We meet with inexplicable enigmas
in the codes of laws of the Barbarians. The law of the Frisians
[117]
allows only half a sou in composition to a person that had been beaten
with a stick, and yet for ever so small a wound it allows more. By the
Salic law, if a freeman gave three blows with a stick to another
freeman, he paid three sous; if he drew blood, he was punished as if he
had wounded him with steel, and he paid fifteen sous: thus the
punishment was proportioned to the greatness of the wound. The law of
the Lombards established different compositions for one, two, three,
four blows, and so on.
[118]
At present, a single blow is equivalent to a
hundred thousand.
The constitution of Charlemagne, inserted in the law of the
Lombards, ordains that those who were allowed the trial by combat should
fight with bastons.
[119]
Perhaps this was out of regard to the clergy;
or probably, as the usage of legal duels gained ground, they wanted to
render them less sanguinary. The capitulary of Louis the Debonnaire
allows the liberty of choosing to fight either with the sword or
baston.
[120]
In process of time none but bondmen fought with the
baston.
[121]
Here I seethe first rise and formation of the particular articles of
our point of honour. The accuser began by declaring in the presence of
the judge that such a person had committed such an action, and the
accused made answer that he lied,
[122]
upon which the judge gave orders
for the duel. It became then an established rule that whenever a person
had the lie given him, it was incumbent on him to fight.
Upon a man's declaring that he would fight,
[123]
he could not
afterwards depart from his word; if he did, he was condemned to a
penalty. Hence this rule ensued, that whenever a person had engaged his
word, honour forbade him to recall it.
Gentlemen fought one another on horseback, and armed at all
points;
[124]
villains fought on foot and with bastons.
[125]
Hence it
followed that the baston was looked upon as the instrument of insults
and affronts,
[126]
because to strike a man with it was treating him like
a villain.
None but villains fought with their faces uncovered,
[127]
so that
none but they could receive a blow on the face. Therefore, a box on the
ear became an injury that must be expiated with blood, because the
person who received it had been treated as a villain.
The several people of Germany were no less sensible than we of the
point of honour; nay, they were more so. Thus the most distant relatives
took a very considerable share to themselves in every affront, and on
this all their codes are founded. The law of the Lombards ordains
[128]
that whosoever goes attended with servants to beat a man unawares, in
order to load him with shame and to render him ridiculous, should pay
half the composition which he would owe if he had killed him;
[129]
and
if through the same motive he tied or bound him, he would pay
three-quarters of the same composition.
Let us then conclude that our forefathers were extremely sensible of
affronts; but that affronts of a particular kind, such as being struck
with a certain instrument on a certain part of the body, and in a
certain manner, were as yet unknown to them. All this was included in
the affront of being beaten, and in this case the amount of violence
determined the magnitude of the outrage.
