University of Virginia Library

Letters To The Editor

The Honor Code And Shoplifting: The Committee States Its Case

Dear Sir:

I am writing this letter to
clear up a few questions and
misconceptions Mr. Henggeler
brought up in his letter of
December 15 concerning the
Honor System.

First of all, an act is never
"wrong per se" under the
Honor System. The Honor
Committee views each offense
and its unique set of
surrounding circumstances
separately. No precedents are
recorded from the decisions the
Committee has made on cases
in the past, but rather each
offense is judged totally on its
own individual merits.

The Honor System has no
set of codified offenses. Lying,
cheating, and stealing are
simply general guidelines and
are not at all inflexible
"rules... (like) the Ten
Commandments." The System
is in no sense unalterably and
rigidly defined as Mr. Henggeler
implies.

Charlottesville, Albemarle
County, and any place where a
student acts thinking that
reliance will be placed on his
status as a University student
are the geographic bounds of
the Honor System. The city
and county lines are simply
listed in an attempt to outline
the places in which a student is
considered to be a student, and
where therefore reliance is
placed on him because of his
student status.

If a student is in Fluvanna
County and has not told
anyone that he attends the
University, then the people
extend no special reliance on
the person's being a student.
Therefore, if he lies, cheats, or
steals in Fluvanna, the act has no
effect on his status at the
University.

The Honor Committee poll
taken last spring has now been
fully analyzed and a complete
report is being given to the
Committee today. The results
of the poll will be published in
full at the beginning of the
second semester in The Cavalier
Daily
issue devoted to the
Honor System.

To quote a few statistics
from the poll, 93% of the poll
respondents believe that an
honor system has a place in the
University community. 77%
agree that the Honor System is
in keeping with their own
ethical beliefs. 74% feel that
lying, cheating, and stealing
should be the scope of the
system, and 64% replied that
the Honor Committee should
handle all cases of stealing. In
no place in the poll can I find
any indication that "60% of
the student body does not
support the code."

Mr. Henggler's letter and Mr.
Carmona's letter of December
13 are apparently concerning
the same offense. A student
was dismissed from the
University for shoplifting last
week. The dismissal was not in
any way a comment on the
character of the student in
question. It was an affirmation
that the dismissed student
succumbed to temptation and
violated the community spirit
of honor.

All communities must set
some minimum standards of
conduct by which a member of
that community must abide.
The standards set by the
present-student generation here
at Virginia are that lying,
cheating, and stealing with the
intent to benefit at the expense
of another constitute
infractions that are considered
dishonorable. Mr. Carmona's
friend violated these
community standards and was
dismissed.

All students attending the
University enjoy the advantages
resulting from the atmosphere
of mutual trust engendered by
the Honor System. The Honor
System is run by the students
and it is the direct result of
each student's individual
morality being applied to the
University community. The
only reason there is an Honor
System here at Virginia is
because a majority of students
support it.

Pat Whitlow
Vice-Chairman,
Honor Committee

WOP Speaks

Dear Sir:

Since September, I have
seen both the shortcomings
and virtues of Mr. Jefferson's
University. One of the most
striking and repulsive of these
vices to me is the unrefined
bigotry and insecure identity
complex of 'Brother Ed.'

Yes, Brother Ed, I am a
"whitey." I am also a WOP. I
am very proud of both,
especially the latter. But I
never degenerate my pride by
using it in attempts to
overshadow others' cultures
and heritages.

It seems unfortunate that a
black with an attitude such as
'Brother Ed's attends the same
university as Delaney Stith,
Charlie Davis, Bubba Small and
so many other blacks that I
have grown to look up to.
They are truly my "Brothers,"
my term not limited to those
persons of lighter pigment as
myself.

Get "cultured," Ed, and
allow your "brotherly love" to
extend beyond the pigment of
your own skin.

James M. Bonavita
College I

Narrow-minded

Dear Sir:

I have read with both
amusement and repugnance the
articles and letters of the last
few days pertaining to the
column written by Brother Ed
about the uncultured white
society. At first, I was amused
by what Brother Ed had to say,
not so much by what he had to
say as how he said it. Now I am
sickened by the thought that
The Cavalier Daily, which I
believe to be a fine newspaper,
can find nothing better to fill
it's pages than articles written
by people who preach hatred
and racism.

What I found most
disconcerting about his last
article was the fact that
everybody who has not read
any poetry by young black
women "is leading a depraved
and superficial existence", and
that, "it is too much to ask
these non-people to understand
love, beauty, sorrow, and life."
This is a narrow-minded,
bigoted, and just plain
ridiculous assumption.

I personally liked the first
poem in the article (dealing
with life), but I think it would
have been in better taste to put
just the poem in and leave
everything preceding it out of
the article. If that were done, I
doubt that any blacks, unless
they knew her personally
would know that Pat Bradley
was one of their race.

If Brother Ed wishes to
cloud this fine newspaper and
this good poetry with his
idiotic phrases, ridiculous
assumptions, and downright
stupid lies, then let him write a
letter to the editor. Find some
other person who can write
about the deplorable racist
problem in a logical manner
without being a racist himself.
In other words, get somebody
with a more objective
viewpoint who can support his
claims, I'm only grateful that
Brother Ed had the good taste
to include Pat Bradley's
excellent poetry and prose in
his article.

Brother Ed's views could be
valid, and he has the right to
state them, but I do not believe
that his view merit a column in
this newspaper.

Andrew Levin
College I