CHAPTER XLVIII
AS PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN DELEGATION AT THE
PEACE CONFERENCE OF THE HAGUE: IV—1899
Autobiography of Andrew Dickson White | ||
48. CHAPTER XLVIII
AS PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN DELEGATION AT THE
PEACE CONFERENCE OF THE HAGUE: IV—1899
June 16.
THIS morning Count Münster called and
seemed much excited by the fact that he had received a despatch from
Berlin in which the German Government—which, of course, means the
Emperor—had strongly and finally declared against everything like an
arbitration tribunal. He was clearly disconcerted by this too literal
acceptance of his own earlier views, and said that he had sent to M. de
Staal insisting that the meeting of the subcommittee on arbitration,
which had been appointed for this day (Friday), should be adjourned on
some pretext until next Monday; "for,'' said he, "if the session takes
place to-day, Zorn must make the declaration
in behalf of Germanywhich these new instructions order him to make, and
that would be a misfortune.'' I was very glad to see this evidence of
change of heart in the count, and immediately joined him in securing the
adjournment he desired. The meeting of the subcommittee has therefore
been deferred, the reason assigned, as I understand, being that Baron
d'Estournelles is too much occupied to be present at the time first
named. Later Count Münster told me that he had decided to send
Professor Zorn to Berlin at once in order to lay the whole matter before
the Foreign Office and induce the authorities to modify the
instructions. I approved this course strongly, whereupon he suggested
that I should do something to the same
In view of the fact that Von Bülow had agreed that the German delegates should stand side by side with us in the conference, I immediately prepared a letter of introduction and a personal letter to Bülow for Holls to take, and he started about five in the afternoon. This latter is as follows:
(Copy.)
(Personal.)
June 16, 1899
DEAR BARON VON BÜLOW:
I trust that, in view of the kindly relations which exist between us, succeeding as they do similar relations begun twenty years ago with your honored father, you will allow me to write you informally, but fully and frankly, regarding the interests of both our governments in the peace conference. The relations between your delegates and ours have, from the first, been of the kindest; your assurances on this point have been thoroughly carried out. But we seem now to be at "the parting of the ways,'' and on the greatest question submitted to us,—the greatest, as I believe, that any conference or any congress has taken up in our time,—namely, the provision for a tribunal of arbitration.
It is generally said here that Germany is opposed to the whole thing, that she is utterly hostile to anything like arbitration, and that she will do all in her power, either alone or through her allies, to thwart every feasible plan of providing for a tribunal which shall give some hope to the world of settling some of the many difficulties between nations otherwise than by bloodshed.
No rational man here expects all wars to be ended by anything done here; no one proposes to submit to any such tribunal questions involving the honor of any nation or the inviolability of its territory, or any of those things which nations feel instinctively must be reserved for their own decision. Nor does any thinking man here
The great thing is that there be a provision made or easily calling together a court of arbitration which shall be seen of all nations, indicate a sincere desire to promote peace, and, in some measure, relieve the various peoples of the fear which so heavily oppresses them all—the dread of an outburst of war at any moment.
I note that it has been believed by many that the motives of Russia in proposing this conference were none too good,—indeed, that they were possibly perfidious; but, even if this be granted, how does this affect the conduct of Germany? Should it not rather lead Germany to go forward boldly and thoughtfully, to accept the championship of the idea of arbitration, and to take the lead in the whole business here?
Germany, if she will do this, will certainly stand before the whole world as the leading power of Europe; for she can then say to the whole world that she has taken the proposal of Russia au sérieux; has supported a thoroughly good plan of arbitration; has done what Russia and France have not been willing to do,—favored the presentation to the conference of a plan providing for the immunity of private property from seizure on the high seas during war,—and that while, as regards the proceedings of the conference, Russia has wished secrecy, Germany has steadily, from the first, promoted frankness and openness.
With these three points in your favor, you can stand before the whole world as the great Continental power which has stood up f or peace as neither Russia nor France has been able to do. On the other hand, if you do not do this, if you put a stumbling-block in the way of arbitration, what results? The other powers will go on and create as good a tribunal as possible, and whatever
And this will come not alone from the anti-social forces which are hoping that the conference may fail, in order that thereby they may have a new weapon in their hands, but it will also come from the middle and substantial classes of other nations.
It is sure to make the relations between Germany and the United States, which have been of late improving infinitely more bitter than they have ever before been and it is no less sure to provoke the most bitter hatred of the German monarchy in nearly all other nations.
Should his advisers permit so noble and so gifted a sovereign to incur this political storm of obloquy, this convergence of hatred upon him? Should a ruler of such noble ambitions and such admirable powers be exposed to this? I fully believe that he should not, and that his advisers should beg him not to place himself before the world as the antagonist of a plan to which millions upon millions in all parts of the world are devoted.
From the United States come evidences of a feeling wide-spread and deep on this subject beyond anything I have ever known. This very morning I received a prayer set forth by the most conservative of all Protestant religious bodies—namely, the American branch of the Anglican Church—to be said in all churches, begging the Almighty to favor the work of the peace conference; and this is what is going on in various other American churches, and in vast numbers of households. Something of the same sort is true in Great Britain and, perhaps in many parts of the Continent.
Granted that expectations are overwrought, still this fact indicates that here is a feeling which cannot be disregarded.
Moreover, to my certain knowledge, within a month, a leading socialist in France has boasted to one of the members of this conference that it would end in failure; that the monarchs and governments of Europe do not wish to diminish bloodshed; that they would refuse to yield to the desire of the peoples for peace, and that by the resentment thus aroused a new path to victory would be open to socialism.
Grant, too, that this is overstated, still such a declaration is significant.
I know it has been said that arbitration is derogatory to sovereignty. I really fail to see how this can be said in Germany. Germany has already submitted a great political question between herself and Spain to arbitration, and the Emperor William I was himself the arbiter between the United States and Great Britain in the matter of our northwestern boundary.
Bear in mind again that it is only voluntary arbitration that is proposed, and that it will always rest with the German Emperor to decide what questions he will submit to the tribunal and what he will not.
It has also been said that arbitration proceedings would give the enemies of Germany time to put themselves in readiness for war; but if this be feared in any emergency, the Emperor and his government are always free to mobilize the German army at once.
As you are aware, what is seriously proposed here now, in the way of arbitration, is not a tribunal constantly in session, but a system under which each of the signatory powers shall be free to choose, for a limited time, from an international court, say two or more judges who can go to The Hague if their services are required, but to be paid only while actually in session here; such payment to be made by the litigating parties.
As to the machinery, the plan is that there shall be a dignified body composed of the diplomatic representatives of the various signatory powers, to sit at The Hague, presided over by the Netherlands minister of
Such council would receive notice from powers having differences with each other which are willing to submit the questions between them to a court, and would then give notice to the judges selected by the parties. The whole of the present plan, except some subordinate features of little account, which can easily be stricken out, is voluntary. There is nothing whatever obligatory about it. Every signatory power is free to resort to such a tribunal or not, as it may think best. Surely a concession like this may well be made to the deep and wide sentiment throughout the world in favor of some possible means of settling controversies between nations other than by bloodshed.
Pardon me for earnestly pressing upon you these facts and considerations. I beg that you will not consider me as going beyond my province. I present them to you as man to man, not only in the interest of good relations between Germany and the United States, but of interests common to all the great nations of the earth,—of their common interest in giving something like satisfaction to a desire so earnest and wide-spread as that which has been shown in all parts of the world for arbitration.
I remain, dear Baron von Bülow,
Most respectfully and sincerely yours,
(Sgd.) ANDREW D. WHITE.
P. S. Think how easily, if some such tribunal existed, your government and mine could refer to it the whole mass of minor questions which our respective parliamentary bodies have got control of, and entangled in all sorts of petty prejudices and demagogical utterances; for instance, Samoa, the tonnage dues, the sugar-bounty question, the most-favored-nation clause, etc., etc., which keep the two countries constantly at loggerheads. Do you not see that submission of such questions to such
(Sgd.) A.D.W.
It is indeed a crisis in the history of the conference, and perhaps in the history of Germany. I can only hope that Bülow will give careful attention to the considerations which Münster and myself press upon him.
Later in the day Sir Julian Pauncefote called, evidently much vexed that the sitting of the subcommittee had been deferred, and even more vexed since he had learned from De Staal the real reason. He declared that he was opposed to stringing out the conference much longer; that the subcommittee could get along perfectly well without Dr. Zorn; that if Germany did not wish to come in, she could keep out; etc., etc. He seemed to forget that Germany's going out means the departure of Austria and Italy, to say nothing of one or two minor powers, and therefore the bringing to naught of the conference. I did not think it best to say anything about Molls's departure, but soothed him as much as I could by dwelling on the success of his proposal that the permanent council here shall be composed of the resident diplomatic representatives.
The other members of our commission, and especially President Low, were at first very much opposed to Dr. Holls's going, on the ground that it might be considered an interference in a matter pertaining to Germany; but I persisted in sending him, agreeing to take all the responsibility, and declaring that he should go simply as a messenger from me, as the American ambassador at Berlin, to the imperial minister of foreign affairs.
The morning was given largely to completing my draft of our memorial to the conference regarding the immunity of private property in time of war from seizure on the high seas.
In the afternoon drove to Scheveningen to make sundry official visits, and in the evening to the great festival given by the Netherlands Government to the conference.
Its first feature was a series of tableaux representing some of the most famous pictures in the Dutch galleries the most successful of all being Rembrandt's "Night Watch.'' Jan Steen's "Wedding Party'' was also very beautiful. Then came peasant dances given, in the midst of the great hall, by persons in the costumes of all the different provinces. These were characteristic and interesting, some of them being wonderfully quaint.
The violinist of the late King, Johannes Wolff, played some solos in a masterly way.
The music by the great military band, especially the hymn of William of Nassau and the Dutch and Russian national anthems, was splendidly rendered, and the old Dutch provincial music played in connection with the dances and tableaux was also noteworthy.
It was an exceedingly brilliant assemblage, and the whole festival from first to last a decided success.
June 18, Sunday.
Went to Leyden to attend service at St. Peter's. Both
the church and its monuments are interesting. Visited
also the church of St. Pancras, a remarkable specimen of
Gothic architecture, and looked upon the tomb of Van der
Werf, the brave burgomaster who defended the town
against the Spaniards during the siege.
At the university I was much interested in the public hall where degrees are conferred, and above all in the many portraits of distinguished professors. Lingered next in the botanical gardens back of the university, which are very beautiful.
Then to the Museum of Antiquities, which is remarkably
Thence home, and, on arriving, found, of all men in the world, Thomas B. Reed, Speaker of our House of Representatives. Mr. Newel, our minister, took us both for a drive to Scheveningen, and Mr. Reed's conversation was exceedingly interesting; he is well read in history and, apparently, in every field of English literature. There is a bigness, a heartiness, a shrewdness, and a genuineness about him which greatly attract me.
June 19.
Called on M. de Staal to show him Holls's telegram from Berlin, which is
encouraging. De Staal thinks that we may have to give up the tenth
section of the arbitration plan, which includes obligatory arbitration
in sundry minor matters; but while I shall be very sorry to see this
done, we ought to make the sacrifice if it will hold Germany, Italy, and
Austria to us.
A little later received a hearty telegram from the Secretary of State authorizing our ordering the wreath of silver and gold and placing it on the tomb of Grotius. Telegraphed and wrote Major Allen at Berlin full directions on the subject. I am determined that the tribute shall be worthy of our country, of its object, and of the occasion.
In the afternoon took Speaker Reed, with his wife and daughter, through the "House in the Wood,'' afterward through the grounds, which are more beautiful than ever, and then to Delft, where we visited the tombs of William the Silent and Grotius, and finally the house in which William was assassinated. It was even more interesting to me than during either of my former visits, and was evidently quite as interesting to Mr. Reed.
At six attended a long meeting of the American delegation, which elaborated the final draft of our communication to M. de Staal on the immunity of private property on the high seas. Various passages were stricken
June 20.
Went to the session of one of the committees at the "House in the
Wood,'' and showed Mr. van Karnebeek our private-property memorial,
which he read, and on which he heartily complimented us.
I then made known to him our proposal to lay a wreath on the tomb of Grotius, and with this he seemed exceedingly pleased, saying that the minister of foreign affairs, M. de Beaufort, would be especially delighted, since he is devoted to the memory of Grotius, and delivered the historical address when the statue in front of the great church at Delft was unveiled
A little later submitted the memorial; as previously agreed upon, to Count Münster, who also approved it.
Holls telegraphs me from Berlin that he has been admirably received by the chancellor, Prince Hohenlohe, and by Baron von Bülow, and that he is leaving for Hamburg to see the Emperor.
At four P.M. to a meeting of the full conference to receive report on improvements and extension of the Red Cross rules, etc. This was adopted in a happy-go-lucky unparliamentary way, for the eminent diplomatist who presides over the conference still betrays a Russian lack
Walked home through the beautiful avenues of the park with Mr. van Karnebeek and Baron d'Estournelles, who is also a charming man. He has been a minister plenipotentiary, but is now a member of the French Chamber of Deputies and of the conference.
June 21.
Early in the morning received a report from Holls, who arrived from
Hamburg late last night. His talks with Bülow and Prince Hohenlohe
had been most encouraging. Bülow has sent to the Emperor my long
private letter to himself, earnestly urging the acceptance by Germany of
our plan of arbitration. Prince Hohenlohe seems to have entered most
cordially into our ideas, giving Holls a card which would admit him to
the Emperor, and telegraphing a request that his Majesty see him. But
the Emperor was still upon his yacht, at sea, and Holls could stay no
longer. Bülow is trying to make an appointment for him to meet the
Emperor at the close of the week.
Early in the afternoon went with Minister Newel and Mr. Low to call on M. de Beaufort regarding plans for the Grotius celebration, on July 4, at Delft. It was in general decided that we should have the ceremony in the great church at eleven o 'clock, with sundry speeches, and that at half-past twelve the American delegation should give a luncheon to all the invited guests in the town hall opposite.
Holls tells me that last night, at the dinner of the president of the Austrian delegation, he met Münster, who said to him, "I can get along with Hohenlohe, and also with Bülow, but not with those d—d lawyers in the Foreign Office'' ("Mit Hohenlohe kann ich auskommen, mit Bülow auch, aber mit diesen verdammten Juristen im Auswärtigen Amt, nicht'').
June 22.
Up at four o'clock and at ten attended a session of the first section at
the "House in the Wood.'' Very interesting were the discussions
regarding bullets and asphyxiating bombs. As to the former, Sir John
Ardagh of the British delegation repelled earnestly the charges made
regarding the British bullets used in India, and offered to substitute
for the original proposal one which certainly would be much more
effective in preventing unnecessary suffering and death; but the
Russians seemed glad to score a point against Great Britain, and Sir
John's proposal was voted down, its only support being derived from our
own delegation. Captain Crozier, our military delegate, took an active
part in supporting Sir John Ardagh, but the majority against us was
overwhelming.
As to asphyxiating bombs, Captain Mahan spoke at length against the provision to forbid them: his ground being that not the slightest thing had yet been done looking to such an invention; that, even if there had been, their use would not be so bad as the use of torpedoes against ships of war; that asphyxiating men by means of deleterious gases was no worse than asphyxiating them with water; indeed, that the former was the less dangerous of the two, since the gases used might simply incapacitate men for a short time, while the blowing up of a ship of war means death to all or nearly all of those upon it.
To this it was answered—and, as it seemed to me, with force—that asphyxiating bombs might be used against towns for the destruction of vast numbers of non-combatants, including women and children, while torpedoes at sea are used only against the military and naval forces of the enemy. The original proposal was carried by a unanimous vote, save ours. I am not satisfied with our attitude on this question; but what can a layman do when he has against him the foremost contemporary military and naval experts? My hope is that the
I stated afterward in a bantering way to Captain Mahan, as well as others, that while I could not support any of the arguments that had been made in favor of allowing asphyxiating bombs, there was one which somewhat appealed to me—namely, that the dread of them might do something to prevent the rush of the rural population to the cities, and the aggregation of the poorer classes in them, which is one of the most threatening things to modern society, and also a second argument that such bombs would bring home to warlike stay-at-home orators and writers the realities of war.
At noon received the French translation of our memorial to De Staal, but found it very imperfect throughout, and in some parts absolutely inadmissible; so I worked with Baron de Bildt, president of the Swedish delegation here, all the afternoon in revising it.
At six the American delegation met and chose me for their orator at the approaching Grotius festival at Delft. I naturally feel proud to discharge a duty of this kind, and can put my heart into it, for Grotius has long been to me almost an object of idolatry, and his main works a subject of earnest study. There are few men in history whom I so deeply venerate. Twenty years ago, when minister at Berlin, I sent an eminent American artist to Holland and secured admirable copies of the two best portraits of the great man. One of these now hangs in the Law Library of Cornell University, and the other over my work-table at the Berlin Embassy.
June 23.
At work all the morning on letters and revising final draft of memorial
on immunity of private property at sea, and lunched afterward at the
"House in the Wood'' to talk it over with Baron de Bildt.
At the same table met M. de Martens, who has just returned by night to his work here, after presiding a
In the evening to a reception at the house of M. de Beaufort, minister of foreign affairs, and was cordially greeted by him and his wife, both promising that they would accept our invitation to Delft. I took in to the buffet the wife of the present Dutch prime minister, who also expressed great interest in our proposal, and declared her intention of being present.
Count Zanini, the Italian minister and delegate here, gave me a comical account of two speeches in the session of the first section this morning; one being by a delegate from Persia, Mirza Riza Khan, who is minister at St. Petersburg. His Persian Excellency waxed eloquent over the noble qualities of the Emperor of Russia, and especially over his sincerity as shown by the fact that when his Excellency tumbled from his horse at a review, his Majesty sent twice to inquire after his health. The whole effect upon the conference was to provoke roars of laughter.
But the great matter of the day was the news, which has not yet been made public, that Prince Hohenlohe, the German chancellor, has come out strongly for the arbitration tribunal, and has sent instructions here accordingly. This is a great gain, and seems to remove one of the worst stumbling-blocks. But we will have to pay for this removal, probably, by giving up section 10 of the present plan, which includes a system of obligatory arbitration in various minor matters,—a system which would be of use to the world in many ways. While the American delegation, as stated in my letter which Holls took to Bülow, and which has been forwarded to the Emperor, will aid in throwing out of the arbitration
A curious part of the means used in bringing about this change of opinion was the pastoral letter, elsewhere referred to, issued by the Protestant Episcopal bishop of Texas, calling for prayers throughout the State for the success of the conference in its efforts to diminish the horrors of war. This pastoral letter, to which I referred in my letter to Minister von Bülow, I intrusted to Holls, authorizing him to use it as he thought fit. He showed it to Prince Hohenlohe, and the latter, although a Roman Catholic, was evidently affected by it, and especially by the depth and extent of the longing for peace which it showed. It is perhaps an interesting example of an indirect "answer to prayer,'' since it undoubtedly strengthened the feelings in the prince chancellor's mind which led him to favor arbitration.
June 24.
Sent to M. de Staal, as president of the conference, the memorial
relating to the exemption of private property, not contraband of war,
from capture on the high seas. Devoted the morning to blocking out my
Grotius address, and afterward drove with Holls to Delft to look over
the ground for our Fourth-of-July festival. The town hall is interesting
and contains, among other portraits, one which is evidently a good
likeness of Grotius; the only difficulty is that, for our intended
luncheon, the rooms, though beautiful, seem inadequate.
Thence to the church, and after looking over that part of it near the monuments, with reference to the Grotius ceremony, went into the organ-loft with the organist. There I listened for nearly an hour while he and Holls played finely on that noble instrument; and as I sat and looked down over the church and upon the distant monuments, the old historic scenes of four hundred years
June 25.
At nine in the morning off with Holls to Rotterdam, and on arriving took
the tram through the city to the steamboat wharf, going thence by
steamer to Dort. Arrived, just before the close of service, at the great
church where various sessions of the synod were held. The organ was very
fine; the choir-stalls, where those wretched theologians wrangled
through so many sessions and did so much harm to their own country and
others, were the only other fine things in the church, and they were
much dilapidated. I could not but reflect bitterly on the monstrous
evils provoked by these men who sat so long there spinning a monstrous
theology to be substituted for the teachings of Christ himself.
Thence back to The Hague and to Scheveningen, and talked over conference matters with Count Münster. Received telegrams from Count von Bülow in answer to mine congratulating him on his promotion, also one from Baron von Mumm, the German minister at Luxemburg, who goes temporarily to Washington.
June 26.
At work all the morning on my Grotius address Lunched at the "House in
the Wood,'' and walked to town with sundry delegates. In the afternoon
went to a "tea'' at the house of Madame Boreel and met a number of
charming people; but the great attraction was the house, which is that
formerly occupied by John De Witt—that from which he went to prison and
to assassination. Here also Motley lived, and I was shown the room in
which a large part of his history was written, and where Queen Sophia
used to discuss Dutch events and personages with him.
The house is beautiful, spacious, and most charmingly
June 27.
At all sorts of work during the morning, and then, on invitation of
President Low, went with the other members of the delegation to Haarlem,
where we saw the wonderful portraits by Frans Hals, which impressed me
more than ever, and heard the great organ. It has been rebuilt since I
was there thirty-five years ago; but it is still the same great clumsy
machine, and very poorly played,—that is, with no spirit, and without
any effort to exhibit anything beyond the ordinary effects for which any
little church organ would do as well.
In the evening dined with Count Zanini, the Italian minister and delegate, and discussed French matters with Baron d'Estournelles. He represents the best type of French diplomatist, and is in every way attractive.
Afterward to Mr. van Karnebeek's reception, meeting various people in a semi-satisfactory way.
June 29.
In the morning, in order to work off the beginnings of a headache, I
went to Rotterdam and walked until noon about the streets and places,
recalling my former visit, which came very vividly before me as I gazed
upon the statue of Erasmus, and thought upon his life here. No man in
history has had more persistent injustice done him. If my life were long
enough I would gladly use my great collection of Erasmiana in
illustrating his services to the world. To say nothing of other things,
the modern "Higher Criticism'' has its roots in his work.
June 30.
Engaged on the final revision of my Grotius speech, and on various
documents.
At noon to the "House in the Wood'' for lunch, and afterward took a walk in the grounds with Beldiman, the
It appears that whereas Switzerland initiated the Red Cross movement, has ever since cherished it, and has been urged by Italy and other powers to take still further practical measures for it, the Dutch delegation recently interposed, secured for one of their number the presidency of the special conference, and thus threw out my Berlin colleague, Colonel Roth, who had been previously asked to take the position and had accepted it, with the result that the whole matter has been taken out of the hands of Switzerland, where it justly belonged, and put under the care of the Netherlands. This has provoked much ill feeling in Switzerland, and there is especial astonishment at the fact that when Beldiman moved an amendment undoing this unjust arrangement it was, by some misunderstanding lost, and that therefore there has been perpetuated what seems much like an injustice against Switzerland. I promised to exert myself to have the matter rectified so far as the American delegation was concerned, and later was successful in doing so.
In the evening dined at Minister Newel's. Sat between Minister Okolicsanyi of the Austrian delegation, and Count Welsersheimb, the chairman of that delegation, and had interesting talks with them, with the Duke of Tetuan, and others. It appears that the Duke, who is a very charming, kindly man, has, like myself, a passion both for cathedral architecture and for organ music; he dwelt much upon Burgos, which he called the gem of Spanish cathedrals.
Thence to the final reception at the house of M. de Beaufort, minister of foreign affairs, who showed me a contemporary portrait of Grotius which displays the traits observable in the copies which Burleigh painted for me twenty years ago at Amsterdam and Leyden. Talked with Sir Julian Pauncefote regarding the Swiss
July 2.
In the morning Major Allen, military attaché of our embassy at
Berlin, arrived, bringing the Grotius wreath. Under Secretary Hay's
permission, I had given to one of the best Berlin silversmiths virtually
carte blanche, and the result is most satisfactory. The wreath is
very large, being made up, on one side, of a laurel branch with leaves
of frosted silver and berries of gold, and, on the other, of an oak
branch with silver leaves and gold acorns, both boughs being tied
together at the bottom by a large knot of ribbon in silver gilded,
bearing the arms of the Netherlands and the United States on enameled
shields, and an inscription as follows:
To the Memory of HUGO GROTIUS;
In Reverence and Gratitude,
From the United States of America;
On the Occasion of the International Peace Conference
of The Hague.
July 4th, 1899.
It is a superb piece of work, and its ebony case, with silver clasps, and bearing a silver shield with suitable inscription, is also perfect: the whole thing attracts most favorable attention.
CHAPTER XLVIII
AS PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN DELEGATION AT THE
PEACE CONFERENCE OF THE HAGUE: IV—1899
Autobiography of Andrew Dickson White | ||