University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
collapse section12. 
 12.1. 
expand section12.2. 
expand section12.3. 
expand section12.4. 
expand section12.5. 
expand section12.6. 
expand section12.7. 
expand section12.8. 
expand section12.9. 
expand section12.10. 
expand section12.11. 
expand section12.12. 
expand section12.13. 
expand section12.14. 
expand section12.15. 
expand section12.16. 
expand section12.17. 
expand section12.18. 
expand section12.19. 
expand section12.20. 
expand section12.21. 
 12.22. 
 12.23. 
expand section12.24. 
expand section12.25. 
expand section12.26. 
 12.27. 
 12.28. 
expand section12.29. 
collapse section12.30. 
  
  
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

6.9. 9. Of the ancient French Laws.

In the ancient French laws we find the true spirit of monarchy. In cases relating to pecuniary mulcts, the common people are less severely punished than the nobility. [25] But in criminal [26] cases it is quite the reverse; the nobleman loses his honour and his voice in court, while the peasant, who has no honour to lose, undergoes a corporal punishment.

Footnotes

[25]

Suppose, for instance, to prevent the execution of a decree, the common people paid a fine of forty sous, and the nobility of sixty livres. — "Somme Rurale," ii, p. 198, ed. Goth. 1512; and Beaumanoir, 61, p. 309.

[26]

See the "Council of Peter Defontaines," 13, especially art. 22.