3. III. PROPOSALS FOR REFORM
Now, although I am too small a man to make propositions which might
effect a reform in this dreadful state of things, nevertheless I may as well
sing my fool's song to the end, and say, so far as I am able, what could and
should be done by the temporal authorities or by a general council.
-
1. Every prince, nobleman and
city should boldly forbid their subjects to pay the annates to Rome and
should abolish them entirely; [102] for the
pope has broken the compact and made the annates a robbery, to the
injury and shame of the whole German nation. He gives them to his
friends, sells them for large amounts of money, and uses them to endow
offices. He has thus lost his right to them, and deserves punishment. It
is therefore the duty of the temporal authorities to protect the
innocent and prevent injustice, as Paul teaches in Romans 13:4, and St.
Peter in I Peter 2:14, and even the canon law in Case 16, Question 7
de filiis. [103] Thus it has come about that men are saying to
the pope and his followers, Tu
ora, "Thou shalt pray"; to the emperor and his followers,
Tu protege, "Thou shalt guard";
to the common man, Tu labora,
"Thou shalt work." Not, however, as though everyone were not to pray,
guard and work; for the man who is diligent in his calling is praying,
guarding and working in all that he does, but everyone should have his
own especial task.
-
2. Since the pope with his Roman practices -- his commends,
[104]
adjutories;
[105]
reservations,
[106]
gratiae
expectativae,
[107]
papal
months,
[108]
incorporations,
[109]
unions,
[110]
pallia,
[111]
rules in chancery,
[112]
and such like knavery -- usurps all the German foundations without authority
and right, and gives and sells them to foreigners at Rome, who do nothing in
German lands to earn them; and since he thereby robs the ordinaries
[113]
of
their rights, makes the bishops mere ciphers and figure-heads, and acts
against his own canon law, against nature and against reason, until it has
finally gone so far that out of sheer avarice the livings and benefices are
sold to gross, ignorant asses and knaves at Rome, while pious and learned
folk have no profit of their wisdom and merit, so that the poor people of
the German nation have to go without good and learned prelates and thus go
to ruin.
Therefore, the Christian nobility should set itself against the pope as
against a common enemy and destroyer of Christendom, and should do this for
the salvation of the poor souls who must go to ruin through his tyranny.
They should. ordain, order, and decree, that henceforth no benefice shall be
drawn into the hands of Rome, and that hereafter no appointment shall be
obtained there in any manner whatsoever, but that the benefices shall be
brought out and kept out from under this tyrannical authority; and they
should restore to the ordinaries the right and office of ordering these
benefices in the German nation as best they may. And if a "courtesan" were
to come from Rome, he should receive a strict command either to keep his
distance, or else to jump into the Rhine or the nearest river, and take the
Roman ban, with its seals and letters, to a cold bath. They would then take
note at Rome that the Germans are not always mad and drunken, but that they
have really become Christians, and intend to permit no longer the mockery
and scorn of the holy name of Christ, under which all this knavery and
destruction of souls goes on, but have more regard to God and His glory than
to the authority of men.
-
3. An imperial law should be issued, that no bishop's cloak
[114]
and no
confirmation of any dignity
[115]
whatsoever shall henceforth be secured from
Rome, but that the ordinance of the most holy and most famous Council of
Nicaea
[116]
shall be restored, in which it is decreed that a bishop shall be
confirmed by the two nearest bishops or by the archbishop. If the pope will
break the statutes of this and of all other councils, what is the use of
holding councils; or who has given him the authority thus to despise and
break the rules of councils?
If he has this power then we should depose all bishops, archbishops and
primates
[117]
and make them mere parish-priests, so that the pope alone may
be over them, as he now is. He leaves to bishops, archbishops and primates
no regular authority or office, usurps everything for himself, and lets them
keep only the name and empty title. It has gone so far that by his
"exemptions"
[118]
the monasteries, the abbots and the prelates are withdrawn
from the regular authority of the bishops, so that there is no longer any
order in Christendom. From this must follow what has followed -- relaxation
of discipline and license to do evil everywhere -- so that I verily fear the
pope can be called the "man of sin."
[119]
There is in Christendom no discipline,
no rule, no order; and who is to blame except the pope? This usurped
authority of his he applies strictly to all the prelates, and takes away
their rods; and he is generous to all subjects, giving them or selling them
their liberty.
Nevertheless, for fear he may complain that he is robbed of his
authority, it should be decreed that when the primates or archbishops are
unable to settle a case, or when a controversy arises among themselves, such
a case must be laid before the pope, but not every little matter.
[120]
Thus
it was done in olden times, and thus the famous Council of Nicaea
decreed.
[121]
If a case can be settled without the pope, then his Holiness
should not be troubled with such minor matters, but give himself to that
prayer, meditation and care for all Christendom, of which he boasts. This is
what the Apostles did. They said, Acts 6:2, "It is not meet that we should
leave the Word of God and serve tables, but we will keep to preaching and
prayer and set others over the work." But now Rome stands for nothing else
than the despising of the Gospel and of prayer, and for the serving of
"tables," i.e., of temporal affairs, and the rule of the Apostles and of the
pope agree as Christ agrees with Lucifer, heaven with hell, night with day;
yet he is called "Vicar of Christ and Successor of the Apostles."
-
4. It should be decreed that no temporal matter shall be taken to
Rome,
[122]
but that all such cases shall be left to the temporal authorities,
as the Romans themselves decree in that canon law of theirs, which they do
not keep. For it from the should be the duty of the pope, as the man most
learned in the Scriptures and most Holy, not in name only, but in truth, to
administer affairs which concern the faith and holy life of Christians, to
hold the primates and arch-bishops to these things, and to help them in
dealing with and caring for these matters. So St. Paul teaches in
Corinthians 6:7, and takes the Corinthians severely to task for their
concern with worldly things. For it works intolerable injury to all lands
that such cases are tried at Rome. It increases the costs, and moreover the
judges do not know the manners, laws and customs of the various countries,
so that they often do violence to the facts and base their decisions on
their own laws and opinions, and thus injustice is inevitably done the
contestants.
Moreover, the outrageous extortion practiced by the officiales
[123]
must
be forbidden in all the dioceses, so that they may attend to nothing else
than matters of faith and good morals, and leave to the temporal judges the
things that concern money, property, life and honor. The temporal
authorities, therefore, should not permit sentences of ban or exile when
faith or right life is not concerned. Spiritual authorities should have rule
over spiritual goods, as reason teaches; but spiritual goods are not money,
nor anything pertaining to the body, but they are faith and good works.
Nevertheless it might be granted that cases which concern benefices or
livings should be tried before bishops, archbishops and primates. Therefore,
in order to decide contests and contentions, it might be possible for the
Primate of Germany to maintain a general consistory, with auditors and
chancellors, which should have control over the signaturae
gratiae
and signaturae justitiae,
[124]
that are now
controlled at Rome, and
which should be the final court of appeal for German cases. The officers of
this consistory must not, however, be paid, as at Rome, by chance presents
and gifts, and thereby acquire the habit of selling justice and injustice,
which they now have to do at Rome because the pope gives them no
remuneration, but allows them to fatten themselves on presents. For at Rome
no one cares what is right or not right, but only what is money or not
money. This court might, however, be paid out of the annates, or some other
way might easily be devised, by those who are more intelligent and who have
more experience in these matters than I. All I wish to do is to arouse and
set to thinking those who have the ability and the inclination to help the
German nation become once more free and Christian, after the wretched,
heathenish and unchristian rule of the pope.
-
5. No more reservations should be valid, and no more benefices should be
seized by Rome, even if the incumbent dies, or there is a contest, or the
incumbent is a "servant" of a cardinal or of the pope;
[125]
and it should be
strictly forbidden and prevented that any "courtesan"
[126]
should institute a
contest over any benefice, so as to cite pious priests to Rome, harass them
and drive them into lawsuits. If, in consequence of this prohibition, there
should come from Rome a ban or an ecclesiastical censure, it should be
disregarded, just as though a thief were to lay a man under the ban because
he would not let him steal. Indeed they should be severely punished because
they so blasphemously misuse the ban and the name of God to support their
robbery, and with falsely devised threats would drive us to endure and to
praise such blasphemy of God's name arid such abuse of Christian authority,
and thus to become, in the sight of God, partakers in their rascality; it is
our duty before God to resist it, for St. Paul, in Romans 1:32, reproves as
guilty of death not only "those who do such things," but also those who
consent to such things and allow them to be done. Most unbearable of all is
the lying reservatio pectoralis,
[127]
whereby
Christendom is so
scandalously and openly put to shame and scorn, because its head deals in
open lies, and out of love for the accursed money, shamelessly deceives and
fools everybody.
-
6. The casus reservati,
[128]
the
"reserved cases," should also be
abolished, for not only are they the means of extorting much money from the
people, but by means of them the ravening tyrants ensnare and confuse many
poor consciences to the intolerable injury of their faith in God. This is
especially true of the ridiculous and childish cases about which they make
so much ado in the Bull Coena Domini,
[129]
and which are not worth
calling daily sins, still less cases so grave that the pope may not remit
them by any indulgence; as for example, hindering a pilgrim on his way to
Rome, furnishing weapons to the Turks, or tampering with papal letters. With
such gross, crazy, clumsy things do they make fools of us! Sodom and
Gomorrah, and all the sins which are committed and can be committed against
the commandments of God are not reserved cases; but sins against what God
has never commanded and what they have themselves devised, these must be
reserved cases, solely that no one be hindered in bringing money to Rome, in
order that, safe from the Turks, they may live in luxury and keep the world
under their tyranny with their wanton, useless bulls and braves.
[130]
All priests ought rightly to know, or else there should be a public
ordinance to that effect, that no secret sin, of which a man has not been
publicly accused, is a reserved case, and that every priest has the power to
remit all sorts of sins, however they may be called, so long as they are
secret; moreover that no abbot, bishop or pope has the power to reserve any
such case to himself.
[131]
If they attempt it, their reservation does not
hold and is not valid, and they should be reproved, as men who without
authority interfere in God's judgment, and without cause ensnare and burden
poor, ignorant consciences.
But if great public sins are committed,
especially sins against God's commandments, then there is indeed a reason
for reserved cases, but even then there should not be too many of them, and
they should not be reserved arbitrarily and without cause; 1 Peter 5:3, for
Christ has set in His Church not tyrants, but shepherds, as saith St. Peter.
-
7. The Roman See should also do away with the officia,[132]
and diminish the swarm of vermin at Rome, so that the pope's household
can be supported by the pope's own purse. The pope should not allow his
court to surpass in pomp and extravagance the courts of all kings,
seeing that such a condition not only has never been serviceable to the
cause of Christian faith, but the courtiers have been kept thereby from
study and prayer, until they are scarce able to speak about the faith at
all. This they proved quite plainly at the last Roman Council,[133] in which, amongst many other childish and
frivolous things, they decreed that the soul of man is immortal and that
every priest must say his prayers once a month on pain of losing his
benefice. How shall matters which concern faith and the Church be
decided by people so hardened and blinded by great avarice, wealth and
worldly splendor, that they have only now decreed that the soul is
immortal? It is no small shame to all Christians that at Rome they deal
so disgracefully with the faith. If they had less wealth and pomp, they
could pray and study better, and so become worthy and able to deal with
matters of faith, as was the case in olden times when they were bishops,
and did not presume to be kings over all kings.
-
8. The hard and terrible oaths should be abolished, which the bishops are
wrongfully compelled to render to the pope,
[134]
and by which they are bound
like servants, as that worthless and unlearned chapter,
Significasti,
[135]
arbitrarily and most
stupidly decrees. It is not
enough that they burden us in body, soul and property with their many mad
laws, by which faith is weakened and Christendom ruined; but they seize upon
the person and office and work of the bishops, and now upon the
investiture
[136]
also, which was in olden times the right of the
German emperors, and in France and other kingdoms still belongs to the
kings.
On this point they had great wars and disputes with the emperors, [137] until at last, with impudent authority, they
took the right and have kept it until now; just as though the Germans,
above all the Christians on earth, had to be the puppets of the pope and
the Roman See and do and suffer what no one else will do and suffer.
Since, then, this is sheer violence and robbery, hindering the regular
authority of the bishops and injuring poor souls, therefore the emperor
and
-
9. The pope should have no authority over the emperor, except that he
anoints and crowns him at the altar, just as a bishop anoints and crowns a
king;
[138]
and we should not henceforth yield to that devilish pride which
compels the emperor to kiss the pope's feet or sit at his feet, or, as they
claim, hold his stirrup or the bridle of his mule when he mounts for a ride;
still less should he do homage and swear faithful allegiance to the pope, as
the popes have shamelessly ventured to demand as if they possessed that
right. The chapter Solite
[139]
in which the papal authority is raised
above the imperial authority, is not worth a heller, nor are any of those
who rest upon it or fear it; for it does nothing else than force the holy
words of God out of their true meaning, and wrest them to human dreams, as I
have showed in a Latin treatise.
[140]
Such extravagant, over-presumptuous, and more than wicked doings of the
pope have been devised by the devil, in order that under their cover he may
in time bring in Antichrist, and raise the pope above God, as many are ready
doing and have done. It is not proper for the pope to exalt himself above
the temporal authorities, save only in spiritual offices such as preaching
and absolving.
In other things he is to be subject, as Paul and Peter teach,
in Romans 13:1, and 1 Peter 2:13, and as I have said above.[141] His nobles are
in duty bound to prevent and punish such tyranny. He is not vicar of Christ
in heaven, but of Christ as He walked on earth.
[142]
For Christ in heaven, in
the form of a ruler, needs no vicar, but He sits and sees, does, and knows
all things, and has all power. But He needs a vicar in the form of a
servant, in which He walked on earth, toiling, preaching, suffering and
dying. Now they turn it around, take from Christ the heavenly form of ruler
and give it to the pope, leaving the form of a servant to perish utterly. He
might almost be the "Counter-Christ" whom the Scriptures call Antichrist,
for all his nature, work and doings are against Christ, for the destruction
of Christ's nature and work.
It is also ridiculous and childish that the pope, with such perverted and
deluded reasoning, boasts in his decretal Pastoralis,
[143]
that he is
rightful heir to the Empire, in case of a vacancy. Who has given him this
right? Did Christ, when He said, Luke 22:25, "The princes of the Gentiles
are lords, but ye shall not be so"? Did St. Peter will it to him? It vexes
me that we must read and learn such shameless, gross, crazy lies in the
canon law, and must even hold them for Christian doctrine, when they are
devilish lies.
Of the same sort is also that unheard-of lie about the "Donation of
Constantine."
[144]
It must have been some special plague of God that so many
people of understanding have let themselves be talked into accepting such
likes as these, which are so manifest and clumsy that I should think any
drunken peasant could lie more adroitly and skillfully. How can a man rule
an empire and at the same time continue to preach, pray, study and care for
the poor? Yet these are the duties which properly and peculiarly belong to
the pope, and they were imposed by Christ (Matthew 10:10) in such earnest
that He even forbade His disciples to take with them cloak or money, since
these duties can scarcely be performed by one who has to rule even a single
household. Yet the pope would rule an empire and continue to be pope! This
is a device of the knaves who would like, under the pope's name, to be lords
of the world, and by means of the pope and the name of Christ, to restore
the Roman Empire to its former state.
-
10. The pope should restrain himself, take his fingers out of the pie,
and claim no title to the Kingdom of Naples and Sicily.
[145]
He has exactly
as much right to that kingdom as I have, and yet he wishes to be its
overlord. It is plunder got by violence, like almost all his other
possessions. The emperor, therefore, should not grant him this fief, and if
it has been granted, he should no longer give his consent to it, and should
point him instead to the Bible and the prayer-books, so that he may preach
and pray, and leave to temporal lords the ruling of lands and peoples,
especially when no one has given them to him.
The same opinion should hold as regards Bologna, Imola, Vicenza, Ravenna
and all the territories in the Mark of Ancona, in Romagna, and in other
Italian lands, which the pope has taken by force and possesses without
right.
[146]
Moreover, he has meddled in these things against all the commands
of Christ and of St. Paul. For thus saith St. Paul, 2 Timothy 2:3, "No one
entangleth himself with worldly affairs, whose business it is to wait upon
the divine knighthood".
[147]
Now the pope should be the head and front of
this knighthood, yet he meddles in worldly affairs more than any emperor or
king. Why then he must be helped out of them and allowed to attend to his
knighthood. Christ also, Whose vicar he boasts himself to be, was never
willing to have aught to do with temporal rule; indeed, to one who asked of
him a decision respecting his brother, He said, Luke 12:14, "Who made Me a
judge over you?" But the pope rushes in unbidden, and boldly takes hold of
everything as though he were a god, until he no longer knows what Christ is,
Whose vicar he pretends to be.
-
11. The kissing of the pope's feet
[148]
should take place no more. It is
an unchristian, nay, an anti-Christian thing for a poor sinful man to let
his feet be kissed by one who is a hundred times better than himself. If it
is done in honor of his authority, why does not the pope do the same to
others in honor of their holiness? Compare the two -- Christ and the pope!
John 13:1 ff., Christ washed His disciples' feet and dried them, and the
disciples never washed His feet; the pope, as though he were higher than
Christ, turns things around and, as a great favor, allows people to kiss his
feet, though he ought properly to use all his power to prevent it, if anyone
wished to do it; like Paul and Barnabas, who would not let the people of
Lystra pay them divine honor, but said, Acts 14:11-16, "We are men like
you." But our sycophants have gone so far as to make for us an idol, and now
no one fears God so much as he fears the pope, no one pays Him such
ceremonious honor. That they can endure! What they cannot endure is that a
hair's-breadth should be taken away from the proud estate of the pope. Now
if they were Christians, and held God's honor above their own, the pope
would never be happy while he knew that God's honor was despised and his own
exalted, and he would let no man pay him honor until he saw that God's honor
was again exalted and was greater than his own.
[149]
It is another piece of the same scandalous pride, that the pope is
not satisfied to ride or to be driven in a vehicle, but although he is
strong and in good health, he has himself borne by men, with unheard-of
splendor, like an idol. How, pray, does such satanic pride agree with the
example of Christ, Who went on foot, as did all His disciples? Where has
there ever been a worldly monarch who went about in such worldly glory as he
who wishes to be the head of all those who are to despise and flee worldly
glory, i.e., of Christians? Not that this in itself should give us very much
concern, but we should rightly fear the wrath of God, if we flatter this
kind of pride and do not show our indignation. It is enough that the pope
should rant and play the fool in this wise; but that we should approve it
and tolerate it, -- this too much.
For what Christian heart can or ought to take pleasure in seeing that
when the pope wishes to receive the communion, he sits quiet, like a
gracious lord, and has the sacrament passed to him on a golden rod by a
bowing cardinal on bended knee? As though the holy sacrament were no worthy
that a pope, a poor stinking sinner, should rise to show God honor, when all
other Christians, who are much more holy than the Most Holy Father, the
pope, receive it with all reverence! Would it be a wonder if God were to
send a plague upon us all because we suffer such dishonor to be done Him by
our prelates, and approve it, and by our silence or our flattery make
ourselves partakers of such damnable pride?
It is the same way when he carries the sacrament in procession. He must
be carried, but the sacrament is set before him, like a can of wine on the
table. In short, at Rome Christ counts for nothing, the pope counts for
everything; and yet they would compel us with threats to approve, and praise
and honor such antichristian sins, though this is against God and against
all Christian doctrine. Now God help a free Council to teach the pope that
he too is a man, and is not more than God, as he presumes to be.
-
12. Pilgrimages to Rome
[150]
should either be abolished, or else no one
should be allowed to make such a pilgrimage out of curiosity or because of a
pious impulse, unless it is first recognized by his parish-priest, his town
authorities or his overlord, that he has good and sufficient reason for it.
I say this not because pilgrimages are bad, but because they are at this
time ill-advised. For men see at Rome no good example, but only that which
offends; and they have themselves made the proverb, "The nearer Rome, the
worse Christians."
[151]
Men bring back with them contempt for God and His
commandments. It is said: "The first time one goes to Rome he seeks a
rascal, the second time he finds him, the third time he brings him home with
him."
[152]
Now, however, they have become so clever that they make the three
journeys at once, and they have verily brought back from Rome such pretty
things that it were better never to have seen or known Rome.
Even if this reason did not exist, there is still another and a better:
to wit, that by these pilgrimages men are led away into a false conceit and
a misunderstanding of the divine commandments; for they think that this
going on pilgrimage is a precious, good work, and this is not true. It is a
very small good work, oftentimes an evil, delusive work, for God has not
commanded it. But He has commanded that a man shall care for his wife and
children, and look after such other duties as belong to the married state,
and besides this, to serve and help his neighbor. Now it comes to pass that
a man makes a pilgrimage to Rome when no one has commanded him to do so,
spends fifty or a hundred gulden, more or less, and leaves his wife and
child, or at least his neighbor, at home to suffer want. Yet the foolish
fellow thinks to gloss over such disobedience and contempt of the divine
commandments with his self-willed pilgriming, when it is really only
curiosity or devilish delusion which leads him to it. The popes have helped
this along with their false, feigned, foolish, "golden years,"
[153]
by which
the people are excited, stirred up, torn away from God's commandments, and
drawn toward their own deluded undertakings. Thus they have accomplished the
very thing they should have forbidden; but it has brought in money and
strengthened false authority, therefore it has had to continue, though it is
against God and the salvation of souls.
In order to destroy in simple Christians this false, seductive faith, and
to restore a true understanding of good works, all pilgrimages should be
given up; for there is in them nothing good -- no commandment, no obedience
-- but, on the contrary, numberless occasions for sin and for the despising
of God's commandments. Hence come the many beggars, who by this pilgriming
carry on endless knaveries and learn the habit of begging when they are not
in want. Hence, too, come vagabondage, and many other ills which I shall not
now recount.
If any one, now, wishes to go on pilgrimage or take a pilgrim's vow, he
should first show his reasons to his parish-priest or to his lord. If it
turns out that he wishes to do it for the sake of the good work, the priest
or lord should boldly tread the vow and good work under foot, as though it
were a lure of the devil, and show him how to apply the money and labor
necessary for the pilgrimage to the keeping of God's commandments and to
works a thousandfold better, viz., by spending it on his own family or on
his poor neighbors. But if he wishes to make the pilgrimage out of
curiosity, to see new lands and cities, he may be allowed to do as he likes.
If, however, he has made the vow while ill, then such vows ought to be
forbidden and canceled, and the commandments of God exalted, and he ought to
be shown that he should henceforth be satisfied with the vow he made in
baptism,
[154]
to keep the commandments of God. And yet, in order to quiet his
conscience, he may be allowed this once to perform his foolish vow. No one
wants to walk in the straight and common path of God's commandments;
everyone makes himself new roads and new vows, as though he had fulfilled
all the commandments of God.
-
13. Next we come to that great crowd who vow much and keep little. Be not
angry, dear lords! Truly, I mean it well. It is the truth, and bitter-sweet,
and it is this, -- the building of mendicant-houses
[155]
should no more be
permitted. God help us, there are already far too many of them! Would to God
they were all done away, or at least given over to two or three orders!
Wandering about the land has never brought any good, and never l bring any
good. It is my advice, therefore, to put together ten of these houses, or as
many as may be necessary, and out of them all to make one house, which will
be well provided and need no more begging. It is much more important to
consider what the common people need for their salvation, than what St.
Francis, Dominic, St. Augustine
[156]
or any other man has decreed; especially
since things have not turned out as they expected.
The mendicants should also be relieved of preaching and hearing
confession, except when they are called to this work by the express desire
of bishops, parishes, congregations or the temporal authorities. Out of
their preaching and shriving there has come nothing but hatred and envy
between priests and monks, and great offense and hindrance to the common
people. For this reason it should properly and deservedly cease, because it
can well be dispensed with.
[157]
It looks suspiciously as though it were not
for nothing that the Holy Roman See has increased this army, so that the
priests and bishops, tired of its tyranny, might not some time become too
strong for it and begin a reformation which would not be to the liking of
his Holiness.
At the same time the manifold divisions and differences within one and
the same order should be abolished. These divisions have at times arisen for
small reason and maintained themselves for still smaller, combating one
another with unspeakable hatred and envy.
[158]
Nevertheless the Christian
faith, which can well exist without any of these distinctions, is lost by
both sides, and a good Christian life is valued and sought after only in
outward laws, works and forms; and this results only in the devising of
hypocrisy and the destruction of souls, as everyone may see with his own
eyes.
The pope must also be forbidden to found and confirm any more of these
orders; nay, he must be commanded to abolish some of them and reduce their
number, since the faith of Christ, which is alone the highest good and which
exists without any orders, is in no small danger, because these many
different works and forms easily mislead men into living for them instead of
giving heed to the faith. Unless there are in the monasteries wise prelates,
who preach and who concern themselves with faith more than with the rules of
the orders, the order cannot but harm and delude simple souls who think only
of works.
In our days, however, the prelates who have had faith and who founded the
orders have almost all passed away. Just as in olden days among the children
of Israel, when the fathers, who knew God's works and wonders, had passed
away, the children, from ignorance of God's works and of faith, immediately
became idolatrous and set up their own human works; so now, alas! these
orders have lost the understanding of God's works and of faith, and only
torture themselves pitifully, with labor and sorrow, in their own rules,
laws and customs, and withal never come to a right understanding of a good
spiritual life, as the Apostle declared when he said in 2 Timothy 3:5, 7:
"They have the appearance of a spiritual life, yet there is nothing back of
it; they are ever and ever learning, but they never come to a knowledge of
what a true spiritual life is." There should be no monastery unless there
were a spiritual prelate, learned in the Christian faith, to rule it, for no
other kind of prelate can rule without injury and ruin, and the holier and
better he appears to be in his outward works and life, the more injury and
ruin he causes.
To my way of thinking it would be a necessary measure, especially in
these perilous times of ours, that all foundations and monasteries should be
re-established as they were at the first, in the days of the Apostles and
for a long time afterwards, when they were all open to every man, and every
man might remain in them as long as he pleased. For what were the
foundations and monasteries except Christian schools in which the Scriptures
and Christian living were taught, and people were trained to rule and to
preach? So we read that St. Agnes
[159]
went to school, and we still see the
same practice in some of the nunneries, like that at Quedlinburg
[160]
and
others elsewhere. And in truth all monasteries and convents ought to be so
free that God is served in them with free will and not with forced avarice.
Afterward, however, they hedged them about with vows and turned them into a
lifelong prison, so that these vows are thought to be of more account than
the vows of baptism. What sort of fruit this has borne, we see, hear, read
and learn more and more every day.
I suppose this advice of mine will be regarded as the height of
foolishness; but I am not concerned about that just now. I advise what I
think best; let him reject it who will! I see how the vows are kept,
especially the vow of chastity, which has become so universal through these
monasteries and yet is not commanded by Christ; on the contrary, it is given
to very few to keep it, as He himself says, and St. Paul. (Matt. 19:11 ff.,
1 Cor. 7:7, Col. 2:20) I would have all men to be helped, and not have
Christian souls caught in human, self-devised customs and laws.
-
14. We also see how the priesthood has fallen, and how many a poor priest
is overburdened with wife and child, and his conscience troubled, yet no one
does anything to help him though he might easily be helped. Though pope and
bishops may let things go as they go, and let them go to ruin if they will,
I will save my conscience and open my month freely, whether it vex pope,
bishops or any one else.
Wherefore I say that according to the institution of Christ and the
Apostles every city should have a priest or bishop, as St. Paul clearly says
in Titus 1:6; and this priest should not be compelled to live without a
wedded wife, but should be permitted to have one, as St. Paul says in I
Timothy 3:2, and Titus 1:6, "A bishop should be a man who is blameless, and
the husband of but one wedded wife, whose children are obedient and
virtuous," etc. For with St. Paul a bishop and a priest are one and the same
thing, as witness also St. Jerome.
[161]
But of bishops as they now are; the
Scriptures know nothing; they have been appointed by the ordinance of the
Christian Church, that one of them may rule over many priests.
So then we clearly learn from the Apostle that it should be the custom
for every town to choose out of the congregation
[162]
a learned and pious
citizen, entrust to him the office of the ministry, and support him at the
expense of the community, leaving him free choice to marry or not. He should
have with him several priests or deacons, who might also be married or not,
as they chose, to help him rule the people of the community
[163]
by means of
preaching and the sacraments, as is still the practice in the Greek Church.
At a later time,
[164]
when there were so many persecutions and controversies
with heretics, there were many holy fathers who of their own accord
abstained from matrimony, to the end that they might the better devote
themselves to study and be prepared at any time for death or for
controversy. Then the Roman See interfered, out of sheer wantonness, and
made a universal commandment forbidding priests to marry.
[165]
This was done
at the bidding of the devil, as St. Paul declares in I Timothy 4, "There
shall come teachers who bring doctrines of devils, and forbid to marry."
From this has arisen so much untold misery, occasion was given for the
withdrawal of the Greek Church,
[166]
and division, sin, shame and scandal
were increased without end, - which is the result of everything the devil
does.
What, then, shall we do about it? My advice is that matrimony be again
made free,
[167]
and that every one be left free choice to marry or not to
marry. In that case, however, there must be a very different government and
administration of Church property, the whole canon law must go to pieces and
not many benefices find their way to Rome.
[168]
I fear that greed has been a
cause of this wretched unchaste chastity, and as a result of greed every man
has wished to become a priest and everyone wants his son to study for the
priesthood, not with the idea of living in chastity, for that could be done
outside the priesthood, but of being supported in temporal things without
care or labor, contrary to the command of God in Genesis 3:19, "In the sweat
of thy face shalt thou eat thy bread." They have construed this to mean that
their labor was to pray and say mass.
I am not referring here to popes, bishops, canons and monks. God has not
instituted these offices. They have taken burdens on themselves; let them
bear them. I would speak only of the ministry which God has instituted
[169]
and which is to rule a congregation by means of preaching and sacraments,
whose incumbents are to live and be at home among the people. Such ministers
should be granted liberty by a Christian council to marry, for the avoidance
of temptation and sin. Gal. 1:8, For since God has not bound them, no one
else ought to bind them or can bind them, even though he were an angel from
heaven, still less if he be only a pope; and everything that the canon law
decrees to the contrary is mere fable and idle talk.
Furthermore, I advise that henceforth neither at his consecration to the
priesthood nor at any other time shall any one under any circumstances
promise the bishop to live in celibacy, but shall declare to the bishop that
he has no authority to demand such a vow, and that to demand it is the
devil's own tyranny.
But if anyone is compelled to say or wishes to say, as do some, "so far
as human frailty permits,"
[170]
let everyone frankly interpret these words
negatively, to mean "I do not promise chastity."
[171]
For human frailty does
not permit a chaste life,
[172]
but only angelic power and celestial might. 2
Pet. 2:11.
[173]
Thus he should keep his conscience free from all vows.
On the question whether those who are not yet married should marry or
remain unmarried, I do not care to give advice either way. I leave that to
common Christian order and to everyone's better judgment. But as regards the
wretched multitude who now sit in shame and heaviness of conscience because
their wives are called "priests' harlots" and their children "priests'
children" I will not withhold my faithful counsel nor deprive them of the
comfort which is their due, I say this boldly by my jester's right.
[174]
You will find many a pious priest against whom no one has anything to say
except that he is weak and has come to shame with a woman, though both
parties may be minded with all their heart to live always together in wedded
love and troth, if only they could do it with a clear conscience, even
though they might have to bear public shame. Two such persons are certainly
married before God. And I say that where they are thus minded, and so come
to live together, they should boldly save their consciences; let him take
and keep her as his wedded wife, and live honestly with her as her husband,
caring nothing whether the pope will have it so or not, whether it be
against canon law or human law. The salvation of your soul is of more
importance than tyrannical, arbitrary, wicked laws, which are not necessary
for salvation and are not commanded by God. Ex. 12:35 f. You should do like
the children of Israel, who stole from the Egyptians the hire they had
earned, or like a servant who steals from his wicked master the wages he has
earned. In like manner steal thou from the pope thy wife and child! Let the
man who has faith enough to venture this, boldly follow me; I shall not lead
him astray. Though I have not the authority of a pope, I have the authority
of a Christian to advise and help my neighbor against sins and temptations;
and that, not without cause and reason.
First, not every priest can do without a woman, not only on account of
the weakness of the flesh, but much more because of the necessities of the
household. If he, then, may have a woman, and the pope grants him that,
and yet may not have her in marriage, -- what is that but leaving a man
and a woman alone and forbidding them to fall? It is as though one were to
put fire and straw together and command that it shall neither smoke nor
burn.
Second, The pope has as little power to command this, as he has to
forbid eating, drinking, the natural movement of the bowels or growing
fat. No one, therefore, is bound to keep it, but the pope is responsible
for all the sins which are committed against this ordinance, for all the
souls which are lost thereby, for all the consciences which are thereby
confused and tortured; and therefore he has long deserved that some one
should drive him out of the world, so many wretched souls has he strangled
with this devil's snare; though I hope that there are many to whom God has
been more gracious at their last hour than the pope has been in their
life. Nothing good has ever come out of the papacy and its laws, nor ever
will.
Third, Although the law of the pope is against it, nevertheless, when
the estate of matrimony has been entered against the pope's law, then his
law is at an end, and is no longer valid; for the commandment of God,
which decrees that no one shall put man and wife asunder, takes precedence
of the law of the pope; and the commandments of God must not be broken and
neglected for the sake of the pope's commandment, though many mad jurists,
in the papal interest, have devised "impediments"
[175]
and have prevented,
destroyed and confused the estate of matrimony, until by their means God's
commandment has been altogether destroyed. To make a long story short,
there are not in the whole "spiritual" law of the pope two lines which
could be instructive to a pious Christian, and there are, alas! So many
mistaken and dangerous laws that the best thing would be to make a bonfire
of it.
[176]
But if you say that this
[177]
would give offense, and the pope must first
grant dispensation, I reply that whatever offense is in it, is the fault of
the Roman See, which has established such laws without right and against
God; before God and the Scriptures it is no offense. Moreover, if the pope
can grant dispensations from his avaricious and tyrannical laws for money's
sake, then every Christian can grant dispensations from them -- for the sake
of God and the salvation of souls. For Christ has set us free from all human
laws, especially when they are opposed to God and the salvation of souls, as
St. Paul teaches in Galatians 5:1 and 1 Corinthians 9:4 ff.; 10:23.
-
15. Nor must I forget the poor convents! The evil spirit, who by human
laws now confuses all estates in life, and has made them unbearable, has
taken possession of certain abbots, abbesses and prelates also, and causes
them so to govern their brethren and sisters as to send them the more
speedily to hell, and make them lead a wretched life even here; for such is
the log of all the devil's martyrs. That is to say, they have reserved to
themselves in confession, all, or at least some, of the mortal sins which
are secret, so that no brother, on his obedience and on pain of the ban, can
absolve another from these sins.
[178]
Now we do not always find angels
everywhere, but we find also flesh and blood, which suffers all bannings and
threatenings rather than confess secret sins to the prelates and the
appointed confessors. Thus they go to the sacrament with such consciences
that they become "irregular"
[179]
and all sorts of other terrible things. O
blind shepherds! O mad prelates! O ravening wolves!
To this I say: If a sin is public or notorious, then it is proper that
the prelate alone should punish it, and of these sins only and no others he
may make exceptions, and reserve them to himself over secret sins he has no
authority, even though they were the worst sins that are or ever can be
found, and if the prelate makes exceptions of these sins, he is a tyrant,
for he has no such right and is interfering in the judgment of God.
And so I advise these children, brethren and sisters: If your superiors
are unwilling to grant you permission to confess your secret sins to
whomever you wish, then take them to whatever brother or sister you will and
confess them, receive absolution, and then go and do whatever you wish and
ought to do; only believe firmly that you are absolved, and nothing more is
needed. And do not allow yourself to be troubled by ban, "irregularity," or
any of the other things they threaten; these things are valid only in the
case of public or notorious sins which one is unwilling to confess; they do
not affect you at all. Why do you try by your threatenings, O blind prelate,
to prevent secret sins? Let go what you cannot publicly prove, so that God's
judgment and grace may also have its work in your subjects! He did not give
them so entirely into your hands as to let them go entirely out of His own!
Nay, what you have under your rule is but the smaller part. Let your statues
be statutes, but do not exalt them to heaven, to the judgment-seat of God.
-
16. It were also necessary to abolish all anniversary mortuary and "soul"
masses,
[180]
or at least to diminish their number, since we plainly see that
they have become nothing but a mockery, by which God is deeply angered, and
that their only purpose is money-getting, gorging and drunkenness. What kind
of pleasure should God have in such a miserable gabbing or wretched vigils
and masses, which is neither reading nor praying, and even when prayed,
[181]
they are performed not for God's sake and out of willing love, but for
money's sake and because they are a bounden duty. Now it is not possible
that any work not done out of willing love can please God or obtain anything
from Him. And so it is altogether Christian to abolish, or at least
diminish, everything which we see growing into an abuse, and which angers
rather than reconciles God. It would please me more -- nay, it would be more
acceptable to God and far better -- that a foundation, church or monastery
should put all its anniversary masses and vigils together, and on one day,
with hearty sincerity, devotion and faith, hold a true vigil and mass for
all its benefactors, rather than hold them by the thousand every year, for
each benefactor a special mass, without this devotion and faith. O dear
Christians! God cares not for much praying, but for true praying! Nay, He
condemns the many and long prayers, and says in Matthew 6:7; 23:14, they
will only earn more punishment thereby. But avarice, which cannot trust God,
brings such things to pass, fearing that otherwise it must die of hunger!
-
17. Certain of the penalties or punishments of the canon law should also
be abolished, especially the interdict,[182] which
is, beyond all doubt, an invention of the evil Spirit. It is not a devil's
work to try to atone for
one sin with many greater sins? And yet, to put God's Word and worship to
silence, or to do away with them, is a greater sin than strangling twenty
popes at once, and far greater than killing a priest or keeping back some
Church property. This is another of the tender virtues taught in the
"spiritual law." For one of the reasons why this law is called "spiritual"
is because it comes from the Spirit; not, however, from the Holy Spirit, but
from the evil spirit.
The ban
[183]
is to be used in no case except where the Scriptures prescribe
its use, i.e., against those who do not hold the true faith, or who live in
open sin; it is not to be used for the sake of temporal possessions. But now
it is the other way around. Everyone believes and lives as he pleases, most
of all those who use the ban to plunder and defame other people, and all the
bans are now laid only on account of temporal possessions, for which we have
no one to thank but the holy "spiritual lawlessness."
[184]
Of this I have
previously said more in the Discourse.
[185]
The other punishments and penalties, -- suspension, irregularity,
aggravation, reaggravation, deposition, lightnings, thunderings, cursings,
damnings and the rest of these devices, -- should be buried ten fathoms deep
in the earth, so that there should be neither name nor memory of them left
on earth. The evil spirit, who has been let loose by the "spiritual law" has
brought this terrible plague and misery into the heavenly kingdom of the
holy Church, and has accomplished by it nothing else than the destruction
and hindrance of souls, so that the word of Christ may well be applied to
them
[186]
; Matthew 23:13: "Woe unto you scribes! Ye have taken upon your the
authority to teach, and ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men. Ye go
not in yourselves, and ye suffer not them that are entering."
-
18. All festivals
[187]
should be abolished, and Sunday alone retained. If
it were desired, however, to retain the festivals of Our Lady and of the
greater saints, they should be transferred to Sunday, or observed only by a
morning mass, after which all the rest of the day should be a working-day.
The reason is this: The feast-days are now abused by drinking, gaming,
idleness and all manner of sins, so that on the holy days we anger God more
than on other days, and have altogether turned things around; the hold days
are not holy and the working days are holy, and not only is no service done
to God and His saints by the many holy days, but rather great dishonor.
There are, indeed, some mad prelates who think they are doing a good work if
they make a festival in honor of St. Ottilia or St. Barbara or some other
saint, according to the promptings of their blind devotion; but they would
be doing a far better work if they honored the saint by turning a
saint's-day into a working day.
Over and above the spiritual injury, the common man receives two material
injuries from this practice, i.e., he neglects his work and he spends more
than at other times; nay, he also weakens his body and unfits it for work.
We see this every day, yet no one thinks to make it better. We ought not to
consider whether or not the pope has instituted the feasts, and whether we
must have dispensation and permission to omit them. If a thing is opposed to
God, and harmful to man in body and soul, any community,
[188]
council
[189]
or
government has not only the right to abolish it and put a stop to it,
without the will or knowledge or pope or bishop, but they are bound on their
souls' salvation to prevent it, even against the will of pope and bishop,
thought these ought to be themselves the first to forbid it.
Above all, we ought utterly to abolish the consecration days,
[190]
since
they have become nothing else than taverns, fairs and gaming places,
[191]
and
serve only to the increase of God's dishonor and to the damnation of souls.
All the pretence about the custom having had the custom having had a good
beginning and being a good work is of no avail. Did not God Himself set
aside His own law, which He had given from heaven, when it was perverted and
abused? And does He not still daily overturn what He has appointed and
destroy what He has made, because of such perversion and abuse? As it is
written of Him in Psalm 18:27, "With the perverted Thou wilt show Thyself
perverse."
-
19. The grades or degrees within which marriage is forbidden should be
changed, as, for instance, the sponsorships and the third and fourth degrees
and if the pope can grant dispensation in these matters for money and for
the sake of the shameful traffic,
[192]
then every parish priest may give the
same dispensations gratis and for the salvation of souls. Yea, would to God
that all the things which we must buy at Rome to free ourselves from that
money-snare, the canon law, -- such things as indulgences, letters or
indulgence, "butter-letters,"
[193]
"mass-letters,"
[194]
and all the rest of
the confessionalia
[195]
and knaveries for the sale at Rome, with which
the poor folk are deceived and robbed of their money; would to God, I say,
that any priest could, without payment, do and omit all these things! For if
the pope has the authority to sell his snares for money and his spiritual
nets (I should say laws),
[196]
surely any priest has much more authority to
vrend his nets and for God's sake to tread them under foot. But if he has not
this right, neither has the pope the right to sell them at his shameful
fair.
[197]
This is the place to say too that the fasts should be matters of liberty,
and all sorts of food made free, as the Gospel makes them. (Matthew 15:11)
For at Rome they themselves laugh at the fasts, making us foreigners eat the
oil with which they would not grease their shoes, and afterwards selling us
liberty to eat butter and all sorts of other things; yet the holy Apostle
says that in all these things we already have liberty through the Gospel. (1
Cor. 10:25 ff.) But they have caught us with their canon law and stolen our
rights from us, so that we may have to buy them back with money. Thus they
have made our consciences so timid and shy that it is no longer easy to
preach about this liberty because the common people take such great offense,
thinking it is a greater sin to eat butter than to lie, to swear, or even to
live unchastely. Nevertheless, what men have decreed, that is the work of
man; put it where you will,
[198]
nothing good ever comes out of it.
-
20. The forest chapels and rustic churches
[199]
must be utterly destroyed,
-- those, namely, to which the recent pilgrimages have been directed, --
Wilsnack,
[200]
Sternberg,
[201]
Trier,
[202]
the Grimmenthal,
[203]
and now
Regensburg
[204]
and a goodly number of others. Oh, what a terrible and heavy
account will the bishops have to render, who permit this devilish deceit and
receive its profits.
[205]
They should be the first to forbid it, and yet they
think it a divine and holy thing, and do not see that it is the devil's
doing, to strengthen avarice, to create a false, feigned faith, to weaken
the parish churches, to multiply taverns and harlotry, to waste money and
labor, and to lead the poor folk by the nose. If they had only read the
Scriptures to as good purpose as they have read their damnable canon law,
they would know well how to deal with this matter.
That miracles are done at these places does not help things, for the evil
spirit can do miracles, as Christ has told us in Matthew 24:24. If they took
the matter seriously and forbade this sort of thing, the miracles would
quickly come to an end; (Acts 5:39) on the other hand, if the thing were of
God their prohibition would not hinder it. And if there were no other
evidence that it is not of God, this would be enough, -- that people run to
these places in excited crowds, as though they had lost their reason, like
herds of cattle; for this cannot possible be the God. Moreover, God has
commanded nothing of all this; there is neither obedience nor merit in it;
the bishops, therefore, should boldly step in and keep the folk away. For
what is not commanded -- and is concerned for self rather than for the
commands of God -- that is surely the devil himself. Then, too, the parish
churches receive injury, because they are held in smaller honor. In short,
these things are signs of great unbelief among the people; if they truly
believed, they would have all that they need in their own churches, for to
them they are commanded to go.
But what shall I say? Every one
[206]
plans only how he may establish and
maintain such a place of pilgrimage in his diocese and is not at all
concerned to have the people believe and live aright; the rulers are like
the people; one blind man leads another. (Matthew 13:14) Nay, where
pilgrimages are not successful, they begin to canonize saints,
[207]
not in
honor of the saints -- for they are sufficiently honored without
canonization -- but in order to draw crowds and bring in money. Pope and
bishop help along; it rains indulgences; there is always money enough for
that. But for what God has commanded no one provides; no one runs after
these things; there is no money for them. Alas, that we should be so blind!
We not only give the devil his own way in his tricks, but we even strengthen
him in his wantonness and increase his pranks. I would that the dear saints
were left in peace, and the poor folk not lead astray! What spirit has given
the pope the authority to canonize the saints? Who tells him whether they
are saints or not? Are there not already sins enough on earth, that we too
must tempt God, interfere in His judgment and set up the dear saints as
lures for money?
Therefore I advise that the saints be left to canonize themselves. Yea,
it is God alone who should canonize them. And let every man stay in his own
parish, where he finds more than in all the shrines of pilgrimage, even
though all the shrines were one. Here we find baptism, the sacrament,
preaching and our neighbor, and these are greater things, than all the
saints in heaven, for it is by God's Word and sacrament that they have all
been made saints. So long as we despise such great things God is just in the
wrathful judgment by which He appoints the devil to lead us hither and
thither, to establish pilgrimages, to found churches and chapels, to secure
the canonization of saints, and to do other such fool's-works, by which we
depart from true faith into new, false misbelief. This is what he did in
olden times to the people of Israel, when he led them away from the temple
at Jerusalem to countless other places, though he did it in the name of God
and under the plausible guise of holiness, though all the prophets preached
against it and were persecuted for so doing. But now no one preaches against
it, perhaps for fear that pope, priests and monks would persecute him also.
In this way St. Antoninus of Florence
[208]
and certain others must now be
made saints and canonized, that their holiness, which would otherwise have
served only for the glory of God and as a good example, may serve to bring
in fame and money.
Although the canonizing of saints may have been good in olden times, it
is not good now; just as many other things were good in olden times and are
now scandalous and injurious, such as feast-days, church-treasures and
church-adornment. For it is evident that through the canonizing of saints
neither God's glory nor the improvement of Christians is sought, but only
money and glory, in that one church wants to be something more and have
something more than others, and would be sorry if another had the same thing
and its advantage were common property. So entirely, in these last, evil
days, have spiritual goods been misused and applied to the gaining of
temporal goods, that everything, even God Himself, has been forced into the
service of avarice. And even these special advantages lead only to
dissensions, divisions and pride, in that the churches, differing from one
another, hold each other in contempt, and exalt themselves one above
another, though all the gifts which God bestows are the common and equal
property of all churches and should only serve the cause of unity. The pope,
too, is glad for the present state of affairs; he would be sorry if all
Christians were equal and were at one.
This is the place to speak of the church licenses, bulls and other things
which the pope sells at his flaying-place in Rome. We should either abolish
them or disregard them, or at least make them the common property of all
churches. For if he sells or gives away licenses and privileges,
indulgences, graces, advantages, faculties
[209]
to Wittenberg, to Halle, to
Venice and, above, all to his own Rome, why does he not give these things to
all churches alike? Is he not bound to do for all Christians, gratis and for
God's sake, everything that he can, and even to shed his blood for them?
Tell me, then, why he gives or sells to one church and not to another? Or
must the accursed money make, in the eyes of His Holiness, so great a
difference among Christians, who all have the same baptism, Word, faith,
Christ, God and all things? (Eph. 4:4 f.) Are we to be blind while we have
eyes to see, fools while we have our reason, that they expect us to worship
such greed, knavery and humbug? He is a shepherd, -- yes, so long as you
have money, and no longer! And yet they are not ashamed of their knavery,
leading us hither and yon with their bulls! Their one concern is the
accursed money, and nothing else!
My advice is this: If such fool's-work cannot be abolished, then every
pious Christian man should open his eyes, and not be misled by the
hypocritical Roman bulls and seals, stay at home in his own church and be
content with his baptism, his Gospel, his faith, his Christ and with God,
Who is everywhere the same; and let the pope remain a blind leader of the
blind. (Matt. 15:4) Neither angel nor pope can give you as much as God gives
you in your parish-church. Nay, the pope leads you away from the gifts of
God, which you have without pay, to his gifts, which you must buy; and he
have without pay, to his gifts, which you must buy; and he gives you
lead
[210]
for gold, hide for meat, the string for the purse, wax for honey,
words for goods, the letter for the spirit. You see this before your very
eyes, but you are unwilling to notice it. If you are to ride to heaven on
his wax and parchment, your chariot will soon go to pieces, and you will
fall into hell, not in God's name!
Let this be your fixed rule: What you must buy from the pope is neither
good nor of God; for what is from God, to wit, the Gospel and the works of
God; for what is from God, to wit, the Gospel and the works of God, is not
only given without money, but the whole world is punished and damned because
it has not been willing to receive it as a free gift. We have deserved of
God that we should be so deceived, because we have despised His holy Word
and the grace of baptism, as St. Paul says: 2 Thess. 2:11 f.: "God shall
send a strong delusion upon all those who have not received the truth to
their salvation, to the end that they may believe and follow after lies and
knavery," which serves them right.
-
21. One of our greatest necessities is the abolition of all begging
throughout Christendom. Among Christians no one ought to go begging! It
would also be easy to make a law, if only we had the courage and the serious
intention, to the effect that every city should provide for its own poor,
and admit no foreign beggars by whatever name they might be called, whether
pilgrims or mendicant monks. Every city could support its own poor, and if
it were too small, the people in the surrounding villages also should be
exhorted to contribute, since in any case they have to feed so many
vagabonds and knaves in the guise of mendicants. In this way, too, it could
be known who were really poor and who not.
There would have to be an overseer or warden who knew all the poor and
informed the city council or the priests what they needed; or some other
better arrangement might be made. In my judgment there is no other business
in which so much knavery and deceit are practiced as in begging, and yet it
could all be easily abolished. Moreover, this free and universal begging
hurts the common people. I have considered that each of the five or six
mendicant orders
[211]
visits the same place more than six or seven times
every year; besides these there are the common beggars, the
"stationaries"
[212]
and the palmers,
[213]
so that it has been reckoned that
every town is laid under tribute about sixty times a year, not counting what
is given to the government in taxes, imposts and assessments, what is stolen
by the Roman See with its wares, and what is uselessly consumed. Thus it
seems to me one of God's greatest miracles that we can continue to support
ourselves.
To be sure, some think that in this way
[214]
the poor would not be so well
provided for and that not so many great stone houses and monasteries would
be built. This I can well believe. Nor is it necessary. He who wishes to be
poor should not be rich; and if he wishes to be rich, let him put his hand
to the plow and seek his riches in the earth! It is enough if the poor are
decently cared for, so that they do not die of hunger or of cold. It is not
fitting that one man should live in idleness on another's labor, or be rich
and live comfortably at the cost of another's discomfort, according to the
present perverted custom; for St. Paul says, 2 Thess. 3:10: "If a man will
not work, neither shall he eat." God has not decreed that any man shall live
from another's goods save only the priests, who rule and preach, and these
because of their spiritual labor, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 9:14, and
Christ also says to the Apostles, Luke 10:7: "Every laborer is worthy of his
hire."
-
22. It is also to be feared that the many masses [215] which are endowed in the
foundation sand monasteries are not only of little use, but greatly arouse
the wrath of God. It would therefore be profitable not to endow any more,
but rather to abolish many that are already endowed, since we see that they
are regarded only as sacrifices and good works,
[216] though they are really
sacraments, just like baptism and penance,[217] which profit only those who
receive them, and no others. But now the custom has crept in, that masses
are said for the living and the dead, and all hopes are built upon them; for
this reason so many of them have been founded and the present state of
affairs has come about.
My proposal is perhaps too novel an daring, especially for those who fear
that through the discontinuance of these masses their trade and livelihood
may be destroyed, and so I must refrain from saying more about it until we
have come back to a correct understanding of what the mass is and what it is
good for. These many years, alas, it has been made a trade practiced for a
temporal livelihood, so that I would henceforth advise a man to become a
shepherd or to seek some other trade rather than become a shepherd or to
seek some other trade rather than become a priest or a monk, unless he first
knows well what it is to celebrate mass.
I am not speaking, however, of the old foundations and cathedrals, which
were doubtless established in order that the children of the nobility
(since, according to the customs of the German nation not all of them can
become heirs or rulers), might be provided for in these foundations, and
there be free to serve God, to study, to become scholars and to make
scholars. But I am speaking of the new foundations, which have been
established only for the saying of prayers and masses; for after their
example, even the old foundations have been burdened with like prayers and
masses, so that they are of little or no profit; though it is also of God's
grace that they too come at last, as they deserve, to the dregs, i.e., to
the wailing of organs and of choral singers, and to dead, cold masses, by
which the incomes of the worldly endowments are gotten and spent. Such
things pope, bishops and doctors should examine and proscribe: but now it is
they who are most given to them. They let everything pass, if only it brings
in money; one blind man is always leading another. This is the work of
avarice and of the spiritual law.
Again, no one person should be allowed any longer to hold more than one
canonry or prebend. He must be content with a modest position, that some one
else may also have something. This would do away with the excuses of those
who say that they must hold more than one such office to "maintain a proper
station." A "proper station" might be so broadly interpreted that a whole
land would not be enough to maintain it! Moreover avarice and veiled
distrust of God assuredly go with it, so that what is alleged to be the need
of "a proper station" is often nothing else than avarice and distrust.
-
23. Sodalities,
[218]
indulgences, letters of indulgence,
"butter-letter,"
[219]
mass-letters,
[220]
dispensations, and everything else of
the sort, are to be drowned and destroyed. There is nothing good in them. If
the pope has the power to grant you dispensation to eat butter and to absent
yourself from mass, then he ought also be able to leave this power to the
priests, from whom, indeed, he has no right to take it. I speak especially
of those fraternities in which indulgences, masses and good works are
portioned out. Dear friend, in your baptism you entered into a fraternity
with Christ, all the angels, saints and Christians on earth. Hold to this
fraternity and live up to its demands, and you have fraternities enough. The
others -- let them glitter as they will -- are but as counters compared with
guldens. But if there were a fraternity which contributed money to feed the
poor or to help somebody in some other way, such a one would be good, and
would have its indulgence and its merit in heaven. Now, however, they have
become excuses for gluttony and drunkenness.[221]
Above all, we should drive out of German lands the papal legates with
their "faculties,"
[222]
which they sell us for large sums of money, though
that is sheer knavery. For example, in return for money they legalize unjust
gains, dissolve oaths, vows and agreements, break and teach men to break the
faith and fealty which they have pledged to one another; and they say the
pope has the authority to do this. It is the evil Spirit who bids them say
this. Thus they sell us a doctrine of devils, and take money for teaching us
sin and leading us to hell.
If there were no other evil wiles to prove the pope the true Antichrist,
yet this one thing were enough to prove it. Hearest thou this, O pope, not
most holy, but most sinful? O that God from heaven would soon destroy thy
throne and sink it in the abyss of hell! Who hath given thee authority to
exalt thyself above thy God, to break and to loose His commandments, and to
teach Christians, especially the German nation, praised in all history for
its nobility, its constancy and fidelity, to be inconstant, perjurers,
traitors, profligates, faithless? God hath commanded to keep oath and faith
even with an enemy, and thou undertakest to loose this His commandment, and
ordainest in thine heretical, antichristian decretals that thou hast His
power. Thus through thy throat and through thy pen the wicked Satan doth lie
as he hath never lied before. O Christ, my Lord, look down, let the day of
thy judgment break, and destroy the devil's nest at Rome! Here sitteth the
man of whom St. Paul hath said (2 Thess. 2:3 f.) that he shall exalt himself
above Thee, sit in Thy Church and set himself up as God, -- the man of sin
and the son of perdition! What else is the papal power than only the
teaching and increasing of sin and evil, the leading of souls to damnation
under Thy name and guise?
In olden times the children of Israel had to keep the oath which they had
unwittingly been deceived into giving to their enemies, the Gibeonites, and
King Zedekiah was miserably lost, with all his people, because he broke this
oath to the King of Babylon. (Josh. 9:19 ff.; 2 Kings 24:20; 25:4 ff.) Even
among us, a hundred years ago, that fine king of Hungary and Poland,
Wladislav,
[223]
was slain by the Turk, with so many noble people, because he
allowed himself to be deceived by the papal legate and cardinal, and broke
the good and advantageous treaty which he had sworn with the Turk. The pious
Emperor Sigismund had no good fortune after the Council of Constance, when
allowed the knaves to break the safe-conduct which had been given to John
Hus and Jerome,
[224]
and all the trouble between us and the Bohemians was the
consequence. Even in our own times, God help us! How much Christian blood
has been shed over the oath and alliance which Pope Julius made between the
Emperor Maximilian and King Louis of France,
[225]
and afterwards broke? How
could I tell all the troubles which the popes have stirred up by the
devilish presumption with which they annul oaths and vows which have been
made between great princes, making a jest of these things, and taking money
for it. I have hopes that the judgment day is at the door; nothing can
possibly be worse than the Roman See. He suppresses God's commandment, he
exalts his own commandment over it; if he is not Antichrist, then let some
one else tell who he can be! But more of this another time, and better.
-
24. It is high time that we seriously and honestly consider the case of
the Bohemians,
[226]
and come into union with them so that the terrible
slander, hatred and envy on both sides may cease. As befits my folly, I
shall be the first to submit an opinion on this subject, with due deference
to every one who may understand the case better than I.
First, We must honestly confess the truth, stop justifying ourselves, and
grant the Bohemians that John Hus and Jerome of Prague were burned at
Constance in violation of the papal, Christian, imperial safe-conduct and
oath; whereby God's commandment was sinned against and the Bohemians were
given ample cause for bitterness; and although they ought to have been
perfect and to have patiently endured this great injustice and disobedience
of God on our part, nevertheless they were not bound to approve of it and to
acknowledge that it was well done. Nay, even to-day they should give up life
and limb rather than confess that it is right to violate an imperial, papal
Christian safe-conduct, and faithlessly to act contrary to it. So then,
although it is the impatience of the Bohemians which is at fault, yet the
pope and his followers are still more to blame for all the trouble, error
and loss of souls that have followed upon that council.
I have no desire to pass judgment at this time upon John Hus's articles
or to defend his errors, though I have not yet found any errors in his
writings, and I am quite prepared to believe that it was neither fair
judgment nor honest condemnation which was passed by those who, in their
faithless dealing, violated a Christian safe-conduct and a commandment of
God. Beyond doubt they were possessed rather by the evil spirit than by the
Holy Spirit. No one will doubt that the Holy Spirit does not act contrary to
the commandment of God; and no one is so ignorant as not to know that the
violation of faith and of a safe-conduct is contrary to the commandment of
God, even though they had been promised to the devil himself, still more
when the promise was made to a mere heretic. It is also quite evident that
such a promise was made to John Hus and the Bohemians and was not kept, but
that he was burned in spite of it. I do not wish, however, to make John Hus
a saint or a martyr, as do some of the Bohemians, though I confess that
injustice was done him, and that his books and doctrines were unjustly
condemned; for the judgments of God are secret and terrible, and no one save
God alone should undertake to reveal or utter them.
All I wish to say is this: though he were never so wicked a heretic,
nevertheless he was burned unjustly and against God's commandment, and the
Bohemians should not be forced to approve of such conduct, or else we shall
never come into unity. Not obstinacy but the open admission of truth must
make us one. It is useless to pretend, as was done at the time, that a
safe-conduct given to a heretic need not be kept.
[227]
That is as much as to
say that God's commandments are not to be kept to the end that God's
commandments may be kept. The devil made them mad and foolish, so that they
did not know what they were saying or doing. God has commanded that a
safe-conduct shall be kept. This commandment we should keep though the world
fall. How much more, when it is only a question of freeing a heretic! We
should vanquish heretics with books, not with burning; for so the ancient
fathers did. If it were a science to vanquish the heretics with fire, then
the hangmen would be the most learned doctors on earth; we should no longer
need to study, but he who overcame another by force might burn him at the
stake.
Second, The emperor and the princes should send to the Bohemians some
pious and sensible bishops and scholars; but by no means a cardinal or papal
legate or inquisitor, for those people are utter ignoramuses as regards
things Christian; they seek not the welfare of souls but, like all the
pope's hypocrites, only their own power, profit and glory' indeed, they were
the prime movers in this miserable business at Constance. The men thus sent
into Bohemia should inform themselves about the faith of the Bohemians, and
whether it be possible to unite all their sects. Then the pope should, for
their souls' sake, lay aside his supremacy for the time being, and,
according to the decree of the most Christian Council of Nicaea,
[228]
allow
the Bohemians to choose one of their number to be Archbishop of Prague,
[229]
and he should be confirmed by the bishop of Olmutz in Moravia, or the bishop
of Gran in Hungary, or the bishop of Gnesen in Poland, or the bishop of
Magdeburg in Germany.
[230]
It will be enough if he is confirmed by one or two
of these, as was the custom in the time of St. Cyprian.
[231]
The pope has no
right to oppose such an arrangement, and if he does oppose it, he becomes a
wolf and a tyrant; no one should follow him and his ban should be met with a
counter-ban.
If, however, it were desired, in honor of the See of St. Peter, to do
this with the pope's consent, I should be satisfied, provided it does not
cost the Bohemians a heller and the pope does not bind them at all nor make
them subject to his tyrannies by oaths and obligations, as he does all other
bishops, in despite of God and of justice. If he will not be satisfied with
the honor of having his consent asked, then let them not bother any more
about him
[232]
and his rights, laws and tyrannies; let the election suffice,
and let the blood of all the souls which are endangered cry out against him,
for no one should consent to injustice; it is enough to have offered tyranny
an honor. If it cannot be otherwise, then an election and approval by the
common people can even now be quite as valid as a confirmation by a tyrant;
but I hope this will not be necessary. Some of the Romans or the good
bishops and scholars will sometime mare and oppose papal tyranny.
I would also advise against compelling them to abolish both kinds in the
sacrament,
[233]
since that is neither unchristian nor heretical, but they
should be allowed to retain their own practice, if they wish. Yet the new
bishop should be careful that no discord arise because of such a practice is
wrong;
[234]
just as it ought not to cause dissension that the clergy differ
from the laity in manner of life and in dress. In like manner if they were
unwilling to receive the Roman canon law, they should not be forced to do
so, but we should first make sure that they live in accordance with faith
and with the Scriptures. For Christian faith and life can well exist without
the intolerable laws of the pope, nay, they cannot well exist unless there
be fewer of these Roman laws, or none at all. In baptism we have become free
and have been made subject to God's Word only; why should any man ensnare us
in his words? As St. Paul says, 1 Cor. 7:23 and Gal. 5:1: "Ye have become
free, be not servants of men," i.e. of those who rule with man-made laws.
If I knew that the Picards
[235]
held no other error touching the sacrament
of the altar except that they believe that the bread and wine are present in
their true nature, but that the body and blood of Christ are truly present
under them, then I would not condemn them, but would let them enter the
obedience of the bishop of Prague. For it is not an article of faith that
bread and wine are not essentially and naturally in the sacrament, but this
is an opinion of St. Thomas
[236]
and the pope. On the other hand, it is an
article of faith that in the natural bread and wine the true natural body
and blood of Christ are present.
[237]
And so we should tolerate the opinions
of both sides until they come to an agreement, because there is no danger in
believing that bread is there or is not there. For we have to endure many
practices and ordinances so long as they are not harmful to faith. On the
other hand, if they had a different faith,
[238]
I would rather have them
outside the Church; yet I would teach them the truth.
Whatever other errors and schisms might be discovered in Bohemia should
be tolerated until the archbishop had been restored and had gradually
brought all the people together again in one common doctrine. They will
assuredly never be united by force, nor by defiance, nor by haste; it will
take time and forbearance. Had not even Christ to tarry with His disciples a
long while and bear with their unbelief, until they believed His
resurrections? If they but had again a regular bishop and church order,
without Roman tyranny, I could hope that things would soon be better.
The restoration of the temporal goods which formerly belonged to the
Church should not be too strictly demanded, but since we are Christians and
each is bound to help the rest, it is in our power, for the sake of unity,
to give them these things and let them keep them in the sight of God and
men. For Christ says, Matt. 18:19 f.: "Where two are at one with each other
on earth, there am I in the midst of them." Would to God that on both sides
we were working toward this unity, offering our hands to one another in
brotherly humility, and not standing stubbornly on our powers or rights!
Love is greater and more necessary than the papacy at Rome, for there can be
papacy without love and love without papacy.
With this counsel I shall have done what I could. If the pope or his
followers hinder it, (Phil. 2:4), they shall render an account for seeking
their own things rather than the things of their neighbor, contrary to the
love of God. The pope ought to give up his papacy and all his possessions
and honors, if he could by that means save one soul; but now he would let
the world go to destruction rather than yield a hair's-breadth of his
presumptuous authority. And yet he would be the "most holy"! Here my
responsibility ends.
-
25. The universities also need a good, thorough reformation -- I must say
it no matter whom it vexes -- for everything which the papacy has instituted
and ordered is directed only towards the increasing of sin and error. What
else are the universities, if their present condition remains unchanged,
than as the book of Maccabees says, 2 Macc. 4:9, 12: Gymnasia Epheborum
et Graecae gloriae,
[239]
in which loose living prevails, the Holy
Scriptures and the Christian faith are little taught, and the blind, heathen
master Aristotle
[240]
rules alone, even more than Christ. In this regard my
advice would be that Aristotle's Physics, Metaphysics, On
the Soul, Ethics, which have hitherto been thought his best
books, should be altogether discarded, together with all the rest of his
books which boast of treating the things of nature, although nothing can be
learned from the either of the things of nature or the things of the Spirit.
Moreover no one has so far understood his meaning, and many souls have been
burdened with profitless labor and study, at the cost of much precious time.
I venture to say that any potter has more knowledge of nature than is
written in these books. It grieves me to the heart that this damned,
conceited, rascally heathen has with his false words deluded and made fools
of so many of the best Christians. God has sent him as a plague upon us for
our sins.
Why, this wretched man, in his best book, On the Soul, teaches
that the soul dies with the body, although many have tried with vain words
to save his reputation. As though we had not the Holy Scriptures, in which
we are abundantly instructed about all things, and of them Aristotle had not
the faintest inkling! And yet this dead heathen has conquered and obstructed
and almost suppressed the books of the living God, so that when I think of
this miserable business I can believe nothing else than that the evil spirit
has introduced the study of Aristotle.
Again, his book on Ethics is the worst of all books. It flatly
opposes divine grace and all Christian virtues, and yet it is considered one
of his best works. Away with such books! Keep them away from all Christians!
Let no one accuse me of exaggeration, or of condemning what I do not
understand! My dear friend, I know well whereof I speak. I know my Aristotle
as well as you or the likes of you. I have lectured on him
[241]
and heard
lectures on him, and I understand him better than do St. Thomas or
Scotus.
[242]
This I can say without pride, and if necessary I can prove it. I
care not that so many great minds have wearied themselves over him for so
many hundred years. Such objections do not disturb me as once they did; for
it is plain as day that other errors have remained for even more centuries
in the world and in the universities.
I should be glad to see Aristotle's books on Logic,
Rhetoric and Poetics retained or used in an abridged form as
text-books for the profitable training of young people in speaking and
preaching. But the commentaries and notes should be abolished, and as
Cicero's Rhetoric is read without commentaries and notes, so
Aristotle's Logic should be read as it is, without such a mass of comments.
But now neither speaking nor preaching is learned from it, and it has become
nothing but a disputing and a weariness to the flesh.
Besides this there are the languages -- Latin, Greek and Hebrew -- the
mathematical disciplines and history. But all this I give over to the
specialists, and, indeed, the reform would come of itself, if we were only
seriously bent upon it. In truth, much depends upon it; for it is here
[243]
that the Christian youth and the best of our people, with whom the future of
Christendom lies, are to be educated and trained. Therefore I consider that
there is no work more worthy of pope or emperor than a thorough reformation
of the universities, and there is nothing worse or more worthy of the devil
than unreformed universities.
The medical men I leave to reform their own faculties; the jurists and
theologians I take as my share, and I say, in the first place, that it were
well if the canon law, from the first letter to the last, and especially the
decretals, were utterly blotted out. The Bible contains more than enough
directions for all our living, and so the study of the canon law only stands
in the way of the study of the Holy Scriptures; moreover, it smacks for the
most part of mere avarice and pride. Even though there were much in it that
is good, it might as well be destroyed, for the pope has taken the whole
canon law captive and imprisoned it in the "chamber of his hear,
[244]
so that
the study of it is henceforth a waste of time and a farce. At present the
canon law is not what is in the books, but what is in the sweet will of the
pope and his flatterers. Your cause may be thoroughly established in the
canon law; still the pope has his scrinium
pectoris,
[245]
and all law
and the whole world must be guided by that. Now it is oft times a knave, and
even the devil himself, who rules this scrinium, and they boast that it is
ruled by the Holy Spirit! Thus they deal with Christ's unfortunate people.
They give them many laws and themselves keep none of them, but others they
compel either to keep them or else to buy release.
Since, then, the pope and his followers have suspended the whole canon
law, and since they pay no heed to it, but regard their own wanton will as a
law exalting them above all the world, we should follow their example and
for our part also reject these books. Why should we waste our time studying
them? We could never discover the whole arbitrary will of the pope, which
has now become the canon law. The canon law has arisen in the devil's name,
let it fall in the name of God, and let there be no more doctores
decretorum
[246]
in the work, but only doctores scrinii papalis,
that is, "hypocrites of the pope"! It is said that there is no better
temporal rule anywhere than among the Turks, who have neither spiritual nor
temporal law, but only their Koran; and we must confess that there is no
more shameful rule than among us, with our spiritual and temporal law, so
that there is no estate which lives according to the light of nature, still
less according to Holy Scripture.
The temporal law, -- God help us! What a wilderness it has become!
[247]
Though it is much better, wiser and more rational than the "spiritual law"
which has nothing good about it except the name, still there is far too much
of it. Surely the Holy Scriptures and good rulers would be law enough; as
St. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 6:1: "Is there no one among you can judge his
neighbor's cause, that ye must go to law before heathen courts?" It seems
just to me that territorial laws and territorial customs should take
precedence of the general imperial laws, and the imperial laws be used only
in case of necessity. Would to God that as every land has its own peculiar
character, so it were ruled by its own brief laws, as the lands were ruled
before these imperial laws were invented, and many lands are still ruled
without them! These diffuse and far-fetched laws are only a burden to the
people, and hinder causes more than they help them. I hope, however, that
others have given this matter more thought and attention than I am able to
do.
My friends the theologians have spared themselves pains and labor; they
leave the Bible in peace and read the Sentences. I should think that the
Sentences
[248]
ought to be the first study of young students in theology and
the Bible ought to be the study for the doctors. But now it is turned
around; the Bible come first, and is put aside when the bachelor's degree is
reached, and the Sentences come last. They are attached forever to the
doctorate, and that with such a solemn obligation that a man who is not a
priest may indeed read may indeed the Bible, but the Sentences a priest must
read. A married man, I observe, could be a Doctor of the Bible, but under no
circumstances a Doctor of the Sentences. What good fortune can we expect if
we act so perversely and in this way put the Bible, the holy Word of God, so
far to the rear? Moreover the pope commands, with many severe words, that
his laws are to be read and used in the schools and the courts, but little
is said of the Gospel. Thus it is the custom that in the schools and the
courts the Gospel lies idle in the dust under the bench,
[249]
to the end that
the pope's harmful laws may rule alone.
If we are called by the title of teachers
[250]
of Holy Scripture, then we
ought to be compelled, in accordance with our name, to teach the Holy
Scriptures and nothing else, although even this title is too proud and
boastful and no one ought to be proclaimed and crowned teacher of Holy
Scripture. Yet it might be suffered, if the work justified the name; but
now, under the despotism of the Sentences, we find among the theologians
more of heathen and human opinion than of the holy and certain doctrine of
Scripture. What, then, are we to do? I know of no other way than humbly to
pray God to give us Doctors of Theology. Pope, emperor and universities may
make Doctors of Arts, of Medicine, of Laws, of the Sentences; but be assured
that no one will make a Doctor of Holy Scripture, save only the Holy Ghost
from heaven, as Christ says in John 6:45: "They must all be taught of God
Himself." Now the Holy Ghost does not concern Himself about red or brown
birettas
[251]
or other decorations, nor does He ask whether one is old or
young, layman or priest, monk or secular, virgin or married; nay He spake of
old by an ass, against the prophet who rode upon it. (Number 22:28). Would
God that we were worthy to have such doctors given us, whether they were
layman or priests, married or virgin. True, they now try to force the Holy
Ghost into pope, bishops and doctors, although there is no sign or
indication whatever that He is in them.
The number of theological books must also be lessened, and a selection
made of the best of them. For it is not many books or much reading that
makes men learned; but it is good things, however little of them, often
read, that make men learned in the Scriptures, and make them godly, too.
Indeed the writings of all the holy fathers should be read only for a time,
in order that through them we may be led to the Holy Scriptures. As it is,
however, we read them only to be absorbed in them and never come to the
Scriptures. We are like men who study the sign-posts and never travel the
road. The dear fathers wished, by their writings, to lead us to the
Scriptures, but we so use them as to be led away from the Scriptures, though
the Scriptures alone are our vineyard in which we ought to work and toil.
Above all, the foremost and most general subject of study, both in the
higher and the lower schools, should be the Holy Scriptures, and for the
young boys the Gospel. And would to God that every town had a girl's school
also, in which the girls were taught the Gospel for an hour each day either
in German or Latin. Indeed the schools, monasteries and nunneries began long
ago with that end in view, and it was a praiseworthy and Christian purpose,
as we learn from the story of St. Agnes
[252]
and other of the saints. That
was the time of holy virgins and martyrs, and then it was well with
Christendom; but now they
[253]
have come to nothing but praying and singing.
Ought not every Christian at his ninth or tenth year to know the entire holy
Gospel from which he derives his name
[254]
and his life? A spinner or a
seamstress teaches her daughter the trade in her early years; but now even
the great, learned prelates and bishops themselves do not know the Gospel.
O how unjustly we deal with these poor young people who are committed to
us for direction and instruction! We must give a terrible accounting for our
neglect to set the Word of God before them. They fare as Jeremiah says in
Lamentations 2:11 ff.: "Mine eyes are grown weary with weeping, my bowels
are terrified, my liver is poured out upon the ground, because of the
destruction of the daughter of my people, for the youth and the children
perish in all the streets of the whole city; they said to their mothers,
"Where is bread and wine? And they swooned as the wounded in the streets of
the city and gave up the ghost in their mothers' bosom." This pitiful evil
we do not see, -- how even now the young folk in the midst of Christendom
languish and perish miserably for want of the Gospel, in which we ought to
be giving them constant instruction and training.
Moreover, if the universities were diligent in the study of Holy
Scripture, we should not send everybody there, as we do when all we ask is
numbers, and everyone wishes to have a doctor's degree; but we should send
only the best qualified students, who have previously been well trained in
the lower schools. A prince or city council ought to see to this, and permit
only the well qualified to be sent. But where the Holy Scriptures do not
rule, there I advise no one to send his son. Everyone not unceasingly busy
with the Word of God must become corrupt; that is why the people who are in
the universities and who are trained there are the kind of people they are.
For this no one is to blame with the training of the youth. For the
universities ought to turn out only men who are experts in the Holy
Scriptures, who can become bishops and priests, leaders in the fight against
heretics, the devil and all the world. But where do you find this true? I
greatly fear that the universities are wide gates of hell, if they do not
diligently teach the Holy Scriptures and impress them on the youth.
-
26.
[255]
I know full well that the Roman crowd will make pretensions and
great boasts about how the pope took the Holy Roman Empire from the Greek
Emperor
[256]
and bestowed it on the Germans, for which honor and benevolence
he is said to have justly deserved and obtained from the Germans submission
and thanks and all good things. For this reason they will, perhaps,
undertake to throw to the winds all attempts to reform them, and will not
allow us to think about anything but the bestowal of the Roman Empire. For
this cause they have heretofore persecuted and oppressed many a worthy
emperor so arbitrarily and arrogantly that it is pity to tell of it, and
with the same adroitness they have made themselves overlords of all the
temporal powers and authorities, contrary to the Holy Gospel. Of this too I
must therefore speak.
There is no doubt that the true Roman Empire, which the writings of the
prophets foretold in Numbers 24:24 and in Daniel 2:39 ff., has long since
been overthrown and brought to an end, as Balaam clearly prophesied in
Numbers 24:24:, when he said: "The Romans shall come and overthrow the Jews;
and afterwards they also shall be destroyed." That was brought to pass by
the Goths,
[257]
but especially when the Turkish Empire arose almost a
thousand years ago,
[258]
then in time Asia and Africa fell away, and finally
Venice arose, and there remained to Rome nothing of its former power.
Now when the pope could not subdue to his arrogant will the Greeks and
the emperor at Constantinople, who was hereditary Roman Emperor, he
bethought himself of this device, viz., to rob him of his empire and his
title and turn it over to the Germans, who were at that time warlike and of
good repute, so as to bring the power of the Roman Empire under his control
and give it away as a fief. So too it turned out. It was taken away from the
emperor at Constantinople and its name and title were given to us Germans.
Thereby we became the servants of the pope, and there is now a second Roman
Empire, which the pope has built upon the Germans; for the other, which was
first, has long since fallen, as I have said.
So then the Roman See has its will. It has taken possession of Rome,
driven out the German Emperor and bound him with oaths not to dwell at Rome.
He is to be Roman Emperor, and yet he is not to have possession of Rome, and
besides he is at all times to be dependent upon the caprice of the pope and
his followers, so that we have the name and they have the land and cities.
hey have always abused our simplicity to serve their own arrogance and
tyranny, and they call us mad Germans, who let ourselves be made apes and
fools at their bidding.
Ah well! For God the Lord it is a small thing to toss empires and
principalities to and fro! He is so generous with then that once in a while
He gives a kingdom to a knave and takes it from a good man, sometimes by the
treachery of wicked, faithless men and sometimes by heredity, as we read of
the Kingdoms of Persia and Greece, and of almost all kingdoms; and Daniel
2:21 and 4:14 says: "He Who ruleth over all things dwelleth in heaven, and
it is He alone Who changeth kingdoms, tosseth them to and fro, and maketh
them." Since, therefore, no one can think it a great thing to have a kingdom
given him, especially if he is a Christian, we Germans too cannot be puffed
up because a new Roman Empire is bestowed on us; for in His eyes it is a
trifling gift, which He often gives to the most unworthy, as Daniel 4:35
says: "All who dwell upon the earth are in His eyes as nothing, and He has
power in all the kingdoms of men, to give them to whomsoever He will."
But although the pope unjustly and by violence robbed the true emperor of
his Roman Empire, or of its name, and gave it to us Germans, it is certain,
nevertheless, that in this matter God has used the pope's wickedness to give
such an empire to the German nation, and after the fall of the first Roman
Empire, to set up another, which still exists. And although we gave no
occasion to this wickedness of the popes, and did not understand their false
aims and purposes, nevertheless, through this papal trickery and roguery, we
have already paid too dearly for our empire, with incalculable bloodshed,
with the suppression of our liberty, with the risk of robbery of all our
goods, especially the goods of the churches and canonries, and with the
suffering of unspeakable deception and insult. We have the name of the
empire, but the pope has our wealth, honor, body, life, soul and all that is
ours. So we Germans are to be cheated in the trade.
[259]
What the popes
sought was to be emperors, and since they could not manage that, they at
least succeeded in setting themselves over the emperors.
Because then, the empire has been given us without our fault, by the
providence of God and the plotting of evil men, I would not advise that we
give it up, but rather that we rule it wisely and in the fear of God, so
long as it shall please Him. For, as has been said, it matters not to Him
where an empire comes from; it is His will that it shall be ruled. Though
the popes took it dishonestly from others, nevertheless we did not get it
dishonestly. It is given us by the will of God through evil-minded men; and
we have more regard for God's will than for the treacherous purpose of the
popes, who, in bestowing it, wished to be emperors themselves, and more than
emperors, and only to fool and mock us with the name. The King of Babylon
also seized his empire by robbery and force; yet it was God's will that it
should be ruled by the holy princes, Daniel, Hananiah, Azariah and Mishael;
much more then is it His will that this empire be ruled by the Christian
princes of Germany, regardless whether the pope stole it, or got it by
robbery, or made it anew. It is all God's ordering, which came to pass
before we knew of it.
Therefore the pope and his followers may not boast that they have done a
great favor to the German nation by the bestowal of this Roman Empire.
First, because they did not mean it for our good, but were rather taking
advantage of our simplicity in order to strengthen themselves in their proud
designs against the Roman Emperor at Constantinople, from whom the pope
godlessly and lawlessly took this empire, a thing which he had no right to
do. Second, because the pope's intention was not to give us the empire, but
to get it for myself, that he might bring all our power, our freedom,
wealth, body and soul into subjection to himself and use us (if God had not
prevented) to subdue all the world. He clearly says so himself in his
decretals, and he has attempted it, by many evil wiles, with a number of the
German emperors. How beautifully we Germans have been taught our German!
When we thought to be lords, we became slaves of the most deceitful tyrants;
we have the name, title and insignia of the empire, but the pope has its
treasures, its authority, its law and its liberty. So the pope gobbles the
kernel, and we play with the empty hulls.
Now may God, Who by the wiles of tyrants has tossed this empire into our
lap, and charged us with the ruling of it, help us to live up to the name,
title and insignia, to rescue our liberty, and to show the Romans, for once,
what it is that we, through them, have received from God! They boast that
they have bestowed on us an empire. So be it, then! If it is true, then let
the pope give us Rome and everything else which he has got from the empire;
let him free our land from his intolerable taxing and robbing, and give us
back our liberty, authority, wealth, honor, body and soul; let the empire be
what an empire should be, and let his words and pretensions be fulfilled!
If he will not do that, they why all this shamming, these false and lying
words and juggler's tricks? Is he not satisfied with having so rudely led
this noble nation by the nose these many hundred years without ceasing? It
does not follow that the pope must be above an emperor because he makes or
crowns him. The prophet Samuel at God's command anointed and crowned Kings
Saul and David, and yet he was their subject (1 Samuel 10:1; 16:13); and the
prophet Nathan anointed King Solomon, but was not set over him on that
account (1 Kings 1:38 f.); Elisha too had one of his servants anoint Jehu
King of Israel, and yet they remained obedient and subject to him (2 Kings
9:1 ff.). Except in the case of the pope, it has never happened in all the
world's history that he who consecrated or crowned the king was over the
king. He lets himself be crowned pope by three cardinals, who are under him,
and he is nevertheless their superior. Why then should he, contrary to the
example which he himself sets, and contrary to the custom and teaching of
all the world and of the Scriptures, exalt himself above temporal
authorities, or the empire, simply because he crowns or consecrates the
emperor? It is enough that he should be the emperor's superior in divine
things, to wit, in preaching, teaching and administering the sacraments, in
which things, indeed, any bishop or priest is over every other man, as St.
Ambrose in his See was over the emperor Theodosius,
[260]
and the prophet
Nathan over David, and Samuel over Saul. Therefore, let the German Emperor
be really and truly emperor, and let not his authority or his sword be put
down by this blind pretension of papal hypocrites, as though they were to be
excepted from his dominion and themselves direct the temporal sword in all
things.
-
27. Enough has now been said about the failings of the clergy, though
more of them can and will be found if these are properly considered. We
would say something too about the failings of the temporal estate.