University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  

collapse section 
 XLVI. 
collapse sectionXLVII. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionXLVIII. 
  
  
collapse sectionXLIX. 
  
  
  
  
 L. 
 LI. 
collapse sectionLII. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionLIII. 
  
 LIV. 
 LV. 
collapse sectionLVI. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionLVII. 
  
collapse sectionLVIII. 
  
  
collapse sectionLIX. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionLX. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionLXI. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionLXII. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionLXIII. 
  
  
  
 LXIV. 
ARTICLE LXIV.
 LXV. 
collapse sectionLXVI. 
  
 LXVII. 
 LXVIII. 
collapse sectionLXIX. 
  
collapse sectionLXX. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionLXXI. 
  
 LXXII. 
 LXXIII. 
 LXXIV. 
 LXXV. 
collapse sectionLXXVI. 
  
 LXXVII. 
collapse sectionLXXVIII. 
  
  
collapse sectionLXXIX. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionLXXX. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

collapse section 
collapse sectionI. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionII. 
  
 III. 
 IV. 
 V. 
 VI. 
collapse sectionVII. 
  
 VIII. 
 IX. 
 X. 
 XI. 
 XII. 
 XIII. 
 XIV. 
 XV. 
collapse sectionXVI. 
  
collapse sectionXVII. 
  
 XVIII. 
 XIX. 
 XX. 
 XXI. 
 XXII. 
 XXIII. 
collapse sectionXXIV. 
  
  
 XXV. 

197

Page 197

ARTICLE LXIV.

Overwharton Parish, Stafford County.

I come now to Overwharton parish in Stafford county. The
county and parish take their names from the corresponding ones
in England. Stafford county once extended up to the Blue Ridge
Mountain. In the year 1730, Prince William county was formed
from the "heads of King George and Stafford." Overwharton
parish was also coextensive with Stafford before Prince William
was taken off. In the same year,—1730,—Overwharton parish
was divided and Hamilton parish taken off. Overwharton covered
the narrow county of Stafford, and Hamilton the large county of
Prince William before Fauquier, Fairfax, and Loudoun were taken
away. Stafford, in its original dimensions, first appears as a
county in 1666. When it was erected into a parish is not known,—
but most probably about the same time. Its division in 1730
is the first mention of it. The Rev. Robert Rose in his account-book
mentions the Rev. Alexander Scott as a minister in it in
1727; and it is well known that he was the minister of this parish
for many years.[31] He came from Scotland,—being obliged to leave,
it is supposed, after some unsuccessful rebellion. He never married.
Having acquired considerable property, he invited his younger
brother, the Rev. James Scott, to come over and inherit it. He
had one estate in Stafford called Dipple, at which he lived. His


198

Page 198
brother came over, and after some time became the minister of the
adjoining parish of Dettingen in Prince William, which was separated
from Hamilton when Fauquier was taken from Prince
William, and in which he ministered for thirty-seven years. Mr.
Alexander Scott had as his assistant or curate, for a short time
before his death, the Rev. Mr. Moncure, a Scotchman, but descendant
of a Huguenot refugee who fled from France at the revocation
of the Edict of Nantes. Mr. Moncure was the successor of
Mr. Scott. In what year he entered on his duties I have been
unable to ascertain, but his name is still to be seen painted on one
of the panels of the gallery in Old Aquia Church, together with
those of the vestry in 1757. The first church was burned in the
year 1751. I here give the names of the minister and vestry as
painted on the gallery in the year 1757, when it is supposed the
second church was finished. John Moncure, minister. Peter
Houseman, John Mercer, John Lee, Mott Donithan, Henry Tyler,
William Mountjoy, Benjamin Strother, Thomas Fitzhugh, Peter
Daniel, Traverse Cooke, John Fitzhugh, John Peyton, vestrymen.
It is gratifying to know that the descendants of the above are, with
probably but few exceptions, in some part of our State or land still
attached to the Episcopal Church. Their names are a guarantee
for their fidelity to the Church of their fathers. Of the minister,
the Rev. J. Moncure, the following extract from a letter of one of
his daughters, who married General—afterward Governor—Wood,
of Virginia, will give a more interesting account than any which
could possibly be collected from all other sources. It was written
in the year 1820, to a female relative, the grand-daughter of the
Rev. James Scott, who married a sister of the Rev. Mr. Moncure's
wife, and daughter of Dr. Gustavus Brown, of Port Tobacco,
Maryland:—

"I was only ten years old when I lost my dear father. He was a Scotchman
descended from a French ancestor, who fled among the first Protestants
who left France in consequence of the persecution that took place
soon after the Reformation. He had an excellent education, and had made
considerable progress in the study of medicine, when an invitation to seek
an establishment in Virginia induced him to cross the Atlantic, and his
first engagement was in Northumberland county, where he lived two years
in a gentleman's family as private tutor. During that time, although teaching
others, he was closely engaged in the study of divinity, and, at the commencement
of the third year from his first arrival, returned to Great Britain
and was ordained a minister of the then Established Church; came back
to Virginia and engaged as curate to your great-uncle, Alexander Scott,
who at that time was minister of Overwharton parish, in Stafford county,
and resided at his seat of Dipple. Your uncle died a short time after, and


199

Page 199
my dear father succeeded him in his parish and resided at the glebe-house.
Your grandfather, the Rev. James Scott, who inherited Dipple, continued
there until he settled at Westwood, in Prince William. He was my
father's dearest, kindest friend, and one of the best of men. Their intimacy
brought my father and my mother acquainted, who was sister to
your grandmother Scott. Old Dr. Gustavus Brown, of Maryland, my maternal
grandfather, objected to the marriage of my father and mother.
Although he thought highly of my father, he did not think him an eligible
match for his daughter. He was poor, and very delicate in his health.
Dr. Brown did not, however, forbid their union, and it accordingly took
place. The old gentleman received them as visitors and visited them
again, but would not pay down my mother's intended dowry until he saw
how they could get along, and `to let them see that they could not live on
love without other sauce.'[32] I have often heard my dear mother relate the
circumstances of her first housekeeping with tears of tender and delightful
recollection. They went home from your grandpapa's, where they were
married, with a slenderly-supplied purse and to an empty house,—except
a few absolute necessaries from their kind friends. When thus arrived,
they found some of my good father's parishioners there: one had brought
some wood, another some fowls, a third some meal, and so on. One good
neighbour would insist on washing for them, another would milk, and
another would tend the garden; and they all delighted to serve their good
minister and his wife. Notwithstanding these aids, my mother found much
to initiate her into the habits of an industrious housewife, and my father
into those of an active, practical farmer and gardener, which they never
gave up. When the business of preparing their meal was over, a small
writing-stand was their table, the stair-steps furnished one a seat, and a
trunk the other. Often, when provisions were scarce, my father took his
gun or his fishing-rod and with his dog sallied forth to provide their dinner,
which, when he returned, his happy wife dressed; and often would she

200

Page 200
accompany him a-fishing or fowling, for she said that they were too poor
to have full employment in domestic business. Though destitute of every
luxury, they had a small, well-chosen library which my father had collected
while a student and tutor. This was their evening's regale. While
my mother worked with her needle he read to her. This mode of
enjoyment pleasantly brought round the close of the first year. When
the minister's salary was paid they were now comparatively rich. My
dearest father exchanged his shabby black coat for a new one, and the next
year was affluent. By this time the neighbouring gentry found out the
value of their minister and his wife, and contended for their society by
soliciting visits and making them presents of many comforts. Frequently
these grandees would come in their splendid equipages to spend a day at
the glebe, and bring every thing requisite to prevent trouble or expense to
its owners,—merely for the enjoyment of the society of the humble inhabitants
of this humble dwelling. In the lapse of a few years, by frugality
and industry in the management of a good salary, these dear parents
became quite easy in their circumstances. My father purchased a large
tract of land on the river Potomac. He settled this principally by tenants;
but on the most beautiful eminence that I ever beheld, he built a good
house, and soon improved it into a very sweet establishment. Here I was
born: my brother and two sisters, considerably my seniors, were born at the
glebe. My brother, who was intended for the Church, had a private tutor
in the house. This man attended also to my two sisters, who previously
to his residence in the family were under the care of an Englishman, who
lived in the house, but also kept a public school under my father's direction
about a mile from his house. Unhappily for me, I was the youngest,
and very sickly. My father and mother would not allow me to be compelled
to attend to my books or my needle, and to both I had a decided
aversion, unless voluntarily resorted to as an amusement. In this I was indulged.
I would sometimes read a lesson to my sister or the housekeeper, or,
if their authority was resisted, I was called to my mother's side. All this
amounted to my being an ignorant child at my father's death, which was a
death-stroke to my dearest mother. The incurable grief into which it plunged
her could scarcely be a matter of surprise, when the uncommonly tender
affection which united them is considered. They were rather more than
middle-aged when I was first old enough to remember them; yet I well recollect
their inseparable and undeviating association. They were rarely seen
asunder. My mother was an active walker and a good rider. Whenever she
could do so, she accompanied him in his pastoral visits,—a faithful white
servant attending in her absence from home. They walked hand in hand,
and often rode hand in hand,—were both uncommonly fond of the cultivation
of flowers, fruits, and rare plants. They watched the opening buds
together,—together admired the beauty of the full-blown blossoms, and
gathered the ripening fruit or seed. While he wrote or read, she worked
near his table,—which always occupied the pleasantest place in their chamber,
where he chose to study, often laying down his pen to read and comment
on an impressive passage. Frequently, when our evening repast was
over, (if the family were together,) some book, amusing and instructive,
was read aloud by my dear father, and those of the children or their
young associates who could not be silent were sent to bed after evening
worship,—which always took place immediately after supper. Under the
void which this sad separation occasioned, my poor mother's spirits sunk
and never rallied. The first six or eight months were spent in a dark,

201

Page 201
secluded chamber, distant from that formerly occupied. The management
of the family devolved on my brother and second sister. My eldest
married two or three years previous to this period. I was left pretty much
to my own management. The education of my brother and sister was
so far finished that they not only held what they had acquired, but continued
to improve; but alas, poor me! I as usual refused every thing like
study, but became, unfortunately, immoderately fond of books. The key
of the library was now within my power, and the few romances it contained
were devoured. Poetry and a botanical work with plates came
next. This gave me a useless, superficial knowledge of what might have
been useful, but what in this indigested way was far otherwise. The
Tattler, Guardian, and Spectator were the only works I read which contained
beneficial instruction; and of these I only read the amusing papers;
and, taking the beautiful and sublime allegories which abound with moral
instruction in a literal sense, I read them as amusing tales. This kind
of reading made up a pernicious mass of chaotic matter that darkened
while it seemed to enlighten my mind, and I soon became romantic and
exceedingly ridiculous,—turned the branches of trees together and called
them a bower, and fancied I could write poetry, and many other silly
things. My dear mother suffered greatly toward the close of her life with a
cancer: for this she visited the medicinal springs, and I was chosen to attend
her. It was a crowded and gay scene for me, who had lived almost entirely
in seclusion. I did not mix in its gayest circle; yet it was of service to
me, as it gave me the first view of real life that ever I had. My beloved
parent was not desirous of confining me; but I rejoice at the recollection
that I very seldom could be prevailed on to leave her. There I first
became the favourite and devoted friend of your most excellent mother.
Forgive the vanity of this boast, my dear cousin, but I cannot help
observing that she afterward told me that it was the manner in which
I discharged this duty that won her esteem and love. At this place I
first met with General Wood, who visited me soon after my return home,
and became my husband four years after."

The time of Mr. Moncure's death is seen from the following letter
from that true patriot and statesman, Mr. George Mason, of Gunston,
Fairfax county, Virginia. As he signs himself the kinsman
of Mrs. Moncure, the relationship must have come from connection
between the Browns, of Maryland, and Masons. Dr. Brown came
to this country from Scotland in 1708, and married in Maryland.

"Dear Madam:

I have your letter by Peter yesterday, and the day
before I had one from Mr. Scott, who sent up Gustin Brown on purpose
with it. I entirely agree with Mr. Scott in preferring a funeral sermon at
Aquia Church, without any invitation to the house. Mr. Moncure's character
and general acquaintance will draw together much company, besides
a great part of his parishioners, and I am sure you are not in a condition
to bear such a scene; and it would be very inconvenient for a number of
people to come so far from church in the afternoon after the sermon. As
Mr. Moncure did not desire to be buried in any particular place, and as it
is usual to bury clergymen in their own churches, I think the corpse being


202

Page 202
deposited in the church where he had so long preached is both decent and
proper, and it is probable, could he have chosen himself, he would have
preferred it. Mr. Scott writes to me that it is intended Mr. Green shall
preach the funeral sermon on the 20th of this month, if fair; if not, the
next fair day; and I shall write to Mr. Green to morrow to that purpose,
and inform him that you expect Mrs. Green and him at your house on the
day before; and, if God grants me strength sufficient either to ride on
horseback or in a chair, I will certainly attend to pay the last duty to the
memory of my friend; but I am really so weak at present that I can't walk
without crutches and very little with them, and have never been out of
the house but once or twice, and then, though I stayed but two or three
minutes at a time, it gave me such a cold as greatly to increase my disorder.
Mr. Green has lately been very sick, and was not able to attend
his church yesterday, (which I did not know when I wrote to Mr. Scott:)
if he should not recover soon, so as to be able to come down, I will inform
you or Mr. Scott in time, that some other clergyman may be applied to.

"I beseech you, dear madam, not to give way to melancholy reflections,
or to think that you are without friends. I know nobody that has reason
to expect more, and those that will not be friends to you and your children
now Mr. Moncure is gone were not friends to him when he was living,
let their professions be what they would. If, therefore, you should find
any such, you have no cause to lament the loss, for such friendship is not
worth anybody's concern.

"I am very glad to hear that Mr. Scott purposes to apply for Overwharton
parish. It will be a great comfort to you and your sister to be so
near one another, and I know the goodness of Mr. Scott's heart so well,
that I am sure he will take a pleasure in doing you every good office in
his power, and I had much rather he should succeed Mr. Moncure than
any other person. I hope you will not impute my not visiting you to any
coldness or disrespect. It gives me great concern that I am not able to
see you. You may depend upon my coming down as soon as my disorder
will permit, and I hope you know me too well to need any assurance that
I shall gladly embrace all opportunities of testifying my regard to my deceased
friend by doing every good office in my power to his family.

"I am, with my wife's kindest respects and my own, dear madam, your
most affectionate kinsman,

George Mason."

As to the successor of Mr. Moncure in this parish, it is probable
that the Rev. Mr. Green, mentioned in the above letter, took his
place in 1764. It is certain that Mr. Scott did not. In the years
1774 and 1776 the Rev. Clement Brooke was minister. After the
Revolution, in the Convention of 1785, called for organizing the
diocese and considering the question of a general confederation of
Episcopalians throughout the Union, we find the Rev. Robert
Buchan the minister of Overwharton parish, and the Rev. Mr.
Thornton of Brunswick parish, which had been taken from King
George and given to Stafford when St. Paul's was taken from Stafford
and given to King George. The lay delegates at that Convention
were Mr. Charles Carter, representing Overwharton parish,
and Mr. William Fitzhugh, of Chatham, representing Brunswick


203

Page 203
parish, which lay on the Rappahannock and reached to Hanover
parish in King George. In the year 1786 we find Mr. Fitzhugh
again representing Brunswick parish; and this is the last notice we
have of the Church in Stafford until some years after the revival
of Conventions. In the year 1819, the Rev. Thomas Allen, the
present devoted missionary to the poor in Philadelphia, took charge
of this parish and laboured hard for its resuscitation, preaching
alternately at Dumfries and Aquia Churches. At a subsequent
period the Rev. Mr. Prestman, afterward of New Castle, Delaware,
gave all his energies to the work of its revival. The labours of
both were of some avail to preserve it from utter extinction, but
not to raise it to any thing like prosperity. The Rev. Mr. Johnson
also made some ineffectual efforts in its behalf as a missionary. In
the year 1838, I visited Old Aquia Church as Assistant-Bishop. It
stands upon a high eminence, not very far from the main road from
Alexandria to Fredericksburg. It was a melancholy sight to behold
the vacant space around the house, which in other days had
been filled with horses and carriages and footmen, now overgrown
with trees and bushes, the limbs of the green cedars not only casting
their shadows but resting their arms on the dingy walls and
thrusting them through the broken windows, thus giving an air of
pensiveness and gloom to the whole scene. The very pathway up
the commanding eminence on which it stood was filled with young
trees, while the arms of the older ones so embraced each other over
it that it was difficult to ascend. The church had a noble exterior,
being a high two-story house, of the figure of the cross. On its top
was an observatory, which you reached by a flight of stairs leading
from the gallery, and from which the Potomac and Rappahannock
Rivers, which are not far distant from each other, and much of the
surrounding country, might be seen. Not a great way off, on another
eminence, there might be seen the high, tottering walls of the
Old Potomac Church, one of the largest in Virginia, and long before
this time a deserted one. The soldiers during the last war
with England, when English vessels were in the Potomac, had
quartered in it; and it was said to have been sometimes used as a
nursery for caterpillars, a manufactory of silk having been set up
almost at its doors. The worshippers in it had disappeared from the
country long before it ceased to be a fit place for prayer. But there
is hope even now for the once desolated region about which we have
been speaking. At my visit to Old Aquia Church in the year 1837,
to which I allude, I baptized five of the children of the present Judge
Moncure, in the venerable old building in which his first ancestor

204

Page 204
had preached and so many of his other relatives had worshipped.
He had been saving them for that house and that day. I visited
once more, during the last spring, that interesting spot. Had I
been suddenly dropped down upon it, I should not have recognised
the place or building. The trees and brushwood and rubbish had
been cleared away. The light of heaven had been let in upon the
once gloomy sanctuary. At the expense of eighteen hundred
dollars, (almost all of it contributed by the descendants of Mr.
Moncure,) the house had been repaired within, without, and above.
The dingy walls were painted white and looked new and fresh, and
to me it appeared one of the best and most imposing temples in our
land. The congregation was a good one. The descendants of Mr.
Moncure, still bearing his name, formed a large portion. I was
told that all those whom I had baptized eighteen years ago (some of
whom, of course, were not babes at the time) were there and meant
to make it their home. The country, which seemed some time
since as if it were about to be deserted of its inhabitants by reason
of sickness and worn-out fields, is putting on a new aspect. Agriculture
is improving. A better population is establishing itself in
the county, and at the end of a century there is an encouraging
prospect that a good society and an Episcopal congregation will be
again seen around and within Old Aquia Church. The Rev. Mr.
Wall is now their minister.

The Hon. Judge Daniel, of the Supreme Court, has been kind
enough to supply me with the following letter, which, with the
accompanying extracts from the county records, will be an important
addition to my notices of this parish:—

"Dear Sir:

In reply to your inquiries concerning the Old Potomac
Church and its neighbourhood, I give you the following statement, founded
in part upon tradition and partly upon my own recollection. My maternal
grandfather, John Moncure, a native of Scotland, was the regular minister
both of Aquia and Potomac Churches. He was succeeded in the ministry
in these churches by a clergyman named Brooke, who removed to the
State of Maryland. The Rev. Mr. Buchan succeeded him: he was tutor
in my father's family, and educated John Thompson Mason, General
Mason, of Georgetown, Judge Nicholas Fitzhugh, and many others.
Going back to a period somewhat remote in enumerating those who lived
in the vicinity of Potomac Church, I will mention my great-grandfather,
Rowleigh Travers, one of the most extensive landed proprietors in that
section of the country, and who married Hannah Ball, half-sister of Mary
Ball, the mother of General George Washington. From Rowleigh Travers
and Hannah Ball descended two daughters, Elizabeth and Sarah Travers:
the former married a man named Cooke, and the latter my grandfather,


205

Page 205
Peter Daniel. To Peter and Sarah Daniel was born an only son,—Travers
Daniel, my father,—who married Frances Moncure, my mother, the daughter
of the Rev. John Moncure and Frances Brown, daughter of Dr. Gustavus
Brown, of Maryland. The nearest and the coterminous neighbour
of my father was John Mercer, of Marlborough, a native of Ireland, a
distinguished lawyer; the compiler of `Mercer's Abridgment of the Virginia
Laws;' the father of Colonel George Mercer, an officer in the British
service, and who died in England about the commencement of the Revolution;
the father also of Judge James Mercer, father of Charles F. Mercer,
of John Francis Mercer, who in my boyhood resided at Marlborough, in
Stafford, and was afterward Governor of Maryland; of Robert Mercer, who
lived and died in Fredericksburg; of Ann Mercer, who married Samuel
Selden, of Selvington, Stafford; of Maria Mercer, who married Richard
Brooke, of King William, father of General George M. Brooke; and of
another daughter, whose name is not recollected,—the wife of Muscoe
Garnett and mother of the late James M. Garnett.

Proceeding according to contiguity were Elijah Threlheld, John
Hedgeman, who married a daughter of Parson Spencer Grayson, of
Prince William; Thomas Mountjoy, William Mountjoy, and John Mountjoy,
the last-mentioned of whom emigrated to Kentucky, having sold
his farm to Mr. John T. Brooke, the brother of the late Judge Francis
T. Brooke, and who married Ann Cary Selden, daughter of Ann Mercer
and grand-daughter of John Mercer. Next in the progression was the
residence of John Brown, who married Hannah Cooke, daughter of Elizabeth
Travers and grand-daughter of Hannah Ball, wife of Rowleigh
Travers. Next was the glebe, the residence of the Rev. Robert Buchan.
Adjoining this was the residence, (in the immediate vicinity of the church,)
called Berry Hill, of Colonel Thomas Ludwell Lee, who possessed another
plantation, on the opposite side of Potomac Creek, called Bellevue. The
son of the gentleman last named, and bearing the same name, removed to
London. Of his daughters, one married Daniel Carroll Brent, of Richland,
Stafford, and the other Dr. John Dalrymple Orr, of Prince William. Next
to Berry Hill was the plantation of John Withers, on the stream forming
the head of Potomac Creek. Crossing this stream were those of John
James, Thomas Fitzhugh, of Boscobel, Major Henry Fitzhugh, of Belle
Air, Samuel Selden, of Selvington, the husband of Ann Mercer, and lastly,
Belle Plaine, the estate of Gaury Waugh, and, after his death, of his sons,
George Lee Waugh and Robert Waugh. I have thus, sir, without much
attention to system or style, attempted a compliance with your request,
and shall be gratified if the attempt should prove either serviceable or
gratifying. I would remark that the enumeration given you, limited to a
space of some eight or ten miles square, comprises none but substantial
people, some of them deemed wealthy in their day, several of them persons
of education, polish, and refinement.

"With great respect, yours,
P. V. Daniel."

The present clerk of Stafford county (Mr. Conway) has also been
kind enough to search through the old records, going back to the
year 1664, for such things as may answer my purpose. Among
the items furnished is the presentment, in the year 1693, by Richard
Gipson, of George and Robert Brent as being Popish recusants.


206

Page 206
He calls upon the court to insist upon their taking the test-oath in
order to the practice of law. That oath is abjuration of transubstantiation.
The court sustains the presentment and requires
them to take the oath; but they refuse, and appeal to the General
Court in Williamsburg. What was the issue we know not, but
believe that they were leading men at the bar after that. One of
them was associated in the practice with the first William Fitzhugh,
and one of them joint sponsor with the first George Mason at the
baptism of an Indian boy whom they had taken prisoner.

We find also presentments for swearing, for pitching and playing
on the Sabbath, for not attending church. The fines were five to
ten shillings, to be paid to the churchwardens for the poor of the
parish. To the great kindness and diligence of Mr. Conway I am
indebted for a list of the justices from the year 1664 to 1857. Of
course it is a long list. I shall only select the surnames of those
most familiar to our ears:—

Williams, Alexander, Mason in great numbers, Osburn, Fitzhugh in
great numbers, Buckner, Thompson, Withers, Maddocks, Massey, Anderson,
Waugh, West, Hoe, Washington in great numbers, Sumner, Jameson,
Dade, Harrison, Storkey, Broadwater, Linton, Berryman, Farrow, Thornton,
McCarty, Triplett, Grigsby, French, Aubrey, Hedgeman, Markam,
Lee, Carter, Brent, Fowke, Bernard, Foote, Doniphan, Peyton in numbers,
Grant, Daniel in numbers, Scott, Walker, Waller, Chapman, Mercer,
Strother, Stewart, Stith, Seldon, Moncure, Bronaugh, Edrington, James,
Adie, Brown, Banks, Mountjoy, Hewett, Vowles, Morson, Hood, Nicholas,
Eustace, Ficklin, Richards, Botts, Wallace, Fox, Brooke, Bristoe, Lewis,
Lane, Seddon, Tolson, Voss, Crutcher, Forbes, Skinker, Rose, Beale,
Grayson, Hill, Cooke, Norman, Briggs, Morton, Bowen, Kendall, Conway,
Green, Benson, Chinn, Browne, Stone, Irvine, Slaughter, O'Bannon,
Harding, Hickerson, Clift.

We must not in our minds confine all these to Stafford as it now
is, but think of its original dimensions.

 
[31]

The Rev. Alexander Scott was minister in this parish in 1724, and for thirteen
years before, as appears from his report to the Bishop of London. Being then a
frontier-county, its limits were not known; but it was inhabited about eighty miles
along the Potomac and from three to twenty miles in the interior. There were six
hundred and fifty families, eighty to one hundred communicants, in attendance, one
church, and several chapels. Glebe so inconvenient that he rented it out and bought
one more convenient for himself. His church and chapels as full as they could hold.

Epitaph of Rev. Alexander Scott, who was buried at Dipple, his seat on the Potomac:—"Here
lies the body of Rev. Alexander Scott, A. M., and presbyter of the
Church of England, who lived near twenty-eight years minister of Overwharton
parish, and died in the fifty-third year of his age,—he being born the 20th day of
July, A.D. 1686, and departed this life the 1st day of April, 1738.

"Gaudia Nuncio Magna."

This is written upon his coat of arms, which is engraved upon his tomb.

[32]

The opposition of Dr. Brown to the marriage of his eldest daughter with a
poor clergyman does not seem to have been attended with the evils which he doubtless
apprehended, for Mr. Moncure prospered both in temporal and spiritual things.
He has numerous descendants who have also prospered, and many of them are
living on the very lands bequeathed to them by their ancestor, who purchased them
at a cheap rate during his ministry. They are also zealous friends of the Church
wherever we hear of them. Dr. Brown had many other daughters, four of whom
followed the example of their eldest sister and married clergymen of the Episcopal
Church. The Rev. James Scott, of Dettingen parish, Prince William, married one,
who is the maternal ancestor of numerous families in Virginia of whom we shall
soon speak. The Rev. Mr. Campbell and the Rev. Mr. Hopkins and the Rev.
Samuel Claggett, of Maryland, (doubtless a relative, perhaps a brother, of Bishop
Claggett,) married the fifth, so that the family of Browns were thoroughly identified
with the Episcopal Church and ministry.

Epitaph of Mrs. Frances Brown, who was buried at Dipple, the seat of the Rev.
Alexander Scott, on the Potomac.—"Here lyeth the body of Frances, the wife of
Dr. Gustavus Brown, of Charles county, Maryland. By her he had twelve children,
of whom one son and seven daughters survived her. She was a daughter of Mr.
Gerard Fowke, late of Maryland, and descended from the Fowkes of Gunster Hall,
in Staffordshire, England. She was born February the 2d, 1691, and died, much
lamented, on the 8th of November, 1744, in the fifty-fourth year of her age."