University of Virginia Library

Search this document 

 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
Tactics For Change
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tactics For Change

Questions concerning the extent of student willingness to employ
various tactics were posed. Three responses of interest follow:

I would non-violently demonstrate to achieve important goals in which I
believe.

           
AGREE STRONGLY  113 (41.9%) 
AGREE SOMEWHAT  94 (34.8%) 
NO OPINION  15 (5.6%) 
DISAGREE SOMEWHAT  23 (8.5%) 
DISAGREE STRONGLY  18 (6.7%) 
NO RESPONSE  4 (1.5%) 

I would non-violently strike to achieve important goals in which I
believe.

           
AGREE STRONGLY  111 (41.0%) 
AGREE SOMEWHAT  74 (27.4%) 
NO OPINION  21 (7.8%) 
DISAGREE SOMEWHAT  29 (10.7%) 
DISAGREE STRONGLY  29. (10.7%) 
NO RESPONSE  3 (1.1%) 

Violence in general is necessary if all other attempts at change fail.

           
AGREE STRONGLY  9(3.3%) 
AGREE SOMEWHAT  11(4.0%) 
NO OPINION  8(3.0%) 
DISAGREE SOMEWHAT  41(15.2%) 
DISAGREE STRONGLY  193(71.4%) 
NO RESPONSE  5(1.9%) 

A majority opinion among the sample in agreement (76.7%) with the
first statement to non-violently demonstrate, dropped slightly to 67.4%
when asked if they would non-violently strike. Those in agreement to
dissenting tactics dropped sharply to 7.3% when asked if violence in
general is useful.

Another notable factor in the responses is the breakdown of answers by
years in school. Figures indicated no major shift occurs between the
undergraduate and graduate years.