University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
collapse section20. 
expand section20.1. 
expand section20.2. 
 20.3. 
expand section20.4. 
expand section20.5. 
 20.6. 
 20.7. 
 20.8. 
expand section20.9. 
 20.10. 
 20.11. 
collapse section20.12. 
  
  
 20.13. 
expand section20.14. 
expand section20.15. 
 20.16. 
expand section20.17. 
expand section20.18. 
expand section20.19. 
 20.20. 
expand section20.21. 
expand section20.22. 
 20.23. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

28.30. 30. Observation on Appeals.

I apprehend that appeals, which were challenges to a combat, must have been made immediately on the spot. "If the party leaves the court without appealing," says Beaumanoir, [237] "he loses his appeal, and the judgment stands good." This continued still in force, even after all the restrictions of judicial combat. [238]

Footnotes

[237]

Chapter 63, p. 327: chapter 61, p. 312.

[238]

See the "Institutions of St. Louis," book ii, chap. 15, and the "Ordinances of Charles VII" in the year 1453.