John Randolph, of Roanoke, and other sketches
                            of character, including William Wirt together with tales of real life  | 
A VISIT TO SIMON KENTON, 
THE LAST OF THE PIONEERS.  | 
|  John Randolph, of Roanoke, and other sketches
                            of character, including William Wirt | ||

A VISIT TO SIMON KENTON, 
THE LAST OF THE PIONEERS.
Of nature, or the man of Ross, run wild.”
—Byron.
Falling, the other day, accidentally upon Byron's 
beautiful lines in “Don Juan,” on 
“General Boone, backwoodsman of Kentucky,”
as the forests and the character which is his
theme—of a visit which I paid some years ago to
Boone's contemporary and similar, Simon Kenton,
who died shortly afterwards, and I determined to
fill out a slight sketch then made of him. One
bright morning in October, I think '34, after a
hearty breakfast on vension, with the becoming
appliances of cranberry-jelly, and all the et ceteras
of a luxurious meal, such as you often get in the
western country, and which our kind hostess of

of the previous evening, prepared for us by day-dawn,
my friend and myself started from that village
on our way to Bellefontaine, resolved to call
and pay our respects—the respects of strangers
and travellers—to the old pioneer, who, we were
informed, dwelt some thirty miles from our whereabouts.
It was a glorious Indian-summer morning. The 
day was just dawning as we started, and the thick 
haze, which characterizes this season of the year, 
enveloped the whole landscape, but, without concealing, 
made it just indistinct enough for the imagination 
to group and marshal hill, prairie, tree, 
and stream, in a manner agreeable to our feelings. 
The haze rested on the face of nature like a veil 
over a sleeping beauty, disclosing enough of her 
features to charm, without dazzling us with the 
flash of her eye, which makes us shrink while we 
admire.
A vast prairie extended on our right, through 
which loitered a lazy stream, as if it lingered, loath 
to leave the fertile soil which embosomed it. A 
silvery mist hung over it, making it appear like a 
great lake. Here and there, arising from the immense 
body of the prairie, were what are called 
islands—that is, great clumps of trees, covering 
sometimes many acres, appearing just like so 
many islands in an outstretched ocean. One, I 

mound rising out of the prairie, and was covered
with a dense wood, while around it the plain extended
far and wide, and was as level as a floor.
As the day dawned, the scene became more and 
more enchanting. The sun blazed up through the 
forest-trees that skirted the prairie, like a beacon-fire. 
Those of the trees which were earliest touched 
by the frost, and had lost their foliage, seemed like 
so many warriors stretching forth their arms in 
mortal combat; while the fallen ones, which lay in 
their huge length upon the ground, might easily 
be fancied so many braves, who were realizing the 
poet's description of a contest:—
“Few shall part, where many meet.”
Then my fancy caught another impression. I 
thought, as I looked upon the tranquil scene, the 
wide prairie, the sheep browsing on it, the gentle 
stream, the mist curling up, the towering trees, 
the distant hills, the blue smoke ascending here 
and there from a rustic dwelling, all looking tranquillity, 
that Peace had lighted her altar, and all 
nature was worshipping the Being whose blessings 
were upon all. The rich tint of those trees which 
still retained their foliage, added to the beauty 
and oneness of the scene, and, in gilding the 
picture, harmonized with it.
On our left, a hill ascended abruptly, covered 

clear of underwood, and in others choked up
with it. The undergrowth, from its great luxuriance
where it did appear, seemed emulous of the
height of its neighbors. At the foot of the hill,
and winding around it, lay our road; sometimes it
would ascend the hill's side to the very summit,
and then abruptly descend to the very foot. This
gave us a full view of the surrounding scenery. It
was beautiful. To me, like that of another world,
coming, as I did, from the contagious breath of the
city, where disease and death were spread, wide as
the atmosphere, for I had just left Cincinnati,
where the cholera was raging. The bustle of business;
the hum of men; the discordant noises; the
dusty streets; the sameness and dingy red of the
houses; the smoky and impure atmosphere; the
frequent hearse; the hurrying physician; the
many in black; were all remembered in contrast
with this bright scene of nature. I caught myself
almost unconsciously repeating the lines of the
poet:—
Of charms, which Nature to her votary yields!
The warbling woodland, the resounding shore,
The pomp of groves, the garniture of fields;
All that the genial ray of morning gilds,
And all that echoes to the song of even;
All that the mountain's sheltering bosom shields,
And all the dread magnificence of heaven;
Oh, how canst thou renounce, and hope to be forgiven?”

I felt at once why I had been an invalid. I had 
been breathing an air pregnant with all sorts of 
sickness; was it any wonder I was sick? I had 
swallowed a whole drug shop—for what purpose? 
To be drugged to death!
Everything in this world takes the hue of our 
feelings. A few weeks previously I had been to a 
wedding in Lebanon, where I had enjoyed myself 
gloriously. We kept it up till “'tween the late 
and early,” and all went off appropriately—
“As merry as a marriage bell.”
The next morning I breakfasted with the bewitching 
bride and her generous lover, and then away 
from the bridal scene in a hazy rain, over horrible 
roads, tossed about in a trundlebed of a cariole, 
with no companion but my crutch, and a whole 
host of bachelor reflections. The scene was sad 
everywhere. I passed an old rooster by the roadside. 
He stood alone, dripping wet, with not a 
single hen near him—chick nor child—like a grand 
Turk who had been upset in an aquatic excursion, 
and had quarrelled with his whole seraglio. A dog 
skulked by me with his tail between his legs, looking, 
for all the world, as if he had been sheep-killing. 
How desolate the girdled trees looked! As 
the winds whistled through their leafless branches, 
they seemed the very emblems of aspiring manhood, 
deprived of all his honors, when he thought 

blight upon him. The road wound about, as if it
had business all through the woods; and the
long miry places were covered with rails, to prevent
one from disappearing altogether! What jolting!
zig-zag—this way, that way, every way.
Why, Sancho Panza, when tossed in the blanket,
enjoyed perfect luxury in the comparison. And
when, at last, I did get upon a piece of road that
was straight, it appeared a long vista leading to
utter desolation. The turbid streams were but
emblems of the lowering sky. They looked frowning
on each other like foe on foe, while the autumn
leaves fell thick around me like summer hopes.
To-day is different—all is bright. To-morrow may
be cloudy—and thus wags the world.
There is no nobler theme for the novelist and 
the poet than the stirring incidents of the first 
settlement of our country. The muse of Scott has 
made his country appear the appropriate place for 
romantic legend and traditionary feud, but it only 
wants his genius to make our country more than 
the rival of his in that respect. The field here is 
as abundant, and almost untrodden. However, I 
am not one of those who believe that legends of 
the olden time are the best themes for the novelist. 
If he would describe truly the manners, virtues, 
and vices around him as they are, he would win 
more applause than in the description of other 

Scott failed in describing modern manners
in “St. Ronan's Well.” Why? Because his
affections and feelings were with the past; and
those ballads and romances in which his boyhood
delighted, exercised over his imagination a controlling
power; and when he came to give them a
“local habitation and a name,” that controlling
power was manifest.
But who of Scott's readers has not regretted 
that he did not give us more of the men and manners 
of the day? If he had thought as much of 
them as of baronial and other periods; and, having 
studied, had attempted to paint them when his mind 
was in its vigor, he would have succeeded as well 
as in “Ivanhoe,” “Rob Roy,” or the “Crusaders.” 
Fielding could describe only the manners around 
him, because he had thought only of them. Scott's 
imagination had a feudal bias, and, consequently, 
he painted that period best when, as he describes 
it—
With the corslet laced—
Pillowed on buckler cold and hard;
They carved at the meal
With gloves of steel,
And drank the red wine through the helmet barred.”
How delightful if Scott had given us some of 
the scenes which he witnessed among the different 

studied human nature, it is true, but he applied
his knowledge in describing how men acted in
other circumstances than those in which he saw
them act, for he well knew that the truthful
portraiture finds sympathy in every breast. He
learned the whole history of the human heart, and
then gave us volumes of the olden time, because
there his imagination feasted. He should, sometimes,
have shown us ourselves as we are. It
seems to me that not only in our early history is
there a wide field for the novelist, but that in our
own times there is both a wider and a better.
What a great variety of characters in our country!
Men from all climes, of all opinions, parties, sects.
The German, Frenchman, Englishman, Russian,
the Backwoodsman, the Yankee, and the Southerner,
are each and all often found in the bar-room
of a country tavern. To one who likes to
observe character, what enjoyment! Why, as
Falstaff would say, “it is a play extempore.”
And then to quit a scene like this, pass a few
miles from one of these towns, and be right into
the wilderness; for it seems a wilderness to look
around on the deep woods, and the wild prairie,
and see no marks of civilization but the road on
which you travel. How the mind expands! You
look up, and fancy some far-off cloud the Great
Spirit looking down on his primeval world, in all

imagination glows, the feelings freshen, the affections
become intense. Rapidly, then, the scenes of
our boyhood rush upon us—our early manhood, our
hopes, our fears, the lady of our love, the objects
of our ambition. We see some brilliant bird that
we have started from its perch dart off in the blue
ether, and thus before us seems the world, all our
own. And then we enter the town, and behold
the vast variety of human beings among whom
and with whom we have to struggle. Here, too,
we often find woman loveliest and most fascinating,
a flower in the wilderness, and beautiful both in
bud and in bloom. And here are generous and
free spirits, who wear no disguise about them,
whose feelings spring up, like the eagle from its
eyry, in natural fearlessness. The change is enjoyment;
one fits us for the other. In solitude,
we think over, analyze, and examine what we see
in the world; and, in the world, the reflections and
resolutions of solitude strike us like a parental
admonition.
That simplicity which Cooper has described so 
well in the character of Leatherstocking, seems 
to have been the characteristic of the early pioneers. 
It has been my good luck to meet with 
several of them. One, who is now a country 
squire, and of course far advanced in years, with 
whom I became acquainted in the interior of Ohio, 

the peculiarities of the pioneers, lamenting with
simplicity, energy, and natural eloquence, which
told that he was one of them, the “falling off,” as
he called it, of the present times.
“Why,” said he to me, “if you will believe me, 
there is not half the confidence between man and 
man that there used to be, when I was in the wilderness 
here, and used to travel to the different 
stations. It was a long tramp, I tell you; but 
you might rely on the man that went with you, to 
life and to death, just as you would on your rifle; 
and then you rested on your rifle, and looked upon 
the beauties of the wilderness—and the wilderness 
is beautiful to them that like it—and felt that you 
were a man. Why, I could do everything for myself, 
in those days—I needed no help, nohow. I tell 
you, I have a snug farm, and, may-be, some things 
that you call comforts, but I shall never be as happy 
as I was when here in the wilderness with my 
dog and rifle, and nothing else. No, I shall never 
be as happy again, and that's a fact. Mr. —, 
our preacher, preaches a good sermon, bating a 
spice of Calvinism, that somehow I can't relish or 
believe natural; but he can't make me feel like I 
used to—I mean with such a reliance on Providence—as 
I did when I roused up in the morning, 
and looked out on the beauties of nature, just as 
God made them. You find fault with these roads 

myself as I came to town—and yet I used to travel
through the wilderness when there was no road or
town. I sometimes felt tired, it's true; but it was
not the weariness I feel now; no, no! I never
shall be as happy as I was in the wilderness, and
that's a fact.”
I believe I have repeated the very words, as they 
fell from the lips of the fine old man. I was much 
amused with his opinion of novels.
“Why, I am told,” he said, “that a man will 
write two big books, and not a word of truth in 
'em from beginning to end. Now ain't that abominable? 
To tell a lie, anyhow, is a great shame; 
but to write, and then to print it, is what I never 
thought of. How can you tell it from truth, if he's 
an ingenious man? It looks just like truth when 
'tis printed. It destroys all confidence in books. 
Judge Jones tells me that there was a man called 
Scott, who has written whole shelves of 'em—what 
do you call 'em?—novels? He tells me he was a 
pretty good sort of a man, too, with a good deal 
of the briar about him. I read one of them books 
once, that I liked, I suppose, from the name; they 
called it the `Pioneers;' that's the reason I read 
it. I think there must be some mistake; you may 
depend on it, that man Leatherstocking never 
could have known so much about the wilderness 

and among 'em.”
What a fine compliment to the powers of Cooper! 
The scenery was striking, and, as we passed along, 
our conversation turned of course upon it, and 
from that to the dark forms that once flitted 
through it, and to those who had first struggled 
with the red man for its possession; and how naturally 
to him whom we were going to visit, who 
had been among the first and most fearless of the 
pioneers, and who was now lingering the last of 
them.
Simon Kenton's life had been a very eventful 
one—perhaps the most so of all the pioneers. 
Boone has been more spoken of and written about; 
but, in all probability, the reason is because he 
was the elder man, and had been then some time 
dead.
Kenton was a Virginian by birth, and, I believe, 
entirely uneducated. At a very early age he quarrelled 
with a rival in a love affair, and, after an 
unsuccessful conflict with him, Kenton challenged 
him to another, and was getting the worst of it, in 
a rough-and-tumble fight; being undermost, and 
subject to the full rage of his antagonist, he was 
much injured, when it occurred to him that if he 
could twist his rival's hair, which was very long, 
in a bush near by, he could punish him at his 
leisure. Crawling to the point, under the stunning 

energy, seized him by the hair, and succeeded in
entangling it in the bush, as he desired. He then
pommelled him with such right good-will, that he
thought he had killed him. Kenton, fearing the
consequences, instantly absconded, and changed
his name from Simon Butler, which was his real
name, to Simon Kenton. He pushed for the West.
There he joined in several excursions against the
savages, and was several times near being taken by
them. He acted as a spy between the Indians and
the colonies, in the war occasioned by the murder
of Logan's family. After many adventures and
hardships, he was taken by the Indians, in purloining
some of their horses, which, in retaliation,
he had led away in a night foray into one of their
villages. He was treated with great cruelty; he
ran the gauntlet thirteen times, and was finally
saved from torture by the interference of Girty, a
renegade white man who had joined the Indians,
and was their leader in many of their attacks on
the whites. Kenton and Girty had been friends,
and pledged themselves so to continue, whatever
changes might overtake them, before Girty apostatized.
He, with all his savageness and treachery,
was true to Kenton. This is but the caption of a
chapter in Kenton's life.
After journeying for some time through thick 
woods, in which there were innumerable gray and 

and turned off into a swampy road, towards
a log house, in which we were told the old pioneer
lived. The house was comfortable and large for
one of its kind. On stopping, a son-in-law of the
old worthy met us at the bars; and, though he
knew us not, with the hospitality of the country
he insisted on putting up our horses, which kindness
we were compelled to decline, as we could not
tarry long. As we advanced towards the house, I
observed everything about it wore the air of frugal
comfort.
We ascended two or three steps, and entered the 
room, in which was a matron, who, we learned, was 
the wife of the pioneer, and, seated by the fire, was 
the old worthy himself. He rose as we entered. 
Advancing towards him, I said: “Mr. Kenton, we 
are strangers, who have read often of you and your 
adventures, and, being in your neighborhood, we 
have taken the liberty to call and see you, as we 
are anxious to know one of the first and the last 
of the pioneers.”
The old pioneer was touched and gratified by the 
remark; and, while shaking hands with us, he said, 
“Take seats, take seats; I am right glad to see 
you.”
We sat down, and immediately entered into 
conversation with him. He conversed in a desultory 
manner, and often had to make an effort to 

seemed to call up the events alluded to, and, when
asked anything, “Well, I'll tell you,” he would say,
and, after a pause, he narrated it. I have stood in
the presence of men who had won laurels by field
and flood, in the senate, at the bar, and in the
pulpit, but my sensations were merely those of
curiosity; a wish to know if the impressions which
the individual made upon myself corresponded with
the accounts given of him by others; if his countenance
told his passions, and if the capabilities which
he possessed could be read in him. This wish to
observe prevents all other sensations, and makes
one a curious but cold observer. But far different
were my feelings as I looked upon the bent but
manly form of the old pioneer, and observed his
frank and fine features. Here, thought I, is a man
who, if human character were dissected with a correct
eye, would be found to be braver than many a
one who has won the world's eulogy as a soldier.
Who cannot be brave, with all the
“Pride, pomp, and circumstance of glorious war”
trump, the unfurled banner, the great army? In
such a scene, the leader of so many legions finds
in the very excitement bravery. The meanest soldier
catches the contagious spark, and cowards
fight with emulation. But think of a man alone

has taken there, surrounded by wild beasts
and savage foes, hundreds of miles from human aid;
yet he sleeps calmly at night, and in the morning
rises to pierce farther into the wilderness, nearer to
those savage foes, and into the very den of those
wild beasts. How calm must have been his courage!
How enduring his spirit of endurance! In the deep
solitude, hushed and holy as the Sabbath day of the
world, he stands, with a self-reliance that nothing
can shake; and he feels in the balmy air, in the blue
heavens, in the great trees, in the tiny flower, in
the woods and in the waterfalls, in the bird and in
the beast, in everything and in all things, companionship.
George Washington would have made
such a pioneer.
Kenton's form, even under the weight of seventy 
years, was striking, and must have been a model of 
manly strength and agility. His eye was blue, 
mild, and yet penetrating in its glance. The forehead 
projected very much at the eyebrows (which 
were well defined), and then receded, and was not 
very high, nor very broad; his hair had been a 
light brown—it was then nearly all gray; his nose 
straight, and well shaped; his mouth, before he lost 
his teeth, must have been expressive and handsome. 
I observed that he had one tooth left, which, taking 
into consideration his character and manner of 
conversation, was continually reminding me of 

expressive, not of turbulence or excitement, but
rather of rumination and self-possession. Simplicity,
frankness, honesty, and a strict regard to
truth, appeared the prominent traits of his character.
In giving answer to a question which my
friend asked him, I was particularly struck with
his truthfulness and simplicity. The question was,
whether the account of his life in “Sketches of
Western Adventure” was true or not? “Well, I'll
tell you,” he said, “not true. The book says that
when Blackfish, the Indian warrior, asked me, after
they had taken me prisoner, if Colonel Boone sent
me to steal their horses, that I said `No, sir' (here
he looked indignant, and rose from his chair); I
tell you, I never said `sir' to an Ingin in my life;
I scarcely ever say it to a white man.”
Mrs. Kenton, who was engaged in some domestic 
occupation at the table, turned round and remarked: 
“When we were last in Kentucky, some 
one gave me the book to read, and when I came 
to that part, he would not let me read any more.”
“And I will tell you,” interrupted Kenton, “I 
never was tied to a stake in my life, to be burned; 
they had me painted black when I saw Girty, but 
not tied to a stake.”
I mention this, not at all to disparage the book, 
but to show Kenton's character, for, though personally 
unacquainted with the author, I have a 

does not give the account of Kenton's adventures
as narrated to himself by him, but as abridged from
a MS. account given by the venerable pioneer himself,
and now in the possession of Mr. John D.
Taylor, of Kentucky. Kenton stated that he had
narrated his adventures to a young lawyer (whose
name I forget), and that all in the book was true.
In answer to a question about Girty, he observed:—
“He was good to me. When he came up to me, 
when the Ingins had painted me black, I knew him 
at first. He asked me a good many questions, but 
I thought it best not to be too for'ard, and I held 
back from telling him my name; but, when I did 
tell him—oh! he was mighty glad to see me. He 
flung his arms round me, and cried like a child. I 
never did see one man so glad to see another yet. 
He made a speech to the Ingins—he could speak 
the Ingin tongue, and knew how to speak—and 
told them if they meant to do him a favor they 
must do it now, and save my life. Girty, afterwards, 
when we were at (I think he said) Detroit 
together, cried to me like a child, often, and told 
me he was sorry for the part he took against the 
whites; that he was too hasty. Yes, I tell you, 
Girty was good to me.”
I remarked, “It's a wonder he was good to 
you.”
“No,” he replied, quickly but solemnly, “it's 

every day, we don't care for them; but it is different
when you meet a man all alone in the
woods—the wild, lonely woods. I tell you, stranger,
Girty and I met, lonely men, on the banks of the
Ohio, and where Cincinnati now stands, and we
pledged ourselves one to the other, hand in hand,
for life and death, when there was nobody in the
wilderness but God and us.” His very language,
and a sublime expression I thought it.
He spoke kindly of the celebrated Logan, the 
Indian chief, and said he was a fine-looking man, 
with a good countenance, and that Logan spoke 
English as well as himself. Speaking of the 
Indians, he said: “Though they did abuse me 
mightily, I must say that they are as 'cute as 
other people—with many great warriors among 
them; they are as keen marksmen as the whites, 
but they do not take as good care of their rifles. 
Finding one's way through the woods is all habit. 
Indians talk much less than the whites when they 
travel, but that is because they have less to think 
about.”
He spoke of Boone, and said that he had been 
with him a great deal. He described him as a 
Quaker-looking man, with great honesty and singleness 
of purpose, but very keen. We were 
struck with his acuteness and delicacy of feeling. 
He was going to show us his hand, which had been 

and then pulled it on again.
“No,” said he, “it hurts my feelings.”
My friend observed that it was mentioned in 
the different accounts of him, that when himself 
and his companions arrived at the Ohio, with the 
horses of the Indians, they might have escaped if 
they had followed his advice.
“Understand, understand,” said he, “I do not 
mean to blame them. The horses would not, somehow, 
enter the river. I knew the Indians were 
behind us, and told them so. They would not 
leave the horses; I could not leave them, so the 
Indians came yelling down the hills and took us.”
I observed to him that I wondered, after his 
escape from the Indians, that he did not return to 
Virginia, and run no more risks of being taken by 
them.
“Ah!” said he, “I was a changed man; they 
abused me mightily. I determined, after that, 
never to miss a chance.” (Meaning at the life of 
an Indian.)
He was very anxious that Clarke's life should 
be written — General George Rogers Clarke — 
who, he said, had done more to save Kentucky 
from the Indians than any other man. He told 
us that a gentleman from Urbanna, Ohio, had been 
with him two or three days, and that he had told 
him a good deal about himself. “But,” said he, 

Clarke. You may depend he was a brave man,
and did much.”
He then told us that not five miles from the 
place where we were, he had been a captive among 
the Indians, painted black, with his hands pinioned 
behind him, his body lacerated with the severest 
treatment; the bone of his arm broken, and projecting 
through the flesh, and his head shockingly 
bruised. I observed to him that he must have 
been a very strong and active man, to have endured 
so many hardships, and made so many 
escapes.
“Yes,” said he, “I believe I might say I was 
once an active man. But,” continued he, taking 
my crutch in his hand, as I sat beside him, and 
holding it, together with his staff—I could trace 
the association of his ideas—“I am an old man.”
I observed, from his manner, that he wished to 
ask me about my crutch, but that he felt a delicacy 
in doing so. I explained it to him; after observing 
the fashion of it for some time—for I had a fashion 
of my own in my crutches—he looked earnestly at 
me, and said, with emotion, showing me his own 
staff—
“You see I have to use one, too; you are young 
and I am old; but, I tell you, we must all come to 
it at last.”
Many, in their courtesy, have tried to reconcile 

bland a spirit as this blunt backwoodsman, who
never said sir to an Indian in his life, and scarcely
ever to a white man.
True politeness is from the heart, and from the 
abundance of the heart it speaketh; the rest is but 
imitation, and, at best, the automaton fashioned to 
act like a man.
We arose twice to leave ere we did so, the old 
worthy pressed us so warmly “not to go yet.” 
At last, after a hearty shake of the hand with him, 
we departed on our way to Bellefontaine. We 
were scarcely on the road before the rain descended 
fast upon us; but we went on, transacted 
our business, and returned to West Liberty to 
spend the night, unmindful of the heavy storm 
that poured down upon us in our open buggy, but 
full of the old pioneer, and the reflections which 
our visit had called up.
We looked around, and did not wonder that the 
Indians fought hard for the soil, so fruitful with all 
the resources and luxuries of savage life, redolent 
with so many associations for them, all their own 
—theirs for centuries—their prairies, their hunting-grounds, 
the places where their wigwams stood, 
where their council-fires were lighted, where rested 
the bones of their fathers, where their religious rites 
were performed. How often had they hailed the 
“bright eye of the universe!” as we hailed him 

on that very spot. In a few hours, we beheld
him sinking in his canopy of clouds. And thus
they sink, and the shadows of their evening grow
darker and darker, and they shall know no morrow.
Happy for those who now possess their
lands, if they cherish, and if their posterity shall
cherish, the homely virtues, the simple honesty
and love of freedom of the early pioneers—of him
with whom we shook hands that morning, on the
brink of the grave. If they do, then, indeed, may
their broad banner, with its stars and stripes
trebled, be planted on the far shores of the Pacific,
the emblem of a free and a united people.
|  John Randolph, of Roanoke, and other sketches
                            of character, including William Wirt | ||