| ||
Compounded Error
Whereas Table 1 expresses F's success as against its inaction in correcting Q3, it takes no account of actual failures. On nine occasions F compounds an error in Q3 which it apparently undertakes to correct. These are as follows:[17]
166
TLN | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | F1 | |
1.1.71 | 82 | spoke, or thou | spoke, or thou | spoke, or what | spoken, or |
canst worse | canst | thou canst | thou canst | ||
2.1.18 | 659 | whose taste the | whose state the | of his state: | |
wise are found | wise are found | then there are | |||
sound | |||||
2.2.3 | 955 | life-harming | half-harming | selfe-harming | |
2.2.103 | 1058 | there no | there two | there | |
3.3.17 | 1601 | our heads | your heads | your head | |
3.3.119 | 1706 | princesse | a Prince | a Prince, is | |
3.4.24 | 1834 | come | commeth | comes | |
4.1.41 | 1964 | to see that | I to see the | to see the | |
5.3.63 | 2562 | held | hald | had |
The small number of compounded errors is itself significant when compared with the number of correct restorations of the Q1 reading. But to compare figures directly would be misleading, if the hypothesis of relatively well-corrected areas of text has any validity: one would need to examine in turn the situation inside and outside those areas.
| ||