University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
collapse section6. 
expand section6.1. 
 6.2. 
expand section6.3. 
expand section6.4. 
 6.5. 
expand section6.6. 
expand section6.7. 
expand section6.8. 
expand section6.9. 
expand section6.10. 
expand section6.11. 
expand section6.12. 
expand section6.13. 
collapse section6.14. 
  
  
expand section6.15. 
expand section6.16. 
expand section6.17. 
expand section6.18. 
expand section6.19. 
expand section6.20. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

29.10. 10. That Laws which seem contrary proceed sometimes from the same
Spirit.

In our time we give summons to people in their own houses; but this was not permitted among the Romans. [13]

A summons was a violent action, [14] and a kind of warrant for seizing the body; [15] hence it was no more allowed to summon a person in his own house than it is now allowed to arrest a person in his own house for debt.

Both the Roman and our laws admit of this principle alike, that every man ought to have his own house for an asylum, where he should suffer no violence. [16]

Footnotes

[13]

Leg. 18, ff. de in fus vocando.

[14]

See the Law of the Twelve Tables.

[15]

Rapit in jus. -- Horace, Sat., i. 9. Hence they could not summon those to whom a particular respect was due.

[16]

See Leg. 18, ff. de in jus vocando.