University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
collapse section19. 
 19.2. 
expand section19.2. 
expand section19.3. 
 19.4. 
 19.5. 
 19.6. 
 19.7. 
expand section19.8. 
expand section19.9. 
expand section19.10. 
 19.11. 
 19.12. 
expand section19.13. 
 19.14. 
 19.15. 
expand section19.16. 
expand section19.17. 
expand section19.18. 
 19.19. 
expand section19.20. 
expand section19.21. 
collapse section19.22. 
  
  
expand section19.23. 
expand section19.24. 
expand section19.25. 
expand section19.26. 
expand section19.27. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

"It was a great infamy," says Tacitus, [130] "among the Germans for a person to leave his buckler behind him in battle; for which reason many after a misfortune of this kind have destroyed themselves." Thus the ancient Salic law [131] allows a composition of fifteen sous to any person that had been injuriously reproached with having left his buckler behind him.

When Charlemagne amended the Salic law, [132] he allowed in this case no more than three sous in composition. As this prince cannot be suspected of having had a design to enervate the military discipline, it is manifest that such an alteration was due to a change of weapons, and that from this change of weapons a great number of usages derive their origin.