University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
collapse section6. 
expand section6.1. 
 6.2. 
expand section6.3. 
collapse section6.4. 
  
  
Footnotes
 6.5. 
expand section6.6. 
expand section6.7. 
expand section6.8. 
expand section6.9. 
expand section6.10. 
expand section6.11. 
expand section6.12. 
expand section6.13. 
expand section6.14. 
expand section6.15. 
expand section6.16. 
expand section6.17. 
expand section6.18. 
expand section6.19. 
expand section6.20. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

Footnotes

[6]

"Discourse on the First Decade of Livy," Book i., 7.

[7]

This is well explained in Cicero's oration "Pro Cæcina," towards the end, 100.

[8]

This was the law at Athens, as appears by Demosthenes. Socrates refused to make use of it.

[9]

Demosthenes, "De Corona," p. 494, Frankfort, 1604.

[10]

See Philostratus, "Lives of the Sophists," Book i., "Life of Æschines."

[11]

Plato does not think it right that kings, who, as he says, are priests, should preside at trials where people are condemned to death, to exile, or to imprisonment.

[12]

See the account of the trial of the Duke de la Valette. It is printed in the "Memoirs of Montresor," tome ii, p. 62.

[13]

It was afterwards revoked. See the same account, ii. p. 236. It was ordinarily a right of the peerage that a peer criminally accused should be judged by the king, as Francis II in the trial of the Prince of Cond, and Charles VII in the case of the Duc d'Alenon. To-day, the presence of the king at the trial of a peer, in order to condemn him would seem an act of tyranny. — Voltaire.

[14]

Annals, xi. 5.

[15]

Ibid., xiii. 4.

[16]

"Histories," v.

[17]

The same disorder happened under Theodosius the younger.

[18]

"Secret History."