University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  

collapse section 
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 A. 
 B. 
B. LINDSTRAND COMPARATORS
 C. 
 D. 
 E. 
  
  
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

B. LINDSTRAND COMPARATORS

1971 Gordon Lindstrand, an assistant professor of English at the University
of South Carolina, announced the first viable alternative to the Hinman
Collator (Lindstrand, "Mechanized Textual Collation") [plate 2]. He
had developed his device in the 1960s while a graduate student at the University
of Illinois, where his dissertation concerned textual matters in Conrad's
Nostromo. His invention, dubbed the Lindstrand Comparator (and
also known as the Mark I), was offered in two models—the Comparator
Criterion and the Comparator Library Custom. The Comparator Criterion,


151

Page 151
designed to accommodate copies or original images with text pages no larger
than 8½ inches tall and 7 inches wide, was the basic model. The Comparator
Library Custom was designed for larger documents, depending on the needs
of the purchaser. Though he seems to have built a prototype of the Custom,
I do not know that he actually sold one. A third model, which apparently
never left the drawing board, was called the Comparator Portable, designed,
as the name indicates, to travel more easily than the other two versions.
Lindstrand also proposed a device for cross-edition collation—the Mark II—
though, like the portable version, it does not appear to have ever gotten
beyond the planning stages.

The Lindstrand Comparator utilizes stereoscopic principles to detect
typographical and other printed variations in nearly identical printed documents,
usually those descending from the same edition. Stereoscopes have
been utilized for everything from parlor entertainment to astronomical work
since at least the early part of the nineteenth century ("Stereoscope"). Rather
than relying on lights and shutters to present alternate images as with the
Hinman, the Lindstrand was built to take advantage of the central nervous
system's capacity to "fuse" images of two identical or nearly identical objects
together when said objects are presented in a manner conducive to such
fusion. Gordon Lindstrand's device was simply an "environmental apparatus"
designed to facilitate this process (Lindstrand, The Lindstrand Comparator
[1]). The researcher views two texts set up in separate cradles and
positioned beneath a set of binocular optics. The optics, a set of mirrors,
and a prism help overlay the texts in a kind of virtual superimposition.
When this effect is achieved, small discrepancies between the texts seem to
stand above the similarities in 3D. Big differences (for example, several reset
lines) appear as areas of "total confusion" (Lindstrand, "Mechanized" 209).
In contrast to its predecessor, however, the Lindstrand requires two good
eyes on the part of the viewer. The Hinman is the only collator that can be
used by individuals lacking good vision in one eye.

Lindstrand got the idea for the comparator from a mapmaker in Champagne,
Illinois (Roberta Lindstrand). He noted in a promotional pamphlet
that stereoscopic view "has in the past been particularly appropriate for mapmaking
from aerial photographic surveys" (The Lindstrand Comparator).
He also remarked in his 1971 Studies in Bibliography article that similar
devices had been used in the military, though "for an entirely different
purpose" from the one he was proposing (209).[5] As I have mentioned elsewhere,
Charlton Hinman apparently experimented with a stereoscope just
after WWII, and there is also evidence that before the war other bibliographers


152

Page 152
had attempted to use the stereoscope or a similar device for textual
collation (Smith 134-135). Lindstrand does not appear to have known about
any bibliographical applications or experiments other than his own, however.

In 1976, the Comparator Criterion cost $940. The two lamps, which
again were optional features, cost an extra $48.00, and a dust cover could be
purchased for $24.00 (Lindstrand, Comparator Research Associates [1]). The
price of the Library Custom model varied upward according to the requested
specifications, though again I do not know if he ever sold one of these larger
models. At this time, the Hinman Collator was selling for around $8000.
Lindstrand built his machine under the company name Comparator Research
Associates, and over the course of about six years sold around thirty-eight
devices to people and organizations (universities, libraries, research centers,
etc.) throughout the United States and in Canada, England, South Africa,
and Australia.

Lindstrand published one location list in a bibliographical journal and
issued updates with his promotional material ("Lindstrand Comparators: A
Summary Report;" The Lindstrand Comparator).[6] These have been the primary
sources in compiling the list below, though I have also interviewed
people who knew Lindstrand and/or used his machine. Additionally, I have
recovered a few documents and letters that have also provided useful information.
These interviews and documents have led me to two machines (or,
rather, one machine and a "ghost"—more about the latter in a moment)
that were not included in the list and updates. I have confirmed at least the
original location (or lack thereof—again, more in a moment) of every Comparator
recorded by Lindstrand. Information on his invention, however, has
been generally harder to track down and verify than for the Hinman. The
arrival of a Lindstrand did not attract the same level of attention. The
comparator was much less visually striking and much more easily disassembled,
stowed away, and forgotten or lost than its predecessor. Moreover, its
inventor did not leave nearly the paper trail that Arthur Johnson did.

There is a longstanding rumor that Gordon Lindstrand reneged on the
delivery of several machines after accepting payment for them. In some
versions of the story he is said to have absconded with the funds and lived
the rest of his life on the run, more or less. In another version he did jail
time. The truth is less sensational. He was considering going out of business
as early as 1975 (Lindstrand, Letter to William L. Mitchell). In 1976 or
1977, he appears to have stopped making comparators and failed to follow
through on the delivery of at least three. These were machines promised to
Trinity College, Cambridge; the University of Leeds; and Trinity College,
Dublin. Records referring to the non-delivery of these machines are located
in the archives of the latter. They indicate that he accepted at least partial


153

Page 153
if not complete payments on these orders.[7] A fourth may have also been
promised but never delivered to the University of Calgary. He listed a Calgary
machine in an update he distributed with other promotional material
in 1976 or 1977, just as he was shutting the business down. I have been unable
to locate anyone who remembers this device—hence the "ghost" I mentioned
earlier. Cambridge and Dublin were also listed for the first and only
time in the same update (Leeds never appears in any of his lists.) His failure
to deliver devices to Cambridge, Dublin, Leeds, and possibly Calgary coincides
with his going out of business. At the time he was suffering severely
from the effects of alcoholism. Two years earlier, in 1975, he had lost his
bid for tenure and his first marriage had ended in divorce (Roberta Lindstrand).
Despite these difficulties, however, he was never in jail, and neither
was he ever hard to find. Except for a short stay in a treatment facility in
Charleston, South Carolina, and another brief relocation to Ohio, he continued
to live in Columbia, the town from which he had always marketed
and sold the comparator, until his passing in March of 2000 (Obituary). He
was eventually able to control his drinking problem, though its effects left
him legally blind. At his death he was working on a memoir about his battle
with alcoholism.

Were there more machines, either built and sold or sold and never delivered?
I do not think so, though all I can say with certainty is that I have
not found evidence of others. Despite my doubts as to its existence, I have
chosen to give the Calgary machine a separate entry below, as I have for the
devices I know Lindstrand did not deliver. Except for Leeds, these were all
claimed by Lindstrand in print and so listing them with an appropriate note
not only makes them easier to index but also facilitates correcting the record.
The machines in this section are listed alphabetically by the last known location.
As mentioned above, the machines that were never delivered are
listed where they were supposed to have gone. A chronological arrangement
is not possible because of the lack of records. Furthermore, since the Lindstrand
was sold over a much shorter time period than the Hinman (five or
six years as opposed to nearly thirty), sorting out the dates would not only
be more difficult but probably less valuable. When the original location is
known and differs from the current, that fact is noted in parentheses along
with other potentially useful information.

    ARIZONA

  • B1. Arizona State University, University Library, Department of Special Collections


154

Page 154

    FLORIDA

  • B2. Florida State University, English Department

    ILLINOIS

  • B3. Northern Illinois University, English Department

  • B4. Southern Illinois University

    Purchased for work on the Dewey edition and originally located in the
    John Dewey Studies Center. According to Jo Ann Boydston, editor of the
    Dewey edition, it was passed on to the Morris Library fairly soon after its
    arrival because the editors of the edition found the Hinman much easier
    and more efficient to use. It is currently located in the Special Collections
    Department of the Morris Library.

    INDIANA

  • B5. Ball State University, English Department
    Surplused around 1960.

    KANSAS

  • B6. Kansas State University, English Department
    Current disposition unknown.

    KENTUCKY

  • B7. Eastern Kentucky University, John Crabbe Grant Library

    MASSACHUSETTS

  • B8. Harvard University, Houghton Library

  • B9. University of Massachusetts at Boston, University Library
    Current disposition unknown.

    MISSISSIPPI

  • B10. Mississippi State University, English Department

  • B11. University of Southern Mississippi, English Department
    Purchased in 1977. Lindstrand told Noel Polk that this was his last
    machine.

    NEBRASKA

  • B12. University of Nebraska, Willa Cather edition
    Originally purchased for the Harold Frederic edition at the University
    of Texas, Arlington.

    NEW JERSEY

  • B13. Princeton University, Firestone Library
    Originally purchased for the Henry David Thoreau edition.

    NEW YORK

  • B14. Cornell University, Kroch Library

  • B15. State University of New York at Fredonia, University Library

    OHIO

  • B16. Bowling Green University, University Library, Rare Books and Special
    Collections Department

    Originally purchased for the George Washington Cable edition.

  • B17. Kent State University, University Library, Institute for Bibliography and
    Editing


  • 155

    Page 155
  • B18. Ohio University

    Current disposition unknown. Originally purchased for the Robert
    Browning edition.

    PENNSYLVANIA

  • B19. State College, James L. W. West

    West purchased this machine when he was on the faculty at Virginia
    Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia, and moved it with him when he joined
    the faculty of Penn State University.

  • B20. University of Pennsylvania, Van Pelt Library

    RHODE ISLAND

  • B21. Brown University, John Hay Library

    SOUTH CAROLINA

  • B22. University of South Carolina, Thomas Cooper Library, Special Collections
    Department

    Originally purchased by and located in the office of the Center for
    Editions of American Authors.

    TEXAS

  • B23. Texas A&M University, Cushing Memorial Library and Archives
    Originally purchased by the Department of English and later transferred
    to the Library. Surplused around 1992.

  • B24. Texas A&M University, Cushing Memorial Library and Archives
    Originally purchased by Joseph Katz, Columbia, South Carolina. Acquired
    by Texas A&M in 2003.

  • B25. Texas Tech University, Southwest Collection/Special Collections
    Originally purchased for the Joseph Conrad edition.

  • B26. University of Houston, M. D. Anderson Library, Department of Special
    Collections

  • B27. University of Texas at Austin, Humanities Research Center

    VIRGINIA

  • B28. Nellysford, Catherine Rodriguez

    Originally purchased by Matthew Bruccoli, Columbia, South Carolina.

  • B29. University of Virginia, Alderman Library, Department of Special Collections

    AUSTRALIA

  • B30. Monash University, University Library

    CANADA

  • B31. Simon Fraser University

    Current disposition unknown.

  • B32. University of Calgary

    I have been unable to confirm whether this device was ever delivered.

  • B33. University of Toronto, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library

    ENGLAND

  • B34. Cambridge University, Trinity Library

    This machine was ordered and paid for in part or whole but never
    delivered.


  • 156

    Page 156
  • B35. Oxford University, Bodleian Library, Department of Western Manuscripts,
    Johnson Reading Room

  • B36. University of Leeds

    This machine was ordered and paid for in part or whole but never delivered.

    IRELAND

  • B37. University of Dublin, Trinity College Library

    This machine was ordered and paid for in part or whole but never delivered.

    SOUTH AFRICA

  • B38. Rhodes University, Institute for the Study of English in Africa

    Current disposition unknown.

 
[5]

Stereoscopes have indeed been used in the interpretation of aerial photographs,
which, when taken from directly overhead, present a very unnatural view—because the
objects pictured appear flat they are difficult for a viewer to recognize. Military photoanalysts
and mapmakers use the stereoscope to view two photographs, slightly offset from
one another, taken consecutively along the line of flight or simultaneously from different
cameras in the same plane. This creates a 3-D effect that gives the images contour and thus
makes them easier to interpret (Stanley 265-270).

[6]

Announcements and descriptions of the machine were also published in PMLA 89
(1974): 1338, and BiN: Bibliography Newsletter 2.6 (June 1974): 2.

[7]

Unfortunately I have not been able to examine these records, though their contents
have been summarized for me. They date from 1975 to 1982 and range from internal discussion
before ordering to Lindstrand's acknowledgement of money to correspondence
with Leeds and Cambridge, who also ordered but never received machines. I am grateful
to Charles Benson, Keeper of Early Printed Books, for providing me this information. By
library policy the file will remain closed until 2012, thirty years from the date of the
creation of the last item in the file.