University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
collapse section21. 
expand section21.1. 
 21.2. 
 21.3. 
 21.4. 
expand section21.5. 
expand section21.6. 
expand section21.7. 
collapse section21.8. 
  
  
expand section21.9. 
expand section21.10. 
expand section21.11. 
expand section21.12. 
expand section21.13. 
expand section21.14. 
expand section21.15. 
expand section21.16. 
expand section21.17. 
expand section21.18. 
 21.19. 
expand section21.20. 
expand section21.21. 
expand section21.22. 
 21.23. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

29.7. 7. The same Subject continued.

Necessity of composing Laws in a proper Manner. The law of ostracism was established at Athens, at Argos, [6] and at Syracuse. At Syracuse it was productive of a thousand mischiefs, because it was imprudently enacted. The principal citizens banished one another by holding the leaf of a fig-tree in their hands, so that those who had any kind of merit withdrew from public affairs. [7] At Athens, where the legislator was sensible of the proper extent and limits of his law, ostracism proved an admirable regulation. They never condemned more than one person at a time; and such a number of suffrages were requisite for passing this sentence that it was extremely difficult for them to banish aperson whose absence was not necessary to the state. [8]

The power of banishing was exercised only every fifth year: and indeed, as the ostracism was designed against none but great personages who threatened the state with danger, it ought not to have been the transaction of every day.

Footnotes

[6]

Aristotle, "Politics," lib. v, chap. 3.

[7]

Plutarch, "Dionysius."

[8]

See xxvi. 17, p. 223, above.