BIBLIOGRAPHY
Francisco Suárez's influential Disputationes
metaphysicae
(1597) contains an extended presentation and
discussion of
the scholastic doctrine of fourfold causation. See Disputa-
tions XII-XXXIII, in Vol. II,
323ff., and Vol. III of the recent
Latin and Spanish edition (Madrid,
1960-64). The interest-
ing and
revealing controversy between Descartes and More
is to be found in Vol.
VIII, 90-107, 121-39, 154-85, 204-17,
240-52, and 261-67 of Descartes: Correspondance, edited
by Charles
Adam and Gérard Milhaud (Paris, 1963). New-
ton's anti-Cartesian tract “De gravitatione
et aequipondio
fluidorum” was published by A. Rupert Hall
and Marie Boas
Hall in Unpublished Scientific Papers
of Isaac Newton (Cam-
bridge,
1962), pp. 89ff. The following books and articles,
representing a very
small part of the literature, have been
particularly useful: Yvon
Belaval, Leibniz, critique de Des-
cartes (Paris, 1960); M. H. Carteron,
“L'Idée de force
mécanique dans le
système de Descartes,” Revue philos-
ophique de la France et de
l'étranger,
94 (1922), 243-77,
483-511; R. W. Church,
“Malebranche and Hume,” Revue
internationale de philosophie,
1 (1938), 143-61; Étienne
Gilson,
“De la Critique des formes substantielles au doute
méthodique,” Études sur le
rôle de la pensée médiévale
dans
la formation du système cartésien
(Paris, 1951), pp. 141-90;
Marie Boas Hall, Robert
Boyle on Natural Philosophy
(Bloomington, 1965); Peter Hoenen,
Cosmologia (Rome,
1949); Max Jammer, Concepts of Force (Cambridge, Mass.,
1957);
Alexandre Koyré, “Galilée et la loi
d'inertie,” Études
galiléennes, Vol. III (Paris, 1939); idem,
“Newton and Des-
cartes,” Newtonian Studies (London,
1965), pp. 53-200;
David Kubrin, “Newton and the Cyclical
Universe, Provi-
dence and the Mechanical
Philosophy,” Journal of the His-
tory of Ideas,
28 (1967), 325-46; Maurice Mandelbaum,
Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception (Baltimore,
1964);
Richard McKeon, “Causation and the Geometric
Method
in the Philosophy of Spinoza,” The
Philosophical Review,
39 (1930), 178-89 and 275-96; Paul Mouy, Le Développe-
ment de la physique cartésienne, 1646-1712
(Paris, 1934);
idem, Les lois du choc des corps
d'après Malebranche (Paris,
1927); Joseph Prost,
Essai sur l'atomisme et l'occasionalisme
dans
la philosophie cartésienne (Paris, 1907); P. P.
Wiener,
“The Experimental Philosophy of Robert
Boyle,” The Philo-
sophical Review,
41 (1932), 594-609.
WILLIS DONEY
[See also Atomism;
Baconianism; Causation, Final
Causes; God;
Man-Machine; Nature.]
