11. THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION
THE results of the last three sections show that the apparent
incompatibility of the law of propagation of light with the principle
of relativity (Section VII) has been derived by means of a
consideration which borrowed two unjustifiable hypotheses from
classical mechanics; these are as follows:
- (1) The time-interval (time) between two events is independent of the
condition of motion of the body of reference.
- (2) The space-interval (distance) between two points of a rigid body
is independent of the condition of motion of the body of reference.
If we drop these hypotheses, then the dilemma of Section VII
disappears, because the theorem of the addition of velocities derived
in Section VI becomes invalid. The possibility presents itself that
the law of the propagation of light in vacuo may be compatible with
the principle of relativity, and the question arises: How have we to
modify the considerations of Section VI in order to remove
the
apparent disagreement between these two fundamental results of
experience? This question leads to a general one. In the discussion of
Section VI we have to do with places and times relative both to the
train and to the embankment. How are we to find the place and time of
an event in relation to the train, when we know the place and time of
the event with respect to the railway embankment? Is there a
thinkable answer to this question of such a nature that the law of
transmission of light
in vacuo does not contradict the principle of
relativity? In other words: Can we conceive of a relation between
place and time of the individual events relative to both
reference-bodies, such that every ray of light possesses the velocity
of transmission
c relative to the embankment and relative to the train? This question leads to a quite definite positive answer, and to a
perfectly definite transformation law for the space-time magnitudes of
an event when changing over from one body of reference to another.
Before we deal with this, we shall introduce the following incidental
consideration. Up to the present we have only considered events taking
place along the embankment, which had mathematically to assume the
function of a straight line. In the manner indicated in Section II
we can imagine this reference-body supplemented laterally and in a
vertical direction by means of a
framework of rods, so that an event
which takes place anywhere can be localised with reference to this
framework. Similarly, we can imagine the train travelling with
the velocity
v to be continued across the whole of space, so that
every event, no matter how far off it may be, could also be localised
with respect to the second framework. Without committing any
fundamental error, we can disregard the fact that in reality these
frameworks would continually interfere with each other, owing to the
impenetrability of solid bodies. In every such framework we imagine
three surfaces perpendicular to each other marked out, and designated
as "co-ordinate planes" ("co-ordinate system"). A co-ordinate
system
K then corresponds to the embankment, and a co-ordinate system
K' to the train. An event, wherever it may have taken place, would be
fixed in space with respect to
K by the three perpendiculars
x,
y,
z
on the co-ordinate planes, and with regard to time by a time value
t.
Relative to
K', the same event would be fixed in respect of space and
time by corresponding values
x',
y',
z',
t', which of course are not
identical with
x,
y,
z,
t. It has already been set forth in detail how
these magnitudes are to be regarded as results of physical
measurements.
Obviously our problem can be exactly formulated in the following
manner. What are the
values
x',
y',
z',
t', of an event with respect
to
K', when the magnitudes
x,
y,
z,
t, of the same event with respect
to
K are given? The relations must be so chosen that the law of the
transmission of light
in vacuo is satisfied for one and the same ray
of light (and of course for every ray) with respect to
K and
K'. For
the relative orientation in space of the co-ordinate systems indicated
in the diagram (Fig. 2),
[Description: Equation]
this problem is solved by means of the
equations :
[Description: Equation]
This system of equations is known as the "Lorentz transformation."
*
If in place of the law of transmission of light we had taken as our
basis the tacit assumptions of the older mechanics as to the absolute
character
of times and lengths, then instead of the above we should
have obtained the following equations:
x' =
x -
vt
y' =
y
z' =
z
t' =
t
This system of equations is often termed the "Galilei
transformation." The Galilei transformation can be obtained from the
Lorentz transformation by substituting an infinitely large value for
the velocity of light
c in the latter transformation.
Aided by the following illustration, we can readily see that, in
accordance with the Lorentz transformation, the law of the
transmission of light in vacuo is satisfied both for the
reference-body K and for the reference-body K'. A light-signal is sent
along the positive x-axis, and this light-stimulus advances in
accordance with the equation
x = ct,
i.e. with the velocity c. According to the equations of the Lorentz
transformation, this simple relation between x and t involves a
relation between x' and t'. In point of fact, if we substitute for x
the value ct in the first and fourth equations of the Lorentz
transformation, we obtain:
[Description: Equation]
[Description: Equation]
from which, by division, the expression
x1 = ct1
immediately follows. If referred to the system
K', the propagation of
light takes place according to this equation. We thus see that the
velocity of transmission relative to the reference-body
K' is also
equal to
c. The same result is obtained for rays of light advancing in
any other direction whatsoever. Of cause this is not surprising, since
the equations of the Lorentz transformation were derived conformably
to this point of view.
[*)]
A simple derivation of the Lorentz transformation is given in
Appendix I.