Anomalous Types
Three anomalous appearances are listed among the types charted
(no.'s 12, 21 and 22). I can discover no explanation for the anomalous
appearance of numbers 12 and 22, but the third, no. 21, can be readily
explained. Distinctive type Y21 (no. 21) is found in the lower part of
column H2vb at l. 36 and found again in the Dz page
K5v. Since
column H2vb supplied three distinctive types to By pages,
distribution
of column H2vb is assigned to Compositor B in the chart.
The three
distinctive types mentioned are h44, common to H2vb32
and
H6va44; e27, common to H2vb29 and
I5b11; and o38, common
to H2vb66 and I2b11. Only the last of these three
distinctive types is
evidence that Compositor B distributed the lower part of column
H2vb,
but it is not good evidence because it was located in the last line of the
wrought-off column H2vb where it would have been
especially
vulnerable to a stripping accident. More probably, therefore, Compositor
B distributed only the
upper part of column H2vb, including ll. 29 and 32, while
Compositor
D distributed the lower part of the column, including l. 36 where Y21 was
last seen before it recurred in the Dz page K5v. The
recurrence of Y21
is probably not anomalous but instead becomes further evidence of
Compositor D's use of case z during the setting of quire H. In summary,
the three-case hypothesis for quires G-I explains all but two of the
distinctive type recurrences charted (no.'s 12 and 22), whereas Hinman's
two-case theory for quires G-I failed to explain six of these recurrences
(no.'s 17-22).