21. Difference between identity of man and of person.
But yet it is hard to conceive that Socrates, the same
individual man, should be two persons. To help us a little in this, we must consider what is meant by Socrates, or
the same individual man.
First, it must be either the same individual, immaterial, thinking substance; in short, the same numerical soul, and
nothing else.
Secondly, or the same animal, without any regard to an immaterial soul.
Thirdly, or the same immaterial spirit united to the same animal.
Now, take which of these suppositions you please, it is impossible to make personal identity to consist in anything
but consciousness; or reach any further than that does.
For, by the first of them, it must be allowed possible that a man born of different women, and in distant times,
may be the same man. A way of speaking which, whoever admits, must allow it possible for the same man to be
two distinct persons, as any two that have lived in different ages without the knowledge of one another's thoughts.
By the second and third, Socrates, in this life and after it, cannot be the same man any way, but by the same
consciousness; and so making human identity to consist in the same thing wherein we place personal identity,
there will be no difficulty to allow the same man to be the same person. But then they who place human identity
in consciousness only, and not in something else, must consider how they will make the infant Socrates the same
man with Socrates after the resurrection. But whatsoever to some men makes a man, and consequently the same
individual man, wherein perhaps few are agreed, personal identity can by us be placed in nothing but
consciousness, (which is that alone which makes what we call self,) without involving us in great absurdities.