University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  

collapse section 
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 A. 
 B. 
 C. 
 D. 
 E. 
  
  
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section 
 1. 
1. Book Production in Mid-Jacobean London
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

1. Book Production in Mid-Jacobean London[6]

During the five-year period 1614-1618, London stationers produced an
average of 7616 edition sheets and 356 distinct editions each year,[7] and the


187

Page 187
size of a typical book was slightly less than twenty-two edition sheets (see
table 1). A little over half of that output was religious material, with 15%

Table 1. London printing, 1614-1618

             
Year  Edition sheets  Editions[8]   Edition sheets/Edition 
1614  7932  326  24.3 
1615  8156  412  19.8 
1616  7095  379  18.7 
1617  7240  320  22.6 
1618  7653  341  22.4 
Average  7616  356  21.4 
works of literature, 12% informational texts, 11% law and politics, 7%
history, and the remaining 2% ephemera and official documents (see table 2).
Of the religious materials, about two-thirds of the output consisted of devotional
or instructional volumes, learned commentary, controversial tracts,
and other such works, with 20% devoted to biblical texts, 14% to sermons,
and 4% to copies of the Book of Common Prayer (see table 3). It is useful to
recall at this point that these figures describe only the output of London
printers and do not reflect the larger bookselling market for which they
labored. For example, manuscripts still played an important role in the
production and circulation of certain types of works. Furthermore, London
presses produced mainly English-language volumes, while stationers imported
large numbers of Greek and Latin works from the continent that they
then retailed through bookstalls and to a broad clientele of aristocrats and
intellectuals.[9] Mark Bland estimates that "80 per cent of the books that survive
from the libraries of Ben Jonson and John Donne . . . were printed on
the Continent" (450), and Sir Edward Stanhope's book bequest to Trinity

188

Page 188
College, Cambridge, in 1608 contained nearly 93% continental imprints.[10]
Each of these collections reflects its owner's interests; less scholarly personal
libraries contain more native printing, as is illustrated by an inventory of
Sir Roger Townsend's books around 1625 in which 60% of the titles are
English-language works printed in Britain.[11]

While the overall book trade increased, internal Company restrictions and
periodic Star Chamber decrees meant the number of master printers active in
London during the first forty years of the seventeenth century hovered around
twenty, and with a few exceptions those licensed printers were limited to
only one or two presses. Many London printers owned more than two presses
but used them for proofing and other purposes, interpreting the decrees to
mean one or two production presses. Compare this situation with that of
Christophe Plantin of Antwerp, who in the early 1570s had up to sixteen
active presses and employed in the neighborhood of fifty workers,[12] an order
issued by the Provost of Paris in 1618 decreeing that each master printer
have at least two working presses,[13] or with a 1644 Parisian inventory indicating
that one printing house had seven presses, five had five presses, eight
had four, eleven had three, thirty-five had two, and sixteen had one press.[14]
The reasons for this apparent imbalance are various—the lack of a significant
domestic supply of paper (the English wore mainly wool and thus lacked a
ready source of the linen rags from which paper was made), the minuscule
continental market for English-language books, the inability to achieve economies
of scale that continental printers enjoyed, the dominance of French
printing during the sixteenth century, and the obvious fact that Paris was
nearly twice as large as London and the population of France three times as
large as England—but the important point to bear in mind is that the London
printing trade was a relatively small industry serving a subset of a larger
market.

Although the domestic printing trade may have remained small relative to
the continental industry, it is clear that the overall circulation and sales of
books printed in England had been growing for some time. Veylit has compiled
figures for British publishing from 1475-1800, based upon individual
titles listed in the ESTC database. These indicate that the average number
of titles annually printed in the forty-year period between the death of Elizabeth
and the beginning of the English Civil War roughly doubled, from


189

Page 189
about 250 per year to 500.[15] This expansion is part of a longer trend of steady
growth in common-press books that began when Caxton set up his office in
Westminster in 1475. Marjorie Plant has observed that "The prosperity of
any branch of economic activity is directly affected by the prevalence of war,
and this is surely nowhere more true than in the case of the book industry."[16]
Certainly the accession of Henry VII at the end of 100 years of civil strife and
the one and one-half centuries of relative domestic peace that followed played
a major role in the growth of the English market for books. Other larger factors
contributed as well: rising literacy, national population recovery from
the fourteenth-century plagues and accompanying economic development
(albeit usually slow and halting), the growing hegemony of London within
England, and a host of smaller influences all made for not just an expanding
market for books but also a diverse one.[17]

As far as the five-year period of this study is concerned, a number of localized
factors combined to make it an especially interesting one. Politically it
marked the center of James I's rule and the last years of an era of relative
calm that had begun with the Edict of Nantes in 1598 and peace with Spain
in 1604; by 1619 Ralegh had been executed, James's popularity at home had
evaporated, and turmoil in Bohemia had sparked the Thirty Years War.
England was experiencing sustained economic prosperity, marked by stable
prices, a series of good harvests, and a welcome lack of plague visitations.[18]
In 1616 the Stationers' Company renewed and enlarged its exclusive right to
print primers, Psalters, and almanacs, titles that formed the core of the
profitable English Stock. In the same year, an apparent optimistic moment,
the Company also struck a deal with Bonham Norton and formed the Latin
Stock, which was primarily concerned with importing books from the continent.
Two years later, in 1618, the Stationers formed the Irish Stock in a
bid to control the book trade in Ireland. Overall the middle years of James's
reign were marked by relative peace and prosperity, a business climate that
would have encouraged printers and publishers to produce at a fairly high
level.

The increasingly complex and active market is reflected in the varied
subjects of the works published, bought, and consumed in England. Different
genres of works brought with them assumptions about textual presentation,


190

Page 190
and nowhere is this clearer than in the choice of format.[19] Full-sheet broadsides
were usually reserved for official proclamations or ballads, while the
smallest formats (16°-64°) were almost exclusively the domain of religious
publication. Overall, the bulk of the works from this period were printed
either in folio (36%) or quarto (41%) format, with 15% in octavo, 6% duodecimo,
and the remaining 2% in a collection of little-used formats (see
table 2).

Informational and literary publishing most closely mirrors the distribution
of formats seen in the overall trade, with slightly more quartos than
folios, and a significant percentage of octavo printing. Other genres show
much more striking preferences. Books of history, as well as works of law
and politics, are overwhelmingly printed in folio, a format perceived as carrying
a certain amount of weight and prestige, while religious works dominate
small-format publication. Ephemera were overwhelmingly published in
the more portable quarto and octavo formats, with official documents either
printed as full-sheet broadside proclamations or quarto pamphlets.

It is in the printing of religious materials that the greatest diversity of
formats is employed. Almost half of the religious works are imposed in a
quarto format, with a significant number of folio, octavo, and duodecimo
titles and a smattering of small-format printing. Two sub-categories of religious
publishing are worth touching on as well. Two-thirds of all sermons
are published in quarto format, although sermon compilations tend to appear
in octavo and duodecimo. The greatest range of format choices, however,
is in the printing of Bibles; there appears to have been a market for
Bibles, single-testament books and psalm translations in nearly every format
(see table 3).

Similar studies against which we might compare these data are hard to
come by and often detail the activities of a single house rather than the industry
as a whole. For example, Jan Materné's survey of the Officina Plantiniana's
practices during the Counter-Reformation shows that this Antwerp
enterprise favored smaller formats than did the London trade. The most
common format as measured by titles printed was octavo, followed by duodecimo,
quarto, 24mo, 32mo, and finally folio.[20] Counting titles, McKenzie
examined a trio of five-year periods in the sixteenth-century London trade
and revealed that religious works made up about half the total output and
that the most popular format was octavo (accounting for between fifty and
seventy percent of the total output in the late 1540s).[21] Yamada's study of
Creede's establishment 1593-1617 analyzed his output by genre and size but
not format, while Blayney's examination of Okes's house contains an appen-


191

Page 191

Table 2. London printing by genre and format, 1614-1618 (in edition sheets)

                   
Genre  1°  2°  4°  8°  12°  16°  24°  32°  64°  Total  Proportion 
Religion  5125  9475  3212  1799  125  85  28  19858  52% 
Literature  12  2101  2360  1113  146  60  —  5798  15% 
Information  1370  2073  813  126  —  —  —  —  4389  12% 
Law/Politics  3095  710  470  32  —  —  —  —  4309  11% 
History  —  2118  496  155  —  —  —  —  —  2769  7% 
Ephemera  38  280  178  —  —  —  —  501  1% 
Official Documents  232  59  148  —  —  —  —  452  1% 
Total  295  13869  15542  5949  2108  189  85  30  38076 
Proportion  1%  36%  41%  15%  6%  1%  —  —  — 

192

Page 192

Table 3. London religious printing by sub-genre and format, 1614-1618 (in edition sheets)

                       
Sub-Genre  1°  2°  4°  8°  12°  16°  24°  32°  64°  Total  Proportion 
Commentary  —  2367  2165  298  26  —  —  —  —  4856  24% 
Instructional  373  1678  810  529  —  —  —  —  3393  17% 
Sermons  —  —  1930  732  66  —  —  —  2731  14% 
Complete Bibles  —  934  1092  392  125  12  10  —  —  2565  13% 
Controversial  —  765  1431  165  16  —  —  —  —  2377  12% 
Devotional  —  436  320  997  32  —  —  1788  9% 
Psalms  —  172  383  183  24  38  28  26  —  854  4% 
Book of Common Prayer  —  268  360  41  16  —  15  —  703  4% 
New Testament  —  246  —  271  —  40  32  —  591  3% 
Total  5125  9475  3212  1799  125  85  28  19858 
Proportion  —  26%  48%  16%  9%  1%  —  —  — 

193

Page 193
dix listing his production output 1604-1609 and including a bibliographical
description of each item but does not compile the data into a single chart. In
any case, a strong correlation between format and certain types of books
suggests presentational expectations among readers.

 
[6]

The information upon which this study relies comes from the STC, the ESTC,
ProQuest's Early English Books Online ({http://eebo.chadwyck.com}), the UMI Early
English Books
microfilm series, numerous public and private On-line Public Access Catalogues
(OPACs), and a physical examination of roughly half the items in question. In some
cases I was forced to estimate the edition-sheet total of a particular title based upon data
derived from similar editions of the same work (for example when dealing with the Ames
collection of title pages in the British Library), and in one case I was not able to acquire
or estimate edition sheet totals because it was unavailable: Bartholomew Robertson,
Sapienta Secundum Pietatem (London: John Beale, 1618; STC 21098.2). The base quantitative
unit in this study is the edition; in those cases where the editors of the STC have
split a single edition into multiple entries to reflect the presence of variants, issues, or impressions,
I have only counted the single edition entry in my totals. The STC defines an
edition as "An item having a majority of sheets (usually all) from reset type," while a
variant has a "major change in title, imprint or colophon," an issue has had the "addition,
deletion, and/or substitution of leaves or sheets constituting up to half of a book's original
sheets," and an impression "indicates standing type which has been reimposed" and additional
sheets printed from it (1.xli). In those cases where the STC editors were able to
identify the quantity of reset material in an issue, or when I was able to generate such
figures from my physical inspection, I have included those numbers in my data.

[7]

Compare this with Mark Bland's estimate of 5400 edition sheets and 262 editions in
1600 London (457-458).

[8]

These figures differ significantly from those generated by Maureen Bell and John
Barnard, "Provisional Count of STC Titles 1475-1648," Publishing History 31 (1992),
48-66. The scope of their study forced Bell and Barnard to count all STC items, while as
noted above, I was able to eliminate variants, issues, and impressions from my totals and
focus my analysis on composition and production numbers.

[9]

See Julian Roberts, "The Latin Trade," The Cambridge History of the Book in
Britain, Vol. 4, 1557-1695,
ed. John Barnard and D. F. McKenzie, with the assistance of
Maureen Bell (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002), 141-173.

[10]

Alain A. Wijffels, "Sir Edward Stanhope's Bequest of Books to Trinity College, Cambridge,
1608," Private Libraries in Renaissance England, ed. R. J. Fehrnbach (Binghamton:
Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1992), 1.41-78.

[11]

R. J. Fehrenbach, "An Inventory of Books in the Possession of Sir Roger Townshend,
ca. 1625," Private Libraries in Renaissance England, ed. R. J. Fehrnbach (Binghamton:
Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1992), 1.79-136.

[12]

Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press,
1972), 164-165.

[13]

Henri-Jean Martin, Print, Power, and People in 17th-Century France, trans. David
Gerard (Metuchen and London: Scarecrow Press, 1993), 39-40.

[14]

Martin, 246.

[15]

See {http://cbsr26.ucr.edu/ESTCStatistics.html}.

[16]

Marjorie Plant, The English Book Trade (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd,
1939), 32.

[17]

Whether the trade's growth indicates an associated prosperity is less clear, and the
progressive model presented here is only a simple overview. For a discussion of the issues
concerning the economics of the London book trade see John Barnard's Introduction to
The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. 4, especially pp. 14-21.

[18]

Of course, one's experience of prosperity varied with station. The relentless flood
of immigration into London also caused a growing disparity between wages and prices.
Figures cited by C. G. A. Clay indicate that the relative purchasing power of a craftsman's
wages in the building trade between 1500 and 1720 reached its lowest point in the 1610s
(Economic Expansion and Social Change: England 1500-1700 [Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.
Press, 1984], 216-218).

[19]

Gaskell has a very useful discussion of formats in his New Introduction, pp. 78-117.

[20]

"The Officina Plantiana and the Dynamics of the Counter-Reformation, 1590-1650,"
Produzione e Commercio della Carta e del Libro Secc. XIII-XVIII (Prato: Le Monnier,
1992), 485.

[21]

"The Economics of Print, 1550-1750: Scales of Production and Conditions of Constraint,"
Produzione e Commercio della Carta e del Libro Secc. XIII-XVIII (Prato: Le
Monnier, 1992), 417-418.