University of Virginia Library

Search this document 

collapse section1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
CRITIC AND POET.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
collapse section1. 
 1. 
 4. 
collapse section2. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section3. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
collapse section4. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
collapse section5. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
  
collapse section 
collapse section1. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
collapse section2. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section3. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section4. 
 1. 
collapse section5. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 


215

CRITIC AND POET.

AN APOLOGUE.

(“Poetry must be simple, sensuous, or impassioned; this man is neither simple, sensuous, nor impassioned; therefore he is not a poet.”)

No man had ever heard a nightingale,
When once a keen-eyed naturalist was stirred
To study and define—what is a bird,
To classify by rote and book, nor fail
To mark its structure and to note the scale
Whereon its song might possibly be heard.
Thus far, no farther;—so he spake the word.
When of a sudden,—hark, the nightingale!
Oh deeper, higher than he could divine
That all-unearthly, untaught strain! He saw
The plain, brown warbler, unabashed. “Not mine”
(He cried) “the error of this fatal flaw.
No bird is this, it soars beyond my line,
Were it a bird, 'twould answer to my law.”