I found the YAF statement in
last Friday's issue of the CD quite
astounding. They attacked the
Vietnam Moratorium as "morally
reprehensible." Before that statement
joins many of the other
moronic utterances of YAF, it
should be analyzed so that we can
see that it is among the worst.
YAF, or at least the group led
by John Kwapisz, believes the
Moratorium is morally reprehensible.
Have they stopped to think
what it is? The Moratorium stands
for an end to the war in Vietnam.
The war stands for the slaughtering
of Vietnamese peasants, and the
mindless manipulations of the Pentagon
to destroy the lives of
American men between the ages of
18 and 35.
If this group considers the
Moratorium to be morally reprehensible,
then they must consider
all of the above to be morally
commendable. If this is the case,
then I will leave this group of
barbaric, power-hungry war-mongers
to their personal pursuits of
destruction, but I will ask that they
please not misuse the English
language to the point of calling
themselves young Americans for
"freedom."
