University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
expand section 
  
expand section 
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
expand section13. 
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
collapse section20. 
expand section20.1. 
expand section20.2. 
 20.3. 
expand section20.4. 
expand section20.5. 
 20.6. 
 20.7. 
 20.8. 
expand section20.9. 
 20.10. 
 20.11. 
expand section20.12. 
 20.13. 
expand section20.14. 
expand section20.15. 
 20.16. 
expand section20.17. 
expand section20.18. 
expand section20.19. 
 20.20. 
expand section20.21. 
expand section20.22. 
 20.23. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
expand section28. 
expand section29. 
expand section30. 
expand section31. 

25.14. 14. Why the Christian Religion is so odious in Japan.

We have already mentioned the perverse temper of the people of Japan. [22] The magistrates considered the firmness which Christianity inspires, when they attempted to make the people renounce their faith, as in itself most dangerous; they fancied that it increased their obstinacy. The law of Japan punishes severely the least disobedience. The people were ordered to renounce the Christian religion; they did not renounce it; this was disobedience; the magistrates punished this crime; and the continuance in disobedience seemed to deserve another punishment.

Punishments among the Japanese are considered as the revenge of an insult done to the prince; the songs of triumph sung by our martyrs appeared as an outrage against him: the title of martyr provoked the magistrates; in their opinion it signified rebel; they did all in their power to prevent their obtaining it. Then it was that their minds were exasperated, and a horrid struggle was seen between the tribunals that condemned and the accused who suffered; between the civil laws and those of religion.

Footnotes

[22]

Book vi., 13.