University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
collapse section28. 
expand section28.1. 
expand section28.2. 
expand section28.3. 
expand section28.4. 
 28.5. 
expand section28.6. 
expand section28.7. 
expand section28.8. 
expand section28.9. 
expand section28.10. 
expand section28.11. 
expand section28.12. 
expand section28.13. 
expand section28.14. 
 28.15. 
expand section28.16. 
expand section28.17. 
expand section28.18. 
expand section28.19. 
expand section28.20. 
expand section28.21. 
expand section28.22. 
expand section28.23. 
expand section28.24. 
expand section28.25. 
expand section28.26. 
expand section28.27. 
expand section28.28. 
expand section28.29. 
expand section28.30. 
collapse section28.31. 
  
  
expand section28.32. 
expand section28.33. 
expand section28.34. 
expand section28.35. 
expand section28.36. 
expand section28.37. 
expand section28.38. 
expand section28.39. 
expand section28.40. 
expand section28.41. 
expand section28.42. 
expand section28.43. 
expand section28.44. 
expand section28.45. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

Under the consulate of Acilius Glabrio and Piso, the Asilian law [38] was made to prevent the intriguing for places. Dio says [39] that the senate engaged the consuls to propose it, by reason that C. Cornelius, the tribune, had resolved to cause more severe punishments to be established against this crime; to which the people seemed greatly inclined. The senate rightly judged that immoderate punishments would strike, indeed, a terror into people's minds, but must have also this effect, that there would be nobody afterwards to accuse or condemn; whereas, by proposing moderate penalties, there would be always judges and accusers.