1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. |
8. |
9. |
10. |
11. |
12. |
12.1. |
12.2. |
12.3. |
12.4. |
12.5. |
12.6. |
12.7. |
12.8. |
12.9. |
12.10. |
12.11. |
12.12. |
12.13. |
12.14. |
12.15. |
12.16. |
12.17. |
12.18. |
12.19. |
12.20. |
12.21. |
12.22. |
12.23. |
12.24. |
12.25. |
12.26. |
12.27. |
12.28. |
12.29. |
12.30. |
13. |
14. |
15. |
16. |
17. |
18. |
19. |
20. |
21. |
22. |
23. |
24. |
25. |
26. |
27. |
28. |
29. |
30. |
31. |
3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||
Those laws which condemn a man to death on the deposition of a single witness are fatal to liberty. In reason there should be two, because a witness who affirms, and the accused who denies, make an equal balance, and a third must incline the scale.
The Greeks [5] and Romans [6] required one voice more to condemn: but our French laws insist upon two. The Greeks pretend that their custom was established by the gods; [7] but this more justly may be said of ours.
3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||