University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
The Poems of John Byrom

Edited by Adolphus William Ward

expand sectionI. 
collapse sectionII. 
collapse sectionI. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
expand section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
 I. 
EPISTLE I.
 II. 
 III. 
 IV. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
expand sectionII. 


284

EPISTLE I.

Baguley, August 12, 1756.

I

Our Folks gone a-visiting, Reverend Sir,
Having left me at home here, less able to stir,
I am thinking on Matters that lovingly pass'd
Where the Squire of the House and I visited last,—
At the Vicar's of Bowdon, old Friend of us two
And a lover of Learning fair, honest and true;
Especially such as shall make to appear
Any Passage of Scripture more easy and clear.

II

The Scripture was writ, and is oft understood,
By Persons unlearnèd, but pious and good,
Who have much better Helps than mere Learning can yield,
Which may yet be of use in its own proper Field;—
If it be but to mend its own Faults in a Brother,
And correct in one Man the Mistakes of another;
Or to combat our Scruples and fix a true Thought,
When the Head shall confirm what the Heart has been taught.

III

One Thing, I remember, that fell in our Way,
Was the speaking in Tongues on the Pentecost Day;

285

Which our Friend the Divine had conceiv'd in a Light
That, however so thought, does not seem to be right.
All the Comments, 'tis true, that one ever has met,
Concur with his Notions about it; but yet
The Mistake is so plain that I wish by some Means
To obtain his Review of those wonderful Scenes.

IV

It is not my Thought; for I first was appris'd
Of the Thing by a Jacob, too greatly despis'd;
Dipping into whose Writings, which little I knew,
Some Expression like this was presented to View:

286

All Languages spoken by Peter in one;”—
A Truth which the Moment I enter'd upon,
All the Force of Simplicity, Fitness and Fact
Extorted assent that I could not retract.

V

If the honest old Vicar, our visited Friend,
To St. Luke's own Account will be pleas'd to attend,
I cannot but think that the current Conceit
Will yield to Solution so clear and complete
Of a Number of difficult Points, that arise
Upon viewing the Text with unprejudic'd Eyes;—
If “Speakers” were more than Apostles, and “spoken
But to one in fifteen was a sensible Token.

VI

For the Names to that Number, if rightly I count
By a Baguley Bible, of Nations amount;
Who all understood what a Peter or John,
Or whoever he will, was discoursing upon,—
And to all at one Time; for how plain to be seen
That Persons nor Place could admit of fifteen;
When Parthians, and Medes, Elamítes, and the rest,
Must be too intermix'd to be singly address'd!

VII

“Are not these,” said the Men, the devout of each Land,
Galileans that speak, whom we all understand?—”

287

As much as to say,—“By what wonderful Pow'rs
Does the Tongue Galilean become, to us, ours?”
While the good were so justly astonish'd, the bad,
Whose Hearts were unopen'd, cried out, “They are mad.”
Unaccountable Charge, if we do not recall
That in one single Tongue the Apostles speak all!

VIII

For separate Speakers and Tongues, it is clear,
Good and bad without Madness might equally hear;
And surprise in the bad would be equally keen,
How illiterate Men could speak all the fifteen.
But the Miracle, wrought in the simplest of Ways,
In both good and bad well accounts for Amaze.
One was sensibly touch'd with a Gift so Divine;
One stupidly rais'd the Reproach of “new Wine.”

IX

When St. Peter stood up, and to all the whole Throng
Show'd the Truth in a Sermon so good and so long,
But to one fifteenth Part was it only then shown,—
To the worst, the Jerusalem Scoffers alone;
Whilst all the good Strangers, not knowing one Word,
Stood unedified by?—This is greatly absurd.
God pour'd out his Spirit—that answers all Mock,—
And spake by St. Peter to all his whole Flock.

288

X

The vulgar Objection which commenting Strain
Has made to a Thing so exceedingly plain,
Is: “The Miracle then would not be in the Speaker,
It would be in the Hearers.”—Now, what can be weaker?
For the Gift in this case had a twofold Respect,
And must needs be, in both to produce its Effect,—
To account for the Fact, which the Comments forgot,
Why the pious could hear what the Mockers could not.

XI

It is nowhere affirm'd that th' Apostles acquir'd
Any Tongue but their own, tho' Divinely inspir'd.
St. Peter, St. John are soon mention'd again,
And describ'd as unlearnèd and ignorant Men.—
But enough,—or too much! For the Shortness of Time
Gives a hint to set Bounds to th' Extension of Rime.
Our Friend will acknowledge, tho' hasty the Letter,
This Question's Solution,—or give us a better.

XII

So I shall not here touch upon Hebrew and Greek;
Where a Rabbi so able, if minded to seek,

289

May observe other Points in which Learning, that makes
Many Things clear enough, has occasion'd Mistakes.
Whether this be one Instance, I only desire
That a suitable Leisure may prompt to enquire;
For to me it appears, that the Miracle done
Was all by one Language, as clear as the Sun.