University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  
  

collapse section1. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section2. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section3. 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section4. 
collapse section1. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 2. 
collapse section3. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
 4. 
collapse section5. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
 5. 
collapse section6. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section7. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
 7. 
collapse section8. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section9. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
 9. 
collapse section10. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section11. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
 11. 
collapse section12. 
 1. 
  
collapse section13. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section3. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
 13. 
collapse section14. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
 14. 
collapse section15. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section16. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section17. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
 17. 
collapse section18. 
 0. 
collapse section1. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section19. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
 19. 
collapse section20. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section21. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
Summary.
 21. 
collapse section22. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section23. 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 0. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 3. 
  
collapse section24. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section25. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section26. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  

  

Summary.

—The philosophic dualism between man and nature is reflected in the division of studies between the naturalistic and the humanistic with a tendency to reduce the latter to the literary records of the past. This dualism is not characteristic (as were the others which we have noted) of Greek thought. It arose partly because of the fact that the culture of Rome and of barbarian Europe was not a native product, being borrowed directly or indirectly from Greece, and partly because political and ecclesiastic conditions emphasized dependence upon the authority of past knowledge as that was transmitted in literary documents.

At the outset, the rise of modern science prophesied a restoration of the intimate connection of nature and humanity, for it viewed knowledge of nature as the means of securing human progress and well-being. But the more immediate applications of science were in the interests of a class rather than of men in common; and the received philosophic formulations of scientific doctrine tended either to mark it off as merely material from man as spiritual and immaterial, or else to reduce mind to a subjective illusion. In education, accordingly, the tendency was to treat the sciences as a separate body of studies, consisting of technical information regarding the physical world, and to reserve the older literary studies as distinctively humanistic. The account previously given of the evolution of knowledge, and of the educational scheme of studies based upon it, are designed to overcome the separation, and to secure recognition of the place occupied by the subject matter of the natural sciences in human affairs.