1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. |
8. |
9. |
10. |
11. |
12. |
13. |
14. |
15. |
16. |
17. |
18. |
19. |
20. |
21. |
22. |
23. |
24. |
25. |
26. |
27. |
28. |
29. |
30. |
31. |
31.1. |
31.2. |
31.3. |
31.4. |
31.5. |
31.6. |
31.7. |
31.8. |
31.9. |
31.10. |
31.11. |
31.12. |
31.13. |
31.14. |
31.15. |
31.16. |
31.17. |
31.18. |
31.19. |
31.20. |
31.21. |
31.22. |
31.23. |
31.24. |
31.25. |
31.26. |
31.27. |
31.28. |
31.29. |
31.30. |
31.31. |
31.32. |
31.33. |
31.34. |
3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||
Those laws which condemn a man to death on the deposition of a single witness are fatal to liberty. In reason there should be two, because a witness who affirms, and the accused who denies, make an equal balance, and a third must incline the scale.
The Greeks [5] and Romans [6] required one voice more to condemn: but our French laws insist upon two. The Greeks pretend that their custom was established by the gods; [7] but this more justly may be said of ours.
3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||