visit, however, was to
establish even more indelibly the connection
between the University and the care and study
of books. Fifteen years later, on 30 June-2
July 1974, when the ACRL's Rare Book and
Manuscripts Section Pre-Conference again met
in Charlottesville, the effect was the same--
except that this time the Society formally
participated by sponsoring a cocktail party,
quietly funded by Massey, before the final
banquet.
Though the activities of the
Bibliographical Society and the University
Library sometimes could not be
differentiated, one special function the
Society served from the start was as a
Friends group for the library. (Indeed,
about six months after Wyllie died, C. Waller
Barrett began to organize the group called
the Associates of the University of Virginia
Library and asked Massey to serve on the
Sponsors' Committee.) An advantage of having
supporters under the immediate direction of
the people they purported to help lay in the
efficiency of the operation. Besides
sponsoring book-related talks in the McGregor
Room, as the Associates would do later
(sometimes in conjunction with the Society,
as for the lecture on 23 November 1970 by
Edwin Wolf 2nd), the Society solicited
donations for the library and arranged
exhibitions. In Massey's presidential report
for 1948 (circulated with
SNS 9) he called
attention to "the valuable books acquired
through the Society, many of which have been
described in the Secretary's News Letters"
(e.g. in SNS 2 and 3,
and later 10 and 13). After the visit by
Mrs. Roy Arthur (Rachel McMasters
Miller)
Hunt and the exhibition of her botanical
books in 1952, Wyllie wrote Linton and Mary
Massey,
Two immediate results of your Hunt
operation that are indirect enough for
you never otherwise to hear of: gift of
an incunabulum from Mr. Bemiss . . .
with a nice little 16th-C emblem book
accompanying it. And, Mr. Taylor has
asked me to come by his Long Island home
in June to pick out something he can
give to the University. The
incunabulum, incidentally, is in a Roger
Payne binding. Very nice. (3 May
1952)
But whereas building the library's
collections may have been an implicit goal of
the Society, providing displays of books was
explicitly announced as early as Wyllie's
1946 letter accompanying his questionnaire
(even if a motivation behind such exhibits
might ultimately have also been to develop
University collections). In his 1948 report
Massey reported on the development of this
goal, linking it with the Society's attempt
to spur interest in collecting at the student
level:
Under the auspices of the Society
we instituted a series of exhibitions,
chiefly of rare books belonging to
members. They ranged from a display of
flower prints by Redouté, through a run
of the first editions of William
Faulkner [this exhibition, the first,
was by Massey], to the magnificent
collection of Virginiana shown by Mr.
Arthur Kyle Davis. In the name of the
Society a competition was organized
among students of the University with
suitable prizes offered for the best
three collections of books, which were
later shown in the cases of the McGregor
and Public Documents rooms of the
Alderman Library after awards had been
made by a faculty committee. The
Council proposes to continue both
projects, the exhibition of rare books,
prints and maps, and the student
competition.
He had further presentations to report the
following year (in his 1949 report
distributed with
SNS
13):
Two member exhibitions were held
in the name of the Society: Mr.
Willoughby Newton's collection of the
first editions of T. S. Eliot; and a
display of Mr. John Kelly's novel,
"Alexander's Feast," unique in the sense
that it showed the progression of a
novel step by step from preliminary
sketch to finished book.
Over the years (to the present) the books of
the student winners have continued to provide
interesting displays in the library, even
after the practice of showing members'
collections faded.
Numerous other opportunities also arose
for exhibitions. Sometimes speakers would
bring their own materials--a pattern
established with Chalmers Gemmill's
Baskerville talk in 1946. (That collection
then went on public display at the library.)
One of the earliest attempts to provide such
visual aids miscarried when Nathan Van
Patten's train from Stanford

was snowbound in
Utah and he was unable to speak on 10
February 1949 and show his books published in
Greenland. But others did successfully tell
and show, among them Eric Kessler, from the
Swiss Legation, on "The Contributions of
Switzerland to Book Making" (9 March 1950);
Irvin Kerlan, Acting Director of the Food and
Drug Administration, on children's books (15
May 1953); John D. Gordan, from New York, on
"The Collecting of the First Works of English
and American Authors" (8 October 1954); W.
Hugh Peal, also from New York, on letters of
Charles Lamb (4 November 1955); and Charles
Feinberg, businessman from Detroit, on "Walt
Whitman's Difficulties with Publishers and
Book Sellers" (15 February 1957). Sometimes
the library arranged relevant displays from
its own collections, as it did for Calhoun's
talk "John Bartlett and His `Familiar
Quotations'" (30 September 1957), for
Feinberg's return on 21 March 1958 (where his
own examples were supplemented with holdings
of the Barrett Collection); and Richard
Harwell from Emory University (12 February
1953), whose exhibition consisted of sound
recordings of Confederate songs, complemented
with a display of Confederate sheet music
arranged by Miss Ruth Byrd of the Alderman
staff.
The Society furthermore
cooperated in publicizing travelling
exhibitions in which its own involvement is
unclear--a display of British Books arranged
by the American Institute of Graphic Arts,
for instance (November 1950); a model paper-
making machine from the Hammermill Paper
Company (December 1951); a show on Modern
Swedish Bookbinding (December 1952-January
1953); and books from private presses,
organized by The Society of Printers of
Boston and including the work of Society
members Hunter Middleton, Joe Graves, P. J.
Conkwright, Ben Grauer, and Willis Shell
(October 1953). Another exhibition of
private presswork opened with a Society-
sponsored talk by James Babb, Librarian of
Yale, on 16 October 1953. The Society's
involvement with exhibitions reached full
expression with two major ones it supported
directly: those of botanical books of Mrs.
Roy Arthur Hunt (accompanied by her talk on
25 April 1952) and of the typographical work
of Charles W. Smith (opening on 16 May 1963).
An exhibition of quite a
different kind consisted of what might now be
known as performance art: a presentation of
Charlton Hinman's mechanical collating
machine in action. Wyllie had whetted public
curiosity about the invention as early as
December 1947 in his
Secretary's News Sheet 5:
Dr. Charlton Hinman, who addressed
the Bibliographical Society of the
University of Virginia last June [on
"Why 79 First Folios?"], has caused a
flurry of interest in England with his
"mechanized collation". Mr. F. C.
Francis comments
on it in
The Library for June
1947, and there is a paragraph about it
expressing the "liveliest interest" in
The Times Literary
Supplement for September 27th.
Wyllie's inveterate interest in technology
prompted him to purchase one of the first of
the new machines for the library, and the
interest of Hinman's former dissertation
director Bowers in textual study prompted
Bowers to spur his students to use it. A
burst of publicity accompanied the arrival of
the device in early 1956; with the enthusiasm
that characterized the early Society in
general and
Studies in
Bibliography in particular, Bowers told
the Charlottesville
Daily
Progress that "A whole new field of
investigation is opening before us" (11
February 1956). Given the research then
going on at the University, he was
particularly excited that "This equipment
will reveal previously unsuspected printings
from [nineteenth-century printing] plates,
and will put these in their proper order."
With his recollection of problems he had
earlier tackled himself but also his
characteristic practicality, he went on:
Such information has textual importance,
but also there is a dollars and cents value
to libraries and collectors in knowing which
really were the earliest printings of the
first editions of American classics. We can
now proceed with confidence to the solution
of such problem books as Washington Irving's
"Wolfert's Roost" [the subject of Bowers's
presentation at the very first Society
meeting nine years earlier] and various of
Mark Twain's works.
At the annual business meeting of the
Society a couple weeks later (on 27 February
1956), Matthew Bruccoli, one of Bowers's
students who was to make great use of the
machine, demonstrated it for members and for
guests from the student English Club.
Meanwhile news of the arrival had spread to
Richmond. The book editor of the
Times-Dispatch, Lewis F.
Ball, devoted one of his Sunday columns to
it, in the process providing probably the
most vivid description the machine has ever
received:
There it stood in front of the
fireplace in the McGregor Room of the
Alderman Library at the University of
Virginia--a bulky, box-like metal
monster almost six feet tall with a row
of toggle switches, flashing lights and
a generally sinister appearance. Its
creator, Charlton Hinman, stood by as if
to protect the coven of the
Bibliographical Society, gathered in
solemn sabbath, from any hostile gesture
on the part of the machine. Here,
surely, was Frankenstein Redivivus and a
new creature.
It turned out, though,
that the gadget was entirely harmless--
indeed downright benevolent. . . . (11
March 1956)
Other guests invoked similar imagery. During
the Society's preparation of a bibliography
of his writings, James Branch Cabell wrote
Wyllie after a visit to the library that "I
liked too finding out something about that
mystic Hinman machine" (28 January 1958).
After the 1963 meeting of the Baltimore
Bibliophiles in the McGregor Room, one member
noted
in her letter of thanks to Massey that
"I was ever so glad to see the Hinman
machine--a creature about which I had heard
so much and only now understand." Hinman's
collator, whose presence at UVa was the
product of the interests of early members of
the Bibliographical Society, remains in use
today. Because the machines were expensive
and generally required some understanding of
the bibliographical purposes they might
serve, only a few dozen libraries ever
acquired them; because many libraries that
did so have since removed them from service,
the University of Virginia library has
assumed renewed significance as one of the
best places in the world to conduct
bibliographical research.
Behind the public face of the Society
lay not only weekly attention by its officers
and committees but also formal meetings of
the Council twice a year. From at least 1949
these were held at Kinloch; the business
session would be followed by a dinner
proverbial in local circles for its
excellence. The 4 June 1977 occasion was a
landmark, prompting this tribute from the
Council:
Tonight, for the fiftieth time in its
history, this Society will gather around
the Massey table for gustatory
refreshment after labors intellectual.
Each time we have been introduced to new
delights or we have discovered old
favorites inimitably improved. To
compile a census of the menus would be
to describe a tour through the best
meals of Albemarle and many another
county. . . . Sharing again this
hospitality so graciously given, we look
forward (with some understandable
selfishness) tonight--and to other times
to come--to hearing that "Dinner, Mrs.
Massey, is served."
This tradition had continued even after the
death of Linton Massey on 9 November 1974.
In the memorial resolution Bowers read before
the University faculty, he observed that "The
menus of these dinners, preserved over the
course of twenty-five years, themselves
deserve publication as a bibliography of
dining. The minutes of the meetings we may
leave in decent obscurity." Massey's wife
Mary, who had always been close to the
Society, continued to host the Council until
her poor health forced cessation after the 17
November 1989 dinner, though the Council
visited Kinloch for a business meeting one
last time on 30 April 1993. The minutes that
Bowers spoke of recorded official business,
of course, but those of 13 December 1958 show
the potential inclusiveness of the
Secretary's observations:
There was a brief interlude in the formal
meeting while the President refilled drinks
amid cross currents of discussion, the most
interesting of which seemed to be that
carried on by Messrs. Carrière and Hench on
the topic of sinning and the Catholic
Church.
Meanwhile the Society's annual business
meetings, which had begun as "members only"
occasions for electing officers, modifying
the constitution, and engaging in some
special activity such as examining treasures
of the University Library, viewing movies on
book production, or watching the Hinman
Collator in action, had already in early
years lost their distinctiveness as special
occasions and had been blended into one of
the evening lecture meetings (from the mid
1950s to the mid '60s) or held as short late-
afternoon sessions attended only by Council
members. From 1969 through 1992 the latter
were held in the office of the University
Librarian, with the meetings successively
establishing records for their brevity.
The fortunes of the annual
meetings mirrored the fate of the public
lecture series, whose last talks were
sponsored in 1967. The subsequent
abandonment coincides with the 1968 death of
Wyllie, whose loss deprived the Society of
crucial energy in a program that had already
been confronted by decreased interest.
Attracting an audience had, in fact, been a
challenge from the start. As early as 18
April 1949 Massey had written Bowers
proposing an informal series of talks that
might lure more people (that suggestion soon
led to the Student Round Tables). Some guide
to actual attendance can be gleaned from
Wyllie's advice to Howard Mott before his
talk on 8 November 1951; he told Mott to
expect twenty to thirty people. The day
after Gerald Stevenson addressed the Society
on private presses in Iowa (on 4 January
1962), Chalmers Gemmill wrote Massey, "I
thought that Mr. Stevenson did a good job
last night. It was too bad that more people
did not come out to hear his talk."
In the same letter of 18 April
1949 Massey had pondered the appropriateness
of the setting for the lectures:
Crowd Psychology, applied to our
meetings in the McGregor Room, would
doom us with a sense of inadequacy and
failure. Our numbers are too few for so
large and spacious a room. We should
seek other smaller, possibly more
congenial quarters for our meetings, so
we would not be overwhelmed by the very
magnitude of the McGregor Room, perfect
though it may be in atmosphere and
location.
Bowers responded the next day saying that he
agreed thoroughly; a few years later he had
occasion to express his thoughts more fully
to Massey about a number of the issues at
stake.
I do believe that meetings should be
open to non-members and should be
extensively publicized. I do think we
ought to have more than four a year,
since that is almost complete inactivity
so far as having an organization that
through its meetings can put an impress
on university life. I do think that the
meetings have a little too much
neglected literary-textual subjects and
speakers that would appeal mostly to the
graduate students, who used to attend
meetings very frequently. And we ought
to depend on them to pass on good news
about the Society to other places when
they graduate. Thus Feinberg's talk was
almost ideal because it was about a
literary figure in whom there is a
general interest. It would be nice if
we could work up a talk on Faulkner
bibliography this spring. Why not? I
think we have sometimes thought too
narrowly of subjects as just bookish
ones, and this has had the effect of
alienating the student audience and
others. That is, I do think that most
local members of the Society are NOT
book collectors, and to have talks that
chiefly appeal to the collector a good
deal of the time is to appeal to the
wrong audience. Some yes--but where is
the more general talk we used to have? .
. . I don't think a small gathering is
conspicuous in McGregor room if we
gather in a circle around the speaker in
the big chairs. And it's a hell of a
sight pleasanter. (23 February 1957)
Even after the Society had gotten on its
feet, then, it continued to wrestle about its
appropriate emphasis. Whether the selections
of speakers happened to fit with prevailing
Society goals or not, they had immediate
practical effects: in an overview of Society
activities, the
Cavalier
Daily reported that
"Attendance at meetings
varies from 20 to 150 or more" (11 May 1962).
With only two exceptions, assistance
with the talk by Edwin Wolf 2nd on 23
November 1970 and, notably, with the
Charlottesville conference honoring Fredson
Bowers on his eightieth birthday (20-23 April
1985), the Society sponsored no public
lectures for twenty-seven years. That hiatus
ended in 1994. Under the leadership of its
new president, G. Thomas Tanselle, the
Society's annual business meeting on 22 April
was combined with a program--in the McGregor
Room--conducted by local graduate students.
Moderated by Monique Dull, the session
included Carter Hailey ("George Steevens and
the Revision[s] of Johnson's
Dictionary"), Kelly
Tetterton ("Paperbacks as an Area of
Bibliographical Study: The Case of Virginia
Woolf's Orlando"),
David Gants ("Pictures for the Page:
Techniques in Watermark Reproduction,
Enhancement and Analysis"), and Peter Byrnes
("Byron and the Pirate: The Case of
Poems upon His Domestic
Circumstances"). Besides reestablishing
the Society as a visible presence at the
University, the aim was to recognize and
encourage student bibliographical activity by
providing a public venue for discussion of
that work. Students were able to benefit
further by drawing on the advice of Council
members as they prepared their talks. The
program was remarkably successful, though by
skimming the cream of current work it reduced
the array of papers available the next year.
For the following meeting the Society
consequently pursued another idea it had
considered, that of hearing from University
faculty members doing bibliographical or
textual work other than in the English
Department, where traditionally the Society's
chief academic constituency lay. The speaker
that year, on 21 April 1995, was Gary
Anderson from Religious Studies, who
addressed the group on
"The Life of Adam and Eve
in Text and Iconography." By the next year
another crop of excellent student papers had
matured; with David Gants as moderator at the
29 March 1996 meeting, Frank E. Grizzard,
Jr., spoke on "A Collector's Progress; or,
Why I Have 500 Copies of the Same Book
[Pilgrim's
Progress],"
Elizabeth A. Jordan talked about "Imposing a
Canon: The Curious Printing of Bell's
Poets of Great Britain,"
and Andrew M. Stauffer examined the textual
implications of "Byron's Monumental Epitaph
for His Dog." The revived public meetings
convincingly showed that bibliographical
study at the University had a promising
future.