University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
collapse section7. 
expand section7.1. 
expand section7.2. 
 7.3. 
expand section7.4. 
expand section7.5. 
expand section7.6. 
 7.7. 
 7.8. 
expand section7.9. 
collapse section7.10. 
  
  
Footnotes
expand section7.11. 
expand section7.12. 
expand section7.13. 
expand section7.14. 
expand section7.15. 
expand section7.16. 
expand section7.17. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

Footnotes

[20]

Romulus instituted this tribunal, as appears from Dionysius Halicarnassus, ii, p. 96.

[21]

See in Livy, xxxix, the use that was made of this tribunal at the time of the conspiracy of the Bacchanalians (they gave the name of conspiracy against the republic to assemblies in which the morals of women and young people were debauched.)

[22]

It appears from Dionysius Halicarnassus, ii, that Romulus's institution was that in ordinary cases the husband should sit as judge in the presence of the wife's relatives, but that in heinous crimes he should determine in conjunction with five of them. Hence Ulpian, tit. 6, 9, 12, 13, distinguishes in respect to the different judgments of manners between those which he calls important, and those which are less so: mores, graviores, leviores.