University of Virginia Library

NOTES

[1.]

22 George III. c. 82.

[2.]

Parl. Hist. xxx, 787.

[3.]

State Trials, xxiv, 382.

[4.]

Parl. Hist. xxv, 472.

[5.]

The country-gentlemen, said Wilberforce in 1800, are the 'very nerves and ligatures of the body politic.' -- Correspondence, i. 219.

[6.]

Gneist's Self-Government, (3rd edition, 1871), p. 879.

[7.]

See Dictionary of National Biography.

[8.]

The Law of the Constitution, p 209.

[9.]

See Sir J. F. Stephen's History of the Criminal Law (1883), i. 470. He quotes Blackstone's famous statement that there were 160 felonies without benefit of clergy, and shows that this gives a very uncertain measure of the severity of the law. A single act making larceny in general punishable by death would be more severe than fifty separate acts, making fifty different varieties of larceny punishable by death. He adds, however, that the scheme of punishment was 'severe to the highest degree, and destitute of every sort of principle or system.' The number of executions in the early part of this century varied apparently from a fifth to a ninth of tbe capital sentences passed. See table in Porter's Progress of the Nation (1851), p. 635.

[10.]

See the references to Cottu's report of 1822 in Stephen's History, i. 429, 439, 451. Cottu's book was translated by Blanco White.

[11.]

Gneist's Self-Government (1871), p. 194. It is characteristic that J. S. Mill, in his Representative Government, remarks that the 'Quarter Sessions' are formed in the 'most anomalous' way; that they represent the old feudal principle, and are at variance with the fundamental principles of representative government (Rep. Gov. (1867), p. 113). The mainspring of the old system had become a simple anomaly to the new radicalism.

[12.]

See Arthur Young, passim. There was, however, an improvement even in the first half of the century. See Cunningham's Growth of English Industry, etc. (Modern Times), p. 378.

[13.]

See Military Forces of the Crown, by Charles M. Clode (1869), for a full account of the facts.

[14.]

Parl. Hist. xxx. 490. Clode states (i. 222) that £9,000,000 was spent upon barracks by 1804, and, it seems, without proper authority.

[15.]

Debate in Parl. Hist. xiii. 1382, etc., and see Walpole's Correspondence, i. 400, for some characteristic comments.

[16.]

Clode, ii. 86.

[17.]

See the famous case in 1778 in which Erskine made his first appearance, in State Trials, xxi. Lord St. Vincent's struggle against the corruption of his time is described by Prof Laughton in the Dictionary of National Biography, (s.v. Sir John Jervis). In 1801 half a million a year was stolen, besides all the waste due to corruption and general muddling.

[18.]

The list, checked from other sources of information, is as follows: -- Manners Sutton, archbishop of Canterbury, was grandson of the third duke of Rutland; Edward Vernon, archbishop of York, was son of the first Lord Vernon and cousin of the third Lord Harcourt, whose estates he inherited; Shute Barrington, bishop of Durham, was son of the first and brother of the second Viscount Barrington; Brownlow North, bishop of Winchester, was uncle to the earl of Guildford; James Cornwallis, bishop of Lichfield, was uncle to the second marquis, whose peerage he inherited; George Pelham, bishop of Exeter, was brother of the earl of Chichester; Henry Bathurst, bishop of Norwich, was nephew of the first earl; George Henry Law, bishop of Chester, was brother of the first Lord Ellenborough; Edward Legge, bishop of Oxford, was son of the second earl of Dartmouth; Henry Ryder, bishop of Gloucester, was brother to the earl of Harrowby; George Murray, bishop of Sodor and Man, was nephew.in.law to the duke of Athol and brother-in-law to the earl of Kinnoul. Of the fourteen tutors, etc., mentioned above, William Howley, bishop of London, had been tutor to the prince of Orange at Oxford; George Pretyman Tomline, bishop of Lincoln, had been Pitt's tutor at Cambridge; Richard Beadon, bishop of Bath and Wells, had been tutor to the duke of Gloucester at Cambridge; Folliott Cornewall, bishop of Worcester, had been made chaplain to the House of Commons by the influence of his cousin, the Speaker; John Buckner, bishop of Chichester, had been tutor to the duke of Richmond; Henry William Majendie, bishop of Bangor, was the son of Queen Charlotte's English master, and had been tutor to William IV, George Isaac Huntingford, bishop of Hereford, had been tutor to Addington, prime minister, Thomas Burgess, bishop of St. David's, was a personal friend of Addington, John Fisher, bishop of Salisbury, had been tutor to the duke of Kent; John Luxmoore, bishop of St. Asaph, had been tutor to the duke of Buccleugh, Samuel Goodenough, bishop of Carlisle, had been tutor to the sons of the third duke of Portland and was connected with Addington; William Lort Mansel, bishop of Bristol, had been tutor to Perceval at Cambridge, and owed to Perceval the mastership of trinity, Walter King, bishop of Rochester, had been secretary to the duke of Portland, and Bowyer Edward Sparke, bishop of Ely, had been tutor to the duke of Rutland. the two remaining bishops were Herbert Marsh, bishop of Peterborough, who had established a claim by defending Pitt's financial measures in an important pamphlet, and William Van Mildert, bishop of Llandaff, who had been chaplain to the Grocers' Company and became known as a preacher in London.

[19.]

Travels in France (1892), p. 327.

[20.]

See A Country Clergyman of the Eighteenth Century (Thomas Twining), 1882, for a pleasant picture of the class.

[21.]

At Cambridge subscription was abolished for undergradutes in 1775; and bachelors of arts had only to declare themselves 'bona-fide members of the church of England.'

[22.]

Gilbert Wakefield's Memoirs, ii. 149.

[23.]

De Quincey, Works (1863), ii. 106.

[24.]

Wordsworth's University Life, etc. (1874), 83-87.

[25.]

Professor Dicey's Lectures on the Law of the Constitution (1885), p. 278. Professor Dicey gives an admirable exposition of the 'rule of law.'

[26.]

Pollock and Maitland's History of English Laws, i, 208.

[27.]

A characteristic consequence is that Hale and Blackstone make no distinction between public and private law. Austin (Jurisprudence (1869), 773-76) applauds them for this peculiarity, which he regards as a proof of originality, though it would rather seem to be an acceptance of the traditional view. Austin, however, retorts the charge of Verwirrung upon German critics.

[28.]

This is the theory of Defoe in his Original Power of the People of England (Works by Hazlitt, vol. iii. See especially p. 57).

[29.]

The fourth duke of Newcastle in the House of Lords, 3 Dec. 1830.