1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. |
8. |
9. |
10. |
11. |
12. |
13. |
14. |
15. |
16. |
17. |
18. |
19. |
20. |
21. |
22. |
23. |
24. |
25. |
26. |
26.1. |
26.2. |
26.3. |
26.4. |
26.5. |
26.6. |
26.7. |
26.8. |
26.9. |
26.10. | 10. In what Case we ought to follow the civil Law which permits, and
not the Law of Religion which forbids. |
26.11. |
26.12. |
26.13. |
26.14. |
26.15. |
26.16. |
26.17. |
26.18. |
26.19. |
26.20. |
26.21. |
26.22. |
26.23. |
26.24. |
26.25. |
27. |
28. |
29. |
30. |
31. |
10. In what Case we ought to follow the civil Law which permits, and
not the Law of Religion which forbids. The Spirit of the Laws | ||
26.10. 10. In what Case we ought to follow the civil Law which permits, and
not the Law of Religion which forbids.
When a religion which prohibits polygamy is introduced into a country where it is permitted, we cannot believe (speaking only as a politician) that the laws of the country ought to suffer a man who has many wives to embrace this religion; unless the magistrate or the husband should indemnify them, by restoring them in some way or other to their civil state. Without this their condition would be deplorable; no sooner would they obey the laws than they would find themselves deprived of the greatest advantages of society.
10. In what Case we ought to follow the civil Law which permits, and
not the Law of Religion which forbids. The Spirit of the Laws | ||