| 1. |
| 2. |
| 3. |
| 4. |
| 5. |
| 6. |
| 7. |
| 8. |
| 9. |
| 10. |
| 11. |
| 12. |
| 12.1. |
| 12.2. |
| 12.3. |
| 12.4. |
| 12.5. |
| 12.6. |
| 12.7. |
| 12.8. |
| 12.9. |
| 12.10. |
| 12.11. |
| 12.12. |
| 12.13. |
| 12.14. |
| 12.15. |
| 12.16. |
| 12.17. |
| 12.18. |
| 12.19. |
| 12.20. |
| 12.21. |
| 12.22. |
| 12.23. |
| 12.24. |
| 12.25. |
| 12.26. |
| 12.27. |
| 12.28. |
| 12.29. |
| 12.30. |
| 13. |
| 14. |
| 15. |
| 16. |
| 17. |
| 18. |
| 19. |
| 20. |
| 21. |
| 22. |
| 23. |
| 24. |
| 25. |
| 26. |
| 27. |
| 28. |
| 29. |
| 30. |
| 31. |
| 3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||
Those laws which condemn a man to death on the deposition of a single witness are fatal to liberty. In reason there should be two, because a witness who affirms, and the accused who denies, make an equal balance, and a third must incline the scale.
The Greeks [5] and Romans [6] required one voice more to condemn: but our French laws insist upon two. The Greeks pretend that their custom was established by the gods; [7] but this more justly may be said of ours.
| 3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||