|  The Cavalier daily Wednesday, December 6, 1972  | ||
In Monday's Cavalier Daily 
a colloquium appeared which 
criticized the position taken by 
Mssrs. White and Hurd 
concerning the allocation of 
Student Union Funds to the 
GSU. Not only did this 
editorial unjustifiably attack 
the motives and character of 
the above named individuals, 
but it also distorted the issues 
which are presently before the 
students of this University.
Certain members of the 
Student Council have evidently 
deemed themselves sufficiently 
"tuned-in" to student opinion 
so that they feel competent to 
make allocations of funds to a 
group which is unquestionably 
controversial, and which is also 
considered by many students 
as being morally degenerate 
and repugnant.
Now that Mssrs. Hurd and 
White have sought to make the 
Student Council members who 
approved the allocation to the 
GSU account to their 
electorate, the editorial staff 
has seen fit to brand them as 
"fairy godmothers" of student 
"morals and justice."
In this age of responsive 
democracy, it is difficult for 
me to conceive of how one can 
be classified as a guardian of 
"morals and justice" when he 
is merely seeking to make 
those in elected office 
accountable to their 
constituency. On closer 
scrutiny, the actual guardians 
of student morals are those 
Student Council members who 
consider themselves capable of 
making moral determinations 
on behalf of the University as a 
whole.
Nonetheless, certain 
Cavalier Daily editorialists and 
columnists have resorted to a 
smear campaign in order to 
discredit Mr. White's and Mr. 
Hurd's efforts to bring this 
matter before the students of 
this University. In actuality, I 
believe that an elitist group of 
Cavalier Daily staff members 
who believe themselves to be 
spokesmen for a movement of 
enlightened and progressive 
liberalism are incensed by the 
fact that any individual could 
have the temerity to oppose 
their views on homosexuality.
Opponents of Mr. White and 
Mr. Hurd should abrogate their 
name calling and harsh 
invective, and let the students 
of this University determine 
how their money is to be 
spent.
Law II
colloquium writers and
columnists, presents his own
opinions, not those of the
editors or staff of The Cavalier
Daily. The fact that all sides
are printed, including yours,
Mr. Trichilo, makes your
charges of elitism ring hollow.
– Ed.)
|  The Cavalier daily Wednesday, December 6, 1972  | ||