|  | The Cavalier daily Tuesday, October 12, 1971 |  | 
Tear Gas Pens?
The attack last week on a coed who was 
walking across Nameless Field at night is only 
one episode in a series of molestings in the 
area behind Memorial Gym.
Security has conceded that this particular 
area is a problem area on the Grounds, and 
advised the student who was recently 
attacked that she should carry a tear gas pen 
to protect herself in the future. Rea 
Houchens, Chief of police security, informed 
The Cavalier Daily that "For their own 
security, women would be much safer walking 
in pairs (at night)."
This hardly seems a satisfactory solution 
to the problem of the protection of female 
students who often must, of necessity, walk 
alone at night to and from the library, classes 
or meetings. Last year the Athletic 
Department refused to allow the women's 
intramural basketball team to play their 
games at night, citing the danger of walking 
from the dorms to the gym after dark. 
However the life at this University does not 
grind to a halt when the sun goes down.
The fact that some women are denied the 
right to participate in activities scheduled at 
night, whether by official rule, as in the case 
of the Athletic Department, or by subtle 
intimidation brought on by the fear of being 
attacked, is a deplorable reality in an 
institution which considers itself 
coeducational.
The Department of Buildings and Grounds 
has cooperated with the Security Department 
in installing more lighting during the past year 
but enough has not been done. Other 
methods of security must be explored and 
implemented. For instance, an alarm box 
might be placed behind the gym which would 
summon a security officer to the scene 
immediately—in contrast to the busy signal 
that last week's victim encountered when she 
tried for 15 minutes to telephone the 
Department of Security.
In the troubled Munford-Gwathmey 
Memorial Gym area more foot patrolmen 
could be added to the force during the later 
evening hours, the time when most of the 
molestations have occurred. The guard who is 
consistently dozing on the couch in the Mary 
Munford lounge is an instance demonstrating 
that security is not doing all it possibly might 
do to insure the safety of female University 
students.
Another approach to the problem would 
be for the Physical Education Department to 
offer seminars in self defense, instructing 
women in various means by which they can 
cope with attackers.
The solution to the problem does not lie 
only in the hands of administrators and 
policemen. The women themselves should 
consider the fact that many of the rules in 
effect in the dormitories were designed not 
for their inconvenience but for their 
protection. Many of the molesters which the 
Department of Security has apprehended are 
profoundly psychologically disturbed men 
students as well as non-students, people 
whose behavior cannot be predicted. To have 
completely open dormitories is ideally the 
best arrangement, but unfortunately, 
realistically not the wisest practice.
Whatever the methods used to insure the 
safety of University coeds are implemented, 
they should be done so as soon as possible. 
No female student should feel that she must 
find someone to walk from the library to her 
dorm with her. This is the University of 
Virginia—not Columbia or Northwestern; tear 
gas pens should not have to be in hand as 
women cross the Grounds.
|  | The Cavalier daily Tuesday, October 12, 1971 |  | 

