University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
Dictionary of the History of Ideas

Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas
  
  

expand sectionV. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionII. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionVII. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionIV. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionII. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionII. 
expand sectionVII. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionI. 
expand sectionIII. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionVI. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionVII. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionV. 
expand sectionV. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

For extracts from the Greek, Roman, medieval, and a few
of the more modern authorities mentioned, see Masters of
Political Thought,
eds. E. McC. Sait and W. T. Jones, 3 vols.
(London and New York, 1963). The controversy between
the followers of J. S. Mill and Lord Devlin is fully dealt
with by Basil Mitchell, Law, Morality and Religion in a
Secular Society
(London and New York, 1967); also Patrick
Devlin, “The Enforcement of Morals,” British Academy
Lecture (London and New York, 1959); idem, The Enforce-
ment of Morals
(London and New York, 1965); this includes
additional essays. See also E. S. Corwin, Liberty against
Government
(Baton Rouge, La., 1948); D. V. Cowen, The
Foundations of Freedom
... (Cape Town, 1961), Part II;
A. T. Denning, Freedom under the Law (London, 1949); H.
Street, Freedom, the Individual and the Law (1954; London,
1963; New Orleans, 1964); C. Wirszubski, Libertas as a
Political Idea at Rome
(Cambridge and New York, 1950).
For a technical legal analysis of liberty, see G. L. Williams,
“The Concept of Legal Liberty,” Columbia Law Review,
56 (1956), 1121.

R. W. M. DIAS

[See also Authority; Democracy; Equality; Free Will; Law,
Natural; Social Contract.]

252