21. A vacuum beyond the utmost bounds of body.
But to return to our idea of space. If body be not supposed
infinite, (which I think no one will affirm), I would ask, whether, if God placed a man at the extremity of
corporeal beings, he could not stretch his hand beyond his body? If he could, then he would put his arm where
there was before space without body; and if there he spread his fingers, there would still be space between them
without body. If he could not stretch out his hand, it must be because of some external hindrance; (for we suppose
him alive, with such a power of moving the parts of his body that he hath now, which is not in itself impossible, if
God so pleased to have it; or at least it is not impossible for God so to move him): and then I ask,--whether that
which hinders his hand from moving outwards be substance or accident, something or nothing? And when they
have resolved that, they will be able to resolve themselves,--what that is, which is or may be between two bodies
at a distance, that is not body, and has no solidity. In the mean time, the argument is at least as good, that, where
nothing hinders, (as beyond the utmost bounds of all bodies), a body put in motion may move on, as where there
is nothing between, there two bodies must necessarily touch. For pure space between is sufficient to take away the
necessity of mutual contact; but bare space in the way is not sufficient to stop motion. The truth is, these men
must either own that they think body infinite, though they are loth to speak it out, or else affirm that space is not
body. For I would fain meet with that thinking man that can in his thoughts set any bounds to space, more than he
can to duration; or by thinking hope to arrive at the end of either. And therefore, if his idea of eternity be infinite,
so is his idea of immensity; they are both finite or infinite alike.